# data[].attributes.body
1.I see that Singapore airlines are trying to reassure their customers by ensuring that they would not meet the same fate as the people in the MH17 crash by stating that they would not fly over ukraine
2.I think that Singapore airlines thought that by stating that there will be no flights over ukraine would reassure customers
3 I wonder why are certain people so offended as SIA was only trying to reassure their customers and not trying to be insensitive or offensive

# data[].attributes.body
1. A tweet that Singapore airlines posted to let their customers know they are not flying over ukraine airspace.

2. Netizen being unhappy

3.Why the netizens so mad? The airline is just addressing some concerns customers may have

# data[].attributes.body
1) SIA informs
2) MH17 shot down. SIA reassures.
3) Could they make it more subtle. Or any condolences

# data[].attributes.body
1. a tweet to assure Singapore Airlines' customers that they are not using Ukraine airspace
2. Singapore Airlines was flooded with negative comments for being insensitive towards people who died/got injured in the MH17 plane crash
3. did they think before posting the tweet? what outcome did they wish to get/ what problems did they want to solve?

# data[].attributes.body
1) What do you see?
A tweet by Singapore Airlines to tell people that they will nit be flying over the Ukraine airspace
2) What do you think is going on?
They are telling people that planes will no longer be flying into the Ukraine airspace so that nothing bad/dangerous will happen again

# data[].attributes.body
1. I see a tweet
2. I think that SIA just wanted to assure customers that they are safe, but it offended people instead
3. Why did they have to tweet this

# data[].attributes.body
1. I see a post by SG airlines following MH17 crash that they are not using Ukraine airspace
2. They are trying to reassure their customers by saying Ukraine airspace is dangerous which made netizens angry
3. why did they do that

# data[].attributes.body
1. Tweet by SIA that their flights do not use Ukraine airspace
2. SIA is trying to make sure that people are not detoured from taking SIA flights after MH17 was shot down by Ukraine.
3. Why are people so mad about the tweet?

# data[].attributes.body
1) I see a tweet made by Singapore Airlines regarding their flight paths

2)
Intended message: Singapore Airlines is trying to reassure the public that they will not be flying in Ukraine airspace.
Actual message: Singapore Airlines does not believe that it is safe to fly in Ukraine airspace and wants to avoid it

3) It makes me wonder if Ukraine airspace is safe or not

# data[].attributes.body
1) I see that Singapore Airlines is trying to be more cautious after the MH17 crash
2) I honestly think that the airline was simply trying to stay safe and protect passengers as they believe that similar things could happen there again
3) I wonder how people feel hurt by this tweet honestly. It would make sense if it was considered an attack at Ukraine for not having safe airspace but I guess people also feel that the post was too abrupt, vague and unclear

# data[].attributes.body
1. What do you see?
Singapore Airlines posting that they do not fly over Ukraine airspace
2. What do you think is going on?
They are implying that ukrainian airspace is dangerous
3. What does it make you wonder?
why?

# data[].attributes.body
i see a tweet regarding the MH 17 crash
i think this is not a very good tweet
i wonder whats going to happen to singapore airline shares that day

# data[].attributes.body
1. A tweet that SIA sent out to reassure customeers that they are not flying over Ukranian airspace
2. SIA was blasted by netizens as the phrasing of the tweet showed disrespect to those who died in the MH17 crash.
3. Who thought of posting such a thing without thoroughly looking through it first

# data[].attributes.body
1. I see a tweet by Singapore Airlines
2. I think that Singapore Airlines is trying to assure their customers that they do not fly in the Ukrainian airspace
3. It makes me wonder whether SIA have thought about whether posting the tweet is a good idea before actually posting it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I see a tweet from Singapore Airlines informing their followers that they will not be using the Ukraine Airspace after the MH17 crash in Ukraine.
2. I think Singapore Airlines assumed that the Ukraine Airspace is dangerous after the MH17 crash and therefore for the safety of their passengers, they are not using the Ukraine Airspace.
3. It makes me wonder what triggered the netizens to react negatively.

# data[].attributes.body
9
1. Insensitive to someone
2. They were portraying someone or talking insensitivly about an incident
3. they r rude

# data[].attributes.body
1) A tweet by SIA 8in the context of the wake of the  MH17 flight crash.
2) SIA is informing its customers that they are not flying over Ukraine airspace. This tweet is bluntly put and could be seen as very stereotypical and insensitive to Ukrainians.
3) I wonder if Ukrainians view this tweet as offensive and if SIA apologised afterwards

# data[].attributes.body
1. I see a tweet by the Singapore Airlines informing customers that the Singapore Airlines flights are not using Ukraine airspace
2. I think that this can be perceived as insensitive as some but I personally feel that it is not meant to be insensitive and is only mentioning the truth to help clear any disillusions about the airlines. The airlines only wanted to tell their customers that they would have a safe flight
3. I wonder, what exactly made people insensitive. It seems like people may have gotten upset when the airlines portrayed Ukraine airspace as a dangerous place but I do believe it is a valid thing to assure your customers

# data[].attributes.body
1) I see a tweet that could potentially lead to different views/conflicting opinions
2) I think  that the carrier is scared of the accident happening again therefore they assume that the entire Ukraine airspace is unsafe
3) I feel that it is not wrong for the carrier to assume that the same incident might happen again but it is also wrong to think that it would 100% definitely confirm plus chop happen again in the same way