# data[].attributes.body
Your response

# data[].attributes.body
Your response

# data[].attributes.body
All 3 introductions have clear background informations on the context of the questions, giving the reader an overview.
The argument/stand of the author are also clearly stated in the last few sentences.
Both sides of arguments given (balance): all 3 introductions also demonstrated how technology has improved/ impacted (negatively/positvely) people's lives/skills.

# data[].attributes.body
All of the three examples have shown how technology has helped enhance our quality of life. Despite showing it in three different scenarios of how tech has helped improve our lives, the gist of the three intros shows the improvements made to the human life due to the presence of tech.
Also, all three intros have presented their stands and arguments for the various questions.

# data[].attributes.body
haziqah

there is a stand in every sample

# data[].attributes.body
All 3 of the Introductions provide examples of the points that can be used

Additionally, all 3 provides the author's stand at the end of each paragraph

# data[].attributes.body
simi: stand,rebut and e.g
diff:sample A starts with a definition, sample B starts with a quote and sample C starts with background info.
sample B and C use extreme words like only and completely.
sample A and B provides various e.g of modern tech and heath tech but sample C gives a very specific e.g which narrow down the category of tech.

# data[].attributes.body
All three of the essays provided a background information with reference to context before making their stand

# data[].attributes.body
Jeremiah

All three introductions begin with the anti-thesis of the writer's stand and then transition smoothly into his/her thesis which supports his/her stand. For example if the writer's stand is to disagree to the statement of the question, he/she would begin by exploring the possibility of the validity of the statement in the question and then proceed to challenge it. This was the case for the first two introductions.

For the last introduction the writer's stand was to agree with the statement in the question. Although he is not disagreeing like in the previous two introductions the argument of his structure is exactly the same. He explores the anti-thesis of his stand and then proceeds to challenge it with his thesis. Specifically here, he starts by exploring the invalidity of the question's statement which he agrees with and then proceeds to validate it using breaks such as '' while some. May argue'' and' 'I believe overall that.... Has indeed' '

# data[].attributes.body
every intro sample has shown the impact of technology

# data[].attributes.body
All 3 introductions start off by introducing technology in a good light, giving an overview with many benefits to technology. Furthermore, all the paragraphs show balance in terms of the alternate view points.

# data[].attributes.body
hillary

all 3 samples provide background information on technology

# data[].attributes.body
While all 3 introductions have an overview, balanced argument and stand, Sample B has quoted a famous computer scientist's view, further supporting that technology has brought upon benefits to the health of people

# data[].attributes.body
there is an opposing view against technology in every

# data[].attributes.body
Sample A and C have not included an example to back their viewpoints, while Sample B has done so.

# data[].attributes.body
A brings opposite point
B set condition and context
C brings opposite stand but still agree to the question

# data[].attributes.body
All 3 arguments are valid and relevant to their questions. All also did mentioned both these and anti-thesis, making it balanced.

# data[].attributes.body
The way these 3 start off in their Introduction differs (Different Hook styles)

# data[].attributes.body
Every intro is short enough and adequately addresses the stand, points, and background info

# data[].attributes.body
Sample B has a quote that grabs the attention of the reader

# data[].attributes.body
sample b has a different hook approach

# data[].attributes.body
All 3 paragraphs make use of an opener to their intro (statement/quote)

All 3 para state the impact/current situation of technology in today's context.

All 3 have a balanced stand mentioned in them.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample B started with a quote from the professionist first while sample A and C started with the background information.
Not all essay agree with the question

# data[].attributes.body
Different kinds of hooks. Different ways to attract the marker's attention

# data[].attributes.body
Sample B has an interesting way to start the intro by quoting from a known computer scientist.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample C has a very clear stand