# data[].attributes.body
1. Why would China need to censor so much from the people, 2. Is their really a need to keep servlence of the people who have done nothing to earn it, 3. I chose these questions due to strict monitering that China has shown in the artical, I would like to understand what compels China to do these things.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Why do so many sites need to be censored by Russia, 2.Why did Echo of Moscow close? 3. What is the "false news" that Russia is trying to make?. I chose these questions due to the quanitiy of shut downs that is going on in Russia, and what their motive for this is.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Russia: With War, Censorship Reaches New Heights

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Update (March 4, 2022): Between February 28 and March 3, 2022, the Russian authorities blocked access to at least eight Russian media sites, including The Village, Dozhd, Echo of Moscow, DOXA, The New Times, Krym.Realii, Taiga.Info, and the Current Time and several Ukrainian media outlets.

# data[].attributes.body
1.What is the point of inprisoning people, if what they say isnt imortant. 2. What kinds of new is Russia putting out that facebook would be agenst? 3. Is saying something bad about the arm forces really worthy of punishment? 4. The reasosn i chose these questions is the fact that it seems Russia is so hung up on covering up opinions that are agenst their belifes that they are willing to punish their own people ,for just speaking their minds.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Russia Takes Censorship to New Extremes, Stifling War Coverage (Published 2022)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Contradicting the Kremlin on the war in Ukraine — even calling it a war — is now a crime, prompting independent media to close, and Russia cut off access to Facebook, the BBC and other news sources.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What would be the point of having such a tight grip on raido and new stations. 2. What kind of new is being showen to the people of north Korea 3. What porpues does it sever to have one singlar phone compony control the tech inderstry of North Korea? 4. I chose these questions as a result of my wonder as to why North Korea would need to do so much monitering of its tech and socal media.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Media within North Korea - known officially as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea - are among the most tightly controlled in the world, and fall under the governance of the Korean Workers' Party or, according to some - until his death - the "Dear Leader" Kim Jong-il himself.

The regime bombarded the population with flattering reports about Kim Jong-il and his daily agenda, with radio and television reports often leading on Kim's guidance visits to industrial, agricultural or military sites, where he was often photographed and filmed offering advice to local workers or servicemen.

North Korea's economic hardships or famines are not reported to the domestic audience, which is instead informed of technological advances as a result of the Leader's revolutionary thinking.

The internet is still not readily available within the DPRK, but mobile phones have appeared on the streets of the capital after a ban was lifted in 2008.

Tight control on radio, TV

Press freedom organisation Reporters Without Borders often cited Kim Jong-il as a "predator of press freedom", with only Eritrea ranked below North Korea in its 2010 press freedom index. While state media remain tightly controlled, the NGO noted that that there had been an increase in the flow of news and information into the North thanks both to foreign radio stations and organisations which send multimedia content across the border.

Korean Central Television is the state-run TV channel seen by North Koreans. The network carries news programmes, documentaries and other programmes praising Kim Jong-il and his father Kim Il-sung. It also reports on authoritative statements from the North Korean government, party and military. In addition, it carries revolutionary dramas, operas and other entertainment programmes.

Pyongyang also operates a number of national and local radio networks, including a station intended for servicemen stationed on the contentious border with the South. Newspapers, such as the official party mouthpiece Rodong Sinmun, are all owned by the state.

Radio and TV sets in North Korea are supplied pre-tuned to government stations and radios must be checked and registered with the police. According to reports from dissident and defector groups, some North Koreans purchase a second radio set that is not registered, enabling them to listen to foreign broadcasts.

One radio network is wired into most residences and workplaces. This carries news and commentary that is considered too sensitive for consumption outside North Korea, such as criticising economic activities that are inconsistent with national policy.

Reports from refugees say that there are also those who take the risk of opening the preset radios in order to be able to tune in other frequencies. A number of radio stations operate from the South, but it is difficult to find out how successful they are at reaching their intended audience.

