# data[].attributes.body
1. How is your approach and or thinking about the problem different than your partners?
2. What did you learn from your revision partner?What revisions did you make to your work today and why?What do you now understand about the problem that you didn’t understand before?What are you still confused about?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.body
This was a model solution because the person walks through every step they took to arrive at their answer. They also define each detail that they felt was important to define for all to understand their work. For example, after stating their claim, they elaborated more on why they know it's a sine wave and relating that to their claim.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a model solution because they accurately converted the milliseconds into how many seconds it would take and gave a good reasoning at the top.

# data[].attributes.body
I guess they could've identified the period of time in the picture. it's unclear if they are talking about the whole sound wave or just a portion. They have like a good starting point to answering the question but not going to lie I don't really fully understand how they got their answer.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that this student was partially correct because they didn't fully answer the question. The unit of frequency is in hertz (Hz), but the student never got to that part in their work. They made it about halfway, but just needed to translate (I couldn't think of the right work here lol). They also need to go more into depth about where they got their numbers from.

# data[].attributes.body
The person does provide an answer but the lack of justification/explanation for why their answer is correct could be a factor as to why its not the ideal answer.

# data[].attributes.body
This person could have explained where they got the number 4.4 why they are dividing it by 1000. Overall, this student could have explained a little bit more on how they got what numbers and what the process to get 0.0044 seconds. - Natalee

# data[].attributes.body
I think the student should have explain a bit better as in where did you get the number

# data[].attributes.body
I think that this person had a good starting but I think they should have been more specific like explain the math behind it

# data[].attributes.body
The person did not explain why they are dividing it by one thousand and they didn’t explain the process of getting 4.4 milliseconds.

# data[].attributes.body
The feedback I would give for this problem is that the math is wrong slightly and to look at it again so you can try to get the math right.

# data[].attributes.body
My approach is not much different than my partners other than the fact that they had different numbers since their wavelength was different than mine and shape of their wave and sound. I learned that I should add a sound of the copy for my presentation to make it better.The revisions I made to my work today are that I changed some of the words on my slides.

# data[].attributes.headline
Here are two exemplar responses to question #3 on the summative assessment

# data[].attributes.subject
Here are two exemplar responses to question #3 on the summative assessment

# data[].attributes.body
Please use the rubric to grade both and explain your thought process while grading. Then compare/contrast the two responses with each other below

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.body
Both examples did a good job in explaining their math.

The second example defined each part of the formula and how they found the answer to each variable in the formula. The first example said where they found their equations but didn't explain the importance of each of them. They also used the wrong formula, instead of sin they used cos in their formula.

# data[].attributes.body
The first example was a bit more general in their answer. They referred to which big ideas they used but never explained what they are. Also, I noticed it looked like they used cosine instead of sine but I'm not sure if that was purposeful. The second example explained each variable in the equation and how they got each number. It was color coded and separated out. I do notice that they are similar in that they both provided the picture of the waves and did describe how exactly they calculated it.

# data[].attributes.headline
The student can expand on their thinking by describing what it means for the wave to "return to the same spot" they can also explain why that equation helps give them the answer.

# data[].attributes.subject
The student can expand on their thinking by describing what it means for the wave to "return to the same spot" they can also explain why that equation helps give them the answer.

# data[].attributes.headline
The student has a very detailed answer and goes a good job of describing their thought process but does not talk much about the differences.

# data[].attributes.subject
The student has a very detailed answer and goes a good job of describing their thought process but does not talk much about the differences.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this person scored 3 if not 4 on their responses because they not only gave precise values and displayed it on desmos, but they also color coded their answers to make it easier to locate throughout their response. They explain various steps and specifically say what they did in order to find amplitude, phase shift, period, etc.

Response to number two is also very specific and shows how the responder justified their work.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that this is a great explanation but theirs could use some more work so in my book this is a 4.

# data[].attributes.body
Both examples look like they meet the requirement to earn a 4. Though different, each explanation goes over each part of their equation and how it affects the graph. Personally I like the second explanation because it goes in depth and separates the different parts of the equation from each other. Very organized

# data[].attributes.body
i would give a 4 since they both explained everything very well and they both meet the requirement for a 4

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get access to files anywhere through secure cloud storage and file backup for your photos, videos, files and more with Google Drive.

# data[].attributes.body
Try grading yourself!

# data[].attributes.body
Done

# data[].attributes.body
Done

# data[].attributes.body
I think that my approach is about the same as my partners and we both explain the way the waves and how the height of them changing the pitch. What I learned from my partner was how to explain the wave better and how to use the points of were the lines hit to better explain why its periodic