# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Introduction

Defining The Pizza-sandwich Conundrum

The question of ' Is a Pizza a Sandwich? ' has long been debated among culinary enthusiasts. While some argue that a pizza is a sandwich, others vehemently disagree. To understand the origins of this puzzle, it is important first to define what constitutes a sandwich.

According to Vice writer Drew Brown, who delved into the taxonomy of sandwiches, pizza fits the criteria of a sandwich. In the realm of inclusive food classification, sandwiches adapt to evolving culinary trends, including various foods. However, this broad categorization can lead to blurred lines and heated discussions. The primary point of contention lies in the ambiguity of defining a sandwich and where pizza fits into this definition.

Cultural interpretations further complicate the matter. In cities like New York, it is customary to refer to a pizza as a "pie," while in other regions, it is known as pizza. The versatility of pizza, with its numerous forms ranging from classic Italian versions to innovative American twists, showcases its adaptability and challenges the notion of fitting into a single label.

Understanding The Importance Of Taxonomy In Food Classification

The debate surrounding the classification of pizza as a sandwich highlights the significance of taxonomy in food classification. As with any scientific endeavor, establishing a clear and consistent categorization method is crucial. Culinary enthusiasts can navigate the myriad interpretations and debates surrounding foods like pizza by defining the criteria for sandwich classification.

Some argue that a pizza can be classified as a hot, open-faced sandwich. This perspective emphasizes the similarities between pizza and traditional sandwiches, such as using bread as a base and various toppings. However, it is essential to understand that the classification of a pizza as a sandwich is not universally accepted and continues to spark dialogue within the culinary community.

In conclusion, the answer to 'Is a Pizza a Sandwich?' remains a heated topic. The inclusivity of sandwich classification and pizza adaptability contribute to this problem's complexity. While some argue that pizza meets the criteria of a sandwich, others maintain that it exists as a distinct culinary delight. Ultimately, the interpretation of a pizza as a sandwich or otherwise may vary depending on cultural influences, personal perspectives, and the lens through which one views culinary taxonomy.

The Bread Dough Argument

The debate surrounding 'Is a Pizza a Sandwich?' has sparked countless discussions and disagreements among culinary enthusiasts. While some argue that a pizza fits the criteria of a sandwich, others vehemently disagree. To delve deeper into this puzzle, it is important to explore the bread dough argument, which forms the basis of the pizza as a sandwich perspective.

Exploring The Bread Dough Similarity

One of the key points in favor of categorizing pizza as a sandwich is the use of bread dough as the base. In the case of traditional sandwiches, bread is a fundamental component that holds the fillings together. Similarly, a pizza is created using dough made from flour, water, yeast, and other ingredients, which serve as the foundation for the various toppings. This similarity in the use of bread dough forms the basis for proponents of the pizza as a sandwich argument.

The assertion made by Drew Brown, a writer for Vice, who argues that pizza is a type of hot open-faced sandwich, supports this perspective. According to Brown, the bread dough used in pizza qualifies it as a sandwich, as it shares fundamental characteristics with other types of sandwiches.

Analyzing The Traits Of A Sandwich

To better understand the debate, analyzing the traits that define a sandwich is essential. A sandwich typically consists of two or more slices of bread or a bread-like substance enclosing various fillings. The fillings can vary from meat and cheese to vegetables and condiments, providing various flavors and textures.

When applied to pizza, the argument is that the bread dough functions as the base, akin to the slices of bread in a traditional sandwich. The toppings, such as sauce, cheese, and various ingredients, serve as the fillings, creating a harmonious combination of flavors. Proponents of the pizza as a sandwich viewpoint suggest that these similarities in structure and composition justify labeling pizza as a type of sandwich.

However, it is important to note that the classification of pizza as a sandwich is not unanimously accepted. Critics argue that pizza has established itself as a unique culinary delight with its rich history and cultural significance. While it may share certain characteristics with sandwiches, pizza is considered distinct and deserving of its classification.

