# data[].attributes.headline
Nomination Form - In the community/volunteer engagement section for all of the nomination forms, question 4: How will this be measured? Many chapters don't use the term limits section. Also how does this affect those that have board members that left and new ones take their place? Will the chapter know that we're looking for growth in number of board members or will they look at only how many different people they now have on their board?

# data[].attributes.subject
Nomination Form - In the community/volunteer engagement section for all of the nomination forms, question 4: How will this be measured? Many chapters don't use the term limits section. Also how does this affect those that have board members that left and new ones take their place? Will the chapter know that we're looking for growth in number of board members or will they look at only how many different people they now have on their board?

# data[].attributes.headline
Nomination Form - all 3 - Student Impact/Success Question 2(b) - Maybe change to: If yes, check all of the under-represented student populations below served by your chapter. The way it currently reads it's asking them to check all of them.   Question 2(c) - Are we looking for scholarship profiles here or the number of scholarships or type of scholarships? Maybe change the question to read: What percentage of the total number of scholarship you offer focuses on these students?. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Nomination Form - all 3 - Student Impact/Success Question 2(b) - Maybe change to: If yes, check all of the under-represented student populations below served by your chapter. The way it currently reads it's asking them to check all of them.   Question 2(c) - Are we looking for scholarship profiles here or the number of scholarships or type of scholarships? Maybe change the question to read: What percentage of the total number of scholarship you offer focuses on these students?. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Rubric for all - # of Paid Staff/1099s Issued - just need to keep in mind that 1099's listed by chapters aren't necessarily for payment for board members. Also, if the board members receives less than $600, they don't need to file a 1099 for them. If you're using 1099s, you'll need to look at the financial report for each chapter to compare against the roster.

# data[].attributes.subject
Rubric for all - # of Paid Staff/1099s Issued - just need to keep in mind that 1099's listed by chapters aren't necessarily for payment for board members. Also, if the board members receives less than $600, they don't need to file a 1099 for them. If you're using 1099s, you'll need to look at the financial report for each chapter to compare against the roster.

# data[].attributes.body
Board size - many chapters have duplicate entries for their board members. Need to look at the roster itself to ensure no one is listed more than once.

# data[].attributes.headline
Rubric - Question numbering issues: Community Engagement sb Q5; Add Q1 to Rationale for Scholarship Dollar Amount; Renewable/Post High School Scholarships sb (cover sheet); Under-Represented Students sb Q1; Student Supports sb Q2; Student Success sb Q3

# data[].attributes.subject
Rubric - Question numbering issues: Community Engagement sb Q5; Add Q1 to Rationale for Scholarship Dollar Amount; Renewable/Post High School Scholarships sb (cover sheet); Under-Represented Students sb Q1; Student Supports sb Q2; Student Success sb Q3

# data[].attributes.headline
Rubric - question numbering issues: Community Engagement sb Q4; Rationale for Scholarship Dollar Amount sb Q1; Under-Represented Students sb Q2; Student Success sb Q3

# data[].attributes.subject
Rubric - question numbering issues: Community Engagement sb Q4; Rationale for Scholarship Dollar Amount sb Q1; Under-Represented Students sb Q2; Student Success sb Q3

# data[].attributes.body
Note:

Julie W, mentioned yesterday that all cover-sheets need to include a clear statement in Bold, that if  a chapter is not in Compliance, the cover sheet should not be completed.

This is to ensure that Cary does not feel like she needs to do work for chapters that will not be considered.

# data[].attributes.body
Under Minimum Requirements, the form indicates that chapters must not have won this award in the last three years in order to be eligible to apply. I would recommend changing to any Fradkin Legacy award in the last three years so that we don't have chapters who received the higher dollar awards coming back and applying for this one within 3 years. ~CH

# data[].attributes.body
Under Minimum Requirements, the third bullet point indicates that chapters must agree to "Fully use ChapterNet....from application through to award distribution."

In ChapterNet, we refer to the final step as entering disbursements, so I would recommend changing "distribution" to "disbursements" so it aligns with the terminology we use in the system to make it clearer which steps need to be completed in ChapterNet. ~CH

# data[].attributes.body
Under Question 4, in the "recommended" bulleted list, the third question asks how their initiative could be shared across the network. If this is a new initiative this chapter is going to try, I don't know that they would have sufficient information/data/knowledge to answer this question. Rather, this feels like a question we would ask the chapter who receives the award as a follow-up after they have reported their initiative was successful. ~CH

# data[].attributes.body
1. Have we developed a timeline for the distribution of funds for these awards? What steps do the chapters need to complete before they receive their funds?

2. Have we planned to follow-up with each award recipient to ensure that they are using the funds for their intended purpose? What would we do if we found that a chapter was not using the funds as intended?

3. How do we plan to measure the success of these awards/this program? Will we ask the award recipients to report back on the outcomes of their initiatives and whether or not the board plans to continue once the funds run out? And if not, why?

It may also be valuable to ask the award recipients what challenges they encountered, what they wish they knew before they started, lessons learned, and/or what other resources would have been helpful so that we have this information when counseling/coaching future recipients. ~CH