# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Compensatory justice and the wrongs of deportation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The paper argues that there are resources within theories of corrective justice to make the case against the deportation of immigrants, including those accused of committing criminal actions. More…

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Opinion: Trump’s mass deportations are immoral and illegal - Washington Square News

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
President Donald Trump’s stance on immigration has long been defined by fearmongering and dehumanization — boldly claiming that legal immigrants take advantage of loopholes to suck the country dry, while untold hordes of criminals flock over the southern border to wreak havoc on the unsuspecting citizens of the United States. But his latest moves to…

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Conservatives on migration claim that allowing the DACA recipients to stay shows disrespect for the law. The moral principles that underlie the American legal system, however, tell a different story.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Faith Leaders Call on Congress to Reject Immoral Budget Cuts, Mass Deportations | Faith in Action

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
For Immediate Release: March 3, 2025
Contact: Heather Cabral, 202-5550-6880, hcabral@faithinaction.org

# data[].attributes.body
This is a journal article, published in 2021, The title of the site is arxiv.org, Title "An Empirical Analysis of How Internet Access Influences Public Opinion Towards Undocumented Immigrants and Unaccompanied Children.”

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
An Empirical Analysis of how Internet Access Influences Public Opinion towards Undocumented Immigrants and Unaccompanied Children

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This research adds to the expanding field of data-driven analysis, scientific modeling, and forecasting on the impact of having access to the Internet and IoT on the general US population regarding immigrants and immigration policies. More specifically, this research focuses on the public opinion of undocumented immigrants in the United States and having access to the Internet in their local settings. The term Undocumented Immigrants refers to those who live in the United States without legal papers, documents, or visas. Undocumented immigrants may have come into the country unlawfully or with valid documentation, but their legal status has expired. Using the 2020 American National Election Studies (ANES) time series dataset, I investigated the relationship between internet access (A2I) and public perception of undocumented immigrants. According to my research and analysis, increasing internet access among non-Hispanic whites with at least a bachelors degree with an annual household income of less than 99K is more likely to oppose the deportation of undocumented immigrants and separating unaccompanied children from their families in borderland areas. The individuals with substantial Republican political ideology exhibit significantly lower opposing effects in deporting undocumented immigrants or separating unaccompanied children from their families. The evidence from multiple statistical models is resilient to a variety of factors. The findings show that increased internet access may improve undocumented immigrants social integration and acceptability. During health emergencies, it may be especially beneficial to make them feel safe, included, and supported in their local settings.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a working paper, published in 2025, arxiv.org, “Quantifying the Economic Impact of 2025 ICE Raids on California’s Agricultural Industry: A Case Study of Oxnard.”

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Quantifying the Economic Impact of 2025 ICE Raids on California’s Agricultural Industry: A Case Study of Oxnard

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In 2025, intensified Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Oxnard, California, disrupted the state’s \$49 billion agricultural industry, a critical supplier of 75% of U.S. fruits and nuts and one-third of its vegetables. This paper quantifies the economic consequences of these raids on labor markets, crop production, and food prices using econometric modeling. We estimate a 20-40% reduction in the agricultural workforce, leading to \$3-7 billion in crop losses and a 5-12% increase in produce prices. The analysis draws on USDA Economic Research Service data and recent ICE detention figures, which show arrests in Southern California rising from 699 in May to nearly 2,000 in June 2025. The raids disproportionately affect labor-intensive crops like strawberries, exacerbating supply chain disruptions. Policy recommendations include expanding the H-2A visa program and legalizing undocumented workers to stabilize the sector. This study contributes to agricultural economics by providing a data-driven assessment of immigration enforcement’s economic toll.