In conclusion, the debate surrounding whether a pizza can be considered a sandwich delves into the complex realm of culinary taxonomy. The bread dough argument highlights the similarities between pizza and traditional sandwiches, shedding light on the potential classification of pizza as a sandwich. However, the question remains subjective, with cultural influences, personal perspectives, and the lens through which culinary taxonomy is viewed all playing a role in the argument. Ultimately, whether pizza is a sandwich or a distinct culinary creation is a matter of interpretation and debate among food enthusiasts.

Dissenting Opinions: The Savory Pie Perspective

While the debate rages on about 'Is a Pizza a Sandwich?', another school of thought argues for a different categorization: the savory pie perspective. This viewpoint challenges the notion that a pizza is a sandwich and instead posits that it should be considered a savory pie.

Examining The Argument For Pizza As A Savory Pie

Proponents of the savory pie perspective argue that the similarities between pizza and traditional pies outweigh their similarities with sandwiches. One key aspect is the crust. Both pizza and pies have a crust as their foundation, made from a similar mixture of flour, water, and fat. This shared characteristic distinguishes them from sandwiches, which typically use bread as their base.

Furthermore, the structure of a pizza aligns more closely with that of a pie. Pizzas typically feature a layer of sauce and toppings placed on top of the crust, similar to how a pie filling is contained within a pastry shell. The toppings on a pizza can range from vegetables and meats to cheese and sauce, creating a medley of flavors reminiscent of pie fillings.

Another aspect that supports the pizza as a savory pie argument is how it is often served. Pizzas are commonly sliced into triangular or square pieces, akin to how traditional pies are portioned. This method of serving further emphasizes the pie-like nature of pizzas and sets them apart from the sandwich format.

Addressing Counter Arguments

Critics of the savory pie perspective raise valid counterarguments against classifying pizzas as pies. One key counterargument is that the main distinction between pizzas and pies lies in their fillings. While pies traditionally contain sweet or savory fillings enclosed within the crust, pizzas have their toppings directly on top of the crust. The absence of a separate enclosed filling is seen as a significant departure from the pie category.

Additionally, the cultural and historical significance of pizza cannot be ignored. Pizza has established itself as an iconic dish with its unique identity and place in culinary traditions worldwide. From Neapolitan pizza in Italy to New York-style pizza in the United States, each regional variation carries its cultural significance. This distinctiveness sets pizza apart from both sandwiches and traditional pies.

In conclusion, the debate over 'Is a Pizza a Sandwich or a Pie?' remains unsettled. The savory pie perspective offers a compelling alternative to the sandwich argument, highlighting the similarities between pizza and traditional pies. However, counterarguments raise valid points about the absence of a separate filling and the cultural significance of pizza. Ultimately, classifying a pizza as a sandwich, pie, or a unique culinary creation is subjective and open to interpretation.

The Role Of God And Human Reason

The debate over whether a pizza can be classified as a sandwich or a pie has sparked fierce arguments and passionate opinions. While some argue that pizza should be considered a sandwich due to its composition and structure, others maintain that it is a distinct category. It is necessary to explore the implications of expanding the sandwich category to understand why there is resistance to labeling pizza as a sandwich.

Understanding The Resistance To Labeling Pizza As A Sandwich

One of the primary reasons for the resistance to labeling pizza as a sandwich lies in the cultural and historical significance of pizza. Pizza has evolved into a culinary icon with unique regional variations and a rich heritage. From Neapolitan pizza in Italy to New York-style pizza in the United States, each variation carries its own cultural identity. Labeling pizza as a sandwich could be seen as erasing the distinctiveness of this beloved dish and undermining its cultural significance.

Another aspect of the resistance is rooted in the sandwich itself. Traditional sandwiches typically have two separate layers of bread encasing a filling. In contrast, pizza has toppings placed directly on the crust. Critics argue that the absence of a separate enclosed filling sets pizza apart from the traditional sandwich concept.

Furthermore, expanding the sandwich category to include pizza could create confusion and dilute the meaning of the term "sandwich." The sandwich has long been associated with a specific format - bread enclosing fillings. Broadening the definition to include pizza opens the door to including other open-faced dishes as sandwiches, blurring the lines and losing the clarity of what constitutes a sandwich.

Analyzing The Implications Of Expanding The Sandwich Category

While some may argue that pizza should be considered a sandwich due to its shared elements with traditional sandwiches, expanding the sandwich category to include pizza could have far-reaching implications. It would challenge the existing culinary boundaries and potentially redefine understanding of what constitutes a sandwich.

