# data[].attributes.body
Play :D:D:D:D:

# data[].attributes.body
In my third log chosen, I wrote about another prediction. But unlike my other predictions, I also added backround information. What I mean about backround information is, beside the main prediction, I also predicted little side things that would have been caused or helped due to my main one. I wrote that Brigan would defeat the other people, but I added that he might sacrifice his life for Fire in the process. This shows that my predictions are really developing and becoming longer. From the first log, I wrote a two sentence prediction, and in the second log, I wrote a brief vague prediction. I would definately say in comparison to the other two logs, my predictions are growing much longer.On the other hand, I wrote the same amount of sentences as the last one, (they had higher quality) and I also wrote that I was too lazy to find certain names. My spelling was also not great, I have still yet to put a lot of effort in my response logs. I could’ve added a lot though. If I added my thoughts of the actual piece of text and not just the future, it could’ve made my writing stronger. Especially if I put it in the beginning of my log, it could be sequential. I also should’ve used events of the past to prove my predictions.

# data[].attributes.body
“There’s going to be a war,” he said quietly, “and at the end of it, I don’t know who’ll be king.

Who will be king? I think it will be Brigan’s daughter. Nash will probably defeat the other two guys (too lazy to find names) and sacrafice himself fo Fire in the prosess. Brigan might also save his daughter and she could be like

# data[].attributes.body
This Response log was a whole lot better than the other 3. I elaborated on my thoughts, so I ended up with a lot more sentences. Prior to writing this response log, we learned a lesson to stregnthen our response logs. It was called the gender lense. In this response log, I used the gender lense to compare Fox, (girl) to the general steryotype of women. I didn’t write any sort of prediction, as this was more of a descriptive log. I think I did a great job on this. First, I explained the general female steryotype, then I explained Fox’s traits. Finally, I compared the two sets of traits. Thinking about it, if I included comparisons in my first three logs then they would be so much stronger. Same if I somehow included a prediction in this log. It would make it much stronger and longer. This means that as I am progressing, I am writing about new elements that I should include in all response logs.I feel I put a lot more effort in this log than the other. I didn’t make any spelling errors, but my hand writing was still really messy. I could have made my writing stronger still. Some possible new ideas I could’ve written about were: what kind of impact would a character like Fox have on the real world, how does Fox’s grace help the kingdom. Any of these ideas would have stregnthened the log. I also feel that I should’ve written about the authors purpose. For example, if I wrote that the author put Fox in the story to emphasize her thoughts of women, that would help explain a lot of things in the story.

# data[].attributes.body
Her grace was a strange one: fearlessness.

I feel in all three graceling books, Christen Cashore likes to emphasize women's stregnths and power and how they are just as equal to men. In this case Fox disregards the typical steryotype that women are helpless and scaredy cats, due to her grace of being fearless. But, she doesn’t always give female characters un-steryotypical traits, like Fire, in the previous book, she was very pretty and had the steryotypical girl apearance.

# data[].attributes.body
I would definitely say that this response log was the longest one I have written out of all seven. That doesn’t mean it is completely better. For example, I fit about 3-4 words per line, that’s nothing! Shockingly, I wrote another prediction (sarcasm). Besides writing the prediction, I wrote certain problems that could be caused by the prediction. This is similar to my third response log in the way that I included backround information. But this time I elaborated on that backround information more. This one was the longest because I was connecting theories from previous logs aswell. For example, in previous response logs, I wondered about how Sage was always so calm, and that he might be prince. That is what is so different about this log than any other. When I connected my theories while writing another theory! I put lots of effort into this log compared to the 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th. I think that this log would be worth 2 of my second or first logs. Both included a prediction, and when you join them together, you get two predictions; and when you add explanation, it becomes even better! So that means my response logs have doubled in their qualities, and that’s really good. It can be improved though. If I had explained how the gold or the trick would have helped convince he was prince then it would make that prediction more convincing.

# data[].attributes.body
“Remember this moment, then Sage when someone of my status offered a kindness to someone of yours.”

If Sage becomes prince, what would happen when the princess recognizes Sage? Hasn’t Sage considered the problem? He doesn’t seem nervous. Maybe he is planning on running so he won’t have to deal. Or maybe he is the prince. He does look an awful like the prince, and he also has a similar aditude. That could explain Sages lack of caring. But how will he prove it. Maybe, he will show the coin trick he did towards the beginning of the book. Or show them the gold.

# data[].attributes.body
This response log shows a lot of my logical thinking. It uses outside knowledge to prove my theory. I said that the princess learns the kingdoms war plans, which helped prove that Amarianda might betray Carthya. This response had minimal spelling errors. Just like all the other logs, I included a prediction. Unlike the beginning ones, I am elaborating on my thoughts while using certain evidence (logic outside information) to support my theory. This is similar to response log 5 as I used information there, but in this log, the logic is what is different. That is what mainly improved. It is a big step.

However, as usual my log could have improved. If I had used information against my prediction, I copied have bombed on that counterclaim making my theory superior. The concept is similar to a persuasive essay. I should've also elaborated on how the knowledge of the defensive plans could be used against Carthya instead of assuming people would know.

# data[].attributes.body
“Are we friends Jaron”

What if Amarianda is trying to gain Jaron’s trust and then will betray him. As we know, Jaron doesn’t 100% trust her, as she met with Connor. I think the betrayal idea is highly likely. Just as they became friends, Avenia started attacking Carthya. This can’t be a coincidence. Being the Princess, she will learn Carthya’s defensive plans and may sneak over  to the Avenians to give them info. Maybe Jaron sees this possibility and already made plans. He is a clever boy, and always seems one step ahead of the game.

# data[].attributes.body
In one of my book 2 logs, my writing was a bit neater. This log has one more thought sentance than the last one. I still need to write more neatly. In between the words “a pet” there isn’t really a space. In the writing, I place myself in Katsa’s shoes. I say something as Katsa in first person, but in the next sentence, I switch back to third person, and in the next, first again. Rereading this, it kind of confuses me. This shows that I didn’t reread my log. I may have put in more effort, but it still doesn’t make much sense. Unlike the first one though, I didn’t include a prediction. I did include some character developement. I wrote about character relationships between Katsa and Randa. I could have written more about the author’s purpose. If I wrote why the author gave Katsa and Randa this relationship, it would’ve helped me learn that this hatred for Randa is Katsa’s motivation for most of the book.

# data[].attributes.body
“It’s so amusing.” Randa said, “to see you struggling with an opponent Katsa

If I were Katsa I would’ve wanted to kill Randa. He treats Katsa like a pet and he shows no respect for her. He wouldn’t do anything to me because he knows I am stronger.

# data[].attributes.body
In my first response log, I wrote really messy. It was about 3 sentences, and the last sentence wasn’t even completed. I was very lazy about it, and that lazyness showed. Although, in that RL, I included a prediction, which wasn’t really correct, but a prediction is a good start! I needed, but failed to include something about Toby’s mom. I wrote what Toby thought of her, but I should’ve written more about what this says about her personality. It’s a selfish act to leave your child for awhile.

# data[].attributes.body
Rip the letter into confetti

Why is Toby so upset with the letter from his mom? Maybe he thinks she is trying to soften him so she can stay away for awhile. But he could also just be upset. We will