# data[].attributes.body
1. I think this peace agreement is a good think. Because it reduces the loss of population in the country and I want world peace.

2. Yes, I think it will work it both countries keep talking and follow the agreement. Please needs trust and effort from both sider.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Trust between parties: Peace deals signed under coercion or unequal terms rarely hold. Trust must be rebuilt, sometimes via step‑by‑step confidence-building measures like ceasefires or economic cooperation before full peace

2 I’d need more info to give a confident verdict, but here are typical factors to watch:

Did it define realistic, enforceable timelines? Or is it vague or open-ended?

Were all relevant groups at the table—or left out? Are local or ethnic communities represented?

crisisgroup.org

irrawaddy.com

Is there a neutral third party overseeing compliance?

Does the agreement go beyond ceasefire to address justice, land rights, disarmament, or power-sharing?

Do the parties show political will to implement it in good faith—or just signaling to international audiences?

If any of these pillars is missing, then broadly speaking, the chances of breakdown rise significantly over time.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Overall, the intention appears to be positive: emphasis is placed on strengthening community-based mediation committees, raising legal awareness, and promoting the role of youth in grassroots peacebuilding processes, which are seen as sensible and contextual approaches to addressing complex local issues.

2.Work Emphasizing community empowerment: Building strong community systems, such as mediation committees and community justice agencies, helps local people gain access to and take responsibility for the peace process itself.

# data[].attributes.body
1 I think the peace agreement is a positive step because it helps stop violence and protect people on both sides.

2 Yes, I think it will work if both countries keep talking and follow the agreement. Peace needs trust and effort from both sides.

# data[].attributes.body
ข้อ1ใหญ่

1. A Positive Diplomatic Signal
The agreement shows a clear intention from both Thailand and Cambodia to de-escalate tensions and avoid further violence. It also reflects effective diplomatic efforts from regional and global actors such as Malaysia, China, the U.S., and Japan.

2. Protection of Civilians
A ceasefire brings hope to civilians living near the border, reducing the risk of displacement, injury, or death due to armed conflict.

3. A Step Toward Sustainable Dialogue
If respected, the agreement could serve as a foundation for long-term solutions, such as joint border committees or conflict resolution frameworks.

ข้อ2ใหญ่

❌Reasons It Might Not Work

1. Immediate Ceasefire Violations
Thailand accused Cambodia of breaking the ceasefire within hours of it taking effect. If true, this suggests a serious lack of trust and control.

2. No Independent Monitoring
There’s currently no neutral body (like ASEAN or the UN) on the ground to verify what’s happening. Without this, each side can blame the other — and the truth gets lost in politics.

3. Underlying Issues Still Unresolved
The agreement stops fighting temporarily but doesn’t solve the root problems — like territorial disputes, historical tensions, and military rivalries. Unless these are addressed, conflict could return.

# data[].attributes.body
Ok

เเก้

1.It's good that the two countries are joining hands Shake hands between leaders to show friendship.

2.It works because everyone will be safe

# data[].attributes.body
I think this peace agreement is a positive step toward ending the conflict. It shows that both sides are willing to communicate and compromise. However, it will only work if all parties follow the terms honestly and build trust. If they truly cooperate, it can bring lasting peace to the region.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think it's not very good because why didn't we agree from the beginning so that the situation wouldn't end so badly

แก้

# data[].attributes.body
1. ﻿﻿I think it's a good deal because it reduces the loss of population in the country.

2. It's not good because yesterday there was still shooting and fighting.

# data[].attributes.body
แก้

1.I think it's good because it will reduce civilian casualties and allow soldiers to rest. The people will not be worried and will feel safe, which will allow our country to move forward.

# data[].attributes.body
1.I think it's a good deal because it reduces the loss of population in the country.

2.It works because everyone will be safe.

# data[].attributes.body
1 I think it's good because it reduces the loss of population in the country.
2 It is effective because there will be no loss.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think it will be good, Both Countries live in peace no one hurt👍 And They will work together 🤝

It's can help both countries and stay peaceful.

2. I think it not be work because they attack first and shot people destroy hospital, They will lie for living again. 👿

# data[].attributes.body
1 I think this peace agreement is a good idea because an unconditional ceasefire will

prevent further losses and will help restore rerations and stability in Southest Asia.