Allowing pizza to be classified as a sandwich could lead to other open-faced dishes vying for inclusion. That raises questions about where the line should be drawn and whether the sandwich category should be expanded indefinitely. It could complicate menu offerings, culinary classifications, and consumer expectations.

Moreover, labeling pizza as a sandwich could dilute the uniqueness and recognition of both sandwiches and pizza. Each has distinct qualities and associations, and merging them may risk diminishing their identities.

In conclusion, the resistance to labeling pizza as a sandwich stems from various factors, including the cultural significance of pizza, its departure from the traditional sandwich structure, and the implication of expanding the sandwich category. While arguments can be made for both sides, the classification of a pizza as a sandwich remains subjective and open to interpretation. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to determine how they classify and enjoy this beloved culinary creation.

Is a Pizza a Sandwich?

Presenting Evidence And Factual Data

The ongoing debate surrounding 'Is a Pizza a Sandwich?' has sparked passionate arguments. However, by presenting evidence and factual data, it becomes clear that pizza does not fit within the traditional definition of a sandwich.

Firstly, let's examine the structural composition of a sandwich. A sandwich typically consists of two separate layers of bread with a filling enclosed. In contrast, a pizza has a single layer of dough as its base, with the toppings placed directly on top. This distinction in construction sets pizza apart from the traditional sandwich concept.

Furthermore, the categorization of a sandwich often depends on the presence of specific ingredients. Sandwiches commonly include meat, cheese, and vegetables, whereas pizza is characterized by its distinctive combination of dough, sauce, cheese, and various toppings. The unique combination of these ingredients further distinguishes pizza from the standard sandwich.

Additionally, historical and cultural factors play a significant role in determining the classification of pizza. Pizza has a rich heritage and is deeply ingrained in culinary traditions worldwide. Labeling pizza as a sandwich could undermine this beloved dish's cultural significance and regional variations.

Concluding The Debate

Despite the spirited arguments put forth by those advocating for pizza as a sandwich, the evidence and factual data ultimately debunk the pizza-sandwich conundrum. Pizza does not meet the criteria and characteristics that define a sandwich.

While it is essential to recognize that the debate may continue to stir discussion, branding pizza as a distinct category - separate from sandwiches - is necessary to preserve the integrity and individuality of both dishes. This differentiation ensures that each culinary creation receives the recognition it deserves and resonates with its unique cultural and historical context.

In conclusion, the pizza-sandwich conundrum can be debunked by analyzing pizza's structural composition, ingredients, and cultural significance. Through thoroughly examining these factors, it becomes evident that pizza and sandwiches are distinct entities in the culinary realm. By embracing and celebrating the uniqueness of each dish, individuals can enjoy and appreciate their respective qualities without the need for label overlap or classification confusion.

Conclusion

Now you should know the answer to 'Is a Pizza a Sandwich?'. After a comprehensive analysis of the pizza-sandwich conundrum, it is clear that pizza cannot be classified as a sandwich. By examining pizza's structural composition, ingredients, and cultural significance, we have debunked the notion that pizza falls within the traditional definition of a sandwich. Embracing and celebrating the uniqueness of pizza and sandwiches ensures that each culinary creation receives the recognition it deserves.

Summarizing Key Points

To summarize the key points discussed in this article:

1. Structural Composition: A sandwich typically consists of two separate layers of bread with a filling in between, whereas pizza has a single layer of dough as its base with toppings directly on top.

2. Ingredients: Sandwiches commonly include meat, cheese, and vegetables, while pizza is characterized by its unique combination of dough, sauce, cheese, and various toppings.

3. Cultural Significance: Pizza has a rich heritage and regional variations; labeling it as a sandwich could undermine its cultural significance.

Ending The Pizza-sandwich Conundrum

In conclusion, it is essential to recognize that the debate surrounding the classification of pizza as a sandwich may continue to stir discussion. However, by analyzing pizza's structural composition, ingredients, and cultural significance, it becomes evident that it is a distinct culinary entity. Embracing these differences ensures that pizza and sandwiches receive the recognition they deserve without causing confusion or overlap. Through this understanding, individuals can fully enjoy and appreciate the unique qualities of both dishes. Let us celebrate the diversity of the culinary world and savor each bite without the need for label overlap or classification confusion.

