# data[].attributes.body
Arts and Ethics

what about them; again you are the only one that read your section; what in your section was suggested

# data[].attributes.body
Police brutality and one's experiences connecting to a moral philosophy of blaming every group for a few is wrong, but others don't differentiate.

# data[].attributes.body
People within other countries could interpret the question differently. This is because their personal experiences are different from the experiences of other people; cultural differences

# data[].attributes.body
9/11 is viewed as an act of terrorism, but from another perspective, it may be viewed as an act of heroism.

# data[].attributes.body
Experts are going to disagree with facts because of personal knowledge, relativism,  ethical considerations, and  interpretation.

# data[].attributes.body
Personal knowledge is the stem of opinions by experts

# data[].attributes.body
"moral truths” can guarantee a common ground among experts when discussing a certain topic."

# data[].attributes.body
"beauty is in the eye of the beholder" helps to shed light into personal preferences and aesthetics

# data[].attributes.body
None Mentioned

but what do you suggest could be possible WOKs for this essay

# data[].attributes.body
Universal accepted themes and methods are used to dictate whether or not the art is artistic.

# data[].attributes.body
The Holocaust
9/11
Rwandan Genocide
Mid-Atlantic Slave Trade

# data[].attributes.body
Ethics: Experts are guaranteed to disagree, even if they are given access to the same facts. They use their background to justify why they think a specific way

# data[].attributes.body
Emotion
Language
Perception
Reason

# data[].attributes.body
Art: People disagree because they interpret art differently