# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get access to files anywhere through secure cloud storage and file backup for your photos, videos, files and more with Google Drive.

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16cFR6NmYNGVnK7k5acWgi-ggulO6lb61/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=100273039052344705034&rtpof=true&sd=true

# data[].attributes.body
dont forget to comment like and subscribe!
we have 100 k give away for FREE and a Nintendo Oled!!

# data[].attributes.body
dont mind the picture it leads to the docs

hElLO cLOwNpiERce

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Q. What is this personality test based on?

A. This test is based on the personality theory created by Isabel Myers and Katharine Briggs. It measures your preferences on Myers and Briggs' four dimensions of personality type, as well as 23 more detailed facets of type to personalize your results.

Q. How long is this personality test?

A. The test consists of 130 questions and takes about 10-15 minutes to complete.

Q. Is this personality test really free?

A. You do not need to purchase or register to take this test and view an overview of your results. If you would like, you can purchase a more comprehensive full report for a small fee.

Q. Is this personality test accurate?

A. This test has been researched extensively to ensure it is valid and reliable, using a variety of statistical methods. These results are detailed in the TypeFinder Technical Documentation. Most of our users describe their results as both accurate and insightful. However, it is important to note that no test can determine personality type correctly for everyone-it's essential that you evaluate your results on your own to decide if they describe you well, and research other possible types if necessary.

Q. What will my results for this test look like?

A. You will first see a brief, free report showing the key points from your results. After reviewing your brief report, you then have the option to unlock your full report for a small fee. To see what you can expect from your full report, see this sample report.

Q. How can I access my personality test results?

A. After you take a test, you will have the option to create an account by entering your email address. If you create an account, you can view your test results at any time by returning to Truity.com and logging into your account. We do not email your results to you.

Q. Do I need to complete this personality test all at once?

A. If you've created an account and are logged in when you take the test, your responses will be saved as you go through the test. If you do not log in to a Truity account before starting the test, your progress will not be saved and you will need to complete the test all at once.

Q. Can I have my employees, team or group take the TypeFinder test?

A. Absolutely. Our Truity@Work platform is designed to make it easy to give a TypeFinder personality test to your team or group. See discounted group pricing and learn how to quickly and easily set up testing for your group on the Testing for Business page.

Q. Will this test tell me which careers are best for my type?

A. This test has brief information about the careers for your type, but if you main goal is to find the right career for you, then we recommend you take the TypeFinder for Career Planning, which is specifically designed to help you find the right career for your type as well as your individual interests and strengths.

Q. Is this personality test appropriate for children?

A. None of our tests are appropriate for children under the age of 14. Some of our tests may have mature content, and anyone younger than 18 should only take the test with parental guidance.

Q. Where can I find more information about the 16 personalities?

Q. Can my personality type change over time?

A. If you asked Isabel Briggs Myers and Katherine Briggs (the creators of the 16 personality types) or Carl Jung (the psychologist whose theories Briggs and Myers studied), they would say no, a person's personality type does not change over time. However, personality psychologists who study large populations have found that shifts in personality do occur over time. Research shows that age and individual life experiences can cause a shift in your personality. However, drastic shifts in personality are unusual, and most people find that changes are small and gradual.

Q. I'm looking for the official MBTI® assessment. Is this it?

A. The MBTI® is the original assessment developed by Isabel Myers and Katharine Briggs. The TypeFinder® is based on Myers and Briggs' theory, but is not the same as the MBTI® assessment. Some key differences:
The MBTI® Assessment The TypeFinder®
Q. Are you going to sell my data?

A. . We do not sell your email or other data to any third parties, and we have a zero-spam policy. We carefully comply with applicable privacy laws in handling your personal information. You can read more in our privacy policy.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Myers-Briggs, and MBTI are registered trademarks of The Myers & Briggs Foundation in the United States and other countries. Truity has no affiliation with the organizations publishing or holding rights to the MBTI® assessment.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This updated and expanded edition of our bestselling TypeFinder assessment goes deeper than any personality test you've taken before. Based on original research into the nuances of personality type, the TypeFinder reveals not only your four-letter personality type code, but exactly how your one-of-a-kind personality profile fits within that type.

