# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing is beneficial in steering a positive patient care interaction, which is necessary in fields of public health, such as doing clinical research, field work, or patient-care. With direct patient care being the main interaction for decision processes, it is essential for public health workers within field work scope to implement motivational speaking when speaking with patients and populations. Whether it be on an individual or community practice, supporting goals by not just informing but working with patients to better their health helps. The goal of public health is to change behaviors that benefit health. Motivational interviewing does just that. Incorporating values of patients in their journey to better health and giving them the lead on their health decision allow for complete willingness and awareness of goals to make and reach. All in all, motivational interviewing should be included in public health progression due to its power in acknowledging the patients rights of their own health decision. Motivational interviewing is a gentle guide in which patients become involved on how to improve their health in a way they are will have control over in their own comfortable way.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing should definitely be a must-have skill for all public health professionals. It really enhances patient engagement and plays a key role in helping people make important lifestyle changes. Building a genuine connection and understanding where patients are coming from empowers them to find their reasons for change, which is so important in public health work. Plus, it fosters a more culturally competent approach, allowing professionals to listen actively and respond to the unique needs of diverse communities. It can also help reduce resistance to change, making conversations with patients more productive and supportive. Given the strong evidence that backs up its effectiveness, incorporating this skill as a standard practice can really help public health professionals support individuals in making lasting health improvements, ultimately leading to healthier communities overall.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I believe that motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for public health professionals. As public health professionals it is essential that we are able to foster positive attitudes and motivation to help patients change their negative health behavior. For example smoking, using motivational interviewing can help the patient explore reasons as to why they want to quit and then they can set goals to get ready to create a behavior change. Next we can use the stages of change approach to create a plan that the patient feels comfortable following. Motivational interviewing is essential when wanting to create a major change in one’s lifestyle and that is why I believe it should be mandatory for public health professionals to have this as a skill.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I think that having motivational interviewing should be implemented into public health professions. By including it, it encourages a respectful, empathetic environment between both patients and professionals and creates a further trust between them. MI also helps professionals in different scenarios and different cases that they encounter (substance use, diet, etc.)

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that motivational interview should be a mandatory skill because it helps us public health professionals with many ways, it encourages significant, self-driven habit change. This method is especially helpful for treating long-term health conditions that necessitate lifestyle modifications, such as substance abuse, obesity, and smoking. Motivational interviewing empowers people to define and accomplish their health objectives by emphasizing active listening and using open-ended questions to promote collaboration rather than confrontation.

# data[].attributes.body
I strongly believe that motivational interviewing (MI) should be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals for several compelling reasons. First, MI fosters a collaborative and respectful approach, which aligns perfectly with the principles of patient-centered care. Engaging individuals in their own health decisions is essential in public health, and MI facilitates this process effectively. Additionally, many public health initiatives aim to alter health-related behaviors, such as smoking cessation or increasing physical activity. MI helps navigate the ambivalence that individuals often feel about making these changes, ultimately enhancing the chances of success.

