# data[].attributes.headline
Pseudoscience watchlist- Use of scientific-sounding language that is meaningless

# data[].attributes.subject
Pseudoscience watchlist- Use of scientific-sounding language that is meaningless

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

The use of scientific-sounding language that is meaningless means using big, complex words or phrases that sound smart, but don’t really say anything useful or true.

This link talks about the use of structured water and what it promotes, including high-profile celebrities, who have made claims about its benefits, such as faster hydration, increased energy, weight loss, improved antioxidant status, better skin, and longer life. The scientific language used in this website such as; “hexagonal structure and exclusion zone” to talk about structured water doesn’t seem appropriate to use because it’s not coming from real scientists that we can trust (It’s not a vocabulary we all use or seen). Another term used on the website is “fourth phase of water” but it’s just a theory when looking more into it. They also mention things like "absorbing energy" and "crystalline phase," which sound smart but don’t really explain how the water works in a way that makes sense. The website talks about health benefits like better hydration and more energy, but there’s no solid evidence to show that structured water does any of this.

# data[].attributes.headline
Results can’t be reproduced or verified

# data[].attributes.subject
Results can’t be reproduced or verified

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

someone claims to have found something or proven something, other people can’t repeat the experiment or test to get the same results.

This article talks about how you can use turmeric as a natural hair removal treatment with added skin benefits. However there are no solid scientific claims or evidence to back it up. Turmeric has been used in tradition for beauty practices because of how cost effective and the benefits are.  The article doesn’t provide any studies or verified results to show that turmeric actually works for hair removal or improves the skin in this way. The article also mentions that the treatment can be messy and might stain the skin, which suggests that the benefits might not be as straightforward as they sound. This is a good example of skepticism, meaning we should question the evidence before accepting the benefits as true. Without scientific proof or reliable studies to back up the claims, we should remain doubtful and avoid jumping to conclusions based on appealing idea of it

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
When Nad's was first created, little did Sue Ismiel, founder of Nad's, know that her original natural hair removal gel formula would not only solve her daughter's unwanted hair removal problem, but millions of others around the world! #gonads

Do a little online search and you will find many at-home natural hair removal remedies that are both chemical-free and toxin-free, including sugar waxing and turmeric hair removal. But what exactly are the benefits of these different methods and how do they work?

1. Sugaring

Sugar waxing or sugaring is a traditional method of hair removal which began in the Mediterranean and middle eastern countries. It's made up of simple ingredients including lemon, water, and sugar. Heated together these ingredients form a candy-like consistency and are applied to the skin to remove the hair by the roots. In addition to the natural ingredients, one of the pros of sugaring is that you can re-use the same paste over and over, making it less wasteful. This method although effective for some can be painful and cause sensitivity as the process of kneading the wax along the skin and hair has a bit of an ouch factor! Also, the technique takes some practice until you can see really great results.

2. Turmeric

Yellow spice 'turmeric' has also been used in the beauty space for many years and is especially popular in India, where it originated. When applied to the skin in a paste texture (with again few ingredients... turmeric and milk), it acts as a glue where the hair sticks to and is removed after 20 minutes or until dry. Removing hair with turmeric is can have additional benefits to the skin and is a cost-effective solution. However, it can also be messy and temporarily stains the skin if not done properly-another technique that might be better left to the pros.

3. Waxing

Waxing is our go-to because you can get almost all of the same benefits and it is easy to do at home, for newbies and pros alike! Since Sue's original green Gel, the team at Nad's have continued to work hard on developing, testing and trialling the best natural hair removal options available at your fingertips.

Nad's Natural range of hair removal products are formulated with love and simple ingredients that are good for you and for the planet, empowering you to feel naturally beautiful.

Check out the benefits below:

Naturally Derived Ingredients- Using only a few carefully selected ingredients, we have created a formula that is gentle, fast and effective.

Natural Sugar Wax for the Body Carefully selected 100% natural ingredients including lemon and sugar work together to exfoliate and rejuvenate the skin, leaving your skin looking and feeling radiant!

Natural Wax Strips Non-woven eco-flex material contains more than 90% natural origin wax with 3 simple ingredients to hug every curve of your body to effectively remove unwanted hair.

Eco-friendly Natural ingredients are not only gentle on your skin, but also kind to the planet.

Packaging is 100% recyclable, making our products less wasteful.

The re-usable cotton strips can be washed and used for future waxing sessions.

