# data[].attributes.body
Positive
Interesting
Even better

# data[].attributes.body
Positive
Interesting
Even better

# data[].attributes.body
Positive
Interesting
Even better

# data[].attributes.body
Positive
Interesting
Even better

# data[].attributes.body
Positive
Interesting
Even better

# data[].attributes.body
Positive
Interesting
Even better

# data[].attributes.body
Positive
Interesting
Even better

# data[].attributes.body
Positive
Interesting
Even better

# data[].attributes.body
Positive
Interesting
Even better

# data[].attributes.body
Positive
Interesting
Even better

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the way you guys all talked and talked to the crowd.

All the different years that this was spread through was very interesting to me.

Maybe read off the board a little less

# data[].attributes.body
P- I can tell you guys practiced

I- OxyContin crisis disproved their values

E- try slowing down a little bit so your flow is better

# data[].attributes.body
P: Talked loudly

I: That Purdue Pharma approved opiods were safe to use.

E: Slowing down a bit

# data[].attributes.body
Positive- The slides being clear.

Interesting- The amount of companies that mislead the general public.

Even Better- More contact with the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
P- there were good pictures

I- it was interesting how bad they were

e- read off the board a little less

# data[].attributes.body
P: slides were organized well

I: opioids were the cause of more than 500,000 deaths

E: don't use full sentences in slides

# data[].attributes.body
positive - good job going note card free

Interesting - Purdue Pharma claimed opioids were safe and good to use (proved wrong)

Even better - try to slow down and enunciate a little better

# data[].attributes.body
P : great timeline of the case study

I : the Sackler family itself needs to pay 6 million in fines

E : more eye contact with audience

# data[].attributes.body
P-Good background info

I-lied about addictiveness of opioids

E-lots of words on slide

# data[].attributes.body
P: In-depth information

I: There were 500,000 opioid-related deaths in 2020

E: Speak toward audience more often

# data[].attributes.body
P: Good introduction as to who Purdue Pharma was

I: That the company will be 100% liquidated

E: Monotone

# data[].attributes.body
P- Great information

I- 500,000 deaths from opioids in 2020, after this scandal had closed. Would be interesting to explore.

E- Inconsistent flow

# data[].attributes.body
P: good organized between group members

I: How people believed that opioids were actually safe

E: Some slides had to many words on screen

# data[].attributes.body
P: Well prepared

I: They got their opiods to be aproved

E: Read off the board less

# data[].attributes.body
P- You all talked at a good pace.

I- The amount of deaths that happened.

E- Talk a little louder.

# data[].attributes.body
P- good explanation of the shadows and shadow casters

I- it was proven wrong that opioids were safe

E- make sure everyone is speaking the same amount

# data[].attributes.body
P - There are short points that they went off

I - Siphoning money to Alameda

E - Readling less of the board

# data[].attributes.body
P- you were easy to understand

I- there were a lot of issues with it.

E- maybe use some notecards

# data[].attributes.body
P- Clear tone in speaking.

I- Crypto is an interesting topic.

E- More contact with the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
P: Great job talking loud

I: That since people wanted to pull out $6 million it caused a market crash

E: Maybe use some notecards

# data[].attributes.body
P- I can tell you guys did your research

I- FTX was siphoning money that was being misused by Bankman-Fried

E- stay grounded when talking

# data[].attributes.body
very well spoken

I can't believe they syphened so much money

slowing down

# data[].attributes.body
P : great delivery

I : mentioning who had shares, including Tom Brady and Shaq O'neill, also the fact that Tom Brady was an ambassador

E : Too much stuff (pictures) on the slides

# data[].attributes.body
P: Easy to understand and hear

I: Money was being missued

E: Use notecards

# data[].attributes.body
P- Good pace and volume.

I- The amount of money that people wanted to pull out.

E- Try to stay grounded when you're talking.

# data[].attributes.body
P- Great slide design

I- Very reminiscent of Enron

E- Try to fidget a little less.