# data[].attributes.body
Making motivational interviewing a mandatory skill would be beneficial for all public health professionals. It would assist in enhancing communication skills as it would promote empathy and cut out judgement. This would help with promoting trust which will directly impact the community. It can even assist in supporting behavioral change as it may provide a structured approach, which can in turn improve health outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for public health workers. The main goal of a public health worker is promote a healthy lifestyle for all, meaning they need to motivate and guide individuals to make better choices. Motivational interviewing can help public health workers understand their patient and be able to address goals that might be difficult to achieve. It is difficult to have individuals make a significant change in their life, but being able to help motivate them in a patient-centered approach can significantly drive change. Not only does this help the public health worker have a stronger empathy and communication skills, but it also creates a better community within healthcare.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals because it helps clinicians guide their patients to make the best decisions for them. I also believe that it should be a mandatory skill because it helps us better understand patients by having an open mind and empathy to their health situation. It can help by educating the patient of health risks and other promising effects in lifestyle change and health outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals. Motivational interviewing is proven to be an effective approach to guiding individuals toward positive health behaviors by enhancing intrinsic motivation. Public health professionals engage with diverse populations with different intersectionalities which contributes to a person’s readiness to change. The non-judgmental nature of motivational interviewing allows individuals to feel trust and openness, these individuals feel empowered in their own decision making. Focusing around personal motivations with motivational interviewing can reduce resistance to change and increase better health outcomes. Motivational interviewing has demonstrated significant results in behavior change, as shown in a study where patients who received motivational interviewing reported more attempts to quit smoking and a substantial reduction in cigarette consumption compared to those receiving standard care. This demonstrates the importance and alignment to patient centered care in the health setting. Public health interventions are more successful when tailored to the individual.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing should be mandatory skill for public health professionals because it is an effective method when it comes to wanting to change life style compared to the regular approaches. According to the article, "motivational interviewing, and evidenced based approach", high level intervention were 6 face to face sessions and the results made a positive impact to the person receiving treatment. This makes me believe that the approach is effective and causing the patient to make changes to their life. Additionally, they mention that motivational interviewing is done by natural attempts to get the patient to change on their own which is important to understand. Life style change is usually ineffective when it it forced upon someone. If professionals are trained in this topic, they will know how to assess their patients and what techniques they can do to help them with the issues they are facing. The standard approaches can become ineffective and new ones can have an outside approach. For example, reflective listening is a skill that is used in motivational interviewing that acknowledges the patient's feelings and can make them feel heard.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, I believe motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for nearly all public health professionals for a few different reasons. The reason I believe that not all public health professionals should master motivational interviewing is because not all of these professions require contact with patients. I think it should definitely be mandatory to learn if you are in a profession that requires you to consistantly spea with patients. The first reason why I believe it to be so valuable is because you can make your patients feel safe and comfortable speaking with you about anything. Next, motivational interviewing can help improve the confidence in your patients and encourage them as well. Since motivaitonal interviewing can help patients avoid and get rid of problems, it is also great at decreasing refusal to new methodical approaches to a treatment.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a useful tool for encouraging behavior change, but it should not be mandatory for all public health professionals. Training all public health workers in MI would need a lot of time and resources. In busy public health settings with limited resources, spending on MI training for those who don’t often work directly with patients could take away from other critical areas, like emergency response or public health data analysis.

Not all public health jobs involve patient counseling or changing behavior. Many workers are focused on policy development, research, or analyzing health data, where MI skills may not be as relevant. For these roles, skills like policy analysis or statistical knowledge are usually more important.

Making MI training a requirement for everyone might shift attention away from other essential skills needed in public health that don’t involve patient counseling. While MI is very helpful for those who work directly with patients, making it mandatory for everyone may not be the best use of training resources.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing is a great skill to have, so that public health professionals can build trust between their patients. By building trust, it can guide and direct patients into new behavior changes. However, I do not think that it should be mandatory for all public health professionals. Since some public health professionals may not deal with patient care at all, this skill may not be as needed to them as learning other skills. Overall, I think this skill should not be mandatory, but encouraged, especially for those in direct patient care. As public health professionals, we should always help our patient in any way that this beneficial for them. Motivational interviewing helps public health professionals empathize with their patients more by actively listening to their problems, which can provide better care for patients.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing (MI) should be a mandatory skill for public health professionals, but I don't think it makes sense to require it for every role. MI is an evidence-based technique that helps professionals address patients' ambivalence toward change by fostering collaboration instead of confrontation. Since promoting lifestyle changes, like quitting smoking or adopting healthier eating habits, can be tough, MI gives professionals the tools to tap into people’s own motivation, which is essential for sustainable change. With that said, I think that not every public health role requires this skill. Professionals like data analysts or environmental health workers don’t work directly with individuals on behavior change, so requiring MI for them would be a poor use of time and resources better spent on skills specific to their work.

