# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: since we start from a clear objective. For me, the biggest advantage is the intentionality behind it. When your goals and assessments are well set up from day one, you avoid teaching 'content just for the sake of teaching. Every lesson and activity has a clear purpose tied with standards, giving you full control over student progress.

Disadvantage: I think that the only problem with this type of design is its riguriosity itself; containing lots of procedures to be followed requires a huge teachers commitment. Making teachers' labor more difficult when it comes to having multiple groups with different designs needed.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: this type of design focuses directly on classroom activity, interaction, and task completion, it allows lessons to adjust fluidly to student needs, making it useful for dynamic and conversational matters.

Disadvantage: since learning outcomes and syllabus are not very predetermined this can result, most of the time as "empty or isolated knowledge" Due to the lack of sequence, clear objectives ; learning a language academically needs to be following.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: I think that it does provide a highly organized framework that truly aligns with a preference for order, clear lesson plans, and step-by-step progress tracking.

Drawback: this approach heavily focuses on input rather than real world vocabulary. If students struggle with a pre-planned topic, the rigid structure leaves not too much room to adapt without disrupting the predetermined syllabus sequence. Maybe this can lead students to feel stressed and lost.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: Students and teachers know what competence is expected at the end of the course.

Limitation: Don’t allow spontaneous learning opportunities that don’t fit predetermined targets.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: Keeps learners active and motivated through meaningful tasks.

Limitation: Requires high pedagogical creativity and classroom management.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: Intuitive for teachers or students who are used to traditional step by step learning.

Limitation: Focuses a lot on linguistic knowledge rather than real communicative abilities.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: It helps teachers plan lessons based on clear learning goals.

Limitation: It is a bit idealistic, because achieving the results is not that easy.

It can focus to much on learning outcomes setting aside the content and process.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: Focus on interaction rather than production.

Students interest are priority.

Limitation: Teaching is done for the moment, not for life.

It does not set clear objectives.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: It provides a clear plan to organize content and activities.

Limitation: It could be less flexible and the content is planned before the course starts, so it does not take into account student needs.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: Strong aligment in curriculum components (input, process, outcome)

Limitation: Time consuming.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: It may promote authentic communication.

Limitation: Difficult to assess.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage: It is easy to do planning.

Limitation: Risk of teaching language out of context.