# data[].attributes.body
I will usually come to my own conclusion based on the original text and then just leave at that. But if I am being judged and graded by another individual who will have their own opinions, then I will naturally seek information and evidence that would give me a glimmer of hope for "success". However, as an overall statement, I am satisfied with my own analysis.

# data[].attributes.body
In literary analysis there is no "right" or "wrong". This is why looking up "answers" is dangerous.

# data[].attributes.body
I would agree with Keegan because when we are doing our Google search we usually just type in the search box what our main point is about. Then the answers would come out through the Google Search and we just write/type it down. However, we never really knew what the author of the poem/sonnet is exactly emphasising.

# data[].attributes.body
This is dissimilar because Google has a lot of information to look through. Thus, it takes a long time to look through every website and to analyse every website. As for this website, it is just focusing on this specific Sonnet. Which helps by taking less time to analyse the Sonnet and finding information.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a lot different from if I just searched it up on google. Although the process was a little more tedious and timely, the results were a lot better. I actually understood the poems and the meanings. I could then check the correct answers and paraphrases to see which ideas were wrong. It was helpful to think about it first rather then finding the answers first. '

# data[].attributes.body
that's a good point because when you google something you tend to become very narrow minded in your search

# data[].attributes.body
By reading the poem myself and then trying to work it out, and then seeing what conclusions someone else had come to, it helped me to understand where I went wrong, and what method's of understanding worked well for me. It was really helpful to take the quiz because it showed what I didn't understand, and I could then go back and try and figure out where I went wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
Agreed. The internet is a tool to fill in the gaps of our own interpretation and achieve a level of understanding that we could attain on our own.

# data[].attributes.body
This is slightly similar as to how I use google with regards to literature. I can interpret the meaning of some passages without external sources. Other times, certain things like unfamiliar vocabulary or a confusing method of narration (e.g. the narrator is hallucinating) prevents me from understanding what fundamental events occurred. I usually use the internet to clarify unfamiliar words and figure out what happened specifically. With a more clear picture in mind I am usually able to figure out the intended meaning. However, there are many cases where I still struggle to derive implied meanings of significance. It is on these occasions where my research habits are almost identical to that this activity. I look online for detailed clarifications as to what the author is saying in small chunks. After I attain this assisted general understanding I am able to dive deeper and form my own conclusions.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Alice, it defintely helped to paraphrase the text!

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with what you said about "these having enough background information and different types of analysis on the same page" versus when googling answers material being separated and hard to find all in ONE place.

# data[].attributes.body
Speaking honestly, when having google as a tool for just about anything, if I were given an assignment like this I normally wouldn't even read it but simply try and look it up and find the answers. Sometimes I find the right ones but I have no understanding of why I got it right or the context. When I went through this assignment and actually read the poem and did the quiz I found that I was able to actually get it done quickly, understand it, and actual do well on the quiz and understand the material and why the answer was what it was.

# data[].attributes.body
This is very different from what I used to do. I usually read the poem once then jump right into the analysis part.

# data[].attributes.body
This website was definitely different from my google search. These had enough background information and different types of analysis on the same page, while google has them all separately. It also had a line-by-line paraphrase, which was so much better than brief summaries that you can easily find on google.

# data[].attributes.body
In some ways, this assignment is how I use the internet to help understand literature. I come up with my own ideas and conclusions about a piece of work, I like to check online because there are many sources that are to give me a new perspective on what I am studying.
The internet enables me to consider all viewpoints, delve into differences and become more self-aware. As long as we don't plagiarize the work of others, it is tool to help us think more critically.
This assignment was helpful in that it made us come up with our own conclusions about the text (such as taking the quiz) before referencing online sources.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with chia ching because several of us do actually spend the time to find our own meaning to a reading.

# data[].attributes.body
This is dissimilar. I try to understand the literature by putting it in my own words before googling for answers.

# data[].attributes.body
This exercise was different than what I'd normally do in a Google search. Usually I will read a poem without really trying to understand it and I'll search for a summary/poem analysis if I have questions. But with today's poem, I had to analyze it first before looking at a line-by-line explanation. This allowed me to really think about the meaning of the poem and then check to see how close I was to the actual meaning explained in the commentary.

# data[].attributes.body
I think you should read paraphrase or at least try paraphrasing yourself than just jump into the analysis. And I believe you have some word you don't know that search it up.

# data[].attributes.body
Shawn, thanks for being honest

# data[].attributes.body
This was a little bit different to what I normally search. I usually do a google search and kind of get all the answers from there and not really think what we read.  This actaully will help us all be more motivated to look up questions and do several readings and compare and contrast the readings.

# data[].attributes.body
This is definitely not how I use to learn with Google because first of all I don't know how to find this kinds of website. Second of all, I am too busy to do extra work but I try to read the original work several time to understand it and if I don't I ask my friends or I just assume the meaning. I use dictionary more.

# data[].attributes.body
Google would be my last resort that I would use after a while of thinking and being stuck on a particular part of literature. If I was confident of my answers, Google would be my source of checking and correcting.
This method is quite different because it has a different order and a different way of discovering the answer.