In the end, while MI is a powerful tool, it makes the most sense to focus training on roles that involve direct patient interaction and behavior-change efforts. A targeted approach ensures that professionals have the right tools for their specific jobs, leading to better outcomes and more effective public health work overall.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based strategy that may greatly help public health professionals in promoting behavior change. Many public health programs, such as smoking cessation, physical activity promotion, and chronic disease management, rely on motivating people to overcome barriers and embrace better behaviors. MI is also committed to the values of cultural humility by encouraging active listening and respecting individual individuality, which promotes trust and cultural competency while dealing with various groups. MI, with its variety, can improve the efficacy of health education, community outreach, and patient-centered care, resulting in more meaningful connections between professionals and the populations they serve. However, requiring MI for all public health workers may not be realistic or efficient. Some positions, such as epidemiologists or policy analysts, focus more

on research and data-driven activities, where MI may not be applicable. Furthermore, MI requires ongoing practice to be successful, and requiring it for professionals who do not utilize it consistently may reduce training effectiveness. Because of resource restrictions in public health settings, demanding MI for everyone may divert attention away from other critical skills, such as data analysis or program evaluation. A more fair approach would be to require MI training for people in patient-facing or community-involvement jobs, but make it optional for research and policy-focused positions.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing should be mandatory for all public health professionals as it allows the client and provider to have a partnership that will enable patients to have more positive outcomes. Skills in motivational interviewing, such as active listening and asking open questions, allow the patients to communicate their concerns and feel heard during their encounters. This critical communication will enable their health professional to understand the patient's situation better and build trust in the relationship. Furthermore, motivational listening includes the patient in their health or treatment process, making them feel empowered. This method respects patients' autonomy so they can work together to develop a treatment or health plan, which makes patients more likely to follow this plan. Rather than telling the patients what to do, health professionals motivate clients to change their health behavior. Motivational interviewing can facilitate communication and positive relations between health providers and patients so they can work together to find a plan that best works for them. This can lead to healthier outcomes and promote long-term preventive solutions to populations.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing (MI) should be an essential skill for all public health professionals. This client-centered approach fosters trust, creating a safe environment for patients to express their health concerns and ask questions openly. When patients feel understood through active listening, they are more likely to engage in discussions about their health. This engagement is critical for exploring their motivations and uncertainties about health behavior change.

MI empowers practitioners to support patients in addressing habits that impact their well-being, such as smoking, obesity, and managing chronic diseases. By encouraging clients to articulate their goals, MI helps them make meaningful decisions about their health, leading to improved outcomes. Additionally, MI allows practitioners to adapt their approach to diverse cultural perspectives, making it a valuable tool for providing relevant and respectful care.

Incorporating MI as a required skill in public health can enhance trust, strengthen patient relationships, and support a more culturally sensitive healthcare system. Ultimately, MI is not just about guiding individuals toward healthier choices but about empowering them to take control of their health in a way that respects their unique values and perspectives.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals because it's a valuable skill for various reasons. First, it helps promote behavioral changes and the feeling of uncertainty some patients may have. It can significantly help promote healthy lifestyles and encourage patients to adhere to treatment recommendations. Having a patient-centered approach can help with understanding different patients' values and perspectives, which will ultimately help healthcare professionals provide effective interventions and treatments that cater to the patient's specific circumstances.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for public health professionals because it fosters a client-centered approach that builds trust and openness. Trust is crucial because it allows patients to ask more questions about their health and not be afraid to approach their healthcare provider. Practitioners can help clients feel understood and valued by validating and acknowledging their thoughts and concerns through active listening. Additionally, practitioners can successfully engage people in health-related conversations by employing the MI approach, which encourages them to examine their motivation and ambivalence toward changing their habit. Furthermore, MI can be an effective strategy in preventive health efforts that address issues like obesity, smoking, quitting, and managing chronic diseases by motivating people to actively participate in their health decisions. MI gives public health practitioners the ability to negotiate a variety of cultural viewpoints, guaranteeing that treatments are pertinent and sensitive to cultural differences. Overall, public health practitioners can enhance health outcomes, build meaningful relationships, and develop a more responsive healthcare system by making MI a required skill.

