# data[].attributes.body
Describe how you would arrange the fractions in order from smallest to biggest.

# data[].attributes.headline
How do you think peer feedback can be/has been implemented in your subjects?

# data[].attributes.subject
How do you think peer feedback can be/has been implemented in your subjects?

# data[].attributes.body
Change all to mixed numbers.

Make their denominators equal.

Arrange by numerators.

# data[].attributes.body
Put smaller numerators first, bigger last

# data[].attributes.body
Change to mixed numbers

Compare bigger/smaller than half

Compare by same numerators

# data[].attributes.body
I will change all the denominator to the same number and then rearrange the smallest number to the biggest number. :)

# data[].attributes.body
Change all to improper fraction> change to common denominator, then compare

# data[].attributes.body
Change denominator to 30.. then rearrange from smallest to biggest

# data[].attributes.body
I’ll change all the improper fractions to mixed numbers to compare. For fractions that I’m still unsure, I’ll change their denominators to be the same.

# data[].attributes.headline
Change to improper fraction, then common denominator, followed by arrangement of numbers.

# data[].attributes.subject
Change to improper fraction, then common denominator, followed by arrangement of numbers.

# data[].attributes.headline
1) Change improper fraction to mixed numbers. Compare the whole

# data[].attributes.subject
1) Change improper fraction to mixed numbers. Compare the whole

# data[].attributes.body
2) compare the fractions that have similar whole. Change to like fractions for comparison

# data[].attributes.body
I've tried peer feedback in my lesson before, but as they are LR students they are unable to type well in CL. I used basic emoticons like 👍🏻 and 💪🏻 for them to give simple feedback on their friends work.

# data[].attributes.body
Using 1 star and 1 wish (or 2 stars & 1 wish) FA strategy to give peer feedback.

I do this in my class when students do the reading aloud & stimulus-based conversation components for oral practices.

# data[].attributes.body
Similar to Aizad, my class has difficulties giving written feedback to each other.
Sentence starters would be useful to guide them in crafting their feedback- as writing can be quite daunting to them.
(In some cases) Using a checklist could be better for LP classes, instead of writing, they can just tick the column that their peers fall into.

# data[].attributes.body
Oral and composition. Students followed the rubrics to provide feedback for their peers.

# data[].attributes.body
A checklist with given assessment criteria with columns for self & peer feedback is a way to sieve out peer evaluation, especially for lower primary who can’t express themselves well. Checking their peers’ work against a checklist is a way to give peer feedback. I’ll probably include some writing space below the checklist to allow some personalised comments.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer feedback can be used in writing composition or in oracy practices.

# data[].attributes.body
I’ve used peer feedback when students do compo writing and oral. However, as my students are LP, they were not able to articulate their feedback well. Using emojis and checklist can help these students.