FAQ: Is a Pizza a Sandwich? Debunking the Pizza-Sandwich Conundrum

Q: Is a Pizza a Sandwich??
A: According to Vice writer Drew Brown, who delved deep into the taxonomy of sandwiches, pizza is indeed a type of sandwich.

Q: But isn't pizza a distinct food category on its own?
A: While pizza has long been recognized as its unique culinary delight, the argument is that it meets the criteria to be classified as a sandwich based on its composition.

Q: What makes pizza qualify as a sandwich?
A: The reasoning behind categorizing pizza as a sandwich is that its bread dough serves as the base, much like traditional sandwich bread. Additionally, the toppings and fillings placed on the dough further align with the typical sandwich structure.

Q: So, is pizza considered an open-faced sandwich?
A: Yes, according to the classification proposed by Brown. Pizza falls under hot, open-faced sandwiches, similar to other open-faced creations such as beef Wellington or other savory pies.

Q: What about the common belief that pizza is not a sandwich?
A: Pizza as a sandwich can be unsettling for those with a more traditional perspective on sandwiches. It challenges conventional notions, and some may view it as an insult to tradition.

Q: Is there any significance to understanding the taxonomy of sandwiches?
A: The classification of pizza as a sandwich highlights the flexibility and diversity of the sandwich format. It opens up further possibilities for exploration and innovation in sandwich-making.

Q: Can we consider tacos as sandwiches, too?
A: According to Brown's taxonomy, tacos also fall under the umbrella of the sandwich category. This expands the definition of a sandwich beyond the confines of two slices of bread.

In conclusion, while the claim that pizza is a sandwich may be controversial, it is based on the argument that pizza fulfills the essential criteria of a sandwich. Ultimately, how one interprets and defines a sandwich may vary, but exploring different perspectives can enrich our understanding and appreciation of culinary traditions.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Is a Pizza a Sandwich? Debunking the Pizza-Sandwich Conundrum - Taco and Piña

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The question of 'Is a Pizza a Sandwich?' has long been debated among culinary enthusiasts. While some argue that a pizza is a sandwich, others vehemently disagree.

# data[].attributes.headline
The first article uses facts and statistics in order to convince the reader that pizza is not a sandwich because of the lack of criteria by using facts and an understanding of how the human mind works. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The first article uses facts and statistics in order to convince the reader that pizza is not a sandwich because of the lack of criteria by using facts and an understanding of how the human mind works. 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Youth curfews are popular. In poll after poll, Americans support laws that restrict teenagers' activities during certain hours of the day and night.

Youth curfews are also logical. If youngsters are getting into trouble, it makes sense to get them off the streets.

There's only one problem with youth curfews: They don't work. And we shouldn't kid ourselves that they do.

Yet that's what we're doing in Philadelphia, where Mayor Nutter recently extended a 9 p.m. curfew on Friday and Saturday nights for all unaccompanied minors in Center City and University City. The measure came on the heels of this summer's violent flash-mob episodes, which seem to have quieted down since then.

But the city already had a youth curfew in place, long before the flash-mob mayhem began. On weekdays, it's 9 p.m. for children under 13 and 10:30 p.m. for children 13 to 17; on the weekends, everyone has to be home by midnight.

And that hasn't done anything to stem the tide of youth violence in Philadelphia. Insofar as the downtown curfew has "worked," it probably just displaced crime from one part of the city - and one time of the day - to another.

That's what happened in Detroit, after it adopted a youth curfew in 1976. Juvenile crime dropped 6 percent during the curfew hours, but it increased 13 percent in the midafternoon. Nationwide, more than 80 percent of juvenile offenses take place between 9 a.m. and 10 p.m. - outside most curfews.

Nor do we have any solid evidence that youth curfews lower the overall rate of juvenile crime. In a close study of Monrovia, Calif., in the 1990s, for example, sociologist Michael Males found that juvenile arrests for non-curfew crimes increased 53 percent during the school months when the town's curfew was enforced. In July and August, when the curfew was not enforced, non-curfew youth crime went down 12 percent.

