# data[].attributes.body
Our own conceptual categories most involve cultural traditions that have created boundaries, greatly correlated with morals. Certain animals are not eaten due to cultural differences, yet over time, this has evolved into creating a moral boundary when it comes to eating domesticated animals like dogs or cats; or even animals not typically eaten. We can eat chickens without typically having our morals questioned. Although, if someone were to eat cat, a response to that would be more than, 'that's gross,' but more like, 'you're a disgusting monster."

# data[].attributes.body
Pets vs livestock animals, some are eaten and some are not
Adults vs children, we interact with each differently based on how we perceive their age. Even when that age is very close, i.e. high school students are treated differently than college students
Acceptable crimes vs unacceptable ones, we're fine with traffic violations and minor drug and alcohol offenses but other crimes are totally unacceptable.

# data[].attributes.body
different societies have rules/moral/boundaries that people conform to--those who don't are looked down upon or seen as odd. For example, in the US, dogs and cats are categorized at pets and if someone were to eat them that would be looked down upon

# data[].attributes.body
modern scientific approach to eating different animals
we may think that we eat certain foods bc the are unclean, but a lot of it is cultural

# data[].attributes.body
To us, these conceptual categories boundaries and categorized we place things into as a culture (i.e. which animals we eat). Although it may not seem like it, these may be shaped by early religions events or readings, like the one we are analyzing, that have been carried down through generations. These may also be shaped by certain times indicated in the religious readings (i.e. the eating of fish on Fridays during Lent)

# data[].attributes.body
Creeping, crawling, and swarming are all considered unclean movements. This is because it is an intermediate form of movement, that does not neatly fall into other categories, such as walking or swimming.

# data[].attributes.body
Animals have a "standard" way of moving for their environment. If the animal deviates from that, or blurs the lines of what is "appropriate" for its environment, it is not a "pure/separate" creature and should not be eaten

# data[].attributes.body
Towards the end, she strongly agrees with the symbolism of these animals being an issue, not hygiene

# data[].attributes.body
He was a medieval doctor of medicine and saw dietary rules as physiological but the author says the medical approach to the symbolism is incorrect

# data[].attributes.body
Holiness is rooted in setting aside, and it can be contrasted with abomination. Douglas uses holiness as a key concept because it gives an opposite side to abomination. Holiness can also be seen in physical terms relating to what not to eat, which helps give it some definition.

# data[].attributes.body
Pastoral vs hunting
they don't normally hunt, so you can impose rules on what can be hunted

# data[].attributes.body
We can go through the same reasonings/similar reasoning as the author did to try and examine our own decisions behind our behaviors

# data[].attributes.body
She referenced how he talked about the books being about sanitary reasons, but she seemed to agree with a more ethical interpretation about issues with deviating from anything not of the perfect man

# data[].attributes.headline
Perfect man is issue, not the medical reasons behind why you should not due what you do.

# data[].attributes.subject
Perfect man is issue, not the medical reasons behind why you should not due what you do.

# data[].attributes.headline
Animals- what you should eat and shouln't eat

# data[].attributes.subject
Animals- what you should eat and shouln't eat