# data[].attributes.body
I disagree that computers can replace teachers in educating students. When it comes to the wide range of information that computers provide, teachers are no match for them. But computers can't go face to face with students to correct them when they make mistakes. Computers are just a tool for students to find necessary knowledge for the subject that they are learning. Students will have no self-discipline in studying, that's why teachers are important for education. In addtion, computers can't be creative, teachers have their own experience and they can advise the students. Also, computers may have a wide range of information but it doesn't teach us how to use the knowledge in different cases, especially in Maths, where the teacher can just change the number in the same math problem and students may not be able to solve it. In conclusion, computers can't replace teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. I disagree with this opinion. Computers have no emotions and cannot understand the student as their teachers. Some students will feel uncomfortable while they are studying with computers. Computers are better in repitive things and outshine human about accuracy, information. However, computer are incapable of creative thinking. Moreover, computers are not better than others system which are used by teacher. In brief, Computers cannot undermine the role played by teachers and stand for them.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, it is generally agreed that students should learn a wide range of different subjects for a number of compelling reasons. First and foremost, children can have an all-round pool of knowledge and skills by learning general education. They can be provided with relevant knowledge in many varied fields; therefore, youngsters will have the capacity to deal with a multitude of problems they might encounter in their daily life. Secondly, students can easily get access to the world since they are equipped with a significant proportion of general knowledge. Should schoolchildren gain in-depth knowledge in a variety of fields, they will prevent themselves from being short-sighted and ignorant when. Additionally, they can be prepared with a good command of general knowledge to fulfill their future targets in life. To sum up, I hold my belief that children should learn a diverse range of subjects for an abundance of convincing reason.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day of age,we use more and more computers in education but from my point of view teachers play more important role because some of reasons.First and foremost,computers cannot undermine the roles played by teachers.Computers just make learning easier but teachers is the one who teaches directly in the class so they can know academic performance to foster and figure out effective teaching methods.Futhermore,Computers can hold certain advantage but lack of creative thinking.It just provide accuracy and the amount of information but it not creative .Tacking everything into consideration,it is two reason that teachers is important than computers

# data[].attributes.body
While people still arguing over the benefits of general education, I reckon that this method of educating brings students several beneficial impacts. First and foremost, general education helps children achieve an all-round pool of knowledge as they can get access to a wide range of topics. They can acquire several useful knowledge, skills, and tips that can be put into practice and prepare for the future. For instance, when children are in danger, they can apply lessons of physics that they learn at school to get out of a hole they felt in. Moreover, students can apply those knowledge as a work skills in the future or a tips to face with problem they get into in daily life. Student who learn specific education might face the trouble of learning new things at a job as they only learn a certain discipline. For example, students who learn two languages at public schools cannot access to tachnology subject as they do not have enough time in their timetable in Vietnam, so that they may not know how to use office apps in their job. In conclusion, students can acquire various advantage in their daily life and at school when they follow a general education curriculum.

# data[].attributes.body
With the pressures on today’s young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the statement which was given. Firstly, with those subjects, it is deniable that they will be able to learn in a diverse range of fields. For example, art can help they get to know better about painting as well as exploring some of the most famous artists in the world. By the way, with music they could be integrated with good melodies and developing music perception skills. In addition, having these skills will help them deal with a multitude of problems they might encounter in life. For instance, cookery will transform them to a good-cooker and they sometimes will need cooking skills to creat good impression with one another. In conclusion, it is always better not to remove those non-academic subjects because of all benefits it may bring to one in life.

# data[].attributes.body
Teacher can not be replaced by computers. First, computers cannot possible undermine the roles played by teachers.It would not be able to share with students when they have to face with difficulty such as their bad mark because computers have no feelings. Second, computers incapable of creative thinking and it is only good at repetitive work so the lectures will be boring. Finally,computers is base the tools used by teachers to serve for teaching more convenience. In conclusion, computers cannot instead of teacher in teaching.

# data[].attributes.body
Students should focus on general subjects instead of specific subjects because of 2 main reasons. First, students need an all-round pool of knowledge and skills to deal with the problem in society. For example, should students do not prepare an all-round pool of knowledge for life, they do not know how to deal with a multitude of problems they might face in their daily life. Therefore, they will become short-sighted and ignorant. Second, each subject plays a significant and expansive role in society so that students can get access to the world with full of troubles easily. When they study about physics, they can apply their knowledge to repair all kinds of electrical appliances. They can also use their knowledge of chemistry to preserve food at home. In general, it's more sensible to study general subjects so that students can achieve their life easily.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, the exclusion of non-academic subjects such as cooking, gymnastics, music ... is much debated. In my opinion, we should not remove these objects. The first reason is that non-academic activities such as dance, drama, singing, cooking, or physical education are stress-free. In fact, they bring relaxation and help students focus better on the subjects. In addition, learning these subjects is essential for the all-around development of children. The second reason is that these subjects will provide children with a large number of skills necessary for life.  Every day, people perform their routine like cooking or crafting; such practical needs are important for people’s self-confidence, therefore, must be studied at schools. Although academic subjects are really important, non-academic still need to be maintain.

