# data[].attributes.body
CONTRAST, COMPARE. SUMMARIZE THE MAIN DEVICES AND REACH A SUPER FINAL INTERPRETATION USING YOUR MINI INTERPRETATIONS.

# data[].attributes.body
3RD DEVICE IN TEXT 2. COMPARE-CONTRAST- COMPARE. INTERPRETATION WITH TS.

# data[].attributes.body
EXPLORE/ EVALUATE 3RD DEVICE IN TEXT 1. MINI INTERPRETATION WITH TS.

# data[].attributes.body
DEVICE 2 IN TEXT 2. COMPARE AND CONTRAST AND COMPARE. MINI INTERPRETATION.

# data[].attributes.body
DO THE SAME AS BEFORE WITHOUT SUMMARIZING PLOT. EXPLORE DEVICE 2 IN TEXT 1. MINI INTERPREATION WITH TS.

# data[].attributes.body
MINI INTERPRETATION

WHILE TEXT 1, TEXT 2...COMPARE IN CONNECTION TO TS.

# data[].attributes.body
CONTRAST WITH USE OF TECNIQUE IN TEXT 1 IN CONNECTION TO THEME. THEN FIND SIMILARITY IN CONNECTION TO THESIS STATEMENT.

# data[].attributes.body
EXPLORE THE SECOND PROTAGONIST. SUMMARY OF THE PLOT OF TEXT2. EXPLORE THE SAME TECNIQUE IN TEXT 2.

# data[].attributes.body
MINI INTERPREATION OF 1ST TECHNIQUE IN CONNECTION TO THESIS STATEMENT.

# data[].attributes.body
EXPLORE (ANALYZE/EVALUATE EFFECT) 1ST TECHNIQUE IN TEXT 1. ALWAYS IN CONNECTION TO THESIS STATEMENT.

# data[].attributes.body
SOMETHING IN COMMON. USE THE PROTAGONIST TO SUMMARIZE THE PLOT OF TEXT 1.

# data[].attributes.body
HOW BOTH AUTHORS EXPLORE THE TOPIC: WHAT THEY HAVE IN COMMON: WHAT IS THE COMMON MESSAGE? CREATE THESIS STATEMENT.

# data[].attributes.body
USE ALTHOUGH TO COMPARE HOW BOTH TEXTS USE DEVICES TO EXPLORE THE TOPIC OF THE QUESTION

# data[].attributes.body
AUTHORS, TIMES, CATEGORIZATION

# data[].attributes.body
A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TOPIC OF THE EXAM QUESTION