# data[].attributes.body
We should pay attention to whether the vocabulary is used correctly and whether there are grammatical errors

Whether the topic is relevant to the topic and logical coherence between contexts

# data[].attributes.body
1.The content of writing.
(ideas,logic thinking,coherence,organization...)
2.The knowledge of writing
(the structures,and languge forms,vocabulary,grammar...)
3.Genre (purposes,audience...)

# data[].attributes.body
2. Content
3. Whether the topic complies with the requirement

# data[].attributes.body
1.Correct writing conventions such as correct spelling, grammar and punctuation.
2.The accuracy and appropriateness of the words using.
3.The authors set out their arguments clearly and fluently.
4.Use a clear logical structure in text.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Content of writing
2. Word choices and grammar
3. Structure of writing
4. Coherence and logic

# data[].attributes.body
Text structure, format, topic sentences, grammar mistakes, logic and coherence are recommended to evaluate by using the checklist or assessment criteria.

# data[].attributes.body
1，whether it is closely connected with topics.
2, the clear structure
3, coherence.
4, grammar mistakes.
5, clear thesis statement
6, appropriate phrases
7, whether the structure fit the the requirment of specific genre.
8, the creativity of the idea.

# data[].attributes.body
1.the content of writing
2.selection of materials
3.the form of vocabulary and the sentence structure,make sure the accurate use of the words
4.the structure of the whole paper
5.logical thinking and analytical skills

# data[].attributes.body
-Remember what is the level of the student
- look for idea of writing is clear/good enough
-spellings, grammar, punctuation, vocabulary,  fluency, structure
- time take to finish the task

# data[].attributes.body
1.Be related to the required topic
2.The logic of this writing
3.Proper use of linguistics

# data[].attributes.body
1. Whether the purpose of the writing is achieved.
2. Whether the whole structure fits the genre requirements.
3. Whether the content cover the aspects needed.
4. Whether enough supporting information is provided
5. Whether the language use is appropriate.
6. Whether the coherence  of the writing is logic.

# data[].attributes.headline
what aspects shall we focus on while evaluating the writing?

# data[].attributes.subject
what aspects shall we focus on while evaluating the writing?

# data[].attributes.body
1. creative and critical thinking
2. cohesion and coherence
3. language style
4. the correct use of language

# data[].attributes.body
1. Task response ( whether the writer has fully understand the writing task)
2. Cognitive skills (whether the writer has critically present his/her ideas; whether the writer has used literature wisely
3. Lexical Use
4.Organization
5.Coherence

# data[].attributes.body
the content and the language should both be focused. the students can revise either of them in one process of reviewing

# data[].attributes.body
1. Content (the topic and main idea)

2. Language (vocabulary, grammar and sentence structure)

3. Organisation (Paragraph and tranistion)

# data[].attributes.body
1.Language expression skills
2. The topic of the article
3. The structure
4. The content and materials

# data[].attributes.body
1. if the central idea is clearly stated
2. if the structure is logical
3. if any aspect needs to be added
4. sentence fluency
5. grammar accuracy
6. punctuation

# data[].attributes.body
1.

# data[].attributes.body
1.the structure of the writing
2.text cohesion
3.content
4.grammar accuracy/text accuracy
5.creative thinking

# data[].attributes.body
there are two aspects focused on evaluating the writing:first of all, it is to focused on "the whole picture" such as context, construction, logicality, cohesion, also the construction for each paragraph, if make different design(data, example proof) or progressive logicality in different paragraph. Secondly, it is to focused on "details" including grammar, vocabulary, if existing multiple sentences expression mode and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
1. the topic, to see whether it follow the initial idea
2. the structure, to see if it is logical
3. the language, grammar
4. the format

# data[].attributes.body
-content
-organization
-mechanical/grammatical accuracy
-vocabulary

# data[].attributes.body
For  evaluating the writing, the first thing is to check the main ideas and the structure, whether the writing content has expressed explicitly and properly.
Moreover, the syntax, choice  of vocabulary are also need to be evaluated.
Furthermore, the formats of the genre are also need to be considered while the evaluating process.

# data[].attributes.headline
Aspects to focus on during evaluating and writing

# data[].attributes.subject
Aspects to focus on during evaluating and writing

# data[].attributes.body
1. language skill: for instance, grammar accuracy, sentence structures, and vocabulary should be focused to ensure students get the knowledge of the language.

2. content: whether the contents are valuable and related closely to the topic is an aspect to look at.

3. high-order thinking skills, for examples, creative and critical thinking, the thinking ability is also important for writers. The value of the thinking can also be the bonus for a paper.

# data[].attributes.headline
writings can be evaluated on Fluency, Content, Conventions, Syntax, and Vocabulary. Writings should also be accessed across the purposes for writing to provide evaluation of one's writing performance across different text structures and genres.

# data[].attributes.subject
writings can be evaluated on Fluency, Content, Conventions, Syntax, and Vocabulary. Writings should also be accessed across the purposes for writing to provide evaluation of one's writing performance across different text structures and genres.

# data[].attributes.body
First and foremost, whether the acting plan has been executed is in need to be evaluated. That is, if the plan, does not matter how many times been revised, has been strictly followed to ensure the flow of the article. Then, to my own opinion anyway, the syntactic complexity and number of advanced lexicons (the ones from the product approach) need to  be judged for. Otherwise, any article would be a fish without water. Last but not least, the depth of ideas presented need also be valued, as idea collection plays a significant role in the process approach.