# data[].attributes.body
Although the concept of motivational interviewing (MI) is extremely promising and helpful when appropriately applied to various healthcare settings, I believe it shouldn't be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals to learn. The traditional method of current healthcare has accomplished what was expected although there can be systematic improvements to this approach as discussed in the articles. However, the implementation of MI in different communities poses a significant challenge as cultural and socioeconomic differences will influence peoples' receptiveness towards clinicians' advice if they are required to meet with the client in person which is not a universal experience for all healthcare professionals. Furthermore, the client may not even ease up on their resistance and ambivalence if the clinician utilizes motivational interviewing due to natural inclination; no behavior-changing models or processes can overcome human nature. Training clinicians to account for different behavior change models is considered a "luxury" as pointed out in one of the articles. With the focus on the client's autonomy, the Internet can provide information on how to improve one's health without having to meet with a professional. Overall, while the idea of incorporating MI into all healthcare settings is great, the logistics behind it make it undesirable to do so currently.

# data[].attributes.body
Mandatory interviewing must be an essential skill all Health Care Professionals must have. It has been known that the most successful attempts to health care take a patient-centered approach. By definition, motivational interviewing adheres to what the patient solely needs, or a "philosophy of how you work with another person and how it matters to them." In health care, the way you go about interpersonal communication as a provider may dictate whether a patient will feel open to whatever is necessary. The four skills that are needed for motivational interviewing (reflective listening, affirming, asking open questions, and summarizing) are all to help build trust with the patient and to respect their autonomy as an individual. I appreciated that the reading emphasized how the righting reflex is more prone to turning patients away. Instead, using motivational interviewing can help with a patient's ambivalence in procedures or medications that may be important for their health.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals because it can decrease the stigma of patients being scared to go to the doctors or wanting to ask for help. It helps to create open conversation where the patient has a lot of say and realization to meet specific goals. Especially with kids, doctors can ask them simple questions as they are able to answer themselves and help put a plan together if they want to adapt healthier habits. Health professionals are able to listen and not just come to conclusion and assume why they are doing the wrong thing or making certain choices that may impact their health. Motivational interviewing helps to build connection, trust, and empathy between the health professionals and the patients. Patients are able to explain themselves and after, health professionals are able to expand and explain how their goals can be achieved. They are able to give realistic advice that alters directly to their own needs and wants and show that any simple change can develop great progress.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a powerful tool that helps health professionals encourage patients to embrace behavioral changes by resolving ambivalence. Given its proven effectiveness in a range of health contexts, including smoking termination, substance use, and chronic disease management, it is tempting to suggest that MI should be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals. After all, health professionals frequently encounter patients who are resistant to following treatment recommendations, whether it's remembering to take medication or adhering to lifestyle changes. The high rates of non-adherence to treatment, ranging from 20% to 80% depending on the condition, indicate a widespread issue that can lead to poor health outcomes, increased healthcare costs, and reduced treatment efficacy.

Making MI mandatory for public health professionals could bridge the gap between knowledge and action. Traditional approaches, such as education or confrontational counseling, often fail to address the patient's underlying ambivalence about change. In contrast, MI provides a collaborative, empathetic approach that empowers patients to find their reasons for change. Studies show that MI can significantly improve health outcomes, such as lowering blood pressure or increasing quit attempts among smokers. While making MI a requirement would undoubtedly equip professionals with a valuable tool, it's essential to recognize that only some interactions require an MI approach. Public health professionals must be versatile, adapting their communication style to meet individual patient needs. Still, incorporating MI into routine practice could offer a significant advantage in promoting long-term health improvements across diverse populations.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing is a great skill for all public health professionals to have and practice. I like the key concepts that make up MI as outlined in "Motivational Interviewing in Health Care Settings.

