# data[].attributes.headline
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.subject
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.headline
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.subject
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.headline
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.subject
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.headline
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.subject
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.headline
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.subject
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.headline
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.subject
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.headline
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.subject
Evaluate: Based on evidence, how well did the author support his claim?

# data[].attributes.headline
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.subject
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.headline
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.subject
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.headline
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.subject
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.headline
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.subject
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.headline
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.subject
Reflect & React: Do you agree with this author's claim? Why or Why not?

# data[].attributes.headline
Mahmudou, Divine, Derick, Dayiiah, and Adrian 

# data[].attributes.subject
Mahmudou, Divine, Derick, Dayiiah, and Adrian 

# data[].attributes.body
Group 6

# data[].attributes.body
Group 1

# data[].attributes.body
The authors claim states that, Jibo is a danger to children’s health. -Kaylie

# data[].attributes.body
The authors claim of Sofia is that Sofia is good for the world

# data[].attributes.body
The authors claim is that Jibo, and these social robots isn’t good for children.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors claim is Medi the robot can helps children feel less scared of the hospital by singing dancing and so much more

# data[].attributes.body
The author’s claim is that they want to benefit the food industry by including robots and how every food industry can be affected by this change.

# data[].attributes.body
“MEDi, the little blue and white robot, has an important job: to distract children and make them more comfortable while they are in the hospital. He helps manage their fears of all the things that make them anxious like prickly needles, endless hallways and mysterious medical equipment.”

# data[].attributes.body
For example, “In one study, 8-year-old boy concluded that the robot stopped talking to him because the robot liked his brothers better.”

# data[].attributes.body
“Dr. Patricia Rowe-King is the pediatric program coordinator at the hospital, and says that MEDi takes on many roles with the kids such as companion and pain coach. He is also a teacher, and tells them what to expect when they are having blood drawn or a cast removed.”

# data[].attributes.body
Tommy thinks the hospital is not so scary now, thanks to his robot friend.”

# data[].attributes.body
Tommy thinks the hospital is not so scary now, thanks to his robot friend.”

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses description to support his evidence and also, how they expand that evidence by explaining the way Jibo is not a friend to children. The author shows Jibo as more as a negative effect on children.

# data[].attributes.headline
Next Steps: Please make sure you look at your quotes and come to an agreement if whether or not you agree with this author

# data[].attributes.subject
Next Steps: Please make sure you look at your quotes and come to an agreement if whether or not you agree with this author

# data[].attributes.body
“Their relationships with the robots affected their self-esteem.
In one study, an 8-year-old boy concluded that the robot stopped talking to him because the robot liked his brothers better. “ -Shantell

# data[].attributes.body
This shows that Jibo isn’t good for kids because social robots may lower kids self-esteem and make children feel bad about themselves because kids are naive.

# data[].attributes.headline
Make sure you include a 2nd piece of evidence

# data[].attributes.subject
Make sure you include a 2nd piece of evidence

# data[].attributes.body
Claim - The author states that MEDi is beneficial to kids in the hospital because he can help kids go through emotional phases, and help them become less wary of the hospital.

Evidence- The author supports this claim by describing a cild’s interaction with MEDi. He states, “Tommy thinks the hospital is not so scary now, thanks to his robot friend. “MEDi took the fear of being here away,” his mom says. “There were a lot of dark days for a while. We didn’t think he’d ever get out of the hospital." She says that Tommy is doing well now.”

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence: “we automate those repetitive task so that we can spend more money on higher quality ingredients”
Evidence: “Zume is trying to shorten delivery times as well”

# data[].attributes.body
For example “AI is expected to make huge changes to health care and education. It will certainly help areas where there are not enough doctors and teachers. Sophia also explained the old will have more caregivers and children with autism will have more patient teachers.”

# data[].attributes.body
Explanation - This quote shows that MEDi is beneficial to kids in the hospital because MEDi, in this example, helped a kid go through a scary process and help a kid. Without MEDi, experts claim that the child would have been more stressed out.

Evidence -

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the evidence we have , we believe that the author did a good job on publishing the text . I could support that by saying what Medi does and how it could help .

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the author because the robot helps the doctor and nurse around the job and it helps distract kids from doing needle procedures.

# data[].attributes.body
What are children supposed to be empathizing with, exactly? Empathy allows us to put ourselves in the place of others, to know what they are feeling. Robots, however, have no emotions to share, and they cannot put themselves in our place.

# data[].attributes.body
look at this, wouldn’t you trust this with your 4 yr kid having anxiety in a hospital? i would. (i wouldn’t but if it makes them happy whatever)

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the evidence, the author did a great job supporting and backing up their claim by giving enough evidence. Talking about how this can affect and benefit the food industry by working together, and never changing the topic and staying on track.

# data[].attributes.body
“However, robotic technology has increased fears that humans could lose control."We need to have the principles in place, we need to have the checks and balances," he told news reporters, warning that AI is still somewhat of a mystery, with a set of rules for solving problems that no one really understands.”

# data[].attributes.body
“”These robots are machines made to put children in a position of pretend empathy. It is not the way to show them what empathy is. If we give kids pretend relationships, they won't learn how real relationships — messy relationships — work. They will learn something shallow and inauthentic, but mistake it for real connection.””

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the authors claim because he provided good reasoning and connections that happened real time.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence - The author also uses another expert’s quote to describe the effectiveness of MEDi. The article says, “Dr. Patricia Rowe-King is the pediatric program coordinator at the hospital, and says that MEDi takes on many roles with the kids such as companion and pain coach. He is also a teacher, and tells them what to expect when they are having blood drawn or a cast removed.” This is supports the author’s claim that MEDi can help kids process stress and make the hospitable a more comfortable place to them.

# data[].attributes.body
The author supported his claim very well, because this show how jibo is not good for children because they cannot empathize with actual humans, they are robots, they cannot show feelings/empathy to others, no matter how much they say “they understand” robots “feelings” are never feelings

# data[].attributes.body
We agree with this author’s claim because he gave us many reasons to support his claim and how A.i can benefit and change food industry in such a good way and we can work together.

# data[].attributes.body
We agree with the author’s claim because as evidence in the article continuously shows, MEDi helps kids go through tough times at the hospital, and the author uses expert quotes, descriptions, and examples to show us that. MEDi is good.

# data[].attributes.body
The author of Jibo is not convincing, or evidential. They show only negative ways that Jibo interacts with children. They do not give evidence of children liking or approving of Jibo. The author only gives off mostly their point of view (P.O.V).

# data[].attributes.body
I agree the authors claim, because, he provided evidence into why jibo isn’t good for our children and and he also putted good reasoning that made us think that.