# data[].attributes.body
https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/holocaust-diaries-anne-frank-and-other-young-writer/

On March 28, 1944, the Dutch government in exile gave a radio   broadcast telling the Dutch people to hold onto things such as diaries, letters, and items that could retell life during WWII under Nazi occupation. After hearing this news, Anne went and edited many parts of her diary so that she can publish it in the future. That made me wonder; are there any other diaries or journals like Anne's? I looked up journals and diaries of life during the Holocaust and I found this article about diaries by other young writers of that time.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
'Well, this whole scribbling doesn't make any sense. The world will know about everything even without my wise notes.'

Alexandra Zapruder
Three days before Anne Frank began her diary in Amsterdam on June 12, 1942, another writer 1200 kilometers away in Stanislawow ghetto in Poland began what would be the second-to-last entry in her diary. Twenty-two-year-old Elsa Binder wrote "Well, this whole scribbling doesn't make any sense. The world will know about everything even without my wise notes."

Her words were hauntingly prescient. For decades, the world did indeed come to know about the Holocaust without her "scribbling", which languished, untranslated, in an archive in Poland. In a twist of fate, however, it was precisely Anne Frank's "musings," as she described them, that brought the subject of Jewish suffering during the Holocaust into the homes of many millions of readers.

Jewish diary writers across Europe

Decades later, more than seventy-five diaries of young writers have surfaced from the wreckage of the Holocaust, and many dozens more remain untranslated in archives around the world. Who are these writers? They were both boys and girls; their diaries begin as early as the mid-30s in Germany and span the entire period of the Holocaust, several ending only after liberation.

Some wrote as refugees, others in hiding or passing, and still more inside the Jewish ghettoes of Eastern Europe. Some came from affluent families while others were the impoverished children of peasants or laborers. Some were assimilated Jews while others were strictly Orthodox and many fell in somewhere in the middle, including several children of mixed marriages and at least one convert to Catholicism.

They wrote in Germany, Austria, Holland, France, the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Russia, Romania, and Hungary; not surprisingly, their writings reflect Europe's linguistic Tower of Babel, including Yiddish, the mother-tongue of East European Jews that was almost entirely extinguished by the annihilation of its population.

A voice of their own

More than anything else, however, it is the ineffable, inimitable voice of each writer that is caught and preserved in the pages of their diaries. Each one reflecting the particular constellation that makes us who we are: a name, a family and friends, history and memories, interests and talents and affinities, beliefs and questions and dreams and disappointments. In the face of bewildering suffering and loss, they could be earnest or angry, cynical or naïve, hopeful or despairing, urgent or resigned.

In their efforts to leave a trace of their lives, some recounted events as dry reporters while others were literary chroniclers; some railed like angry prophets and some asked the questions of wise theologians. Some wrote simply, reporting on events as they occurred with little commentary.

Others sketched the cataclysm as it unfolded around them, using their literary gifts to capture both its minute details and its unprecedented enormity.

Is Anne's story too limited?

Much has been written about Anne Frank and whether her story was the best one to represent the Holocaust to mass audiences. Some have said her story was too particular: that being in hiding meant she was spared exposure to the most gruesome horrors.

Others felt that she represented a too familiar figure - secular, assimilated, upper-middle class and Western. Later, many observed that her youthful optimism was appropriated in ways that minimized the meaning of this watershed event.

These objections may be true but, in the end, they are beside the point. The problem is not whether Anne Frank was the "right" one to represent the victims of the Holocaust but that no single person ever could.

Anne Frank compared to other diary writers

Still, Anne's words are the ones we know best. Since her diary defined the genre we seek to explore, it seems only right to begin with its most iconic elements, putting them side by side with those of her fellow writers to find the echoes, layers, contradictions and complexity that run through them all.

Growing up and finding your identity

Let us begin with coming of age. For many readers, Anne's diary resonated more as a "diary of a young girl" than a "diary of the Holocaust:" her efforts to give voice to her inner life seemed to illuminate many previously unacknowledged complexities of adolescence itself.

