# data[].attributes.body
The elk graph and the simulation are similar because they are both growing and dipping

# data[].attributes.body
The simulation graph and elk graph are similar because the prey population is kinda the same as the cougar (prey) population even though its at a upwards trend

# data[].attributes.body
The Elk population is growing faster than the cougar population
But they both go up same when declining.

# data[].attributes.body
A little bit after the elk population falls so does the cougar population. After the cougars fall the elk population rises way up allowing more cougars. then the elk numbers fall because of the amount of cougars. Then there is less food so more cougars die of and the cycle repeats.

# data[].attributes.body
The Elk population is growing and changing at a very different rate than the cougar population, but we do see similar patterns. There are periods of growth and decline with both, usually following one another (When the elk population increased the cougar population would increase soon after). Similarly to the simulation we see a more dramatic change in the prey population than in the predator's, though there is a greater population difference between the elk and the cougar.

# data[].attributes.body
The graph shows that when the elk population grows, the cougar population also grows, same thing as for when the both decline. This is similar in the simulation also about the rabbits and the grass' population. Elks also grow at a much faster rate than cougars along with the rabbits compared to the wolves

# data[].attributes.body
The elk population is growing at a much higher and faster rate than the cougars can, despite significant dips in the elk's population. In the simulation, it was similar in a way that the rabbit population was much larger than the wolves.

# data[].attributes.body
The population of elk follow a similar trend to the population of rabbits in the simulation.

# data[].attributes.body
The Elk and Cougar population has very similar trend compared to the rabbits population.

# data[].attributes.body
It is similar because the population of the prey varies quite a bit, but different because the predator's population stays relatively the same. The graph also does not account for the prey's food source.

# data[].attributes.body
The graph of the populations of elk and cougars appears very similar to the graph of the populations of rabbits and grass in the simulation. The overall trend in the graphs are similar, although the elk and cougar populations are a lot farther apart than the rabbit and grass populations. The populations both increase and decrease periodically, and both populations are correlated. In this graph, however, the population of elk is steadily increasing, whereas the rabbit population in the simulation graph was fluctuating between approximately the same two points.

# data[].attributes.body
Whenever the cougars population dipped down on the graph the total population of the elk would spike up/increase, and vise versa. It was the same for the simulation, when the grass went down the rabbits population would increase.

# data[].attributes.body
It looks like as the amount of elk go down, so do the amount of cougars, but I don't think the cougar data is super accurate because they can't measure the exact amount since they are so elusive.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a significant difference in the numbers of elk and cougar in the area. We saw that there was a difference in the grass and rabbit populations, but there wasn't as big of a difference as we see here. The elk population is also growing at a much higher rate than the cougar, despite having periods of decline.

# data[].attributes.body
like the simulation, the prey population goes through periods of growth and decline, even though in this graph the overall population trend is upward.

# data[].attributes.body
This graph that shows the population of elk compared to cougars tells us that there is an overall trend of exponential growth between the two populations, even though they both decline at one point or another. This relates to the graph in the stimulation because there is also periods of growth and decline with the grass and rabbits, even though there is a bigger significance in the population of elk and cougars.