So why are we so wedded to youth curfews? The answer has less to with youth than with adults. Whenever we get worried that the youth are out of control, we enact a curfew. And that makes us feel better, even if it doesn't make crime go down.

Youth curfews date to late 19th century, when America's cities swelled with millions of unsupervised teens. Like laws mandating school attendance and banning child labor, the argument went, curfews would improve individual lives even as they protected the social order.

President Benjamin Harrison called curfews "the most important municipal regulation for the protection of children in American homes from the vices of the street." By 1900, 3,000 municipalities had curfews in place.

The next set of curfews came during Prohibition in the 1920s, when speakeasies and gang violence sparked new anxieties about American youth. Although juvenile crime dropped during the decade, it made for good press - and, in several cities, for new curfews.

"The street corners and vacant lots of the city are the kindergartens of a school of crime," opined an editorial writer in Chicago, endorsing the city's 1921 curfew. "The primary and intermediate classes meet in vicious poolrooms. Cabarets and tough saloons are offering advanced lessons, and post-graduate instruction is available in the jails and penitentiaries."

Then came the juvenile-delinquency scare of the 1950s, which sparked - surprise! - another wave of youth curfews. By 1957, half of American cities with populations of more than 100,000 had juvenile-curfew laws.

But the greatest spike in curfews came in the early 1990s, amid a sharp rise in youth crime. Between 1988 and 1992, criminal offenses by juveniles rose 26 percent; even worse, youth crimes against persons - murder, rape, and assault - skyrocketed 56 percent.

So curfews boomed, too. From 1990 to 1995, 53 of America's 200 largest cities enacted new curfew ordinances. The effort got a boost from President Bill Clinton, who signed a 1996 measure allotting $75 million to help local governments enact curfews and other anti-crime ordinances. "They help keep our children out of harm's way," Clinton declared.

In fact, they don't. To his credit, Mayor Nutter has instituted other measures to fight juvenile crime, including expanding the hours that recreation centers stay open. And he has skillfully used his bully pulpit, taking to the streets and airwaves to encourage parents to keep a closer watch on their children.

More power to him, but not to the curfews. They might be good politics, but they're bad policy. Let's hope the mayor can tell the difference.
This article previously appeared on Philly.com.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Curfews don't keep kids out of trouble - WHYY

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Youth curfews are popular. In poll after poll, Americans support laws that restrict teenagers' activities during certain hours of the day and night. Youth curfews are also logical. If youngsters are getting into trouble, it makes sense to get them off the streets. There's only one problem with youth curfews: They don't work.

# data[].attributes.headline
This is a cookbook it uses steps and exact measurements in order to make a proper meal. this along with being a nonfictional part of text shows that is procedural writing.

# data[].attributes.subject
This is a cookbook it uses steps and exact measurements in order to make a proper meal. this along with being a nonfictional part of text shows that is procedural writing.

# data[].attributes.headline
The first pictures are all covers of memoirs that allow the reader to learn about the people in a non-fictional way to show and explain how it was written about certain people and what they did within their lives.

# data[].attributes.subject
The first pictures are all covers of memoirs that allow the reader to learn about the people in a non-fictional way to show and explain how it was written about certain people and what they did within their lives.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Examples of Descriptive Essays About a Person - Descriptive essay is one type of essay that aims to describe a specific object (animal, person, or other thing) specifically. This text type has a slight difference with report text written based on common terms.

The following essays are some examples of descriptive essays about a person, family members, and famous people.

Essay 1: My Best Friend Laura

Laura J. Bernal, whose nickname is Laura, is my best friend from my childhood. She has a small body and is quite slim. She has oval face with bright brown eyes and thin lips. Laura J. Bernal has long brown straight hair, but she usually makes her hair with horse ponytails. She looks very beautiful, especially when she smiles.

She is always cheerful and looks in a good mood. She is a very positive person. We have almost the same hobby of singing. Sometimes our opinions are the same. She is always energetic and brings positive energy for everyone around her.

