# data[].attributes.body
What is good:

-Simple colours. There are only 3 colours, so It'e easy to read

-the aim and conclusion are in separate place, on yellow background.

-there are only 2 graphs so we are not confused

-the main graph is located in central

-overall poster look clean

What to improve:

-reduce amount of graphic. In my opinion there are too much blood cells pictures as well as bird pictures.

# data[].attributes.body
-        Texts is too small

-        Conclusion are hidden

-        The background and text are not contrasted enough

-        In the results the graphs on the right side are gunch together and hard to notice

-        The photo takes a lot of space

-        Conclusion are short and clear to understand, remember

-        Structure is ok

# data[].attributes.body
1. PEC_2017:

Disadvantages:
Too much text, idea are not clear from first look, complicated for the poster. Advantages: Complete and well-structured

Advantages:

Connection of graphs and colors are very good

2. ESEB_2019:
Advantages: Graphs are nice, colors are more comfortable. Structure is more understandable. You from the beginning understand what the species what what the job were done.
Disadvantages: comparing with the first one- less info (+-) No conclusion.

3. All eggs are equal:
Disadvantages: Like a draft. No clear structure. The color and adjustment of the text is fully disgusting. You don’t see any sense after such a design. Eggs? What’s going on with the eggs?

Advantages: Statistical grafts are not bad, if you read the text- sentences are ok.

4. 2014_IGLU:
Disadvantages:  Looks like a flyer, not well structured, non informative graphics, space is wasted.
Advantages: Colors are nice and picture is really good.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Good choice of colours
2. Simple structure, but  the graph titles shouldn't be vertical and that long
3. Take home message is ok,

# data[].attributes.body
-        Its needs more colour – too sad

-        Conclusions are hard to spot.

-        Good text – background balance

-        Text is big and easy to read.

-        There are too many graphs.

-        The home message is well constructed.

-        The birds in the middle are eye-catting.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Too much of everything
2. Good pictures, but they are too small
3. Take-home message is not obvious
4. Too many tables

# data[].attributes.body
-        Very good structure, easy to read and fallow

-        Text – white space balance is good

-        In results box the text extend from it

-        Take home message is clear

-        Poster text is big enough

-        Poster has good colours

# data[].attributes.body
1. Good choice of colors; good contrast
2. Not too much text (but one is out of borders)
3. The structure creates an opportunity to quickly go thought the experiment (simple)
4. The take-home message is clear

# data[].attributes.headline
Poster_Plastic governance through knowledge co-creation - room 1

# data[].attributes.subject
Poster_Plastic governance through knowledge co-creation - room 1

# data[].attributes.body
-        Its too much text

-        Text is too small

-        Some photos and graphs are hard to read -are too small

-        Take home message is too long

-        The structure is good

-        Its not colourful enough – easy to miss, but well contrast

-        Graph with circular economy is well done

# data[].attributes.body
1. All that we should know is in the poster;
2. Good graphical presentation of the problem;
3. The colours are not pleasing or eye-catching
4. The take-home message is clear

# data[].attributes.body
Total 4 rooms. Each room will be assigned 4 posters. Provide key elements for each poster. Try to answer the following questions:
-What do you like about this poster?
-What would you improve?
-Is it aesthetically pleasing? (Colours)
-is there a good contrast? is it visible? eye-catching?
-how much white space? Is the font size big enough? is the text clear?
-Is the take-home message clear?
-What about the structure?

Collect key points (1,2,3...) in the padlet from your discussion room for each poster (I suggest to create a different post for each poster)

# data[].attributes.body
Posters to discuss:
1. 2014_IGU_final
2. All eggs are equal_ESEB
3. ESEB 2019-3
4. PEC_2017_ML_v5

# data[].attributes.body
Posters to discuss:
1. Poster_Plastic governance through knowledge co-creation and brokerage_MGJAK_final
2. poster3_PEC_Zagkle
3. starling_dzialo_2
4. sun3

# data[].attributes.body
Posters to discuss:
1. PEC_2018_v7
2. PEC20170923_final
3. PLAZIO_E-posterEuphydryasaurinia3
4. Poster Forest at risk A0_final

# data[].attributes.body
Posters to discuss:
1. poster 4
2. Poster mapowanie ES_MDB_PRINT_extracolors
3. posterTourszf
4. starlingPEC2019_dzialo_1