# data[].attributes.body
P: Information is well-known and explained

I: FTX kept all of their money and went bankrupt because of it

E: Control hand movements and fidgeting

# data[].attributes.body
P: Good voice volume, knew information well didn’t seem like you guys were reading off the board much

I: Tom Brady was an ambassador

E: Less sudden movements

# data[].attributes.body
P-Very good explanation

I-Tom Brady Was ambassador

E-More enthusiastic

# data[].attributes.body
P: very casual, well explained

I: celebrities like Tom Brady were invested in it

E: face the audience a bit more

# data[].attributes.body
P- great job having just a couple words on the slide, and explaining it with more context, it makes you seem very well versed on the topic.

I- the companies and individuals lost all of their money because of this scandal

E- some were reading off of the slides a little too much

# data[].attributes.body
positive - good job not using note cards and talking openly

Interesting - FTX used the shares for fraud and personal benefit

Even Better - use more tone when speaking, rather than being monotone

# data[].attributes.body
P- I liked how you guys didn't just read off of the slides

I- I find it interesting how long it took for him to get caught

E- More visual engagement with the audience

# data[].attributes.body
p- it was very easy to understand

I- it was interesting how much they payed to resolve it

e- maybe look less at the slides.

# data[].attributes.body
P: Good amount of information

I: Related to Purdue Pharma Case

E: Use even more tone

# data[].attributes.body
Very clear voice mason i loved it

crazy that they are influencing the selling of this drug

maybe read off the board a little less

# data[].attributes.body
P: Good explaination

I: Purdue Pharma only wanted money and didn't care about the risks it gave people.

E: Read off of slides less

# data[].attributes.body
positive - good job talking openly

interesting - chased a profit rather than focusing of the opioid addicted population

even better - read off board less and use more tone

# data[].attributes.body
P: Good information overall, easy to understand

I: Their business influence Purdue Pharma into selling opioids, both companies got caught

E: Read less off the slides

# data[].attributes.body
P- Good information

I- I found it interesting how this one ties in with the Purdue group

E- More tone fluctuation

# data[].attributes.body
P- Good slides

I- They made certain people have more than they should, instead of spreading it out

E- Be more engaging while you speak

# data[].attributes.body
P - A lot of good information

I - Payed over 1 billion to reset the company

E - Limit reading off slides

# data[].attributes.body
P- Very professional. No real fidgeting; no awkward pauses.

I- Connection with Purdue Pharma

E- Expand from slides more in the opening. Give more detail if you can.

# data[].attributes.body
P: Good slides with short points they built off

I: worked with Purdue pharma

E: moved around quite a bit

# data[].attributes.body
P: Slides have great visuals and they had good information on the slides

I: They were involved with Purdue Pharma

E: Too many words on certain slides

# data[].attributes.body
P- Good overview.

I- The amount of money they paid to resolve the issue.

E- Talk a little louder.

# data[].attributes.body
P: covered a lot of information

I: How many hundreds of millions of dollars they had to pay in settlements

E: less words on some of the slides would be easier on the eyes

# data[].attributes.body
P- the flow of your presentation was nice

I- impacted many more people than one would think

E- too many words on certain slides

# data[].attributes.body
P: Well explained

I: Worked with purdue pharma

E: Read off the slides less

# data[].attributes.body
P - Seemed to know the information well

I - Interesting how it tied into the first group

E - could summarize slides, use notecards vs reading off slides

# data[].attributes.body
P : great job identifying the ethical dilemma, and values crossed

I : Mckinsey already had a bad reputation

E : too much words on the slides, makes it hard to follow along

# data[].attributes.body
talking to the audience very well

crazy that he killed his son

add a little more pictures

# data[].attributes.body
P: Very good explanation

I: That he stole $12+ million from clients

E: Don't read right off of slides as much

# data[].attributes.body
spoke well and clearly

How can someone get away with so much fraud?

Try not to have note cards

# data[].attributes.body
P : lots of information about the case, very well summarized

I : fraud only found after he committed murder and authorities looked into him

E : Talk a bit louder and affimatively

# data[].attributes.body
positive - good projection and and eye contact while using notes!

interesting - he worked at the law firm and was trusted so nobody knew or suspected him

even better - read less of the board

# data[].attributes.body
P- Great attention getter.

I- The amount of legal issues.

E- Very nitty gritty --> Spacing of notes on the presentation. Because I like what they did.