# data[].attributes.body
https://novoresume.com/career-blog/career-paths-for-every-personality

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
You probably took a Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality test at some point in your life.

You got four mysterious acronyms like ENTJ, INFP, or ESTP, without much insight on what they mean or how to use them.

Here's the rundown:

The letters in each MBTI personality type refer to a specific trait. The combination of those traits forms your personality type.

Your personality type is powerful:

It explains why some people are okay with navigating spreadsheets on a computer all day; while others need to feel like they are helping others through their careers. It also explains why some make better CEOs and some better psychologists.

Curious to see which career path you should take?

We've created an AWESOME guide that splits 101 career paths based on the 16 Myers-Briggs personality type groups.

101 Career Paths by Personality - Visual Guide

What Myers-Briggs Personality Traits Mean

16 Myers-Briggs Personality Types

Haven't done the MBTI test yet? You can take it here.

What Myers-Briggs Personality Traits Mean

Your personality type will depend on four crucial factors:

1. Favorite world - Extrovert (E) or Introvert (I)

2. Information - Sensing (S) or Intuition (N)

3. Decisions - Thinking (T) or Feeling (F)

4. Structure - Judging (J) or Perceiving (P)

Here's a refresher on what all these mean and where you fall.

Do you like to focus on the outer world - other people, nature, external environment? Then you are an extrovert (E): outgoing, comfortable in groups, and energetic around other people.

Do you put your attention on your own inner world? Then, you are an introvert (I): you like doing things alone, like to reflect and are usually reserved.

A sensing (S) personality type pays attention to physical reality when collecting information. If you're a sensor, you trust experience first, are pragmatic, and only rely on facts.

A person who collects information through intuition (N) pays more attention to patterns in the information, rather than the hard facts. They like to work with symbols, theories, and look at the bigger picture.

If you make decisions based on objective principles and facts, you are a thinking (T) type. You enjoy technical and scientific subjects, where logic and facts are important. You are task-oriented, and sometimes can be a bit "uncaring" or "untactful".

If you think you make the best decisions by putting more weight on the people involved, then you are a feeling (F) type. You're all about maintaining harmony and making others happy. You are caring, tactful, but can sometimes be too idealistic or downright "cheesy".

Are you structured and decided? Do you prioritize work before play, start things well before the deadline, and enjoy making to-do lists? Then you are a judging (J) type.

Are you flexible and adaptable? Do you work in bursts of energy, procrastinate, and hate planning? Then you're most likely a perceiving (P) type.

16 Myers-Briggs Personality Types

INTJ - The Orchestrator

You are an INTJ if you are Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, and Judging.

You are creative but dwell on the details, and usually like to work alone. You're an analytical problem-solver, always trying to improve systems, processes, and whatever else you find in your path.

Famous INTJs include Hillary Clinton, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Sir Isaac Newton, and Stephen Hawking.

The top careers for an INTJ are:

ENFP - The Motivator

You are an ENFP if you are Extroverted, Intuitive, Feeling, and Perceiving.

You are a true free spirit - charming, independent, and energetic. You enjoy interacting with others and exploring new ideas and want your work life to reflect that. You find EVERYTHING interesting, so you can have a hard time choosing a career path.

Famous ENFPs include Quentin Tarantino, Robin Williams, Sandra Bullock, Ellen DeGeneres, and Will Smith.

The top career paths for a curious ENFP are:

ESFP - The Entertainer

You are an ESFP if you are Extroverted, Sensing, Feeling, and Perceiving.

As an ESFP, you are definitely THE life of the party. You randomly start singing and dancing and love giving out time and energy to other people. Any job that restrains you from that freedom will 100% make you miserable. You want excitement, interaction, and a chance to shine!

Famous ESFPs include Marilyn Monroe, Elvis Presley, Miley Cyrus, Jamie Foxx, and Adam Levine.

The top careers for an ESFP are:

Conclusion

That was a fun ride!