Strips no longer come packed in plastic wraps.

Synthetic wipes that are often filled with plastics and aluminum harmful to the environment have been replaced with natural soaps and oils for pre and post waxing sessions, leaving skin free of residue and naturally soft.

Instruction booklets and thank you cards are made from FSC paper, meaning forests that employ sustainable practices.

Vegan & Cruelty-free We love our furry friends! Our products are always tested on humans, never on animals. Ingredients are also free of animal products.

Before giving any of these 3 options a go, it's important to do a test patch (especially if you have sensitive skin) on the area where you want to remove hair before proceeding with a full area to see how your skin reacts.

For the best removal solutions at home, find your nearest retailer of Nad's hair removal products: https://nads.com/where-to-buy-nads-hair-removal-products-stockists and follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter for the latest hair removal tips, tricks and giveaways!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
3 of the Best Natural Hair Removal Options that Work!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Nad's explores the best at-home natural hair removal remedies including sugar waxing, turmeric and waxing.

# data[].attributes.headline
Convinces by faith and belief (in spite of evidence)

# data[].attributes.subject
Convinces by faith and belief (in spite of evidence)

# data[].attributes.body
definition:

Convinces by faith and belief (in spite of evidence) means believing in something strongly, even when there is evidence that shows it might not be true.

In this tiktok, the mother was explaining how she noticed regression with her child after receiving a vaccine at 15 months and why she doesn’t like them and had to space it out. Personally I think that her son’s brain and body are still developing, which could also be the reason why she is noticing some changes. I believe that this can be an example of “Convinces by faith and belief (in spite of evidence)” because Some people continue to believe that vaccines are dangerous because of stories they’ve heard or things they've read online, even though doctors and scientists have studied vaccines carefully and know what the major side effects are. These beliefs are often based on anecdotes,personal stories or experiences that people share, which can feel very real to those who hear them. But these personal stories are not the same as scientific evidence, which comes from carefully conducted studies and research that prove vaccines are safe and effective. Even when the scientific method shows that vaccines are safe, some people keep believing otherwise because of their faith in personal stories or misinformation they encounter, which is a key example of convincing by belief.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Replying to @la_china_chong all just a regular mom and her experiences and opinions on them! Do what’s best for you & your kid #autismmom #momsoftiktok #autismadvice #boricua #specialneedsparent #specialneedsmom #autism #autisticchild #vaccines 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
@meli_mel_21
Replying to @la_china_chong all just a regular mom and her experiences and opinions on them! Do what’s best for you & your kid #autismmom #momsoftiktok #autismadvice #boricua #specialneedsparent #specialneedsmom #autism #autisticchild #vaccines
♬ original sound - Autism Mommy Melly

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

Ancient wisdom refers to knowledge, teachings, and insights that have been passed down through generations, often from ancient cultures or traditions.

Herbal medicine has been used for centuries by different cultures based on ancient wisdom passed down over generations. For example, ancient Egyptians used aloe vera and frankincense, and in India, turmeric has long been used to treat inflammation. In Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), herbs like ginseng were used to restore balance in the body. While these remedies have been trusted for a long time, they didn’t have the benefit of the scientific method to back up their claims. Today, we use critical thinking and the scientific method to test if these old remedies really work. The first thing we need to do is define the claim. The claim is  that turmeric helps reduce inflammation. Next, is to recognize any bias, like whether the person claiming the benefits of a herb might have a reason to promote it, such as making money from selling it. Next evaluate the source, The source  article comes from a well-known healthcare institution. Evaluate the evidence. Research shows that turmeric does help with inflammation, which makes sense since it's been used in Ayurvedic medicine for thousands of years. However, some herbs, like Ginkgo biloba, have mixed results, and we don’t have enough solid evidence to say it definitely works for improving memory. After evaluating the evidence. In conclusion based on what the studies actually show I think that this source backs up herbal medicine properties.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Unlock the healing power of nature with evidence-based research and practical tips on incorporating herbal medicine into your everyday life.

# data[].attributes.body
Defintion:

Appeal to Authority is a type of argument where someone tries to convince you that something is true just because an expert or a respected figure says it is, rather than providing solid evidence or reasoning.

