# data[].attributes.body
Strength: This group has made an effort to facilitate data collection for research analysis. This Sampling enables them to collect and analyze data for a smaller portion of the population (STEM 2 STUDENTS). Their choice of the sampling procedure is very important in facilitating the research process which is why their procedure is a strong foundation for searching for participants who are related to their phenomena. Their procedure helped them in reaching out a number of participants meaningful to their study. I was friends with one of their members so I knew how they were able to do the data gathering procedure and I was amazed on the findings of their research it truly contributes to their data analysis chapter.

No Weaknesses. The third group was the quickest group to present their findings but that doesn’t mean that they didn’t do a great job. Their presentation was direct to the point and didn’t include unneccsary details from their manuscript.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: In their presentation, i consider this as their strength because this serves as their foundation in conducting their research. They have stated the statement of the problem they wish to determine very clearly. It is important for every researcher to identify what their study is going to be about and state what the problem really is about. Their motivations and goals for their study really is astounding. I sensed their commitment and willingness to conduct their research because of how enthusiastic their group was in presenting every chapter of their dissertation. I consider their group as the most determined group as they pointed out their points clearly and direct.

As an observer, I won’t be giving any negative comments nor weaknesses to every group as I observed that all of them are very keen and positive in presenting their work.

There aren’t any weaknesses that I could point out in their group as they presented themselves in a very professional manner. All their members are adequately prepared in their attires as well as their parts. Therefore, I give this group a positive feedback.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: I consider their theoretical framework as their strength mainly due to the fact that The it connects the researcher to their  existing knowledge. Being guided by a relevant theory, they are given a basis for their hypotheses and choice of research methods. By virtue of its applicative nature, I can say that the included theory is a good theory in the social sciences and  is of value precisely because it fulfills their main purpose which is  to explain the meaning, nature, and challenges associated with a phenomenon with parent-student relationship.

I won’t be putting any weaknesses as I mentioned earlier. I just want to acknowledge more about their presentation. They were able to present the complex parts of the presentations successfully, they kept it simple so that the audience would be able to understand key points from their dissertation

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: The chapter 4 or review of related literature of this study titled ‘’ Student Experiences with Parents during the Covid-19 Pandemic of Selected Grade 11 Stem 2 Students from NEU-SHS S.Y. 2021-2022: A Transcendental Phenomenological Study’’ is very interesting and valid because it really shows different studies that support their study and give extra knowledge that can expand one individual’s belief. This part of their paper did a great job since all the gathered information or existing studies are five years present which makes it more credible and updated in one specific issue that is being talked about. They also presented their rrl in a short way but can easily understand since they just put the main topic or highlight of the gathered information or existing studies.

Weaknesses: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: These highlight of the research questions of group 3 study’’ Experiences of  STEM 2 Students with an Overseas Filipino Workers Parents: A Transcendental Phenomenology'’ is one of the best and valid part in their research paper as it stated here in the picture that there are varied experiences that the students have gone through because of the lack of parental involvement and they also mention the benefits and drawback that some of the respondents formed a stronger relationship with their parents and last the part where participants from this study mentioned that they are having negative feelings towards their parents such as loneliness and sadness. These highlights and results have been very easy for us the reader and audience since their study proves the different experiences of stem 2 students with overseas Filipino workers' parents. It also gives clarification on the possible and negative effects that one individual may have formed through their parents because of long term separation.

Weaknesses: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: The study of group 1 titled ‘’ The Lived Experience of Grade 11 ABM, ICT, and STEM Students’ Inadequate Virtual Learning Resources in the New Normal at the New Era University: A Transcendental Phenomenology’’ is really eye catching in this part which is statement of the problem since they mention the questions or problem that they want to solve or answer in their study. Their statement of the problem is really valid for me because as you can see here they are very specific on what they want to achieve in their paper and what they want to answer in one specific issue which is talking about experiences.

Weaknesses: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: For this final group, I consider their final part of the presentation as their strength mainly because the topic for their research was very broad. I find the topic of their research very interesting and timely. The outcome of their research includes clear and concise details and they are very beneficial in strengthening their arguments and demonstrating their understanding of the complex and broad outreach of social media influence to students. Also, it provided significant information from the findings and emergent themes. To sum it up, I liked how they synthesized all main points from their dissertation into a short and concise manner despite having a broad scope of the research.

