# data[].attributes.body
What features make an assignment stand out in a coding unit?

# data[].attributes.body
1. Minimum

It means just barely started, not meeting basic requirements. Like putting together a craft but it falls apart easily, and you don’t try to fix it.

2. Satisfactory

It means good enough to pass, does the basic job. Like making a small lamp that lights up— the wires are a bit messy, but it works fine.

3. Competent

It means solid and reliable, done well. Like building a Lego set perfectly following the instructions— it’s stable, with no missing parts or mistakes.

4. Excellent

It means super great, even better than expected. Like making a small robot that not only follows your orders but also has your own cool improvements to make it run faster and smoother.

# data[].attributes.headline
Today, you are the MYP design teacher/evaluator. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Today, you are the MYP design teacher/evaluator. 

# data[].attributes.body
Your job is to judge how well each sample project shows technical skills in the creation process, using the rubric as your guide

# data[].attributes.body
What did you learn about good technical skill demonstration from this example?

# data[].attributes.body
What mistakes or gaps should be avoided when showing technical skills in your own work?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
 As an MYP Design C2 evaluator (focusing on technical skills in the creation process), which score level would you assign to Sample 1

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
1-2. Demonstrates minimum technical skills when developing the solution.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
3-4. Demonstrates satisfactory technical skills when developing the solution.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
5-6. Demonstrates competent technical skills when developing the solution

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
7-8. Demonstrates excellent technical skills when developing the solution

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
 As an MYP Design C2 evaluator (focusing on technical skills in the creation process), which score level would you assign to Sample 1

# data[].attributes.body
I think the good things of sample 1 was just 1 pages, and that make I didn't need read many pages

# data[].attributes.body
The weakness of sample 1 is that he/she didn't write any technical skill that he/she used so this project can only get 1~2 points in cretiria C2

# data[].attributes.body
I think sample 1's weakness was mess, and make me can't see very clear, and didn't explain the technical skills and didn't explain very clear

# data[].attributes.body
The technical skill that the sample 2 shows is a strong coding skill and logical skill. The blocks are very detailed. Based on his/her game he/she can get a really high score.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the strengths of sample 1 were its easy to read and accessibility.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the weakness of the sample is that it's questions is not connected to the main theme

# data[].attributes.body
The weakness of sample one is he/she finish her coding and made a good project, but it is not about our goal , it could cause him/her get a low point.

# data[].attributes.body
The weakness of this samlpe is because it don't have evidence, it don't have explanation and no comment on the blocks

# data[].attributes.body
The weakness of sample 1 is too lack of information, add more description is better. not only lack of information, it does not contain any technical skill and person who make this put all the pictures together was a mess

# data[].attributes.body
I think sample 2 are explain very detail and clear, make me can understand, and shows the skills

# data[].attributes.body
I think the weakness of sample 1 was that there was a pure photo, and not enough explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the weaknesses of samples 1 is a lot of page has no thing

James

# data[].attributes.body
it is very good because it is it is very clear

# data[].attributes.body
I think sample 2's 作者 can't 证明 that was his project.

# data[].attributes.body
it only have the picture of the blocks, doesn't have the picture of the game he/she make. it only don't have the date that it is done.

# data[].attributes.body
The strength of this Sample is that it give a strong evidence it shows the pictures of the project clearly.

# data[].attributes.body
The strengths of sample 2 is that student shows the strong coding and also can summarize the picture she/he put

# data[].attributes.body
i think it to less information

# data[].attributes.body
However, the weakness of sample 2 is also very clear. He/she didn't have an explanation and he didn't tell the function of each parts of the blocks. It is not detailed enough to have a high score.

# data[].attributes.body
i think of sample 1 is weaknesses because all step is put in one pages, and the description is too short., and cant understand.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample 1 don't explain the game and just have picture, and the picture have too much so it looks messy.

# data[].attributes.body
I have learned the technical skills of coding skills, because I code the product with the theme of study and play, I add some interesting part of game, so I already achieve the part that to let others understand the acknowledge of interesting Chinese. I also learn the logical skills and preparing skills, because first I prepare the picture of characters, backgrounds, sounds enough. The logical skills show by the the steps that I do the coding: first, setting the backgrounds, characters, and sounds; second, made the code of the the homepage settings; then, I finish the code part inside each characters. This shows a strong technical skill of logical skills.

# data[].attributes.body
The good thing of sample 1 is he show what does the game looks like.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the most important point of C2 is the part of evidence because it shows that this work is yours and you didn't copy from other or AI

# data[].attributes.body
A good work requires detailed explanation, evidence, pictures and organized due dates.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample 2 didn't show's what does the game looks like, so it can't prove the game is made by him.

# data[].attributes.body
The things that I'm not enough is that I didn't made the interesting game of playing, I just made some a little boring game of code the education part. If I'm a teacher, I will suggest myself to made some interesting game just playing, like Miss. Linda just teach us: the chasing game, catching game, and a lot of interesting game type. This will made the game more interesting. Otherwise, the game will be boring enough. The other point that I need to improve is that I need to use teacher's suggestion to made the game. That's it.

# data[].attributes.body
The strengths of the sample 1 is that he or she put many picture about the game. Those picture can help people look this work clearly.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the most important thing in C2 was the explain of the project and the evidence to support that project was made by you.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample 2 write a has a lot of code and it explain the game very clearly.

# data[].attributes.body
the most important part is it need to contain enough evidence, and the explanation of your game.

# data[].attributes.body
The most essential part is evidence, because it shows this project was made by you and not by others.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the most important thing in C2 is the to let others trust you and think this is made by yours so you need to give full evidence

# data[].attributes.body
in my opinon i think that giving evident of the project is the most good

# data[].attributes.body
The strengths of this work is he put the evidence of this work and he write the explanation for each step that he put. I think this is better work because their are evidence, detail, picture, and explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
The important part is the evidence. So when we are making the game we add the coment on the code.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the most important part of C2 is the evidence, if you don't have enough evidence, you can't prove the game is made by you.

# data[].attributes.body
C2 need good evidence, explaining, those is the most important thing it can show it is doing by yourself.

# data[].attributes.body
give a evidence that the steps of the game is make by our self.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the most important point in the C2 is the evidence too. In the logical skills, evidence is important enough to prove that the product is make by yourself. It also prove that you are honest, and means you are very honest. The other important point is that you can suggest yourself to look at the technical skills: is it fit for my coding point? You will made a great job.