# data[].attributes.body
Legal wrongs can be divided into three main categories: tort, crime, and breach of contract. They can be compared by looking at several criteria.

First, in terms of nature, a tort is a civil wrong against an individual, a crime is a public wrong against society, and a breach of contract is a private wrong arising from an agreement between parties.

Second, regarding duty, tort law imposes duties by law, such as the duty not to harm others. Criminal law involves duties owed to society, such as not committing violence or theft. In contrast, contract law creates duties through voluntary agreements, for example, to pay money or deliver goods.

Third, the parties involved are also different. In a tort, the dispute is between the plaintiff and the defendant. In a crime, the state prosecutes the defendant on behalf of society. In a breach of contract, the non-breaching party sues the breaching party.

Fourth, the remedy varies. Tort law aims at compensation for the injured party. Criminal law focuses on punishment, such as fines or imprisonment. Contract law seeks to enforce promises or provide damages for losses caused by the breach.

Finally, the examples highlight the differences: negligence, defamation, and trespass are torts; assault and murder are crimes; while not paying or failing to deliver are breaches of contract.

In conclusion, although torts, crimes, and breaches of contract all represent wrongful acts, they differ in nature, duty, parties, remedies, and practical examples.

# data[].attributes.headline
Compare tort, crime and breach of contract

# data[].attributes.subject
Compare tort, crime and breach of contract

# data[].attributes.body
The table shows how tort, crime and breach of contract are different but also related. To begin with, a tort is a civil wrong based on duties imposed by law. It usually involves a plaintiff bringing a claim against a defendant, and the remedy is compensation, for example in negligence or defamation. By contrast, a crime is a public wrong because the duty is owed to society. In this case, the state takes action against the defendant and the result is punishment, such as imprisonment for theft or murder. On the other hand, a breach of contract is a private wrong that comes from an agreement between parties. Here, the non-breaching party can sue the breaching party to enforce a promise, for instance when goods are not delivered or payment is not made. Overall, tort and breach of contract both deal with private disputes but arise from different sources of duty, while crime is distinct since it focuses on protecting society as a whole.

# data[].attributes.body
Tort, crime, and breach of contract are three different legal wrongs. A tort is a civil wrong where the law requires people to act carefully, and if someone causes harm, they must pay compensation. Examples are negligence, defamation, or trespass. A crime is a public wrong against society, so the state prosecutes the offender and gives punishment like prison or fines. Crimes include theft, assault, or murder. A breach of contract happens when someone breaks an agreement, such as not paying or not delivering goods. The solution is usually to enforce the promise or pay damages. The main differences are who the duty is owed to, who brings the case, and what the remedy is.

# data[].attributes.body
A tort is a civil wrong, independent of a contract, that causes harm to another person’s rights, such as negligence, trespass or defamation. In a tort, the plaintiff sues the defendant, and the remedy is usually compensation. A crime is a public wrong, is an offense against the state or society as a whole, like theft or murder, where the purpose of the law is to punishment the wrongdoer through fines or imprisonment. A breach of contract is a private wrong, when one party fails to perform their contractual obligations, such as not paying, failling to deliver, and the legal remedy typically involves damages or specific performance to protect the non-breaching party.

# data[].attributes.body
A tort is a civil wrong where the duty is imposed by law. It arises when one party’s conduct causes harm to another, such as negligence, defamation, or trespass. In tort cases, the dispute is between the plaintiff and the defendant, and the usual remedy is compensation for the harm suffered.

In contrast, a crime is considered a public wrong. The duty violated is owed to society as a whole, not just to an individual. Therefore, the case is brought by the state against the defendant. Examples include theft, assault, and murder. Unlike torts, the purpose of criminal law is not compensation but punishment, which may involve fines, imprisonment, or other penalties to deter wrongdoing and protect society.

Meanwhile, a breach of contract arises from a private agreement between parties. The duty breached is created by the contract itself. If one party fails to perform as promised, such as not paying or failing to deliver goods, the non-breaching party may bring a claim against the breaching party. The remedy is usually enforcement of the agreement or compensation for financial losses.

# data[].attributes.body
In the field of law, torts, crimes, and breaches of contract represent three distinct categories of wrongs. A tort refers to a civil wrong, such as negligence or defamation, where the plaintiff seeks compensation from the defendant. In contrast, a crime is considered a public wrong against society, with the state prosecuting the offender to impose penalties for actions like theft or murder. A breach of contract, meanwhile, is a private wrong that occurs when one party fails to fulfill the terms of an agreement, such as not making a payment or failing to deliver goods. While tort and contract law primarily focus on remedies and enforcing private rights, criminal law emphasizes punishment as a means of protecting society.