We hope you learned more about yourself and felt a bit more understood.

Moral of the story:

Don't settle for a career that won't make you happy. Get to know yourself and pick a career where you don't dread for Monday to come. No matter your personality type, there is a job out there where you can feel fulfilled AND be productive.

101+ Career Paths Full Infographic

In case you wish to share the entire visual infographic, here it is:

Want more interesting reads?

We have a few suggestions:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
101 Career Paths for Every Personality [2022 Guide]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
You probably took a Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality test at some point in your life. You got four mysterious acronyms like ENTJ, INFP, or ESTP, without much insight on what they mean or how to use them. Here's the rundown: The letters in each MBTI personality type refer to a specific trait.

# data[].attributes.body
i have a "nice" feeling

# data[].attributes.body
ESFP

# data[].attributes.body
infp

# data[].attributes.headline
Please write down your name and share the message behind your mural

# data[].attributes.subject
Please write down your name and share the message behind your mural

# data[].attributes.body
This mural means that i'm not alone i'm the middle one and there are friends/family near me so i'm not alone

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
This mural it's mean "if opportunity doesn't knock, build a door"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get access to files anywhere through secure cloud storage and file backup for your photos, videos, files and more with Google Drive.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The pandemic's gardening boom shows how gardens can cultivate public health

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
As lockdowns went into effect in the spring of 2020 to slow the spread of the coronavirus, reports emerged of a global gardening boom, with plants, flowers, vegetables and herbs sprouting in backyards and on balconies around the world.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
During the height of the pandemic, people flocked to the park near my home. For those of us who live in neighbourhoods where there is access to greenspace, parks allowed us to lounge on the grass and in the shade of the trees, admire flowers, enjoy a walk in the fresh air, or even grow food in a community garden.

These moments offered a health boost and made visible just one of the ways that human health and well-being is supported by our relationships with plants. It's part of what I call relational health - a term that speaks to the ways health is produced through relationships. From a relational health perspective, health is a constantly unfolding process that is produced by encounters between humans and various aspects of non-human nature.

Sometimes the encounters are not good - we only need to think of emerging infectious diseases to be reminded of this. But mostly, interactions between humans and non-human nature are positive, health-producing and sustaining. Our relationships with plants offer a good example.

Plant blindness

Euro-western culture largely ignores the many roles that plants play in society. It's been called " plant blindness," an "inability to see or notice plants in one's environment." Plants are not much more than background foliage in our busy lives - or worse, expendable.

At the local level, trees are killed as homeowners renovate and infrastructure expands. At the global level, we demonstrate an ignorance of the health-supporting role of plants when we accept, in the name of development, the destruction of forests for palm oil plantations or the paving of wetlands, where all sorts of plants flourish.

The lack of awareness of the role of plants in supporting human health is particularly striking if you consider that plants produce oxygen. We can't breathe without them. They clean our water, they provide us with food and medicine, fibre for our clothes, material for our homes.

The roles of plants

Botanists and ecologists study the natural science of plants. As social scientists, my colleagues and I consider the various roles that plants play in our social and political worlds.

Plants can be considered to be social participants and players in society. So I look at the ways that plants support our health, not only in terms of the food they provide us or the oxygen and shade they offer, but the ways that our relationships with plants facilitate political decisions and actions that support health in the city.

That non-human nature is part of society is foreign to Euro-western thought. Ever since the Enlightenment, the dominant Euro-western worldview has seen the human as the supreme species, leaving the rest of the world as resources to exploit, as writer and philosopher Silvia Wynter explores in her work.

To view a plant as a participant requires a shift in worldview, for some. Indigenous ontologies have understood and valued the contributions of non-humans to world-making. People in other parts of the world, including on the Indian subcontinent, understand that humans are not the only actors on planet earth. Also, the knowledge that health is produced through relationships between humans and non-human nature has long been part of Indigenous ways of knowing. It's only in Euro-western society that has ignored and tried to erase other worldviews.

Plants as social participants

So what does it look like when plants are social participants? Plants are evidently not like us - they don't act with intent. Rather, their agency as health actors emerges from relationships.

