# data[].attributes.body
MAYNOR GUACHIAC

¡Yo fui benévolo y bueno; la miseria me convirtió en un demonio! ¡Hazme feliz, y volveré a ser virtuoso!". Otras citas clave incluyen el lamento de la Criatura sobre su soledad ("Soy solo y miserable. Solo alguien tan feo como yo podría amarme") y la idea de Victor de que si no puede inspirar amor, inspirará miedo.

# data[].attributes.body
¡Yo fui benévolo y bueno; la miseria me convirtió en un demonio! ¡Hazme feliz, y volveré a ser virtuoso!". Otras citas clave incluyen el lamento de la Criatura sobre su soledad ("Soy solo y miserable. Solo alguien tan feo como yo podría amarme") y la idea de Victor de que si no puede inspirar amor, inspirará miedo.

# data[].attributes.body
¡Yo fui benévolo y bueno; la miseria me convirtió en un demonio! ¡Hazme feliz, y volveré a ser virtuoso!". Otras citas clave incluyen el lamento de la Criatura sobre su soledad ("Soy solo y miserable. Solo alguien tan feo como yo podría amarme") y la idea de Victor de que si no puede inspirar amor, inspirará miedo.

# data[].attributes.body
¡Yo fui benévolo y bueno; la miseria me convirtió en un demonio! ¡Hazme feliz, y volveré a ser virtuoso!". Otras citas clave incluyen el lamento de la Criatura sobre su soledad ("Soy solo y miserable. Solo alguien tan feo como yo podría amarme") y la idea de Victor de que si no puede inspirar amor, inspirará miedo.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates an effect of reflection and mystery. Mary Shelley was able to choose this ending to show that the themes of guilt, responsibility and redemption do not have a simple answer, and to keep the moral debate of the story open.

# data[].attributes.body
This ending creates a somewhat curious effect, as it's not known what happened to the monster at the end. Shelley chose it because she perhaps wants the monster to reflect on the bad things he's done, being alone and without anyone.

# data[].attributes.body
Arouse curiosity in the audience or give us a hint that the novel will continue so that the audience asks troubling questions about humanity's responsibility to nature, or even creates our own theories, since it doesn't leave a clear ending.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he chose that ending to leave us with the impression that the monster reflected on his actions and also because he had already suffered so much throughout the story.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the story has an ambiguous ending because the author wants to continue the monster's story in a second installment and give him even more development, either in his solo life or by joining a society. Or he simply wants to leave the suspense and mystery of what will happen to these characters.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shelley chose this ending to let people's imagination find different end to this story

# data[].attributes.body
The ambiguity of Frankenstein's ending creates an effect of uncertainty and suspense. Shelley chose this ending so that each reader could draw their own conclusions about what happened next, which makes the story very interesting.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author doesn't end the story with a concrete ending and I think he wants each person to make their own conclusions about what will happen to the monster.

# data[].attributes.body
The author decided to leave an open ending for more suspense and so that it is up to the author to think about what happened in the end.

# data[].attributes.body
The ending of "Frankenstein" is like a shock of uncertainty that leaves you wondering what happened to the monster. Mary Shelley did it this way to make us question the creature's freedom, fear, and humanity, and to make us feel empathy for him.

# data[].attributes.body
The ending of Frankenstein is uncertain because we never see the Creature die. This ambiguity creates a disturbing and reflective effect. It leaves the mystery of what really happened to the Creature and whether he will ever find peace.

# data[].attributes.body
Frankenstein's ambiguous ending leaves the reader without a clear resolution, prompting reflection on guilt, rejection, and the consequences of creative power. Shelley chose this ending to maintain the mystery, highlight the story's moral complexity, and leave the Creature's fate open to interpretation.

# data[].attributes.body
Frankenstein's ambiguous ending leaves the reader without a clear resolution, prompting reflection on guilt, rejection, and the consequences of creative power. Shelley chose this ending to maintain the mystery, highlight the story's moral complexity, and leave the Creature's fate open to interpretation.

# data[].attributes.body
In my The author chose that ending as a way to expand the story. This makes us want to know more or imagine an alternate ending, or one that shows a shocking outcome.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, seeing that the creature does not die, we can say that the effect created by this ambiguity is one of uncertainty and confusion, which is why Shelley chose this ending to be able to reflect and draw our own conclusions.

# data[].attributes.body
Mary Shelley's choice to end Frankenstein with the Creature's death ambiguous creates a number of powerful effects.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it makes the reader think what could've happen to the creature, it lets the reader imagine what was the end of the creature, which I think makes the tale way better.

# data[].attributes.body
The effects that create is a doubting one because we don't really know what happens with the creature and I think Shelly chose this end to make the reader to make a conclusion by it's own self.

# data[].attributes.body
Shelley chose this ending to emphasize that the creation of the monster and the suffering it caused is a problem without an easy or definitive resolution.