Internet use remains restricted

Internet access in North Korea is restricted to a small section of the elite who have received state approval, and to foreigners living in Pyongyang. The only option, in the absence of a broadband network, is through satellite internet coverage, which is available in some tourist hotels.

Mobile phone use was banned in 2004, but a service was re-introduced in 2008, jointly operated by the Egyptian Orascom company and the state-owned Korea Post and Telecommunications Corporation. According to the Daily NK website, the new service, despite its cost, has proved popular among affluent party members in Pyongyang.

Domestic users are said to be able to access the official Uriminzokkiri web portal via the 3G mobile phone network.

Despite limited access within its borders, North Korea has become increasingly active on the internet for global users, opening official pages on YouTube, Twitter, photo-sharing website Flickr and Facebook.

The main North Korean news agency KCNA launched a new website in late 2010, replacing a previous text-only site that had operated from Japan. The new site, apparently operating from within the DPRK, offers its readers news reports, photographs and video in five languages, including English and Spanish.

BBC Monitoring selects and translates news from radio, television, press, news agencies and the internet from 150 countries in more than 70 languages. It is based in Caversham, UK, and has several bureaux abroad.

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Media within North Korea are among the most tightly controlled in the world.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If censoring content for childen is benifital, what is the limit to how far it should go? 2. What things could we be seeing if said content is not censored. 3. How might this affect the youth when they do learn the censored information.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Censorship has many benefits. Censorship, as defined by Webster Dictionary, is "to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable". Another way it 's interpreted is that its when you purposely take something out in order to influence people a certain way, which can be beneficial. It can filter out hateful and inappropriate material out of media people are exposing themselves and their children too, but honestly, should it happen? Should people only expose children to certain things? No, it shouldn 't. Censorship in schools is a violation of rights. Firstly, censorship in general is a horrible idea, and the reason for that is simple; children need exposure to what 's out in the real world. "Access to a wide range As previously stated, it filters out hateful and inappropriate material out of the media. Exposure like that isn 't exactly necessary; some things should appear in a better light. "Balance and respect for traditional scholarship is NOT censorship," she said. "Again we believe that exposure to the curriculum itself, not inflammatory rhetoric, will convince most parents that a review committee is a very good idea" (Wallace). Most things, however, are better left purely factual and whole. We are guaranteed freedom from censorship in the first amendment, which gives us the freedom of the press, freedom of expression, and more. A Supreme Court case called Tinker v. Des Moines Independent ...show more content...
School District (1969), was a case about freedom of expression. In summary, the school district tried to censor the protest of the Vietnam war, and the students and their parents sued the school board. Tinker and her friends won, insuring freedom of expression to a degree. We already have guaranteed protection against censorship to some extent, so we should be trying to ensure our freedom from censorship on all bases, not censoring select mediums and subjects. Censorship should not be allowed in school. Exposure to different ideas, cultures, religions, and other things can be beneficial, and lack of exposure can be harmful and outright dangerous. Though censorship is sometimes for the best, most of the time it 's not worth it to erase information from a book of a lesson or a system entirely. Censorship is a waste of time and effort that could be used teaching kids acceptance and open

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Censorship has many benefits. Censorship, as defined by Webster Dictionary, is "to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable". Another way it 's interpreted is that its when you purposely take something out in order to influence people a certain way, which can be beneficial.

# data[].attributes.body
1. How would these methodes last in the long run. 2. What would be some simple fixes to social media censorship. 3. How would this be implemnted in a efficent manner. 4. I chose this article because, i provides some of the most clear and effective methodes to stopping censorship throughtout the online space, although i wonder how long it would last consitering how people online tend to act.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
DRL Supporting Diverse Anti-Censorship Solutions - United States Department of State

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
United States Department of State Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO): DRL Supporting Diverse Anti-Censorship Solutions This is the announcement of funding opportunity number SFOP0008516 Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.345 Type o…