I conducted fieldwork in the Regent Park neighbourhood of Toronto that is being redeveloped from a social housing community to a mixed-income area. The redevelopment has involved building on land where residents have grown food for decades. Locals did not want to lose their growing space, so they advocated for gardens in the new neighbourhood. They wanted continued access to homegrown vegetables, and the mental peace and exercise that gardening provided them. They didn't want to lose their relationships with plants.

Very simply, the relationships between people and plants facilitated the advocacy, and residents were able to secure at least some space for gardens in the new design.

At first glance, it might look like humans did the advocacy. They are the ones who spoke up and asked that plants be included in the design. But if you recognize the agency of non-human nature, it shifts the analysis.

If you consider plants as participants in society, then the plants' agency in the advocacy becomes visible. Their agency arises from the relationships they have with humans. When their needs are considered by humans in decision-making, they play a role. The plants partner with the people and their physical presence in gardens stakes a claim to the land. This shift in worldview opens up many possibilities in better understanding the role of non-human nature in contemporary society.

This scenario also sheds light on how health is produced through relationships between humans and non-human nature in the city. Health is not something that one possesses in one's body, but rather for the gardeners who depend on the garden for food and well-being, health is produced in part by their relationships with the plants in their gardens.

To promote human health during this time of climate change and global pandemic requires scrutiny of the relationships we have with non-human nature in ways that may not be familiar to the Euro-western worldview.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How the relationships we have with plants contribute to human health in many ways

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
During the height of the pandemic, people flocked to the park near my home. For those of us who live in neighbourhoods where there is access to greenspace, parks allowed us to lounge on the grass and in the shade of the trees, admire flowers, enjoy a walk in the fresh air, or even grow food in a community garden.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Cooking Stories — Learn how others discover, create and share delicious recipes. — Culineer

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
n a lot of ways, cities are about movement. Commuting, cultural visits, consumer binges, social trips or just staring out of the bus window, feeling part of the flow: motion makes urban life fulfilling, sometimes very tiring and occasionally sublime. Over recent years, without much discussion, the way we move around cities has changed. The change started before the pandemic, but Covid accelerated it, and it has continued as the pandemic has apparently receded.

Since 2010, the UK has acquired bike-hire schemes and Ubers, more than 1 million electric bikes and electric scooters, and a fleet of other personal transport solutions, from electric skateboards to bikes with trailers. A whole new world of what transport theorists call micromobility, some of it backed by corporations, not all of it legal, has appeared on urban roads.

For some people, it has been liberating. Owning a car in a city is expensive, especially during an energy crisis, and increasingly impractical, thanks to much-needed environmental measures such as low traffic neighbourhoods. Micromobility offers more personal choice - you can go almost anywhere; more anonymity - no need for number plates or a licence; and, especially if you're pedalling, feelings of empowerment. In an impatient age, it's also faster than walking. Where I live in east London, with bikes and scooters cruising past in all directions and barely a moving car in sight, the quieter residential streets feel like a vision of greener city living from the 1970s finally come to life. The future of urban travel seems to have arrived, and it's small-scale and individualised.

So in some respects it's an awkward time for London to open the Elizabeth line, a £19bn upgrade of a 19th-century idea: that the best way for people to move around the perpetually congested capital is in crowds in underground train carriages, according to a timetable and along routes over which they have no control. Named after a 96-year-old monarch and connecting already powerful places, such as the bankers' towers of Canary Wharf, the elite boutiques of Bond Street and the overbearing airport at Heathrow, it's possible to see the Elizabeth line - beautiful and ingenious though it is - as a grandiose and old-fashioned enterprise. Given that public transport in many British towns and cities means a few train stations and infrequent buses, adding another London underground line seems a luxury.