# data[].attributes.body
Wow, Morgan! I totally agree with you. Copy and pasting is the easy way to do it, but by only using our brain, we can get the deeper meaning!

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with your method, we chose to use google in a different way depending on the assignment.

# data[].attributes.body
Agreed, commentary is helpful and useful. I like how you compare it to your own ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
This is not at all similar to just googling the answers because I actually used my brain to think before I read the paraphrase. It required me to read the poems  more than once and actually think about the meaning. It is true that googling is easier and faster, but paraphrasing on my own helps me remember the poem better.

# data[].attributes.body
Usually I try to find my own meaning of the poem/story and search it up on google to find out if anyone else made a similar argument. Then I would use their argument to refine my ideas and maybe criticize other viewpoints based of of my reasoning. It not very similar to how I use google due to the fact that I do not try to paraphrase a poem because sometimes there is more meaning that is loss when you break the structure of your poem.

# data[].attributes.body
I totally agree because that is exactly what I usually do.

# data[].attributes.body
This is different that how I use google because most places paraphrase or summarize in total instead of line by line "common" language (English now) which I think is more helpful than a complete summary because you learn the Shakespeareian English.

# data[].attributes.body
I like what you are doing, because you are thinking about it yourself, then asking classmates to discuss and get better understanding.
-Justin

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with your point of view as well because when you really don't understand something then the last resort you can go to is google

# data[].attributes.body
This is quite different than what I've used to research on. Normally, I jumped straight to the poem's analysis instead of trying to understand the paraphrased version of the poem.

# data[].attributes.body
This is dissimilar from googling, because google gives you a summary on what the poem is about, but being able to read the paraphrase of the poem line by line really helps me understand what each line is trying to say. Being able to compare the differences between what we think and what the author is actually trying to convey. But I feel like if you are trying to understand the poem as a whole then google would be a bit more useful becuae they it will give me the whole summary of the poem.

# data[].attributes.body
Th

# data[].attributes.body
Googling something for my English class is extremely helpful. Some literature can be extremely dense or abstract to the point where I don't know where to begin analyzing or I don't have confidence in my understanding of the text. I found this exercise pretty similar in that it dumbs it down for me. However, I will also say that this exercise is different in the sense that it made me think more. Taking the quiz, for example, gave me questions to ponder on as well as understanding the answers to those question.

# data[].attributes.body
This is kind of similar to what I would do. After reading the text, I would try to analyse the text and see if I can understand what it is saying without any external help. After that, I will go online then try to find sources that will help me understand the text better by correcting parts that I got wrong and see if there are any parts that I missed.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Keegan because I do that too. I also agree that doing analyses on our own is helpful.

# data[].attributes.body
I usually try to understand the idea before getting some sort of help from google. It varies in different aspect of literature. But using commentary can really help me get a better gasp of the content, and understanding it more.

# data[].attributes.body
mmm I totally understand, its crispier when no using search tools such as google.

# data[].attributes.body
This is dissimilar to how I usually use google to help me. I usually just read through the summary and understand it, but the assignment helped me see how interesting it can actually be reading the poem first and trying to understand it my self. Comparing the differences between my understanding of the poem and the actual meaning of it helped me learn more and had a deeper understandings of it.

# data[].attributes.body
It is dissimilar to our usual process because we first analyze it on our own, then we look over to see what did did not get on the first time. It is different than how we google it because with the help of google we can just type in the answer and have google tell us what it is. Through this process we would understand the whole poem instead of just the answers to the questions.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree on that this process is different and more time consuming but it is a better process.

# data[].attributes.body
I seem to have the same experience. I usually try to figure it out myself first, but in some cases I just find out how wrong I am.

# data[].attributes.body
One of my goal this year that I added was to understand poems in depth and through this process, I think it was easier for me. Not googling about the poem is hard because we often want the easier way out but when you actually use your brain to think and check it later on you feel accomplished when you realize you were right about the idea. Also, if I was wrong, I am able to learn from the analysis and questions I got wrong on.

# data[].attributes.body
WORD. Completely agree on what you said.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't normally use google to try to help me understand literature. That doesn't mean I can understand the literature myself though. Honestly I'm not sure what I do. Maybe I just read it, fail to understand it well, then be done with it. I probably do look up the name of it one google and read what it says about it, but not line by line paraphrases.

# data[].attributes.body
If other people think of things that you don't, there's a possibility that you might come up with something - an idea, perspective or interpretation- that hasn't really been expressed through summaries and commentaries too! ^_^  And I agree with Google being super helpful with character lists and concrete answers -- i think those answers are things that may even help us comprehend the text better! :D -Praisye

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on what im searching for usually, so some of these aspects are simliar and some are different. Usaually for literature I do try and read it first and come up with my own understanding and later check with a classmate  to make sure my understanding is correct.

# data[].attributes.body
Interesting example.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you Praisye, I learn better when I do things myself. Most of the time I will read other people interpenetration to see if they caught anything i missed, or if they have an entirely different perspective. - Zach

# data[].attributes.body
I agree because I also did a lot more personal thinking than I would normally do

# data[].attributes.body
i am touched and moved by how profound and observant you were on your study of this project. notice me sempai

# data[].attributes.body
I also do that often, even though authors of those analysis pages have different interpretations.