# data[].attributes.body
P - Well covered topic

I - Had wealth but also took advantage of clients

E - Don’t read word for word off the slides

# data[].attributes.body
P- Good information

I- Just the extent of his crimes and the success he had prior to his family's murder.

E- Try to engage the audience more.

# data[].attributes.body
P - There was good delivery

I - He abused the trust people had in him

E - There was a lot of reading off slides

# data[].attributes.body
P: organized slides, spoke clearly and loud enough

I: killed his own family members, and took money from his own family

E: don't rely on the cards/slides as much

# data[].attributes.body
P-well practiced

I- 40 year sentence

E-More enthusiasm

# data[].attributes.body
P: Good information

I: That the fraud wasnt found for so long

E: Read less off the board

# data[].attributes.body
P: Exciting case, and they have presented it well.

I: All the crimes he committed, even though he had everything in his life going well as it seemed.

E:

# data[].attributes.body
P: Good pacing and audience attention

I: Alex Murdaugh stayed hidden for a long time through all of his theft

E: Consistency of effort between members

# data[].attributes.body
P- Good amount of words on slides.

I- He stole $12 million from clients and his own law firm.

E- Talk a little louder.

# data[].attributes.body
P: very calm, explained its effects well

I: How respected he was because people didn't know his dark side

E: to many words on some slides and sometimes too much reading

# data[].attributes.body
P- awesome explanations

I- Alex Murdaugh got away with a lot of crimes because of the money he had

E- maybe practice just a bit more, so you have to read off of your notes less

# data[].attributes.body
spoke really well and clear

took years to realize the fraud

read a little less of the board

# data[].attributes.body
positive - nice job projecting and not using note cards

interesting- Minnesota based

even better - read less of board

# data[].attributes.body
p- there was a lot of good information

I- this was in minnesota

e- use notecards so you aren't looking so much at the screen

# data[].attributes.body
P - Very good information

I - They are based in Minnesota

E - Could use a bit more practice

# data[].attributes.body
P-well prepared

I-Wasting money

E-more visuals

# data[].attributes.body
P: Great teamwork and projection

I: How they took a good cause and made it fraudulent.

E:

# data[].attributes.body
P: Spoke loud

I: That is was in Minnesota

E: Read less straight off board

# data[].attributes.body
P- Good voice volume.

I- It happened in MN.

E- Talk a little slower.

# data[].attributes.body
P: spoke loud and clear

I: 3% of the money they received actually went to kids

E: don't move around as much

# data[].attributes.body
P: Good projection and explation

I: The FBI raided their warehouses

E: Look at the board a little less

# data[].attributes.body
P- Great intro and group chemistry.

I- The way the submitted faulse infromation. The trial is still on going.

E- Clear branchng of topics.

# data[].attributes.body
P: did a good job showing how bad this was for all of the people affected

I: The FBI had to raid their warehouses

E: some more visuals would help

# data[].attributes.body
P - Very well put together, knew the information well

I - case not over yet, many people still under investigation

E - could use a few visuals

# data[].attributes.body
Very well talking to the audience

stealing money from low income families is crazy

Read less of the slides

# data[].attributes.body
P - Not too much looking off slides

I - Used another LLC to run funds through

E - Coud use more practice

# data[].attributes.body
P: Good projection and proper amount of information

I: $7 million was stolen from low-income families, very similar to Feeding Our Future scandal

E: Be more with the audience

# data[].attributes.body
P: Loud voices

I: That stolen funds were used to purchase luxury items.

E: Look to audience more

# data[].attributes.body
P: solid slides, not to long and neat

I: stole 7 million dollars from low-income families

E: don't read off the screen as much, especially with notecards

# data[].attributes.body
P- I can tell you guys did your research, covered everything

I- Children and families were striped from meals

E- practice more so you can sell what you are saying better

# data[].attributes.body
P: The slides had a great layout (looks & information)

I: Children and families were stripped from meals

E: Read less off the slides

# data[].attributes.body
Positive - Solid reaserch

interesting - stolen funds were used for personal benefit

even better - use a more professional tone

# data[].attributes.body
P- Clear tone.

I- Yet again fraud in the food world. Crazy that this keeps going on.

E- Less "closed off" boby langauge.