# data[].attributes.body
-Well prepared, speaks clearly, roles are all planned out with characterization.
-Wants safe trip, doesn't want to have to worry about the kids
-wants to have fun, relaxed
-wants educational
-"hands on" feildtrip
-aquarium
-Badgers sports park
-Chicago art institute
-Science museum
-planetarium
- Voted Badgers Sports park out, not educational enough and wants everyone to stay together
-YMCA
-Starting to think of all the different problems, and there's something wrong with every idea/place they bring up

# data[].attributes.body
-States the problems and roles very clearly.
-Very good eye contact with each other
-They get everyone involved into the conversation.
-The conversation Flowed
Criteria:
-safe
-fun
-educational
-Hands on
They all hand a place to go
-For their own criteria
-Went over a wide variety of  places

Got confusing with all the Ideas and criteria. Too many problems that could go wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
The roles and criteria were explained clearly. Everyone has good eye contact. Everyone is respectful and listens to others ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
The roles were clear, and they brought up good questions and resolved them to the fullest. They followed the dewey problem solving criteria. Refereed to the text. Discussed various senarios and debated whether they were viable or not. Everything that they said was useful and contributed to the discussion, they weren't off topic

# data[].attributes.body
They clearly go through all of the steps. Had a solid criteria. Gave all of the roles. They gave plenty of possible solutions for the problem.

# data[].attributes.body
follows Dewey system
Criteria clearly stated
roles are followed
eye contact is being made well
well prepared ideas
worked with peers to set standards and rules

# data[].attributes.body
Clear criteria stated
Presenting multiple ideas with research
Roles stated
Good eye contact
6

# data[].attributes.body
They explained the roles and the desires of each "character" appropriately. They have listen some solutions and no one is interrupting and everyone seems to appreciate everyone's opinion. When they analyzed the problem, they bounced ideas off of each other while respectfully disagreeing with each other. They have such a long list of possible solutions so I hope they can narrow it down. Right when we came back from lunch, the loudness of the voices has decreased greatly. Lots of mumbling. GREAT JOB ON NARROWING DOWN IDEA.

# data[].attributes.body
You did a good job introducing the problem and sharing your different criteria. Also, you did a good job saying where you wanted to go in a respectful and organized way. Disagreeing with each was also something that was done well. Furthermore, you all did a great job evaluating and selecting a final   place to go on a field trip. Your way of testing the solution was very good as well. Overall, this was a very good di
scussion and everyone in your group did a great job.

# data[].attributes.body
-I noticed that their opinions or wants are to the point.
-Good eye contact when other group members are speaking.
-They allow others to speak and feel welcome doing so. Even directs questions towards others.
-They follow Dewey's system.
-Worked with peers to set rules and roles for collegial discussion and decision making.
-A lot of good solutions.
-Well thought out solution/considered all angles even with the consented destination.

# data[].attributes.body
The roles were explained clearly, but the problem I think the problem could be explained better. Sticking to the Steps. Good eye contact when talking. Sounds like a discussion, flows naturally, and asks others questions, everyone gets involved. There is no interrupting during the conversation. Since lunch, the loudness and clarity of their voices has decreased. I think that thinking out loud would not be a bad idea because that has contributed to the mumbling. I think there is maybe too many ideas that it makes the decision to make that choice a lot more difficult. They narrowed the point down nicely.

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: class field trip destination

I would have defined the problem a little more clearly, eye contact was really good, roles were stated very clearly, ideas were obviously researched, brought others into the the conversation well,  seems to be very well prepared, I would refrain using words like "better" because that could get offensive, many questions opposed, challenges ideas well used all points of view, work together well, provided specific feedback for the ideas that were rejected, overall used Dewey's well, really worked with all ideas to either rule them out or to not, great suggestions, obviously thinking about what they are saying, are being very practical and sorting out all issues.

# data[].attributes.body
did a good job on defining the problem and coming up and discussing ideas on where to go which fits everyone's
criteria.includes other people into the conversation

# data[].attributes.body
Roles and criteria were very clearly stated, everyone is respectful and well spoken , Steps were followed, they brought others into conversation, good summerys, refers to text, good eye contact. good at nicely challenging and turning down ideas,  everyone was able to talk and didn't run on and on. able to all agree on a idea and discussed it thourghally and very creative

there  a lot maybe too many ideas, a little quite at times

# data[].attributes.body
The group is well prepared, everyone has criteria and discussing the main view points. Actively poses and responds to questions that are relating to the problem. They also are working together and inviting each other into the conversation. Each member has enough research and valid reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
They describe their roles really well, and what they want. They all establish what criteria they want for the trip. They definitely want to find something educational but still fun. They all did good at providing a solution that fits with their role. Proposed a potential compromise, discussed it well. They are good at respectfully eliminating their potential options. Good eye contact.

# data[].attributes.body
Clearly following Dewey's steps, good research, evidently trying to find a fun but learning environment that fits the most criteria, including everyone and using names, good questions being asked, good at summarizing other people's points, the criteria was not very clearly explained

# data[].attributes.body
Define the problem and discuss possible options very clearly, a lot of different options instead of settling on one using multiple to narrow the choices. Questions asked and answered very good. All actively participating in discussion.A lot of suggestions.

# data[].attributes.body
Well prepared, each person knows what they want. Respectful of other's ideas and willing to cooperate/compromise. Discusses in full detail about solutions.

# data[].attributes.body
roles are clearly stated, the group as a whole was able to pose questions to certain solutions as they could be seen as suspiciously incorrect, goes in the same order as deweys problem solving sequence, refered to the taxt as well to further support their claim, critera established, there are scenarios of invitations to those that arent talking as much, points of discussion were challenged.