# data[].attributes.body
is this very top down?
STEM focused - how will Arts and Humanities be represented?
Wales is different -  and has many connections to other regions and countries
one size doesn't fit all
Is this about policy (grant capture) or about collaboration (which will in turn bring about grant capture)
Not convinced that there is an understanding that there is a great opportunity around arts and humanities
Where is the innovation and collaboration in all of this?
Fail fast?

# data[].attributes.body
existing competition (a basically competitive structure) getting in the way of constructive collaboration

# data[].attributes.body
lack of recognition / visibility of existing collaborations

# data[].attributes.headline
WIN - Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences, Creative Industries

# data[].attributes.subject
WIN - Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences, Creative Industries

# data[].attributes.body
We need to have a committee/board within WIN to prioritise and focus on these areas (without separating them entirely from STEM).  This will ensure we can build on major pan-Wales potential in these areas.

# data[].attributes.body
bring together disciplines to make a case for non-stem
WIN is here - pan Wales body is a positive - but need to have specific groupings for the disciplines / strengths - need focus and representation
Engagement events or spaces which are below the level of PVC R - people who are doing collaboration at the coalface
Do we understand the problem and how do we design our interventions
Communication and Engagement
Can WIN provide bid development and writing resource at scale?

# data[].attributes.body
shared platform to enhance communication

# data[].attributes.body
Collaboration is great - full of opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
A lot of topics/themes need to be explored collaboratively and in an interdisciplinary way

# data[].attributes.body
collective scaling up of bid writing resources via WIN

# data[].attributes.body
Bring in people who haven't been working in academia for a while - and recognise the huge potential of expertise they can bring to academic work

# data[].attributes.body
Where there are identified priorities for funding (topics/themes) WIN needs to create workshops/inclusive sessions to bring other people tpgether so that wider collaborations beyond the obvious or well-established groups

# data[].attributes.body
Resources are needed (time and money)
And a mindset that expects benefits from collaboration (as opposed to focusing on own expertise only)

# data[].attributes.body
Communications from WIN on areas of interest which will enable existing stakeholders etc to identify themselves. So WIN is not reinventing the wheel but genuinely expanding capacity.

# data[].attributes.headline
A comms plan to communicate with greater clarity the main strategic objectives and policy underpinning them.

# data[].attributes.subject
A comms plan to communicate with greater clarity the main strategic objectives and policy underpinning them.

# data[].attributes.headline
Opportunity to create a more tailored and focussed engagement programme that maybe uses priority thematic areas or global challenges as the basis for some workshops that get to the level of researchers on the ground

# data[].attributes.subject
Opportunity to create a more tailored and focussed engagement programme that maybe uses priority thematic areas or global challenges as the basis for some workshops that get to the level of researchers on the ground

# data[].attributes.body
Communicate with researchers (i.e. level)
Engage with researchers across HEIs/disciplines
Resource - might the need be to enhance scaled bid writing capabilities and/or have individuals tasked with growing collaboration on the ground?