# data[].attributes.body
In my point of view, I disagree that non-academic subjects at school should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects. Firstly, both studying academic and non-academic will provide students an all-round pool of knowledge and skill, which helps students develop themselves. This also will help them to deal with a multitude of problems they might face in their daily life, have more job opportunities. Secondly, some non-academic subjects such as arts, cooking will not only provide students valuable experiences but also help them feel relaxed. Thirdly, without studying non-academic subjects, students might belittle art subjects, only focus on studying core subjects, this might make them become ignorant people. In short, it is more sensible to study both academic and non-academic subjects so that students can have their drive to better themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
In my point of view, I absolutely disagree that computers can replace teachers in the classroom for some reasons. To begin with, there is a large amount of things that computers cannot perform excellently. For instance, they are unable to give students details correction on homework or give them advice at school. Moreover, computers may belittle interpersonal relationships while teachers can have cooperation with them. Children need to talk and discuss together while they are learning with teachers. In conclusion, computers would just be a tool for students and teachers to upgrade information or the results of their works but they cannot take over the teacher's role in education.

# data[].attributes.body
I absolutely disagree that computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. Firstly, being an useful tool which provides information for human, computer is no better than others people use for teaching. They cannot replace the role of teachers in the present, even in the future, when science and technology have developed more than ever before. What students need the most is the knowledge and enthusiasm of the teacher, not the information available on the computer. The better the teachers, the better the students. Although computers have certainly made students' lives much easier, teachers are still important in today learning.

# data[].attributes.body
In my point of view, there are 2 reasons why computers can not replace the teachers role in the classroom .Firstly , computers cannot make students comfortable while studying. Nowadays, learning comfort plays a huge part in student success, and it's the teacher who can do the best. In fact computers are just machines , they don't have feeling and thought . As a result, computers can not understand the students feeling and make them comfortable. Secondly, computers are incapable of creative thinking. Teachers creativity is basically the best factor compared to computers. Teachers can teach some unique, reasonable way that help their students to learn more effectively which computers can not do. In conclusion , computers can not replace the teachers role in the classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic 2
In my opinion, there is no point in eliminating non-academic subjects from the syllabus because of several reasons. First of all, non-academic activities like dance, drama, singing, cookery or physical education cause hardly any stress. In fact, they provide relaxation and help students concentrate better on academic subjects. Moreover, learning these subjects is essential for the overall development of children. Second, there are many reasons to include non-academic subjects in the curriculum. Not all students are academically brilliant. This, however, will not be an issue if the student has skills in other areas. For example, a student does not need an A grade in physics or mathematics to be a successful singer, writer or painter. Finally, nobody is required to be a doctor or an engineer. The world needs athletes, writers, chefs and actors as well. To put it in a nutshell, it is no good eliminating non-academic subjects from the syllabus. Schools should encourage students to pursue a career in a field of their choice.

# data[].attributes.body
As computer are being used more and more in education, some people believe there will be soon no role for teachers in classroom. In my view, I believe that teachers are still a irreplaceable part of the education. The presence of a teacher is essential to students because the contact between people affects them in a positive way. Firstly, students realize that they are not dealing with machines, but with people who deserve attention and respect. They also learned about the importance of group learning and respect for other students, which helps them improve their social skills. Secondly, some students still need interpersonal interaction to understand and learn, so teachers are very important. Similarly, some students can learn more by getting the teacher's appreciation, and they find that they are motivated by the teacher, which is something that machines cannot do. The computer can judge whether the student is doing the right thing, but it cannot predict whether the student understands the topic. In short, I believe that no one can replace teachers, because they play an important role in children's learning.