Very few other writers used their diaries in such a sustained way to examine questions of identity and growing up. Then again, not many writers were cooped up in a tight space for so long with their immediate family and with so little else to do but chafe against one another, and muse about how that chafing reflected their growing pains.

Still, the question of identity - the project of defining oneself in relation to family, religion, nationality, history - runs through nearly every young writer's diary of this period.

Traces can be found in the diary of Moshe Flinker, an Orthodox boy passing as a non-Jew in Belgium, who grappled with his Jewish identity and his faith; in Klaus Langer, an assimilated Jew in 1930s Germany whose interest in Palestine and the Jewish young movement stood in contrast to his father's more traditional German tastes and values; in Dawid Sierakowiak, who rejected his father for his tragic failures of character in the face of extreme deprivation; in Yitskhok Rudashevski who wrestled with himself about whether he should follow his heart and pursue classical studies or learn a trade in order to better survive the war years.

To varying degrees, every writer reflects the fraught lens of the adolescent self, but this complexity is compounded by the fact that one aspect of their identities - being Jewish - was suddenly not only a defining one, but a mortal threat.

Life in hiding

Another lasting contribution of Anne's diary is her day to day reporting of the hardships, challenges, deprivations and small joys of her life in hiding. Otto Wolf also kept a diary in hiding though he wrote in the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, living with his sister and parents in the forest, often outdoors or in temporary shelters and later with local non-Jewish neighbors.

There are strong echoes - the fear of capture, the care not to leave traces or make sounds, the tedium, the logistical problems, and even the occasional moments of reprieve. But unlike the Frank's protectors, who were unfailingly kind and giving, the loose network of people who aided the Wolf family were more mixed in their motivations and behavior, by turns kind, generous, and patient but then unpredictable, insensitive, and opportunistic.

Put side by side, Anne and Otto's accounts complement one another, confirming common aspects of life in hiding but also add nuance and complexity, expanding what we know. If this is true for multiple diaries written in similar situations, it is still more true when we include writers whose work reflects day to day life across a wider range of circumstances.

Writing about love

There are still more ways that Anne's diary can be juxtaposed with those of her peers to lessen her singular aloneness. Just as Anne wrote about her tender, budding love for Peter, nineteen-year-old Ilya Gerber in Kovno ghetto confessed his passionate feelings for his classmate Heni, recording his infatuation, their brief encounters and then their abrupt breakup.

Just as Anne Frank wrote at length about her relationship to her parents and sister, writers such as Elsa Binder, Dawid Rubinowitz in Kielce, Poland, and an anonymous girl in Lodz ghetto also confided in their diaries their tensions with siblings and their frustrated disappointment in parents.

Just as Anne reflected on her ambitions as a writer, her dreams of fame, and her efforts to alleviate her boredom by writing, reading, and studying, so too did Petr Ginz in Terezin, Yitskhok Rudashevski in Vilna ghetto, and an anonymous boy in Lodz, among others, share this impulse, holding to their writing, art, and studies as central lifelines to help survive the stagnation that came with their drastically circumscribed lives.

'I still believe that human beings are good at heart'

Hope in hopeless times

And what about hope? Since the beginning, thanks in part to her buoyant, irrepressible spirit and in part to her words, "I still believe that human beings are good at heart," Anne and her diary have been nearly synonymous with a particular form of hope, that is, faith in humanity and the future.