When a hairdresser says that "going to sleep with wet hair causes mold," they are making an appeal to authority. This means they are using their job as a hair expert to make a claim that sounds true, even though it isn’t backed by facts. Hairdressers know a lot about hair, but they aren't experts on mold or how it grows. Mold needs certain conditions, like moisture and something organic to grow on, but not just from wet hair. The idea that mold grows in your hair from sleeping with it wet is not true. Mold usually grows on things like walls or carpets, not your hair. Wet hair might cause scalp problems like dandruff or fungal infections, but it doesn’t cause mold. This is a good example of how someone with knowledge in one area, like a hairdresser, can give advice about something they’re not trained in. It’s important to use critical thinking to question these kinds of claims and not believe everything someone says, especially if there is no real proof behind it.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Have you heard of hair mold? I’m actually terrified now 😳 #hairmold #preventhairmold #howtopreventhairmold #whatishairmold 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
@allthingskaley
Have you heard of hair mold? I’m actually terrified now 😳 #hairmold #preventhairmold #howtopreventhairmold #whatishairmold
♬ Funny video "Carmen Prelude" Arranging weakness(836530) - yo suzuki(akisai)

# data[].attributes.body
Defintion:

Ideological Support refers to the way people or groups support and defend ideas, beliefs, or systems that align with their values or worldview.

A lot of people say that vaping is better than smoking cigarettes because it doesn’t have tobacco and might have fewer harmful chemicals. They claim that since vaping doesn’t create tar or carbon monoxide like cigarettes, it must be safer. This idea is often pushed by people who want to promote vaping or who are part of the e-cigarette market. But the truth is, even though vaping might have fewer chemicals than smoking, it’s still not safe. The problem with saying vaping is better is that many people ignore the risks. Yes, vaping might have fewer harmful chemicals than smoking, but it still contains nicotine, which is addictive, and other chemicals that can damage your lungs and heart over time. A lot of the arguments for vaping don’t consider the long-term health risks, which we still don’t fully understand because vaping is new. For example, people who say vaping is better often only talk about the studies showing it’s less harmful than smoking, but they ignore studies that show it can still cause lung damage and heart problems. This is an example of group-think where people just believe what’s popular or what others are saying, without really questioning it. By focusing only on the “good” parts and ignoring the bad, they are creating a distorted view of the truth. In reality, vaping isn’t safe. While it might be less harmful than smoking, it still has health risks. We need to debunk the idea that vaping is completely safe. There’s not enough clear proof to say that it’s harmless. So, just because something is new or sounds better doesn’t mean it’s good for you. It’s important to look at all the facts before making a decision.

# data[].attributes.body
Definiton:

Proof by Verbosity is when someone tries to convince you something is true not by providing clear evidence, but by saying a lot of words without really saying much.

The "Is water wet?" debate has become really popular on social media, especially on sites like Twitter and TikTok. People are arguing about whether water itself is wet or if it just makes other things wet. Some of the explanations people give are super complicated, and this is a good example of proof by verbosity. That’s when someone uses a lot of big, fancy words to sound smart but doesn’t actually answer the question. For example, I just had this conversation with my aunt the other day (she is a science teacher in Australia) and she said , "Water, when it touches a solid surface, creates an interaction that makes the surface stick to the water molecules." I personally have no idea what this means but  tt sounds scientific, but it doesn’t really help answer the question or make things clearer. The problem with these long explanations is that they don’t really add anything useful, they just make the conversation more confusing. Instead of answering the simple question, people are focusing on using complicated language to sound more convincing, even though it doesn't really get to the point. This shows how proof by verbosity works, using fancy words to make an argument sound smarter, even if it doesn’t actually explain anything.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

it can prevent people from making informed decisions or fully understanding the issues at hand.

In this article it talks about the Canadian residential school and how Canada has failed to educate us on it. I think this is is a good example of Suppression by Authorities. The Canadian Residential School System is a sad example of how authorities tried to control and erase Indigenous cultures. For over 100 years, starting in the 17th century and lasting until the late 1990s, Indigenous children were taken from their families and sent to residential schools. These schools were meant to force them to forget their languages, traditions, and way of life. The government and churches said the schools were there to “help” the children, but in reality, they caused a lot of harm. One reason this system went on for so long was lack of practice in questioning what was happening. For many years, people didn’t stop to think about how harmful the schools were. The government and church leaders kept telling everyone that the schools were good for the children, and no one really challenged that.