Opportunities and Limitations" by Emmons and Rollnick, 2001. Some key principles outlined in the article included empathy through reflective listening, developing discrepancies between client goals and behavior, avoiding assumptions that the patient is responsible for the decision change, and supporting self-efficacy and optimism towards clients. If all health professionals exhibited these MI principles, clients would feel better cared for by professionals and be more empowered to change with the guidance of evidence-based practices. These practices would also avoid unnecessary assumptions, bias, or other barriers to health.

# data[].attributes.body
I think motivational interviewing should not be a mandatory skill but rather a plus for a health professional. As well as I think training for it should be offered, because not every patient may want or need it. Not to say that it isn’t important, but I believe there are other skills that are more important. For example, a health professional that is culturally competent. Motivational interviewing is a great skill to have for patients to want to change their behaviors for better health habits, however, not every patient responds well to it possibly because of their cultural differences and/or expectations.

# data[].attributes.body
I think motivational interviewing is a valuable skill for public health professionals, but it doesn't need to be mandatory for everyone. It's really effective for encouraging behavior change, especially when someone wants to quit smoking or improve diet and it helps build trust by being patient-centered and non-judgmental. Since a lot of public health work involves helping people make healthier choices, motivational interviewing can be super helpful in making those conversations more productive. However, I don't think every public health role involves direct interaction with individuals. For example, people working in policy or data analysis might not use this as much and the training required could take up resources unnecessarily for those roles. So while it's a great tool for those working closely with communities, I don't think it should be mandatory for everyone in public health.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing is a great tool and skill for many public health professionals. I feel like it needs to be a skill that is incorporated into public health. Motivational interviewing can be helpful to patients and it will help public health professionals help to create a space for behavior change. It also promotes better communication between provider and patient as well as better empathetic approaches to health and behavior change. Although I do believe that motivational interviewing should be incorporated into public health because of these benefits, I think it should not be mandated. These approaches may work during some instances but I do not think it will work for everyone, therefore it should only be used in trainings instead of mandates.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for public health professionals because it allows for a good way to help patients think about their behavior and commence a behavior change if needed. It helps the provider understand the struggles of the patient and allows for the patient to be heard rather than feel judged. Many people don't reach out for help because of the fear of being judged when in reality that's what professional help is for. However, there have been incidents where professionals that do not have this training may not let patients discuss their concern or problem in depth nor allow them to build a plan for change diminishing the patient's self-efficacy, eventually leading to undesirable health outcomes, while motivational interviewing does the opposite. The goal to having a healthier population may begin with motivational interviewing.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals. Watching the video titled "motivational interviewing in brief consultation" was very realistic. More than often, health professionals just blame your weight on everything and send you off about your day. I know because this has happened to me more than once. I truly believe that my weight did not cause my sore throat yet my weight is always discussed. Regardless, it is bothersome that you wait at the doctor's office for a long time just to be dismissed. The "health professional" in this case, is seen taking a step back and asking all the right questions. The man's reaction was very valid in my opinion. I think the people who struggle with weight specifically do not want to hear that they need to lose weight because it has already been in the back of their mind for a while. It's almost like a mom saying "I told you so" you simply just don't want to hear it. Anyway, the health professional starts asking simple questions and uses the skills of reflective listening, and asking open ended questions. This guides the patient to just open up by themselves without having to state the obvious. Allowing the patient to make their own goals to help them have this want on their own makes for better outcomes. I believe that allowing the patient to just open up by themselves also creates little to no excuses about why they aren't achieving their health goal. In the beginning, the patient just start listing so many excuses which I tend to do too but, when he was able to just express himself on his own he owned up to his lack of not trying to achieve his goal. In conclusion, the gentle parenting approach is very much needed in the public health profession community. The softer approach of what it means to have motivational interviewing (reflective listening, asking open ended questions, affirming, summarizing) seems beneficial. The summarizing at the end pulls this approach altogether, to hopefully get the patient to speak a healthy lifestyle into existence.