2 This ceasefire agreement should ease the acute situation in the short term,but its long-term sustainability depends on whether both countries can engage in serious negotiations to access the "root" issues and establish a mechanism to control tensions.

Jakkrit Phutburee No.16

# data[].attributes.body
1.I thinkBoth countries will live together in peace without conflict and will help each other in any way

2.Yes because this agreement allows both countries to live in peace without any more wars

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think it's a possible deal that can be believed because the Khmer used a BM21 rocket to shoot at the Seven-eleven store, causing people to die, even students, and also attacked our country.

2. Can't because from the 1st mentioned, the Khmer attacked our country without giving a signal before the war.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Here are a few ways to respond to the question “What do you think about this peace agreement?”, depending on the tone or angle you want:

---

🟢 Neutral / Thoughtful

“It seems like a step in the right direction, but its success will depend on how both sides follow through.”

“I think it has potential, but implementation is always the real challenge.”

“It's promising on paper, but time will tell if it leads to lasting peace.”

---

🟢 Positive

“It’s a hopeful development—finally some progress after so much tension.”

“I support it. Any move toward peace is better than prolonged conflict.”

“It shows real willingness to compromise. That’s encouraging.”

---

🔴 Skeptical / Critical

“It looks good on the surface, but I’m not sure either side will fully commit.”

“It feels more symbolic than practical at this point.”

“Without accountability and trust, I’m afraid it might collapse like past attempts.”

---

If you'd like help crafting a specific answer (e.g., for a speech, essay, or conversation), just let me know the context — who you're speaking to, your position on the issue, or whether you want

to sound formal, casual, critical, etc.

2.work ilIt stops fighting and prevents people from getting hurt and makes them feel comfortable being friends.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think it’s just an excuses for them (khmer) as we all seen almost week or week ago, khmer attacked our country killed innocent people included students

2. Doesn’t work at all if the word they said doesn’t mean as they said, it’s just a excuse to let them get away from troubles and blame us (thailand) like “it’s thailand who’s started the war, blah blah blah” so it’s not gonna work

# data[].attributes.body
1.I think it good,I don't want to see war I want to see peace no one hurt

2.It work because we don't need war we need peace we need focus economy it good more

Prin sornsart number 7 M 4/8

# data[].attributes.body
1.It's good to have a mediator to stop the war.

2.It's not fair that Cambodia ended the war but it's not fair that they bombed Thailand first. It's not fair to Thailand. Who is responsible for the people who died?

Tiyada Chatpramote 26

# data[].attributes.body
1. Good

2. Work good goodgood goodgood goodgood goodgood goodgood goodgood goodgood goodgood goodgood goodgood goodgood goodgood good

# data[].attributes.body
1.I thought that at first we would live in peace, but the Khmers broke their promise and came to destroy Thailand, so I don't like the Khmers.

2.It is not because the Khmer secretly attacked Thailand that the war started because of dishonesty and wanting to end the war as soon as possible.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think they will work together with no hate and loves eachother💔 because I want world peace🌅

2. It will work because I said so.

But if it didn't work.I think it will over and i can't go around the world 🌍 bruh😡

# data[].attributes.body
I think this peace agreement is a good first step. It shows that both sides are willing to stop the violence and try to solve problems through talking.

I think it might work, but it will take time and trust. There are still small attacks happening, which shows that both countries need to follow the agreement more strictly. If they keep communicating and let neutral observers help, peace might last longer.

# data[].attributes.body
What do you think about this ~ peace agreement? I think it's the right thing to do because it reduces the loss and no one else gets hurt. Do you think it will work?

Why or why not? It is a good method because it will reduce injuries and allow for negotiations for peace and for the people.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What do you think about this peace agreement?

I think this peace agreement is a very positive step for both Thailand and Cambodia. It shows that both countries are willing to talk and find peaceful solutions instead of fighting.

2. Do you think it will work? Why or why not? Write your opinion (3–5 sentences):

I believe it will work if both sides truly respect the agreement. Peace needs trust and honest communication. If they keep meeting and solving problems together, the ceasefire can last. However, if old conflicts come back, it might be difficult to keep the peace. So both countries must keep working together to make it successful.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I believe that to end the war, we must negotiate with good leaders and keep our promises. If no one invaded anyone beforehand, the Thai-Cambodian war would never have happened.