This lack of practice in thinking critically meant many people believed these schools were helping, even though children were being abused and hurt.

group-think, where everyone just agreed with the main idea, even if it wasn’t true. The people in charge—like the government and the churches—believed that the schools were needed to “civilize” the Indigenous children. They ignored the voices of Indigenous people who fought to keep their children at home. Instead of listening to their concerns, the authorities pushed ahead with the schools, assuming they were right.

distorted view of truth. For many years, the government and churches told a story that the residential schools were for the children’s own good. They didn’t want to talk about the abuse, hunger, and pain that the children suffered. This distorted view of truth kept the real story hidden for a long time, so survivors couldn’t speak up. It wasn’t until the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was set up in 2008 that people started to hear the full truth about what really happened at these schools.

In the end, the residential school system lasted so long because of lack of practice in questioning it, group-think where everyone just went along with it, and a distorted view of truth that ignored the harm being done. Only when survivors spoke up and told their stories did the truth begin to come out. Now, Canada is starting to understand the damage caused by the residential school system, but the effects are still felt by Indigenous communities today. To truly heal, we need to listen, think critically, and face the full truth of what happened.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Warning!
The Residential School System is a topic that may cause trauma invoked by memories of past abuse. The Government of Canada recognizes the need for safety measures to minimize the risk associated with triggering. A National Residential School Crisis Line has been set up to provide support for former residential school students. You can access information on the website or access emotional and crisis referral services by calling the 24-Hour National Crisis Line: 1-866-925-4419.

The Residential School System was designated a national historic event in 2019.
Historical importance: Part of a policy of assimilation imposed on Indigenous Peoples by the federal government and certain churches resulting in intergenerational harm to First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, their families, and communities.

Commemorative plaque: no plaque installed

Residential schools for Indigenous children existed in Canada from the 17 th century until the late 1990s. During the 19 th and 20 th centuries, a formal system for the residential schooling of Indigenous children was established and expanded throughout Canada. Concerted federal government involvement in Residential Schools began in the 1880s. It is estimated that at least 150,000 First Nation, Inuit, and Métis children attended residential schools during this period. These schools were largely operated by certain churches and religious organizations and administered and funded by the federal government as a key aspect of colonialism. The system was imposed on Indigenous peoples as part of a broad set of assimilation efforts to destroy their rich cultures and identities and to suppress their histories. The accounts of residential school survivors provide critical insight into the devastating experiences children had at residential schools, and the long-term impact of these experiences not only on survivors, but also on their families and communities. Throughout the system's history, Indigenous peoples fought against the system in many ways. The efforts of residential school survivors to tell their stories and to seek justice have been a crucial catalyst in the growing public recognition of the harm and effects of residential schools.

The first boarding schools for Indigenous children in what would become Canada were established by Roman Catholic missionaries in 17 th century colonial New France. In the first half of the 19 th century, residential schools for Indigenous children were established under British colonial rule in Upper Canada (southern Ontario). Founded on notions of racial, cultural, and spiritual superiority, these schools attempted to convert Indigenous children to Christianity and separate them from their traditional cultures.

With the colonization of Indigenous territories in the years following Confederation, the Canadian government established and expanded a formal system of residential schooling through legislation and policies with the goal of accelerating the assimilation of Indigenous peoples into settler society. The system expanded west and north, and in time government-sponsored residential schools existed in almost every province and territory in Canada, with most of the schools in the north and Quebec opening after 1950. In general, schools focused on providing instruction in trades and agriculture for boys, and in domestic tasks for girls. Residential schools operated in addition to federally-funded day schools, which were often run by religious organizations. In the 1950s and 1960s, the federal government began to pursue a policy of integration in southern Canada, whereby some First Nations children would attend schools in the provincial school system, especially for the higher grades. In the North, the government administered a system of hostels and day schools for First Nation, Inuit, and Métis children. Many Métis students were already attending provincial schools. In practice, the process of integrating students and then closing residential schools took decades, only ending in the late 1990s.

During the years that the system was in place, children were forcibly removed from their homes and, at school, were often subjected to harsh discipline, malnutrition and starvation, poor healthcare, physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, neglect, and the deliberate suppression of their cultures and languages. Thousands of children died while attending residential schools, and the burial sites of many remain unknown. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada described the residential school system as a cultural genocide. The intergenerational effects of the trauma include lower levels of educational and social attainment, interpersonal violence, and broken relationships between parents and children. Residential schools undermined fundamental aspects of Indigenous cultures by separating Indigenous peoples from their traditional knowledge and ways of life, languages, family structures, and connections to the land.

