# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, they do not exhibit the virtue of prudence for they hurt other people online through their posts and comments. It is not right and humane to say harshful words whether it is online or offline. What they did the to man was insensitive and impolite to his feelings and beliefs. It is his right to support the candidate that he wants for the country. It doesn't mean that if they have different political views than others then we can bully them. We need to respect each other and their beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
No, what they did wasn't humane. they hurt and made fun of him just because they have different a opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
No, what they did was wrong. I felt sad seeing how they made fun of him because they have different political views. It's disappointing to see how instead of letting him support his candidate freely, they decided to not only disrespect his choices but also his appearance. I am neutral, I don't have a candidate in mind to support. I choose to listen to people and respect whomever they want to support.

# data[].attributes.body
It is evident that the commenters did not exhibit humane actions and prudence as they were insensitive towards the man. Having different political views is completely fine but bringing down other people for having them is not. They could have educated and accepted his opinion instead of giving harsh words.

# data[].attributes.body
Those who mocked the blind man because of his disability exhibited neither prudent nor ethical acts.  Despite the fact that their political opinions differed from the man's, the way they reacted was reprehensible. Political discourse is necessary, but it must be conducted without crossing lines or adopting ad hominem arguments. Regardless of their opposing viewpoints, they should have exercised caution when expressing their ideas. They all had the right to voice their political opinions, but they should have done so with caution and wisdom.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that it is fine to have different Political preference. Although it is vice to bash or to be rude, just because some people do not have the same opinion. Indeed, Bong Bong Marcos has done many wrong things in our country and I do not think he is a good candidate for a president; however it does not give me the right to ruin other people's image just because they vote and favor BBM. Thus, it is very clear that the people online were not showing prudence and were very harsh and hurtful.

# data[].attributes.body
Having other people's political views contrasting to yours should not serve as a receipt or ticket for you to bully and step on someone. Besides, political views itself are subjective by nature. Therefore, I strongly believe that the behavior of the audience upon the post of the disabled Man is incredibly inhumane. Bashing and belittling the Man is a very unforgiving response to his post upon his political views. If they were really against his presidential vote, they could've just respectfully and gently disagreed albeit straightforwardly. Stating your views and opinions on social media is alright. Even if its intention is to disagree upon something; nonetheless, you still have the right to share your side however, make sure it is in a prudent and cautious manner.

# data[].attributes.body
What they do not exemplify is the virtue of prudence. They were obnoxious and impolite. I believe that anyone can support anyone else and that we should be accepting of their choices. We should not attack someone simply because they do not share the same preferences. Even if I disagree with what he said, that does not give you the right to disrespect someone.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the people who commented did not exhibit the virtue of prudence. What they did was not humane because they expressed negative comments on the post, and the guy who posted the picture did not deserve to get those mean comments. I understand that they did not like the guy supporting BBM, but that does not mean they get to bully the guy just because he has a different political preference or view from the people who commented. Furthermore, I believe that people should be more open-minded and not immediately hate people for having a different political preference. Additionally, those people who bashed should be more prudent.

# data[].attributes.body
For me personally I think it is inhumane to end friendships over different opinions. However, there are reasonable reasons as to why people do it, some people don't respect each others opinions on their candidates and even hate on them.

There is nothing wrong in saying your opinion except when it's something that can hurt people. It's not very prudent of people to hate on one another just because they believe in something that you don't.

# data[].attributes.body
Prudence is not a virtue that they demonstrate. They were rude and aggressive, to say the least. As a human being, I think that everyone has the right to help others and that we should respect their decisions. The only time expressing one's views should be avoided is when they have the potential to harm others. It's not a good practice for people to hate on one other because they have different beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
It is clearly shown that people online weren't practicing the virtue of prudence. They were careless and insensitive about the feelings of the man. No one deserves to hear these hurtful words because one word could have an impact on the person; both mentally and emotionally. The commentors should've been cautious and respectful.

# data[].attributes.body
No, they do not exhibit the virtue of prudence. The words they used are very offensive. They should construct a proper criticism rather than bully the disabled man. We have the right to call out someone that is supporting a candidate that has some track record issues but not in that way.

# data[].attributes.body
I know Bong Bong Marcus is not really a good president but it doesn't mean if he likes BBM you get to bully him because of his disability.

# data[].attributes.body
Even though he supports a atrocious man; I in my opinion, do not think it is right and just to ridicule and mock one's disability. That is very much ableist and inhumane.

# data[].attributes.body
No, the people that commented did not exhibit the virtue of prudence. They were very careless and let their political views take charge of how they reacted to a certain person's opinion. Worst, they were making fun of that person's disability and wished him more harm. Sharing your views and opinions on social media is fine as long as you don't hurt someone. Our political views should not allow us to step or look down on people, but we should respect each other's beliefs because we are a community that wants better for the country.

# data[].attributes.body
What they did was neither humane and exhibits act of prudence. A person should have his/her own freedom of speech whether they have a disability or not. If they wanted to educate the person, they could have commented something that could justify why they thought his/her political belief was wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that those who bashed and made fun of the blind man were not prudent, and were definitely in the wrong. Although I myself don't agree with the man's beliefs, that doesn't excuse bullying someone be it in real life or in the internet. When it comes to social media, it should be okay to express ourselves as long as it is not offensive. The man had every right to show his support, and the viewers must have at least respected that. The commenters should have been more considerate, prudent, and they should've paused before they posted.

# data[].attributes.body
It was very harsh. People were very rude and close minded. It was wrong and inhumane; they should respect each other's opinion in a way that we don't discriminate disabilities.

# data[].attributes.body
No, they do not, if they have prudence in them they wouldn't insult someone just because they have different political preferences. What they did wasn't very humane because the words were very offensive to the victim.