Her words became not only a comfort for millions but a sort of moral imperative, as if to fail at hoping was to fail at being human. Or, alternatively, as if her benediction absolved us all for the moral failure of the Holocaust. But this line - quoted by Meyer Levin, who reviewed the diary in the New York Times Book Review in 1952 and introduced it to America - was plucked out of context and skewed over time to present a message that suited the audience more than it reflected Anne's more nuanced thinking. The passage, written on July 15, 1944, follows:
It's difficult in times like these: ideals, dreams and cherished hopes rise within us, only to be crushed by grim reality. It's a wonder I haven't abandoned all my ideals, they seem so absurd and impractical. Yet I cling to them because I still believe, in spite of everything, that people are truly good at heart. It's utterly impossible for me to build my life on a foundation of chaos, suffering and death. I see the world being slowly transformed into a wilderness, I hear the approaching thunder that, one day, will destroy us too, I feel the suffering of millions. And yet, when I look up at the sky, I somehow feel that everything will change for the better, that this cruelty, too, shall end, that peace and tranquility will return once more.
In fact, hope and its inevitable companion, despair, are among the most prevalent of the themes that run through the diaries of this period. On this subject, too, there are nuances upon nuances across the body of material: some writers expressed determined hope in the face of despair, others voiced fear, supplication to God, resignation, rage, or philosophical acceptance.

If there is a virtue in confronting these writers' points of view, it perhaps lies in seeing their great multiplicity, which, in turn, prevents us from too easily adopting any judgment as our own. The answers to these most difficult questions must lie somewhere in the material's wide and endless range.

The victory of the good

There is one writer, however, whose words presaged Anne's (having been written two and half years earlier) and can be placed alongside hers to reveal the nuances of both. Coincidentally, it is Elsa Binder, whose "wise notes" remained obscure for so many decades while Anne's "musings" were read by millions. She wrote:
[Friday, January 30, 1942] When fear crawls out in the evenings from all four corners, when the winter storm raging outside tells you it is winter, and that it is difficult to live in the winter, when my soul trembles at the sight of distant fantasies, I shiver and say one word with every heartbeat, every pulse, every piece of my soul - liberation. In such moments, it hardly matters where it is going to come from and who will bring it, so long as it's faster and comes sooner. Doubts are growing in my soul. Quiet! Blessed be he who brings good news, no matter from where, no matter to . . . where. Time, go ahead. Time, which carries liberation in its unknown tomorrow; not for Cip, who was happy to live in interesting times, maybe not for me, but for people like me. The result is certain. Down with any doubts. Everything comes to an end. Spring will come.
Both girls - one writing as a young teen in hiding in Amsterdam, and the other a twenty-two year old living in a ghetto in Poland - shared the belief that the world would eventually overcome its madness and right itself, even if they did not live to see it. This is a different kind of hope, one that transcends the particular moment or the writer, and captures a faith in the intrinsic power of goodness and right to prevail in the end, even though the very person expressing the hope may become a casualty in that struggle.

If Anne's words have been taken out of context to give us easy answers to the difficult questions we must ask in a post-Holocaust world, perhaps seeing them in full and alongside Elsa's will remind us that there are no easy answers. And that it is up to us to prove their faith right.

An attempt to understand

In the end, to read Anne Frank's diary is to begin to understand her unique voice, experience and potential. To add still more writers' words to hers is to hear a chorus of reflections and observations that stand as an important historical record and that deepen and challenge what we think we know about this period. In so doing, we can begin to apprehend for a moment the bigger picture: the silencing of those voices and the permanent, irrevocable damage it inflicts on us all.

About the author

Alexandra Zapruder is the author of two books, Salvaged Pages: Young Writers' Diaries of the Holocaust, (published by Yale University Press in 2002 and winner of the National Jewish Book Award in the Holocaust category) and Twenty-Six Seconds: A Personal History of the Zapruder Film (Twelve Books, 2016).

Literature

Adelson, Alan & Turowski, Kamil. The Diary of Dawid Sierakowiak: Five Notebooks From the Łódź Ghetto (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).

Zapruder, Alexandra. Salvaged Pages: Young Writers' Diaries of the Holocaust (New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press, 2002).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Holocaust diaries by Anne Frank and other young writers

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
'Well, this whole scribbling doesn't make any sense. The world will know about everything even without my wise notes.' Alexandra Zapruder Three days before Anne Frank began her diary in Amsterdam on June 12, 1942, another writer 1200 kilometers away in Stanislawow ghetto in Poland began what would be the second-to-last entry in her diary.