It has been done, moreover, just as the capital's public transport use may be entering long-term decline. As in New York and Paris, passenger numbers were falling in London even before the pandemic, thanks to online shopping, home working, micromobility and the long stagnation of incomes since the financial crisis, which has made many people less willing or able to pay for leisure travel. The currently influential idea of the " 15-minute city " - that residents' needs should be within a short walking or cycling distance - could reduce the need for big transport systems further. It's possible that the Elizabeth line, despite the impressive passenger numbers of its opening days, could be the last of its kind.

Yet if public transport use has peaked in London (one of the few British cities where it has grown in recent decades), the environmental, social and political consequences will not be benign. Going on public transport, in a place where a wide range of people still use it, is one of a diminishing number of egalitarian experiences in today's Britain. A city bus or train carriage is a shared space: people of different classes, races, nationalities, ages and abilities mix and observe each other, not always harmoniously but often usefully. Everyone enjoys or endures the same conditions. Everyone has to wait for people to get on or off. While cycling, say, is often an individual experience, using public transport is always collective. Even if you're the only passenger, the route has been shaped by the preferences of others.

Public transport can also be a reminder that the state can still provide and even inspire. Reservations about the Elizabeth line are hard to retain once you've used its elegant, spacious platforms and fast, smooth trains - which last Monday morning were full not of metropolitan elites but ordinary Londoners with prams and plastic bags. The capital's heaviest users of public transport are minority ethnic residents, people on lower incomes, the young and the old.

Tory governments have often neglected or actively undermined urban public transport, sometimes for blatantly political reasons. In 1988, Margaret Thatcher vetoed a rail scheme that would have connected the west and centre of the capital to Hackney, a borough long known for its bad transport and leftwing residents. "Do you know what sort of people live out in Hackney?" she asked the civil servant presenting the scheme. "They are not Conservative voters!" She agreed to a plan that became the Elizabeth line instead.

Boris Johnson's government has responded uncharitably to the collapse of London's public transport usage and revenues since the start of the pandemic. It has given Transport for London - for which the city's Labour mayor, Sadiq Khan, is responsible - a series of short-term bailouts. These have been conditional on cuts severe enough to cause tube strikes, the latest of which is due on Monday; and fare rises and service reductions, potentially including the removal of a fifth of bus services from central London. The current bailout expires in three weeks' time.

Non-Londoners weary of the capital's privilege and dramas may be tempted to shrug. Yet how people move around London is not just a local matter. Many of these people are visitors, and the capital is a model for other British cities. The mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, is campaigning for his city to have " London-style public transport ".

People who prefer to cycle - Johnson is one of them - may in some ways be more modern. When you're waiting ages for a bus, or stuck in traffic in one, and bikes and scooters are shooting past, public transport can feel less like social equality on wheels and more like a Victorian ordeal.

But for many elderly, underconfident or physically vulnerable people, or those who have to travel big distances across London, micromobility is probably never going to be more than an obscure buzzword - or something that occasionally makes city life more hazardous. Memo to people who ride on the pavement: your mobility is no more important than anyone else's.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A bike, a skateboard or the Elizabeth line? It depends where you want society to go | Andy Beckett

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
n a lot of ways, cities are about movement. Commuting, cultural visits, consumer binges, social trips or just staring out of the bus window, feeling part of the flow: motion makes urban life fulfilling, sometimes very tiring and occasionally sublime. Over recent years, without much discussion, the way we move around cities has changed.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Empower Students to Do Their Best, Original Work

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Turnitin solutions promote academic integrity, streamline grading and feedback, deter plagiarism, and improve student outcomes.

# data[].attributes.headline
Hi Students! We're here for you! This is the 911 helpline! This program is led by the school counselors (Ms. Nerin, & Pak Yogie) We encourage you to share your concerns in academic/other areas. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Hi Students! We're here for you! This is the 911 helpline! This program is led by the school counselors (Ms. Nerin, & Pak Yogie) We encourage you to share your concerns in academic/other areas. 

# data[].attributes.body
i care about air pollution because it is important for our health

# data[].attributes.body
Air pollution causes death, and if we die, we can't eat alpacas :[

# data[].attributes.body
I think the action for air pollution is important because it is a serious problem that can cause many diseases.

# data[].attributes.body
pollution stinky