# data[].attributes.body
By: Jesus, Tammy, Maria, Aline

# data[].attributes.body
the article is talking about the changes in 4th street how many of them are just children from immigrants and that most of the owners are location. They are changing this for a good of the economy. They've opened many new shops for more people from all over orange country to come. There has been many stops on a daily from high school students. It was a good idea to do this due to the fact that most of the businesses were drying up.

# data[].attributes.body
Before

# data[].attributes.body
After

# data[].attributes.body
Medina's report talks about how Santa Ana has been getting rid of a lot of Mexican places and replacing them with more "white" culture. She talks about stores putting up signs saying "Stop ethnic cleansing" which shows that the article is negative towards gentrification.

# data[].attributes.body
The issue of the gentrification in Santa Ana as a whole is that old businesses are closing and new businesses are opening up. It's a big melting pot for oldcomers and newcomers.

# data[].attributes.body
Medina said that those shop owners and their customers are second and third-generation Latinos, often far less interested in buying the "goods from back home" that attract more recent arrivals.

# data[].attributes.body
Medina report was published in the new York times. what do you think this says about the issue of gentrification in Santa Ana and the United States as a whole?

# data[].attributes.body
What aspect of gentrification in Santa Ana does Medina identify as being overlooked or "left unsaid?"

# data[].attributes.body
How would you describe Medina's report? Is her representation of gentrification in Santa Ana positive or negative?