2. While the soldiers were fighting for their country, some of them were doing things that didn't end the war.

# data[].attributes.headline
ได้เลย! นี่คือตัวอย่าง

# data[].attributes.body
ได้เลย! นี่คือตัวอย่างคำตอบภาษาอังกฤษสำหรับคำถามทั้งสองข้อ:

1. I think this peace agreement is a very positive step for both Thailand and Cambodia. It shows that both countries are willing to talk and find peaceful solutions instead of fighting.

2. I believe it will work if both sides truly respect the agreement. Peace needs trust and honest communication. If they keep meeting and solving problems together, the ceasefire can last. However, if old conflicts come back, it might be difficult to keep the peace. So both countries must keep working together to make it successful.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It’s good that Cambodia and Thailand are working together It can help both countries grow and stay peaceful.

2. It’s not work Because Khmer people attack first and shot hospital. They lie for a living. And they will obviously lie in this peace agreement.

# data[].attributes.body
1.I think this peace agreement is a good thing. It can help people who live near the border feel safe.

2.Yes, I think it will work if both countries trust each other and keep their promise. I want peace, not war.

Duean kingnakhom no.35

# data[].attributes.body
1. I believe this agreement should have been reached long ago. This kind of tragedy should not have happened. After this incident, the Cambodian side is no longer credible and should no longer be respected, no matter who on the Cambodian side says the agreement will create peace. From now on, the Thai side must continue to defend our home, our democratic city, at all times and should not have any further ties with Cambodia.

2. At that time, many people probably thought this proposal would work. Yes, it only works on TV. Don't forget that Cambodia is untrustworthy. They keep talking nonsense, always hoping to harm Thailand. Therefore, any proposals Cambodia makes should no longer be trusted or relied upon.

# data[].attributes.body
1.I think this peace agreement is a good idea because an unconditional ceasefire will prevent further losses and will help restore relations and stability in Southeast Asia.

2.This ceasefire agreement should ease the acute situation in the short term, but its long-term sustainability depends on whether both countries can engage in serious negotiations to address the "root" issues and establish a mechanism to control tensions.

Premmika Pitchayajindasiri no.37

# data[].attributes.body
1. ﻿﻿﻿I think this peace agreement between
Thailand and Cambodia is a positive step because it shows both countries want to stop violence and find a peaceful solution.

2. ﻿﻿﻿I believe it might work if both sides stay committed to dialogue and avoid conflicts at the border. However, it could fail if there is no trust or if new disputes arise. Overall, it's a hopeful move toward lasting peace.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What do you think about this peace agreement?

I think it’s a good thing because it shows both sides want to end the conflict peacefully and choose to talk instead of using violence.

2. Do you think it will work? Why or why not?

It might work if both sides follow the agreement and truly cooperate. But if there’s still mistrust or some groups disagree, the agreement could fail.

Phichaya Srisamritporn 22 4/8

# data[].attributes.body
1.It's okay because both countries will be at peace and won't lose soldiers or civilians who shouldn't have suffered any damage.

2.Both works will bring peace to the fore. The place will not be damaged, no one will be harmed, the people will not be evacuated from the area by incoming weapons, and the soldiers will be able to live in peace, with no one dying because of anyone. They will love their country.

Phetladda chanphet no.39

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was a really good peace agreement, but from what I've seen, I'm not really sure if I believe this peace agreement because of what happened after. but I do want peace over war. it is safer.

2. Normally this will work. but cambodian being cambodian. this will not work at all. because they will not follow any agreement and break every single rules because they sucks. so I think this peace agreement will not work.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Not very satisfied with The Khmer side launched the attack first. Therefore, the agreement in this round is not reliable or reliable.

2.It not work. The Khmer people can't be trusted, they lie to the king, say that they are attacked first,We want to live in peace, if the Cambodians really want peace or want to end this war, they will not be the first to launch an attack.

# data[].attributes.body
Look at the video and answer the questions.

Part 1: Opinion Writing

1. What do you think about this peace agreement?

2. Do you think it will work? Why or why not?

Write your opinion (3-5 sentences): ..........................................................................................................................................

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Thailand and Cambodia Agree on Unconditional Cease-Fire

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think the peace agreement is very important. It helps protect people who live near the border. Both countries must trust each other and follow the agreement.

2. I hope this will lead to long-term peace and friendship. Peace is better than war.