# data[].attributes.body
System 2

# data[].attributes.body
We all felt that we used fast thinking more than slow thinking in this case.

# data[].attributes.body
System 2 We were deliberate and thoughtful in our analysis, measuring the pros and cons. We looked at every detail to support our ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
We were respectful of each others opinions and heard each others position but, we all had our own opinions coming into the discussion and didn't ask many questions of each other.

# data[].attributes.body
Both
Started with the advocacy and then it got more inquiry base as the discussion went on

# data[].attributes.body
We believed we were analytical but didn’t realize we were missing data

# data[].attributes.body
Inquiry as a group and as individuals.

# data[].attributes.body
We definitely game room for each others opinions even when we disagreed.

# data[].attributes.body
Individually we tried to avoid traps but still fell into them

# data[].attributes.body
System 1 initially with quick initial opinions and then went around discussing and arrived at final conclusion using System 2

# data[].attributes.body
We didn’t inquire about additional information at all. We all had our position and fell into a confirmation bias trap.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes we took steps on list pros and cons, and brought in real life examples to make a precise analysis

# data[].attributes.body
We definitively fell into traps, for example the pitch trap. We were sucked into the author's pitch, and failed to ask for more information before making our final decision.

# data[].attributes.body
We all used mostly advocacy to defend our idea but did venture a small amount into inquiry but stopped when didn't have answers.

# data[].attributes.body
We thought we had lots of justifications for why we chose don't drive, but we slightly fell into the prudence trap in the beginning.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes we believe we took steps to improve and collaborate on our assessments. We acknowledged our awareness of other decision making traps but didn’t realize we the one we fell into.

# data[].attributes.headline
Estimating and forecasting, confirming evidence trap 

# data[].attributes.subject
Estimating and forecasting, confirming evidence trap 

# data[].attributes.body
Most of us team came in with a pre-made decision about whether to race or not, and we tended to focus on the data points from the case that support our already decided stances.

# data[].attributes.body
As mentioned before, the most obvious was confirmation bias and secondary may have been anchoring bias. We assumed we had all the information and focused on the data that supported our position.

# data[].attributes.body
Out team mate identified the hidden trap of not having data at the temperatures the engine doesn't fail. Eventually since our team didn't ask for the other data and went with the data given it was a trap we fell into.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe we did because we were being collaborative, listened to each team member's reasoning, we were open minded with each other's logic, and we ended up making a rational decision that we all agreed with.