From the earliest days of the schools, objections were raised by students, their families, and Indigenous leaders. They protested everything from attendance to poor conditions, mistreatment, and the inadequate quality of schooling itself. Children fought against the system by refusing to let go of their languages and identities. Some children ran away from the schools in an effort to return home. Some died in the process. In the decades when the schools were shutting down, Indigenous peoples fought for official acknowledgement of the harms inflicted by the schools. Survivors advocated for recognition and reparations, and demanded that governments and churches be held accountable for the lasting legacy of harms caused. These efforts ultimately culminated in the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, apologies by the government, and the establishment of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which ran from 2008 to 2015.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Call to Action 79 in part called on the federal government to commemorate the history and legacy of residential schools. The National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation and their Survivors Circle, Parks Canada, and the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada have co-developed this designation and worked collaboratively to determine the national historic significance of this important and defining event in Canadian history that continues to have a significant impact today.

Backgrounder last update: 2020-09-01

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Residential School System National Historic Event

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada described the residential school system as a cultural genocide. Residential schools undermined fundamental aspects of Indigenous cultures by separating Indigenous peoples from their traditional knowledge and ways of life, languages, family structures, and connections to the land.

# data[].attributes.body
Definiton:

Agenticity is when we think something happens for a reason, even if there’s no real reason behind it.

A common superstition is that opening an umbrella inside brings bad luck. This belief is a good example of agenticity, which is when people think something random or ordinary has a purpose or intention behind it. In this case, people believe that opening an umbrella inside isn't just a harmless action; instead, it’s something that invites bad luck or misfortune, like there's an unseen force making it happen. There's no real evidence to support this idea, thoughit’s just a superstition passed down over time. But the belief that opening an umbrella inside causes bad luck is a way of attributing a sense of intention or purpose to something that doesn’t actually have any. It's a classic example of agenticity, where people feel like there’s a hidden force behind everyday actions. (I believe in this)

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

Set of beliefs or ideas that guide how people think about the world and make decisions

The idea of "family first" that my mom emphasizes is a great example of ideology because it represents a set of beliefs or values that shape how we live and make decisions. An ideology is a system of ideas and values that guide people’s actions and views about the world, and in this case, "family first" is the belief that family should always be the top priority. My mom has passed this down to us as a core value, and it influences how we handle things like work, social life, and even difficult situations. It's not just a saying; it’s a way of thinking that shapes how we treat each other, how we make choices, and what we value most. By teaching us this, she’s instilling an ideology that has been passed down in our family for generations, and it guides us in how we view the importance of family bonds and support

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

Patternicity is the tendency to see patterns or connections in things, even when they aren't actually there

I’ve always thought of the number 11 as my lucky number. Whenever I wear it during cross country or volleyball, I always seem to do well. It’s like whenever I put on my uniform with the number 11, I perform better. I’ve noticed this pattern a few times, so now it just feels like that number has something to do with my success. But, I know it’s probably just my brain looking for a connection that’s not really there. This is an example of patternicity—where we start to believe there's a link between two things, even if it’s just a coincidence. The truth is, my performance is probably more about my training, focus, and preparation than the number itself. It’s just that when I see the number 11 and do well, my brain makes a connection, and it starts to feel like the number is the reason I’m successful. I think we all do this in different ways, whether it’s wearing a specific pair of socks or following a certain routine before a big game. We notice these little patterns and start to believe they actually have an effect, even though it’s mostly just our brains making connections that aren’t really there.

# data[].attributes.body
Pseudoscience Watchlist

Included in Assignment 1

Included in Assignment 2

Use of scientific-sounding language that is meaningless

YES

Results can’t be reproduced or verified

YES

Deliberately creates mystery

YES

Does not progress

YES

Often appeals to emotion

YES

Convinces by faith and belief (in spite of evidence)

YES

Money is often involved

YES

Red Flags

Included in Assignment 1

Included in Assignment 2

All Natural

YES

Ancient Wisdom

YES

Appeal to Authority

YES

Confirmation Bias

YES

Confusion of Correlation with Causation

YES

Ideological Support

YES

Mystical Energy

YES

Proof by Verbosity

YES

Red Herring

YES

Suppression by Authorities

YES

Reasons for Belief

Included in Assignment 1

Included in Assignment 2

Agenticity

YES

Emotional Connection

YES

Ideology

YES

Patternicity

YES

Perception and Observation

YES

Simplicity

YES

Unexplained

YES