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals. The readings and the video demonstrated how beneficial motivational interviewing is when interacting with patients or anybody who requires assistance. It allows professionals to put the needs and values of the patient first. That encourages a more successful behavior change because the patient might feel responsible and accountable toward achieving their goal. Not only that, but motivational interviewing involves empathy; sometimes, patients might not feel satisfied with their interaction with a public health professional if they feel like their problems were disregarded. Professionals expressing empathy can reduce any anger from the patient, as it shows them the provider understands where they are coming from. I also thought motivational interviewing is essential because of the skills a professional should have; some include reflective listening and asking open-ended questions. By paying attention to a patient, they can respond appropriately and confirm their thoughts on the situation are actually what the patient meant. It prevents there to be misunderstanding. In addition, by asking open-ended questions, patients can express their concerns more in-depth rather than simply giving worded responses, which can sometimes be useless. For example, I like to have the opportunity to express my concerns about a health issue, especially when I am really worried about it. With motivational interviewing, individuals are the center of the plan, allowing them to contribute to creating their behavior change plan.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe motivational interviewing is a mandatory skill, but it is one many may not possess when first entering the healthcare setting. Training must be conducted to understand how to use motivational interviewing. Even then, I believe those most effective at motivational interviewing come from those who genuinely care. This is one skill that can not be taught, in my opinion. With that being said, public health professionals should possess motivational interviewing skills because it allows the public health provider to see where the patient is at in terms of the healthcare plan and action and also allows the patient to explain their course of action and how willing they are to go through with the plan. With motivational interviewing, the healthcare provider can nudge the patient to take the path of more resistances, while reflecting and empathizing with the patient. This can create a bond between healthcare providers and patients and create trust. I believe that the more a person can trust you, the more likely they are to listen and follow through with the plan offered. Patients have the ability to make changes; through motivational interviewing, healthcare providers can make it easier for those struggling to make changes.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that motivational speaking should be required especially for public health professionals as it is a necessary skill in effectively communicating with your patients. After learning about this type of conversation it is described as being a model which does not aggressively push down information to other patients but acknowledging and recognizing the fact that the patient’s autonomy and that it is ultimately up to the patient whether or not they want to change their health habits. In this method it is instead it is a way to get patients into the “spirit” of the practice which is something that I really resonate with and can get behind. It is one thing to create a chore or something that a patient does not necessarily understand and get them to take those medications or to change their habits. In this model it is making the patient aware of what is going on, what they need to work on, and implementing this encouragement to take the reigns on their own health in a realistic way. It helps create this changing in delivering follow up for patients and creating this environment where the individuals are genuinely interested in changing their health behaviors.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals for a variety of reasons. The main reason being because as public health professionals, our goal is to contribute to better health outcomes in any way we can. Since motivational interviewing is all about collaborative conversation to strengthen a person's motivation and commitment to change, there is no reason why this shouldn't be included in the job description of a public health professional. An efficient public health professional aims for improved health outcomes for their target population using their intervention. Planning, researching, and evaluating is what public health is. Creating models, attaching theories, implementing programs, and evaluating the effectiveness is how we determine if our intervention is actually working. If we throw in motivational interviewing, that could help the health outcome improve if we are motivating the target population to change for their own good. Like the assignments mentioned, patient-centered care is part of motivational interviewing. Patient-centered care is what public health professionals and clinical professionals prioritize. For this reason, making motivational interviewing a required skill should be mandatory as it could potentially benefit everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for public health professionals because almost all of what we do involves implementing and applying theories and models supporting health promotion and disease prevention, most especially highlighting behavioral change dependent on understanding each unique individual to address their special health concerns. That being said, taking from what I’ve gathered in this week’s materials, motivational interviewing is like a type of patient-centered communication that emphasizes using the “spirit” or principles of empathy, discrepancy, acceptance, and self-efficacy as a general guide to implementing care and counseling approaches (not as a strict outline followed for every patient, because everyone is not the same). Additionally, we already know how effective patient-centered care is, and the way it’s expected with every client interaction, so motivational interviewing should be applied since it contributes to this overarching goal. The way I see it, motivational interviewing is a skill that should almost be implied for public health professionals in the work that they do and the goals they aim to achieve with clients, therefore, I think it should be mandatory.