# data[].attributes.body
Shows minimal understanding of the historical content. Makes few or incorrect connections. May present oversimplified or inaccurate historical information.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows basic understanding of the slave trade but may have some historical inaccuracies. Makes limited connections between concepts. Understanding of different perspectives may be superficial.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows good understanding of the historical content with some specific examples. Makes clear connections between different aspects of the slave trade. Demonstrates awareness of multiple historical perspectives.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of the transatlantic slave trade, citing specific historical evidence and examples. Makes sophisticated connections between economic factors, racial beliefs, and social impacts. Shows deep knowledge of multiple perspectives including European, African, and Indigenous peoples' roles.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows minimal analysis skills. May rely on oversimplified explanations. Little to no consideration of multiple perspectives or factors.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates basic analysis of historical events. May focus on simple cause-and-effect relationships. Limited consideration of multiple perspectives or factors.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows good analytical skills in examining historical causes and effects. Considers multiple factors in reasoning. Shows some ability to challenge assumptions and consider different perspectives.

# data[].attributes.body
Expertly analyzes complex causation in historical events. Evaluates multiple factors (economic, racial, social) with sophisticated reasoning. Challenges assumptions and considers nuanced perspectives on responsibility and impact.

# data[].attributes.body
Minimal participation in discussions. May be disruptive or disrespectful. Little movement between corners or justification for positions. Rarely engages with peers.

# data[].attributes.body
Participates occasionally with basic contributions. May show inconsistent respect for others' views. Movement between corners may lack clear justification. Limited engagement with peers.

# data[].attributes.body
Regularly participates in the discussion with relevant contributions. Shows respect for others' views. Moves between corners when appropriate. Engages in dialogue with peers.

# data[].attributes.body
Actively participates throughout the discussion with thoughtful contributions. Respectfully responds to others' viewpoints. Moves between corners with clear justification. Encourages others to participate and extends the conversation.

# data[].attributes.body
Rarely supports positions with evidence. Makes claims without historical support. Arguments lack clear reasoning or evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Occasionally supports positions with evidence, but may be vague or incorrect. Limited use of historical facts to justify positions. Arguments may lack strong support.

# data[].attributes.body
Usually supports positions with relevant evidence and reasoning. Uses some historical facts to justify positions and movements. Arguments are generally well-supported.

# data[].attributes.body
Consistently supports positions with specific historical evidence and clear reasoning. Effectively uses historical facts and examples to justify movement between corners. Makes compelling arguments based on evidence.