# data[].attributes.body
and Mexican land reforms differ more than they are similar.
*Good thesis.*

Doc 4: The Mexican constitution (Doc 4) states that land shall not be taken from citizens without fair compensation. This is stated because the tyranny inflicted by monarchy wanted to be avoided. This shows how the Mexican reforms were much more generous to the wealthy. *Good analysis. Make sure to connect back to your thesis.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Great job! Just make sure that it is clear that your thesis is in the same paragraph as the Contexualization.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Good job*

# data[].attributes.body
*Thesis - You must state that you are discussing the Mexican and Russian Revolutions. You must have a "therefore y" statement.*
*Context - While the Enlightenment these Revolutions, they were much later so I would add more to prove your point.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Good contextualization. (BTW Lenin took power before Stalin.)*

# data[].attributes.body
*Contextualization must be what was happening at the time or what led to it.*

# data[].attributes.body
How tough are you? *relatively tough*

*In both countries, land was owned by powerful land owners.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Good X, A, B, therefore Y.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Make sure your contextualization includes specific facts. Your thesis needs to introduce all three groups of documents and take a stance. To do that, you have to follow the X, A, B therefore Y format.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Good analysis! Just add “this shows that...” to connect to your thesis.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Great thesis*

# data[].attributes.body
*Good contextualization.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Add a little more to Carranza to show he didn’t want to lose his land. Also add “this shows that...” to both to connect them to your thesis.*

# data[].attributes.body
Wii Channel 2.1

*Add more specifics to your contextualization. Make sure your last sentence of your thesis states the extent the revolutions differed.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Nice job. Just add “therefore...” to the end of your thesis.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Doc 10 is good. Doc 7 needs “this shows that...”*

# data[].attributes.body
*Thesis is good. You need more specifics in your contextualization.*

In both Mexico and Russia economics were booming and land was neeeded. This is were peasants land was re-evaluated by the government. Mexico and Russia lost land, but russia turned them into collective farms and mexico turned into land redistribution. People in Mexico that didn’t own land should lose land and Russia, peasants will lose land from people working people. Therefore, they both lost land but in different ways.

# data[].attributes.body
*Good so far. Add “therefore y” to your thesis.*

# data[].attributes.body
*Good thesis. Add more to your contextualization.*

# data[].attributes.body
Contextualizarion: Due to the writings of Karl Marx and and the enlightenment based revolutions happening the Mexican and Russian people’s eere inspired to decrease the large wealth gap in their nations.
*State what Karl Marx advocated in his writings.*

Thesis: Although land was lost by the wealthy in both reforms, the use of land acquired and the methods to gain that land varied greatly Therefore, the Russian and Mexican land reforms differ more than they are similar.
*Good thesis.*

Doc 4: The Mexican constitution (Doc 4) states that land shall not be taken from citizens without fair compensation. This is stated because the tyranny inflicted by monarchy wanted to be avoided. This shows how the Mexican reforms were much more generous to the wealthy. *Good analysis. Make sure to connect back to your thesis.*