No weaknesses at all. Out of all the groups they were the ones who presented it in a moderate amount of time, the pacing of the chapters was very well presented. The presenters were not in a rush but also not slow in explaining the chapters. That is all that I can acknowledge in their group and I am very glad that all of us are able to finish this school year by learning a lot about conducting research. It was a great experience to all of us.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: I believe that group 5's recommendation section is their strongest and most valid part of their work since it conveys the message or recommendations that they want to promote to the readers, particularly students, parents, instructors, and future researchers. Their suggestion is well-written because it is stated in brief sentences that are easy to understand and apply to one's lifestyle.

Weaknesses: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: Aviva's group presentation is well-organized, in my opinion. That is their greatest asset. A well-organized presentation and group can assist the researchers in their group work successfully. It can prevent wrongdoing and bring everyone in the group together. An organized group is the cornerstone of high-performing work, and a solid team spirit may be held primarily responsible for the study's success and smooth operation. If group members do not gel and operate effectively together, difficulties such as poor organization, missed deadlines, and workplace strife can occur.

Weakness: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: The first group, Micole's group, proudly takes the stage first every time since they are the first group. All of you deserve congratulations. This group's strength, in my opinion, is their reliability and versatility. They have presented their insight in its entirety to their readers and audiences. This will aid future researchers who will revisit their topic. This might also assist their group in learning more about the subject.

Weakness: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: The third group's strength, in my opinion, is that their PowerPoint presentation is not overly wordy. This strength can aid their audiences and readers in not becoming bored while reading or viewing their presentation. Their defense presentation is also rather good. Because of the efficacy of their presentation, I got interested in their study as one of their audience members.

Weakness: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: Micole’s group or group 1 did a great job in conducting their study. The whole time of their presentation kept me interested and attentive. For the strength of group 1’s research study, I think it is the significance of their research. The significance of their research is very timely since we are in a Virtual learning set up. And it will really benefit all of its recipient. This can be an eyeopener to everyone and it is really beneficial for everyone. It is also specific and explains why their research is very important, especially these days.

Weakness: As I read their PowerPoint, I see no weakness in their research study.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: For the second group, I think the summary of their 1st research question is their strength. The explains very well the changes in student parent relationship. This, also, is very timely since we are still in the Covid-19 Pandemic. The result of their study is very surprising and amusing since it shows that the relation of student and parent improved greatly.

Weakness: On this part, they conducted their study very well and they leave no gaps.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: For me, I think their strength is the Review of Related Literature. The rrl in their study provides with a framework that helps them build the appropriate hypothesis. Their RRL also helps their study to be more accurate and valid because it really backs up their research study.

Weakness: None, their research study is constructed very well.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: The third group's strength, in my opinion, is that their PowerPoint presentation is not overly wordy. This strength can aid their audiences and readers in not becoming bored while reading or viewing their presentation.

Weakness: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: From how I see it, I’d say that the strength of the first group's presentation, was the scope of their study. The scope of their study covered the challenges experienced by Grade 11 students from different strands with inadequate virtual learning resources, and I believe that having such respondents or participants from different strands was a great asset for their research because they were able to relay the similarities and differences experienced by their participants coming from various strands. Moreover, the number of participants in their study, which was 6, was an appropriate quantity for a qualitative study.

Weakness: I didn’t notice any weaknesses in their presentation as the content they presented was impressive.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: From my point of view, the strength of this second group is their summary of findings. They were able to state a clear and concise finding of their research, which was evident in their summary, in which the research questions were answered correctly. Additionally, as I listened to their presentation, I’d say that I’ve learned a lot from it and I believe that what they’ve found is pretty accurate. Furthermore, rather than focusing solely on the positive aspects of their study, their research was able to focus on both the positive and negative aspects, which made it unbiased in my opinion, and I believe that being unbiased in a study is immensely important in producing a more credible report.

Weakness: As I’ve listened to the whole duration of their presentation, I see no flaws as it was orderly presented.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: Overall, the third group did an incredible job with their PowerPoint presentation. Their presentation was not just clear and instructive, but it was also less wordy. And I believe that this piqued my interest and allowed me to concentrate better because it was not just a pure reading of what was presented in front of us; rather, the explanations were provided by the presenters themselves, making it more entertaining to listen to, in my opinion. Furthermore, despite their brief presentation, they were able to present the content of their paper very well and organized.