# data[].attributes.body
This is actually quite similar to how I usually use the internet to help me in my understanding with literature. I think most of the time, I will first try to interpret it and come to some type of conclusion. Then I go to check if there are other existing sources that have similar ideas to me or whether I may have misunderstood the meaning. However, in this activity, unlike how I usually work, I liked that there was more time spent in really trying to understand the meaning on your own and asking questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Even though this process is different then what I usually do, but it's in a good way. I usually tend to go straight to the answers first and try to think how they got their answers then. This new process is dissimilar for me because it's the opposite. I analyze first and then go check if my ideas and conclusions matches and also check my mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I agree that this assignment helped use our brains.

# data[].attributes.body
It different than how I normally do it. I used more of my brain, but still relied on the paraphrases for some answers. It was good that I checked what I thought it meant, to the actually meaning. Some things were similar, but there was a lot more detail and clarification when I read the paraphrases. It is easier to remember if we use our own thoughts first.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a slight difference compared to how I normally google. When I am looking for something specific, like details, I use google to find the lines and the part of the story. However, I don't usually google themes or analysis because there can be many ways to interpret one story, and the interpretation may not always be right.

# data[].attributes.body
This is different than how I normally use Google in helping me understand literature, because I usually just look up the definition of words I don't understand from the poem, but not look at paraphrases of the whole meaning. This usually still causes confusion in my understand because it is not only the diction, but also the use of language that I do not understand, and so this method is better.

# data[].attributes.body
This is somewhat similar to the process that occurs when I read literature. The main reason of looking up commentary afterwards rather than before is because I want to see how close to the commentary my ideas are/were. however, they pull out more information than i would ever be able to on my own. Commentary is helpful.

# data[].attributes.body
It really depends on what I'm trying to accomplish. If I want the answer for something, I simply ask Google for the answer. For example, a character list, the authors biography information, any possible cultural influences, and the text itself. However, if I'm trying to understand the poem directly, I'm more likely to search for commentaries, summaries, or other peoples reviews on the content. Other people always think of things that I don't, because everyone has their own perspective. This is both similar and dissimilar to what we did in class today. It's similar in that the websites we went to were things that would come up in a search result for the original text, paraphrases of the text, or study material for the text. It's dissimilar in that some of information was less specific than what a Google search might give you.

# data[].attributes.body
This is similar in the aspects of content. We are using the same content that we usually would find by googling. But this difference is, that by using this procedure, it forces us to process the information in our heads; as opposed to simply skimming over it.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with what Kiki said, I also tend to search for overall themes, rather than word for word explanations.
-Kayla

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that JON SENNER's post was very true and aplickable for me as a student learning how to anilize literature in such a way

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with what Morgan said and I do that too.

# data[].attributes.body
Good Job Morgan, It is good to hear that you are learning to use the search engine to search for academic things rather than Anime.

# data[].attributes.body
Paraphrasing is actually a good idea for summarizing important bits into a more concise manner.
-Jamie

# data[].attributes.body
i found that this was nothing like what i do understand poems. i do not use this webcite. but after going there, i found that it was the best place to help understand what i need to for class. the paraphrase helped me understand what the writer truly meant

# data[].attributes.body
It is slightly different, as I normally just search up exactly what I want rather than understanding it incrementally. Personally I know that this way is better for understanding, but I

# data[].attributes.body
This is slightly different from how I would normally search. Usually, when I google search, I look for overall themes in a piece of literature and then look at the analysis of those themes on a few different websites.

# data[].attributes.body
It's dissimilar because usually I would read someone else's interpretation of the poem after I read the poem myself. I would then compare their interpretation and see whether or not I agree with whatever they said and come to my own conclusions. It's like how people will watch reviews on movies or video games to come up with their own conclusion on certain aspects within the work.

# data[].attributes.body
This is different from using Google to directly search the answers. Normally when we look up answers or ideas in Google, we tend to not use our brain to actually think over the information, but in this activity, we were encouraged to first think for ourselves, and then deepen our understandings by reading the analysis or paraphrase. This helps us better understand the ideas instead of mindlessly copying down answers.

# data[].attributes.body
It dissimilar because when I go to google I find one main point or the thing I have to know but now trying to analyse it on my own is a lot harder to do.

# data[].attributes.body
Normally, when I use google search I copy and paste what I want to be answered into the search bar. In this case, it's looking for analysis and a deeper meaning than the answer. I'm not used to this kind of search.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a bit different than my normal Google search. I would usually just look up the direct answer onto Google without thinking or analyzing the poem/story myself. But by using the original piece of literature and trying to analyze and paraphrase it myself helped. Also, by looking at the same website's version of analysis also kept a constant idea.

# data[].attributes.body
This is dissimilar to how I usually use Google in my understanding of literature. I usually search for overall themes seen in the literature and use that(instead of literal word for word explanations) to figure out individual meanings of words or phrases, just because I haven't thought of searching for word for word explanations.