She is like a part of my family. I trust her just as I trust members of my family. She is a very honest type of friend. She always speaks as she is even though it's bad. Laura always says what she thinks. We are very close to each other. She can even know whether I lie to her or not. I'm very lucky to have a friend like her.

Essay 2: Larry Page

Lawrence "Larry" Page is one of the most influential people in the world. Page is an American computer scientist; he is also an Internet entrepreneur. He was a co-founder of Google with his friend, Sergey Brin, in 1998. Now, he plays a role as a chief executive officer (CEO) of Alphabets, Google's parent company.
Larry Page was born on 26th March 1973 in Michigan. By 2019, his age is 46 years old. His hair is dark brown while his skin is fair. About his family, a research scientist named Lucinda Southworth is his wife. Now, he is a father of two children.In November 2016, he becomes the 12th richest person. Larry's last education background is a Ph.D. from Stanford University. Here, he met Sergey Brin. Then, they incorporated Google in order to make world's information easy to access. This company makes him to be one of the successful people in the world.

Essay 3: My Father

Essay 4: Bill Gates

William Henry "Bill" Gates III is one of the richest & influential people. In 1975 together with his friend, Paul Allen, he co-founded Microsoft which became the world's largest PC software company. That is why his name exists in the list of world's wealthiest people by Forbes. Bill Gates or Trey as his nickname was born on 28th October 1955 in Seattle, Washington, USA. By 2019, he is 64 years old. His hair as well as eye color is same, light brown. Bill Gates' weight is 64 kg with 5′ 9″ height. With his wife named Melinda Gates, they have three children.
Besides being the best-known entrepreneur, Bill Gates is also known as a philanthropist. In 2000, he & his wife created Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. It was identified as the world's wealthiest charitable foundation in 2013. Through this foundation, Bill Gates donates large amounts of money to many charitable organizations and scientific research programs.

Essay 5: My Mother

Essay 6: Mark Zuckerberg

Mark Elliot Zuckerberg is an American computer programmer & internet entrepreneur. He is a co-founder of Facebook, a famous social media. His name was in the list of 100 wealthiest and most influential people since 2010 by Time Magazine.
About his physical appearance, Mark's body is 170 centimeters tall with 76 kg weight. His hair color is red while his eyes are blue. Mark Zuckerberg was born on 14th May 1984 in New York, USA. Therefore, he is 35 years old by 2019. Mark Zuckerberg has married to Priscilla Chan; they have one daughter named Maxima Chan Zuckerberg.

Essay 7: My Sister

Essay 8: J. K. Rowling

J. K. Rowling is a British novelist who writes phenomenal fantasy book series of Harry Potter. The books have got worldwide attention. They have become the best selling book series in history. They were sold more than 400 million copies.
Joanne Rowling was born on 31th July 1965 in Yate, Gloucestershire, England. So, she is 54 years old by 2019. About her physical appearance, her height is 5′ 5″, while her weight is 54 kg. She has blonde hair & blue eyes. She's married two times; she's got three children.

JK. Rowling is a terrific & successful novelist that becomes the richest woman in England. In fact, once she had become unemployed with a destitute life. By writing Harry Potter books which are loaded with spectacular high imagination, she turns to be very famous and wealthy.

Essay 9: My Brother

Essay 10: Oprah Winfrey

Essay 11: Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp was born on June 9, 1963 in Owensboro, Kentucky, U.S. He is now 54 years old. He started his career on movie in 1984.

His first movie is A nightmare on Elm Street and his last movie is Untitled Fantastic Beast Sequel that would be released in 2018.

A long his life, he had been an actor in 48 movies. It means that he had been playing more than 40 characters during his life. Thus, seeing his achievement, he is proper to be the winner of the Golden Globe Award and Screen Actors Guild Award for the best actor.

Before he became a famous actor, Depp was a musician. The first genre he played was rock music. He is good in playing guitar and writing songs.
A long his life, he wrote so many songs for bands, solo vocalist or for movie such as Sweeney Todd.

