# data[].attributes.headline
chat GPT 반대 의견을 영어로 남겨주세요. 비슷한 의견은 최대한 지양하고, 새로운 관점의 의견을 남겨주세요. 화이팅입니다:)

# data[].attributes.subject
chat GPT 반대 의견을 영어로 남겨주세요. 비슷한 의견은 최대한 지양하고, 새로운 관점의 의견을 남겨주세요. 화이팅입니다:)

# data[].attributes.headline
찬성측 의견을 예측하고, 이에 대한 반박을 남겨주세요!

# data[].attributes.subject
찬성측 의견을 예측하고, 이에 대한 반박을 남겨주세요!

# data[].attributes.headline
I wonder about “does chat gpt is kind of learning”. In case, learning  means communication between learner & instructor. But using chat gpt just emphasizes searching or typing on chat gpt.

# data[].attributes.subject
I wonder about “does chat gpt is kind of learning”. In case, learning  means communication between learner & instructor. But using chat gpt just emphasizes searching or typing on chat gpt.

# data[].attributes.headline
단순히 시험에서의 부정 행위의 우려 뿐만 아니라 학생들의 사고의 확장, 지식 창출을 chatGPT라는 인공지능을 사용함으로서 원천 차단할 수 있다는 문제점이 있다. 또한 이러한 인공지능이 완벽한 가치중립성을 띄고 있다고 할 수 없기 때문에, 학생들은 이것을 사용함으로서 편향성을 갖출 수 있다. There is a problem that the expansion of students' thinking and knowledge creation can be blocked by using chatGPT. Also, since this AI cannot be said to have perfect value neutrality, students can be biased by using it.

# data[].attributes.subject
단순히 시험에서의 부정 행위의 우려 뿐만 아니라 학생들의 사고의 확장, 지식 창출을 chatGPT라는 인공지능을 사용함으로서 원천 차단할 수 있다는 문제점이 있다. 또한 이러한 인공지능이 완벽한 가치중립성을 띄고 있다고 할 수 없기 때문에, 학생들은 이것을 사용함으로서 편향성을 갖출 수 있다. There is a problem that the expansion of students' thinking and knowledge creation can be blocked by using chatGPT. Also, since this AI cannot be said to have perfect value neutrality, students can be biased by using it.

# data[].attributes.headline
Decrease student's concentration skill that can bring up by reading and writing

# data[].attributes.subject
Decrease student's concentration skill that can bring up by reading and writing

# data[].attributes.headline
평등하지 못한 프로그램입니다. 모든 사람이 쉽게 해당 프로그램에 접근할 수 있는 것은 아니고 그 이유는 사회,경제적 여건인 경우가 대다수입니다. 누군가는 표절할 수 있고 누군가는 그렇지 못해 좋은 점수를 받을 수 없다면 이것은 불평등이며, 우리 사회가 지양해야 하는 방향이라고 볼 수 있습니다.

# data[].attributes.subject
평등하지 못한 프로그램입니다. 모든 사람이 쉽게 해당 프로그램에 접근할 수 있는 것은 아니고 그 이유는 사회,경제적 여건인 경우가 대다수입니다. 누군가는 표절할 수 있고 누군가는 그렇지 못해 좋은 점수를 받을 수 없다면 이것은 불평등이며, 우리 사회가 지양해야 하는 방향이라고 볼 수 있습니다.

# data[].attributes.headline
Chatgpt's data is already taken from someone else. If this is used in assignments, it is plagiarism. Therefore, there is a limit to academic use.

# data[].attributes.subject
Chatgpt's data is already taken from someone else. If this is used in assignments, it is plagiarism. Therefore, there is a limit to academic use.

# data[].attributes.headline
Prevent student's critical thinking. 교육의 본질은 비판적 사고를 할 수 있는 능력을 기르는 것인데, 챗GPT는 결과물만을 제공하기에 이를 막는다

# data[].attributes.subject
Prevent student's critical thinking. 교육의 본질은 비판적 사고를 할 수 있는 능력을 기르는 것인데, 챗GPT는 결과물만을 제공하기에 이를 막는다

# data[].attributes.headline
When Professor Seznowski asked ChatGPT, "What is the world record of the time a person walked across the English Channel?" ChatGPT replied, "The world record of walking across the English Channel is 18 hours and 33 minutes." Even though people cannot cross the English Channel on foot, they answered a false fact. Professor Seznowski explained, "If the question described the British Strait as 'the time it takes to swim', another answer would have been given," adding, "Chat GPT's answer can easily change depending on the questioner's knowledge level or intention." ______As in the previous lyrics, AI gives answers to wrong questions, such as the questioner's lack of accurate knowledge or the question's ambiguous meaning. Therefore, there is a limit to using the answer as it is asked by a questioner whose knowledge is not yet clear.

# data[].attributes.subject
When Professor Seznowski asked ChatGPT, "What is the world record of the time a person walked across the English Channel?" ChatGPT replied, "The world record of walking across the English Channel is 18 hours and 33 minutes." Even though people cannot cross the English Channel on foot, they answered a false fact. Professor Seznowski explained, "If the question described the British Strait as 'the time it takes to swim', another answer would have been given," adding, "Chat GPT's answer can easily change depending on the questioner's knowledge level or intention." ______As in the previous lyrics, AI gives answers to wrong questions, such as the questioner's lack of accurate knowledge or the question's ambiguous meaning. Therefore, there is a limit to using the answer as it is asked by a questioner whose knowledge is not yet clear.

# data[].attributes.headline
Chatgpt's data is based on data until 2021, so there is a problem with the reliability of the data.

# data[].attributes.subject
Chatgpt's data is based on data until 2021, so there is a problem with the reliability of the data.

# data[].attributes.headline
비판적인 사고, 메타인지능력을 떨어뜨린다. Learning starts from knowing what you dont know. However, chapGPT could hinder critical thinking and metacognitive ability.

# data[].attributes.subject
비판적인 사고, 메타인지능력을 떨어뜨린다. Learning starts from knowing what you dont know. However, chapGPT could hinder critical thinking and metacognitive ability.

# data[].attributes.headline
Students can’t have chance to collect information and organize data. I think it’s one of the most important digital literacy ability which is finding information in online.

# data[].attributes.subject
Students can’t have chance to collect information and organize data. I think it’s one of the most important digital literacy ability which is finding information in online.

# data[].attributes.headline
copyright issue: chat GPT learn online contents which are wriiten by someone, but chat GPT didn’t write the rosources

# data[].attributes.subject
copyright issue: chat GPT learn online contents which are wriiten by someone, but chat GPT didn’t write the rosources