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing should be a mandatory skill for all public health professionals because it builds a treatment plan that is effective in providing a behavioral change in individuals. This type of approach allows professionals to understand and take the time to listen to patients. Motivational interviewing is important because it dives into the struggles that patients have when trying to promote behavioral change and transforms their barriers into solutions. Motivating individuals to make behavioral changes is important because it allows them to take control of their health and create a plan that is effective and will be performed in their daily lives. Using motivational interviewing in the field of public health can help individuals create a healthier lifestyle that is tailored to their needs. Some examples that this approach can be effective in addressing is smoking, weight management, and chronic disease. By involving individuals about the importance of their health can increase their engagement and commitment to truly wanting to make a positive behavioral change. Motivational interviewing can enhance a collaborative environment where the individual is encouraged to promote a behavior change that will be long lasting.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing should absolutely be a mandatory skill for public health professionals. Its core strength that has its ability to foster meaningful conversations that promote behavior change, whether it’s encouraging someone to quit smoking or adopt healthier eating habits. Public health professionals regularly face the challenge of getting individuals to take action in their own health, and is a proven method to help them tap into their own motivation for change. Motivational interviewing strengthens the relationship between health professionals and the people they serve. By focusing on active listening and empathy, motivational interviewing ensures that individuals feel understood, valued, and respected. This connection not only helps build trust but also increases the likelihood that people will follow through on health recommendations. As Connie pointed out in the video, it enables health professionals to step back and allow patients and families to take charge of their health journey. This empowering approach is exactly what’s needed in public health to create lasting, impactful change in communities. Incorporating motivational interviewing as a mandatory skill would elevate the effectiveness of public health interventions and improve overall health outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that motivational interviewing is a great way for individuals in the public health field to better communicate with patients or large groups of individuals. So, yes i believe that it should be a mandatory skill. By using motivational interviewing public health professionals can promote behavior changes like smoking cessation and improve physical activity in those with chronic diseases. In doing so, health professionals can help individuals with motivation to change their behavior. Another reason i believe motivational interviewing is a valuable skill is because it can help build relationships with people so that they feel heard and understood. This can then improve engagement and compliance from these individuals which ultimately helps health professionals understanding the needs of their patients. I also really liked what Connie said in the video "what is motivational interviewing?" about how this philosophy helps health professionals step back a bit and give control to the patients and their family in order to help give the best possible service to them. In the end integrating motivational interviewing as a skill can enhance the effectiveness of how public health workers interact with their patients.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interviewing is a really good skill to have especially in the public health field when working with many different individuals. It teaches to have good communication skills such as active listening, being non-judgmental, and having empathy. Having these skills can help make the public health field more inclusive and effective. It can also be helpful when an individual is going through a change. For example, if the person decides to quit smoking motivational interviewing is helpful since it guides them through their path.

# data[].attributes.body
Motivational interview should be one of the many skills for those working within public health and safety. This skill represents the approach in which people seek motivation support or counseling, allowing individuals to express their concerns regarding any issues they may experience. For instance, an individual who is attempting to lose weight can benefit from this as it can assist in producing a behavior change plan to improve their health and lifestyle quality. It is important for people who work within public health to possess this skill as it enhances communications and helps to foster trusts to further develop the best possible solutions and advocate for the issue. By doing this, it helps one to figure out what is needed in order for the behavior change to occur.  Additionally, others are able to learn from the issue and seek preventative care or modify their behaviors to stray away from the problem.