# data[].attributes.body
1. Wind Energy
2. Its used out west in the open areas.
3. I think it can be used out here because we have a higher elevation then some places. This is good because we can get more wind power in a higher elevation.
4. The negatives are it doesn't produce a lot of energy.
5. Wind energy doesn't let out green house gases that hurts the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Biomass energy
2.used to power vehicles
3.Yes
4.Expensive
5.Reduces need for fossil fuels

# data[].attributes.body
1. Wind Energy
2.  Wind energy is used all around the world, but mostly on farms with lots of land.
3. Yes
4. Could harm birds.
5.  doesn't require any fossil fuels

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar Energy
2. Solar energy is used in Italy, Spain, & California.
3. Nc should continue to incentivize growth in solar energy by setting a goal of obtaining 20 percent of its electricity from solar power by 2030.
4. Negatives to Solar Energy would be cost, weather dependency, expensive, it uses lots of space, it is associated with pollution.
5. Solar Energy creates clean, renewable power from the sun and benefits the enviroment.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Solar Energy
2.Can be found all over the world.
3.It can be used here and is used here. It is very effective here because it is normally sunny and clear here. But it is very expensive due to the way they are made.
4.If you don't have lots of them they will not make enough energy to power things properly.
5.If we switched from fossil to solar we could reverse the pollution we have made, and make the world helther over time.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Wind Energy
2. Pretty much everywhere.
3. The cost could be a problem, but it could work.
4. Yes, some days we might not have any wind, therefore no power.
5. Using just wind energy could save a lot of power and not pollute the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
1.solar
2.everywhere
3.yes
4.yes it could be exspensive.
5.It could cause less pollution.

# data[].attributes.body
1.solar energy
2.solar energy is mostly used all over the world.
3.To buy a solar energy it cost about 15,000 to 30,000. its afordable if your not cheep.
4. It cost a lot to get
5.it can be put on roofs of house's and not be in the way.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar Energy
2. Everywhere, mostly in the places where the most wind comes through for better efficiency.
3. Yes,  but the cost would be a problem.
4. Yes, once again the cost would be an issue and where we live is not known to be the windiest place.
5. It would save energy and help the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar Energy

2. Everywhere around the world

3. Yes

4. Very expensive to buy and install panels and takes up alot of land

5. It can improve the environment by causing people to use less of fossil fuels

# data[].attributes.body
1. Tidal Power
2. La Rance, France and Sihwa Lake, South Korea
3. It would not be an alternative resource because of the cost and our location.
4. Tidal Power can disturb water movement, which can disrupt the life cycle of certain marine species.
5. This resource produces no green house gases and is renewable.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Wind energy
2. Mostly found in farm areas with lots of land.
3. Yes
4. Can kill bats and other  flying animals.
5. uses less fossil fuels

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Wind Energy
2. Used on farms so they can obtain energy for the farm.
3. It depends where you live and if you live in an windy area then is good but if not there is no point in getting it.
4. A negative affect is the fact that you need to have a constant flow of wind and it also kills birds.
5. It reduces the amount of non-renewable resources being used.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar energy
2. Russia, Germany.
3.Yes
4.No negative affects
5. It can be used to power houses.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar energy
2. On a backroad in walnut cove
3. Yes for a small town, but they are very expensive
4. Just the cost and putting them up because they are easy to break.
5. Keep pollution out of the air and water

# data[].attributes.body
1. Tidal Power
2. Tidal power is mainly used near lakes and bays. Countries that use tidal power include France, South Korea, and the United Kingdom.
3. No, due to our location.
4. The two negatives of tidal power is its cost and its location near water bodies inland.
5. Tidal power does not emit any harmful gases and substances into the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Wind Energy
2. the united states
3. no
4.kills bats/ birds
5.it could be used for power instead of using coal

# data[].attributes.body
2.America
3.

# data[].attributes.body
1.) Wind Energy
2.) This energy source is mainly found on farms
3.) Yes, we have access to wind energy where we live
4.) One negative affect is that there is not wind all of the time
5.) By using renewable resources

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar energy
2. Germany, Italy, China and USA plus other places
3. Yes
4. Solar panels take up a lot of space, there is lots of water use and some toxic chemicals
5. It reduces water pollution, can improve public health and river ecosystems

# data[].attributes.body
1.Wind energy
2.South America
3.No
4. kills bats/birds
5.Less fossil fuels

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar energy
2. they use it in Germany, Italy, and china
3. solar energy can be expensive but solar panels can be bought pretty easy
4. it uses up a lot of land and can cause habitat loss to some wildlife
5. it would create less air pollution.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar Energy
2. Solar energy is being used in various countries around the world like Germany.
3. Solar Energy can be expensive but solar panels can be purchased easily.
4. Cost is one of the main negatives of solar energy.
5. Solar energy creates clean renewable energy and do not have negative impacts on air quality.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Hydro (water) power
2. Some Countries in Africa and then we one in California. Also Canada has a few.
3.Yes it is because have a lot of rivers and lakes we could use. It would end up saving us money and environment in the long run .
4. It would make us have to take a bit of or rivers but if we regulate everything it would come out nicely.
5.It would keep our lakes from being heated by duke power and keep us from have a problem with toxic waste.