Weakness: As I previously stated, they did an outstanding job with their presentation, and I see no weakness at all.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: For the last group, I think the strength of their presentation is the significance of the study. Their topic is very timely, especially now that we are in an online setting, and from the way I see it, the significance of their study is totally on point and could really help the readers, especially the students, to have a clear understanding of the different lived experiences of their fellow students’ social media engagement, including its benefits and drawbacks, allowing them to have a better knowledge regarding the topic presented by the group.

Weakness: The presentation was quick and it flowed smoothly together with their clear presentation of their study.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: Probably this is one of their strengths, as they also fill citations and references. They basically shared the most essential elements of the study. They only outline the most important aspects of their research so that readers can understand it quickly. Then, within their group, they conduct in-depth research on a variety of incidents or circumstances in our country that our people are faced with.

Weakness: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: This group, which is group 1, is more specific as they put their data and conclusions of their study. Additionally, we can see here that extremely detailed information regarding each participant who benefits and how much each member in their groups actually thought of one other.

Weakness: None.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: For this last group, eumylka’s group, the data gathering is the strength. Here, they state and show the procedure very well. Using interview and other instruments, they gathered the data accurately and precise which helps them to analyze the data very well.

Weakness: Their presentation is very good and I see no weaknesses

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: For me, they perform well as I am listening to their presentation they execute it very clearly and they handle the 10 students very well and I got the answer that I am expecting too. I  will say that  I learned a lot from this group.

Weakness: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: This first group performs well the topic was good and I like the theme which most all students did and they said it very clearly.

Weakness: For me, I don't see any weakness.

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: The Third group performs it nicely and clearly they are so prepared as I listen to them. Good thing that they handle 8 students very well and they answer very well.

Weakness: For me no weakness they perform it very clear

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: The 5th group present it very well and very clear
This last group made it easy to understand and it can make future researchers' life easy

Weakness: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths: When compared to the other groups, Avivuh's group 2 has produced the research paper that is truly the most informative. In addition to that, you will become overwhelmed from all of the references and citations. They have a great deal of data and artifacts, and all of the information that they put up is accurate and genuine. Both the research that they do and the process by which they recruit participants are remarkable. Therefore, this particular group has finished conducting their investigation as of this point. Job well done.

Weakness: None

# data[].attributes.body
Strength: So just like group 1, you can really understand their thesis paper because their structure is very timeless because the research they conducted is titled "THE LIVED EXPERIENCES IN SOCIAL MEDIA ENGAGEMENT OF STUDENTS IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND NEW ERA UNIVERSITY." Here, we can immediately see that this topic is common because it is very trendy in our time today, so points are added because all of their tidbits of information are included in their ppt. Additionally, they put both their data and their conclusions into their research, which makes their study far more specific. Here, we can see that incredibly thorough information concerning each participant who benefits and how much each member in their groups genuinely thought of one another is presented.

Weakness: None

# data[].attributes.body
STRENGTH: Because of their research questions, they have grasped the main goals of the study. I think of this as their strength because, for me, they have expressed completely what are the problems that need a specific answer. This has set the groundwork for their whole study, and without these useful questions, their study will have plenty of errors.

WEAKNESS:
As a student of this class, I have also participated in completing our research study, and all I can say is that it is not easy to make one. You'll need to put a lot of effort and sacrifice to submit and finish on time. None of the groups has a perfect research study, and neither did us, but I can't still spot any weakness. But overall everyone made a great accomplishment that will surely help us a lot in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
STRENGTH: I think their review of related literature is one of the strengths of this group because they have provided a lot of articles or literature that have verified their study. Because of this, we have gained knowledge of the existing study relevant to their given topic.

WEAKNESS: They have presented a great research study and I can't spot any weakness.

# data[].attributes.body
STRENGTH: They were able to state clearly their background of the study which I think is great because it had enable us on understanding more what their topic is all about. This has given us an idea of what will be their research questions and why is their study relevant for us to know also. And because this is part of the first slides, this has given a great start for their presentation.

WEAKNESS: None

# data[].attributes.body
STRENGTH: The way they have presented their findings and discussions is great. They have put all the necesary data and information for us to be aware more of that is the result of their study. They have analyzed and interpreted the importance of their findings of what was already known about the research problem being explored. They have clarified new understanding/insights that occurred as an outcome of their study.

WEAKNESS: None