Essay 12: My Grandmother

I have a grandmother, her name is Mary M. Lewis. I usually called her Granny Mary. Her hair isn't gray like other grandmothers, but blonde. Her body is quite short, about 5′ 1″. She has brown and bit wrinkly skin. Granny Mary lives in a house with my uncle and aunt. I visit her twice a week. I think she is not that old, because she is 70 years old. However, she still looks fit and strong.
She usually goes to the backyard to help my uncle. Sometimes, I go to the backyard with my brother as well and help her pick flowers. We love our grandmother so much.

Essay 13: Taylor Swift

Essay 14: My Grandfather

Essay 15: A Stranger at Every Morning

I see that mysterious person at every morning walking in front of my home in this last two weeks. I never see him before. Perhaps he is a new comer in this village. He always walks slowly with his two big Doberman dogs as he seems like having a total control of his dogs.

He is big and tall man with a long hair and full body tattoo on his skin. I think anybody will be afraid of him. He always uses single shirt and shorts and also black sports shoes when he is walking around with his dog.

Usually, he is passing in front of my home around 6 in the morning. He always using headset and put his iPhone or something like MP3 players in his pocket shorts.

Essay 16: Vincent van Gogh

Vincent Van Gogh was a Dutch painter that was classified as a post-impressionist painter. He was born on March 30, 1853 in Zundert, Netherlands and died on 29 July in Auvers-sur-Oise, France.

At his life time, he was stated as a stupid person who tried and failed to learn painting. Not only that, he was totally poor and suffered. At first, he failed in love and thus made him suffered in life. He failed to be anything like normal people. His failure in love broke his mental and confidence.
Before he became a painter, or let say liked painting, he was a protestant missionary in Southern Belgium.

His duty was in the coal mine and there he saw the truth about suffering and the truth about his own God. Seeing human suffer he also wanted to experience the same in the name of humanity. He lost his faith and started to paint. Traveling from one place to another, Van Gogh lived in poverty. His life was spent to paint even people said that his art work was a bad art.

He also suffered from psychotic and delusion. At the last time of his life, he was at the mental hospital, Auvers-sur-Oise, France. He was depressed and finally shot himself and died two days after that.

After his death and the popularity of the discourse on madness, especially the knowledge of the psychotic, his painting became popular and categorized as a high art of post-impressionist painting.

Unfortunately, Van Gogh never knew that the prices of his painting are now billions.

These are the 15+ examples of descriptive essays about a person. If you're looking for descriptive essay ideas about family members, friends, or famous people (such as CEO, writers, or celebrity), then you were coming to the right place.

We hope this helps and thanks for reading!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
15+ Examples of Descriptive Essays About a Person | Writer River

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Examples of Descriptive Essays About a Person - Descriptive essay is one type of essay that aims to describe a specific object (animal, person, or other

# data[].attributes.headline
For the second link it is an article that gives 15 examples of what descriptive essay memoirs are. they are literary non-fiction because they tell historical information in a way that is about their person's life.

# data[].attributes.subject
For the second link it is an article that gives 15 examples of what descriptive essay memoirs are. they are literary non-fiction because they tell historical information in a way that is about their person's life.

# data[].attributes.headline
The second article uses the history and along with multiple facts along with convincing the readers on how ineffective curfews are and how they have not worked in the past. By using nonfictional elements allowing it to be a persuasive argument.

# data[].attributes.subject
The second article uses the history and along with multiple facts along with convincing the readers on how ineffective curfews are and how they have not worked in the past. By using nonfictional elements allowing it to be a persuasive argument.

# data[].attributes.headline
The first picture shows what chapters of the book are going to named and where you can find that page it mostly acts as a map for the reader, making it easier for them to find information in the document.

# data[].attributes.subject
The first picture shows what chapters of the book are going to named and where you can find that page it mostly acts as a map for the reader, making it easier for them to find information in the document.

# data[].attributes.headline
The second photo is a radio instruction manual, this is procedural writing because while reading it, it can allow the reader to learn how to build and manage the hand radio that was shown in the instructions.

# data[].attributes.subject
The second photo is a radio instruction manual, this is procedural writing because while reading it, it can allow the reader to learn how to build and manage the hand radio that was shown in the instructions.

# data[].attributes.headline
The second photo is expository writing because it shows what each word is written and is able to help the reader understand the context that it is given in. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The second photo is expository writing because it shows what each word is written and is able to help the reader understand the context that it is given in. 