# data[].attributes.body
1. wind energy
2. some of the places where it is used is France, Canada, United kingdom, Spain, and India.
3. its the worlds most fastest growing energy source but it costs about $40,000 for the equipment.
4. it kills birds
5. can be used forever and we can stop a good amount of pollution by using it

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar Energy
2. Solar Energy is starting to be used almost everywhere now, but Germany has the most installed out of any country in the world.
3. Solar Panels are pretty expensive where we live, but it is a particle energy source. It ranges from about $100- $4000. You can buy them at stores like Home Depot, Tractor supply company, and FactoryPure.
4. The cost is one of the bad things about it because they can get to be pretty expensive. Also the weather because after all it runs off of the sun. If there are any trees or anything throwing shadows over the panels it also makes them less effective. Maintenance for them can also be pretty tiring.
5. It improves the environment because it's running off of solar energy which is a renewable resource.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Wind power
2. Denmark has a huge amount of wind turbines
3. No, not enough money or wind.
4. Kills birds and bats.
5. Wind is always blowing

# data[].attributes.body
1.Bio Mass
2. Around in South America
3. Bio Mass cost $3,000 to $4,000 kW
4.No
5. Give us more and more energy in our country

# data[].attributes.body
1.Wind Power
2.Windmill Farm
3.Yes because it is almost free and renewable
4.No
5.No harmful chemicals and can be used forever.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Wind energy is used in old Holland and farms in the United States.
2) It costs $1.3 million to  $2.2 million for a utility wind turbine. It is also renewable.
3)There are no negatives to this.
4) It won’t produce harmful chemicals that will harm our environment and we can use it for a long time, forever basically

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar energy
2.There is actually a solar farm in Walnut Cove  on Fowler road.
3. I think it is because there are good fields to get sun rays.
4. The negatives are it isn t that effecient at the moment and is very costly.
five. It is renewable and doesnt harm the envioronment with any chemicals.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Wind Power
2. farms in the united states
3. wind energy isn't really practical for walnut cove because it's $1.3-$2.2 million
4. a threat to wildlife (birds)
5. does not cause pollution, and can reduce the amount of electricity generation from fossil fuels

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar Energy
2. Many other countries.
3. It's expensive but we can rely on it
4. The sun is not always out.
5. No harmful chemicals, and no waste.

# data[].attributes.body
1.) solar energy
2.) States located in the middle of the US
3.)We could use it but it coast a lot
4.)It depends on the sun and its not always out. Also its expensive
5.)Not harmful to the environment so its more efficient

# data[].attributes.body
1.) An alternative energy source is hydropower.
2.) Hydropower is used in Canada, Brazil,  parts of the United States, and the biggest hydropower producer is China.
3.) Yes, when  the fossil fuels run out hydropower will be a great source of energy to turn to.
4.)Some negatives are that it is expensive, it could cause droughts, and here are limited reservoirs.

# data[].attributes.body
1.alternative energy source is solar energy
2.used in many countries
3. It's kinda expensive but accessible
4.the sun is not always out and it is expensive
5. It's clean, there is no waste

# data[].attributes.body
1. solar energy
2. bunch of countries
3. yes, but mostly only provides enough for your home.
4. the sun is not out all the time.
5. no harmful chemicals

# data[].attributes.body
1.Hydropower
2.China is the largest producer of Hydroelectricity. It is also found in Canada, Brazil and the US
3.I think its a practical alternative because Duke energy has one of the largest Hydroelectric plant.
4. Could damage the water, change the water flow, could affect fish and their home. It could also be very expensive. And a possibility of a drought.
5.It could improve the environment by not polluting the water.

# data[].attributes.body
1) An alternate energy source is geothermal energy.
2) The largest group of geothermal power plants is found at The Geysers in California.
3) The cost to make the energy plant costs between $3000-5000 for a single small plant but we might not be able to use it because of our land.
4) Yes, geothermal energy is clean and can improve the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
This alternative energy source is wind energy. This is used mostly in farms in the United States. This is practical because it uses the wind to create energy. But, there is a problem if the wind isn't blowing. This could improve the environment by using our natural renewable resources. Also, this would save energy all around.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Solar Energy
2. Midwest US
3. Yes, but it is a little expensive
4. Sun isn't out all the time, inefficient
5. No emissions,  no waste

# data[].attributes.body
1) Solar energy is now used in many countries around the world.
2) Solar panel cost will range from $11,380 to $14,990. It is  pretty easy to access within our area.
3) Negatives to Solar Energy are they take up lots of space, it is expensive to store them, it is associated with pollution, and it is weather dependent.
4) It can improve the environment by creating clean, renewable power and it reduces greenhouse gases.

# data[].attributes.body
Reseach the web and find an alternative energy source that could be used in our area. Answer the following questions:

1. What is the alternative energy source?
2. Where is it used now?
3. Is it a practical alternative energy source for our area? (cost wise and access?)
4. Are there any negatives to this alternative energy?
5. How could this alternative energy soucre improve the environment?