# data[].attributes.headline
NTPhuongAnh + Bảo Khang+ Quốc Khánh+ Hồng Ân

# data[].attributes.subject
NTPhuongAnh + Bảo Khang+ Quốc Khánh+ Hồng Ân

# data[].attributes.body
Tort, crime, and breach of contract are distinct areas of law that differ in purpose, parties involved, and remedies. A tort is a civil wrong where a legal duty is breached, typically resulting in harm to an individual—examples include negligence, defamation, or trespass. The injured party (plaintiff) sues the defendant seeking compensation. In contrast, a crime is a public wrong that breaches duties owed to society as a whole. It is prosecuted by the state and aims at punishment, such as imprisonment or fines, with common examples being theft, assault, or murder. Meanwhile, a breach of contract arises from a failure to fulfill agreed obligations between private parties. Here, the non-breaching party may sue to enforce the promise or claim damages. While tort and contract focus on compensation, crime centres on punishment, reflecting their fundamentally different legal and social functions.

# data[].attributes.body
Torts, crimes, and breaches of contract are three different categories of legal wrongs, each with its own nature and consequences. A tort is a civil wrong that arises outside of any agreement, where the main goal of the law is to compensate the victim for harm, such as in negligence or defamation cases. A crime, on the other hand, is considered an offense against society or the state, and the law responds with punishment and deterrence; here, the prosecution is brought by the state, not by the individual victim. A breach of contract differs from both, because it is based on a failure to perform obligations agreed upon in a contract, and remedies are usually limited to compensation or requiring performance. In short, while torts and breaches of contract focus on protecting private interests and compensation, crimes emphasize punishment and the protection of society as a whole.

# data[].attributes.headline
Trần Ngọc Trâm Anh - Phạm An Kỳ - Nguyễn Quách Trường Khang

# data[].attributes.subject
Trần Ngọc Trâm Anh - Phạm An Kỳ - Nguyễn Quách Trường Khang

# data[].attributes.body
A tort is a civil wrong based on legal duties, allowing the injured party to claim compensation. A crime is a public wrong against society, prosecuted by the state, with punishment such as fines or imprisonment. A breach of contract is a private wrong arising from an agreement, where the remedy is usually damages or specific performance. In short, tort and contract aim to compensate, while crime focuses on punishment and protecting society.

# data[].attributes.body
Tort, crime, and breach of contract are three distinct categories of legal wrongs, each with different purposes and remedies. A tort is a civil wrong where the duty is imposed by law, and it arises when one person’s conduct causes harm to another. In such cases, the injured party (plaintiff) sues the wrongdoer (defendant) to seek compensation. A crime, on the other hand, is a public wrong against society. The duty here is owed to the state, and the government prosecutes the offender to impose punishment such as imprisonment or fines. By contrast, a breach of contract is a private wrong that results from failing to fulfill an agreement. The duty comes from the contract itself, and the non-breaching party can sue the breaching party to enforce the promise or claim damages. In conclusion, while torts focus on compensation for harm, crimes focus on punishment for public wrongs, and breaches of contract focus on enforcing agreements between parties.

# data[].attributes.body
Tort, crime, and breach of contract are all wrongs committed by a person, entity or organization, yet there are a few key differences. In term of definition, tort is a civil wrong, while crime and breach of contract are public and private wrongs, respectively. The next thing to consider is duty. For tort, it is duty imposed by law; however, the duty in crime is owed to society. As for breach of contract, the duty mentioned is from agreement. Another factor to compare is the parties involved. We refer to the two sides in tort as plaintiff and defendant; in crime, the correct terminology are prosecutors or state versus defendant. In the last type of violation, breach of contract included breaching party and the injured one. Furthermore, an individual will be considered violating tort by commiting negligence, defamation or trespass. Examples belonging to the crime categorization range from theft to assault murder. Also, a clear sign when someone breaches a contract is when he or she fails to comply with agreed-upon terms. In conclusion, when regulations are broken, a price or some form similar is demanded. Compensation for tort, punishment for crime and finally, promise enforcement for breach of contract.

# data[].attributes.body
Hù , Hùn , Hùng

To begin with, these are all ways the law addresses wrongful acts, but each rests on a different foundation. Firstly, A tort is a civil wrong arising from duties imposed by law, with the aim of compensating the injured party. A crime is a public wrong, violating duties owed to society, the State prosecutes in order to punish and deter. A breach of contract is the failure to fulfill contractual obligations, the non-breaching party may sue to enforce performance or claim damages. Tort focuses on compensation, crime on punishment, and contract on enforcing promises. In short, they form three distinct but interconnected branches of legal responsibility.

# data[].attributes.headline
Nguyễn Ngọc Cát, Hoàng Thuỳ Linh, Nguyễn Thuỳ Linh,  Phạm Đăng Khôi

# data[].attributes.subject
Nguyễn Ngọc Cát, Hoàng Thuỳ Linh, Nguyễn Thuỳ Linh,  Phạm Đăng Khôi

# data[].attributes.body
There are some remarkable differences between tort, crime and breach of contract. Firstly, tort identifies as civil wrongs arising from a breach of duty imposed by law such as negligence, defamation and trespass, while the parties involved are plaintiff and defendant. Secondly, a crime indicates public violations considered harmful to the society, namely theft, assault and murder. Crime is prosecuted by the state and applies punishments like fines or imprisonment. Lastly, a breach of contract occurs when the breaching party fails to fulfill contractual obligations. The injured party has the right to take action against the breaching party in court, whether to sue for compensation or reaching futher agreements between the involving sides. In conclusion, each one serves a respective legal field and it is crucial to determine the suitable type.