# data[].attributes.body
From my perspective, I agree that computers are being used more and more in education but I don’t think there will be no role for teachers in the classroom. On the one hand, computers have many useful functions. Computers are good at repetitive work. Hence it can easily finish some work faster than humans do.  On the other hand, computers can’t be creative and they are just tools. While teachers have their own real experience and personal opinions. So that they can transmit it to their students. Moreover, when students want some advice, teachers are real people so they can communicate and help them. Teachers can know exactly what is necessary for their students. In conclusion, I think both are essential but computers can’t replace teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
Computers are increasingly being utilized in education, yet they cannot potentially replace instructors' duties. First, computers excel at repeated tasks and outperform humans in terms of precision. However, computers are incapable of creative thinking, and pupils cannot interact with a machine; instead, they must deal with a human being who requires care and respect.

# data[].attributes.body
Non-academic disciplines should not be removed from the curriculum, in my opinion, for numerous reasons. To begin with, non-academic activities such as dancing, theatre, singing, cooking, or physical education are relatively stress-free. In fact, they assist pupils relax and focus better on academic topics. Furthermore, mastering these disciplines is critical for children's general growth. Second, there are several reasons why non-academic disciplines should be included in the curriculum. Not every student excels in the classroom. If the student has abilities in other areas, though, this will not be an issue. Students who specialize in one topic may find it challenging to gain new skills at work since they have only studied one discipline. Due to a shortage of time in their timetable, pupils learning two languages at public schools in Vietnam are unable to enroll in a technology course. Finally, students who follow a general educational curriculum can profit from a number of advantages in their everyday life and at school.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not agree with the opinion that we should remove non- academic subjects. Students can only develops when studying both academic and non-academic subjects. It sounds a good idea to only expose the students to academic subjects as then they can spend all of their school hours on studying areas that will get them into university and good jobs later in life. But not all of the students are interested in academic subjects. They can also find their hidden talents when studying non- academic subjects. It cause hardly any stress and provide relaxation and help students concentrate better on academic subjects. The relaxation and hidden talents are the reason why we should not remove non- academic subjects.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, computers are being used more and more in education but they cannot possibly undermine the roles played by teachers. First, computers are better at repetitive work and in terms of accuracy, they outshine humans. But computers are incapable of creative thinking and students cannot engage with a machine; instead, they must deal with a human being who needs to be treated with care and respect. Students also learn the value of group study and how to respect others, which aids in the development of social skills. Furthermore, teachers are necessary in the learning process because they recognize some students' weaknesses and assist them in resolving their issues by repeating the same explanation. As a result, pupils have a better probability of not failing a subject.

# data[].attributes.body
There is too much information available for a teacher to put together the whole way. However, a computer can have a clear grasp of information not only in one area of ​​expertise but also in many different things. Moreover, when a person uses a computer they will have to pay less money for a teacher to teach them. They also don't have to worry too much about whether they are far from their school or if it will take them a long time to go to their places of study. They also don't spend a lot of money on things like paying for gas and travel

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, some people believe that with the advanced technologies, soon after, computers will replace teachers' roles in the classrooms and in my opinion, I oppose that statement. Computers may be productive, nevertheless, they are no better than other tools which assist the teachers’ educational purposes. For example, a computer may be able to present the lessons, nonetheless, teachers are the one who can impart the knowledge of those lessons for the students, help them to understand the lessons more precisely. Moreover, Teachers are more flexible when it comes to facing the unexpected events while computers are only capable of following the programmed actions/ activities. For instance, if in a class, all of the students have understood the lessons while there was only one or two students who could not see the lessons through, then the computers would not be able to do anything at all. Meanwhile, the teacher will be adjustable, they might find a way to easily help the students out without any struggle. Generally speaking, teachers are irreplaceable despite the advanced technology in these days or of the future like the computers.

# data[].attributes.body
Students who get access to non-academic subjects are inclined to deal with a multitude of problems they might encounter in their daily life. Studying non-academic subjects can provide students an all-round pool of knowledge and skills, prevent them from being ignorant and short-sighted. As a result, having a comprehensive amount of knowledge and skills can help them to handle a multitude of problems they might encounter in their daily life. For instance, studying physic helps students to resolve problems related to electricity by themselves and learning civic education may bring benefits for them in dealing with their social relationships. Briefly stated, students should be provided a general education including non-academic subjects to have an all-round pool of knowledge to deal with several problems they can encounter in their daily life.

# data[].attributes.body
Argument about student should Academic subjects or Non-Academic subjects have been arguing through many years but in my opinion I support school to teach Non-Academic subjects because of these reasons. First and foremost, learning non-academic subjects provide us an all-round pool of knowledge and skills. By learning a diverse range of field people can put it into practice to solve multitude of problems that they might encounter in their daily life or some dangerous situations, such as when you help someone suffering from injuries you have to learn first aid. Learning non-academic is a good decision in school and life.