# data[].attributes.body
This Padlet is made up of my own process through 3 articles. You can see my actions by using the teacher's comments or by using websites that help improve my writing skills. In addition, I also put pictures of my drafting task 1, 2 and 3 to make any reader accessible and understandable. Moreover, the reflection of my group discussion about each person article is also out in here. You can see nearly "Stance" topic that I have learnt to know the author opinion. Finally, I link many picture that I have done and it effect to my writing improvement.

# data[].attributes.body
Q1: What is writer's stance ?
A1: I do not know the word 'stance'.
After search google : "Stance" literally refers to where you stand - your position, argument or thesis. In reviewing other work, you need to make it clear to the reader if your attitude is positive or negative. Often this decision is influenced by your ‘perspective’ (Copied from : http://www4.caes.hku.hk/acadgrammar/litrev/section2/part3.htm )

Q2 : How can you see it ?
A2 : It can be found form the author notice bias, notice personal opinions

# data[].attributes.headline
The reflection after discuss about articles 

# data[].attributes.subject
The reflection after discuss about articles 

# data[].attributes.body
Q1 : Did I talk about all 3 articles ?
A1 : It has similarity for all of 3 articles, so I talked to all of them covered by the 1 topic.

Q2 : What have I learnt ?
A2 : I have learnt about Business Model that important to create before start your own business.

Q3 : How have I learnt it ?
A3 : I think I already knew the business model since I read the first article, but I did more understanding when I finished to read article 2 and 3.

Q4 : Did talking about them help ? (Discuss with another classmate )
A4 : I found that some of classmate articles same with me, and most of them also relate with my major. So, it must give me many benefit if I read before start a major course.

# data[].attributes.body
Task 1 Strengths:
- There is a structure and appropriate academic style within your summary with evaluation.
- Use of citations and the language is mostly formal.

Task 2 Strengths:
- There has been an attempt to link both articles and use some synthesising language.

- Excellent referencing and use of integral/non-integral citations.

Task 1 Areas to improve:
- There are some grammatical errors (missing verbs, wrong tense) and missing words from sentences.

Please review these before submitting next time.

- I would like to see more evaluative comments throughout your writing using adjectives and adverbs (check Lesson 2.1 in the RW booklet on criticality).

Task 2 Areas to improve:
- A more thorough summary of Teece needed - with specific details. Try to 'wave in each paragraph' - providing abstract and concrete writing.
- Some awkward phrasing/sentences used.

# data[].attributes.body
Did well + : I think in evaluation part is quite good. It is said about author, and how reliable for this source. Moreover, I always completed task instruction, and reference list is correct.

Be bad - :  I think paraphrase, and word form is always difficult to me. Also, my summarize is quite need to improve because sometimes it missed the key idea or main topic in this section.

# data[].attributes.body
http://uefap.com/writing/feature/hedge.htm : I learnt the hedging language from this site to improve my writing.

https://www.macmillandictionary.com/ : Very useful to find the meaning and synonym of the word.

http://www.just-the-word.com/ : Many collocation show in these website.

https://cpb-eu-w2.wpmucdn.com/mypad.northampton.ac.uk/dist/d/6334/files/2018/01/HarvardRefQuickGuide-update-2016-with-updated-logo-18ld18d.pdf : Document for Harvard reference guide.