# data[].attributes.body
the government has to allow us to speak

PRECEDENT: tinker v Des moines. this cemented free speech for students at school.

# data[].attributes.body
the rulers can't resist this right and should not be infringed.

PRECEDENT: McDonald vs City. They came to the claim that it is a fundamental right for protection and other stuff

# data[].attributes.body
the government can't just come into anyone's home

PRECEDENT: Anti- quartering act 1679. This prohibited English soldiers to enter into someones house without consent.

# data[].attributes.body
the government can't have any unreasonable searches

PRECEDENT: Brendlin vs California. This happened during a traffic stop, being a search and seizure.

# data[].attributes.body
the government must allow us to have a jury

PRECEDENT: Miranda vs Arizona. During this case the further expanded the idea that not only in courts but when a person is being questioned.

# data[].attributes.body
the government can't just accuse someone of a crime without giving them a lawyer and jury

PRECEDENT: Gideon vs Wainwright. This Court case set the standard to give citizens a right to a attorney

# data[].attributes.body
the government has to allow citizens a right to a jury in a federal court case when it exceeds a certain dollar amount.

PRECEDENT: Curtis vs Loether. During analyzation the court concluded that this action of jury is implied.

# data[].attributes.body
no cruel or unusual punishment, an excessive bail shall not be asked

PRECEDENT: Francis v. Resweber. This made Court realize that a second punishment doesn't violate the 8th if it failed the first time.

# data[].attributes.body
the government is not allowed to take away rights that are specified in the constitution

PRECEDENT: U.S. Public Workers v. Mitchell. They fought so the government can't take away rights in the work place.

# data[].attributes.body
If something isn't stated in the constitution government cannot use that power against citizens. It belongs to state or people.

PRECEDENT: Printz v. United States. Federal Bradly violated states right in gun violence act.