# data[].attributes.body
Anne, in her last entry, writes a note that struck something with me.
"[I] keep trying to find a way to become what I'd like to be and what I could be if . . . if only there were no other people in the world" (363).
Anne often fears outside judgement when it comes to her true feelings. "If only there were no other people in the world" just shows how much she wanted to be her true self, but couldn't.

# data[].attributes.body
In the secret Annex, members would go down to Otto Frank's private office and listen to the BBC. Each time the people living in the annex would come down and listen to the radio Anne was terrified of being caught. She says "I was so terrified that someone might hear it that I literally begged Father to go upstairs with me." This reminded me a little of my family during the Vietnam War. After 1975, the communists censored all foreign media. Like the Frank's, my family also had a radio and would listen to the BBC. My family would have to listen to the radio at a very quiet level. After a raid by the communist police, we had to turn in our money, jewels, fabrics, and our radio. My grandfather was then sent to a re-education camp (because he had served in the South Vietnamese military) and we had to close our fabric shop for a while which caused us to go broke.

# data[].attributes.body
On page 306, Jan, Mr. Kugler, and Mr. Kleiman informed the group of some of the prices going around. The fact that half a pound of tea costed 350 guilders shocked me, so I did a little research and math.
One guilder at the time was equivalent to 1.5 Reichsmark, and one Reichsmark was about 2.5 USD at the time of WW2.
If my math is correct, 350 x 1.5 = 525, and 525 x 2.5 = 1312.5. This means that it costed 1,321.50 USD for half a pound of tea!
Numbers often can be used to put things into perspective. Seeing 350 guilders next to other amounts on it's own is shocking enough as is.

# data[].attributes.body
For this Outside Resource I wanted to learn more about the Gestapo. We know who they are, but we don't quite know their exact roles and importance. The Gestapo were the secret police of Nazi Germany persecuting Jews and opponents of the Nazi regime. They were key to the pursing of Hitler's "Final Solution". They were formally organized when the Nazis gained power in 1933 and underwent many amendments, changes, and merges with other Nazi police groups. This blur of power made the Gestapo fragile until the procession of the "Final Solution". In the late months of 1940, the Gestapo was in charge of guarding the ghettos Jews were held in Eastern Europe. To decrease the inhabitants of these ghettos, the Gestapo imposed forced labor, starvation, disease, and torture on them. The inmates of concentration camps were essentially used as lab rats. The Gestapo was trained in different torture techniques which were often used on prisoners. After the war, hardly any of the Gestapo's officials were caught and persecuted.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Geheime Staatspolizei (German for Secret State Police, abbreviated "Gestapo") was the secret police of Nazi Germany, and its main tool of oppression and destruction, which persecuted Germans, opponents of the regime, and Jews. It later played a central role in helping carry out the Nazi's " Final Solution."

The Gestapo was formally organized after the Nazis seized power in 1933. Hermann Göring, the Prussian minister of the interior, detached the espionage and political units of the Prussian police and proceeded to staff them with thousands of Nazis. On April 26, 1933, Göring became the commander of this new force that was given power to shadow, arrest, interrogate, and intern any "enemies" of the state. At the same time that Goring was organzing the Gestapo, Heinrich Himmler was directing the SS ( Schutzstaffel, German for "Protective Echelon"), Hitler's elite paramilitary corps. In April 1936, he was given command of the Gestapo as well, integrating all of Germany's police units under Himmler.

Later in 1936, the Gestapo was merged with the Kriminalpolizei (or "Kripo," German for Criminal Police). The newly integrated unit was the called the Sicherheitspolizei (or "Sipo," German for Secret Police). In 1939, during the reorganization of the German armies, the Sipo was joined with an intelligence branch of the military known as the Sicherheitsdienst ("SD," meaning Security Service). After this merger, the Sipo became known as the Reichssicherheitshauptamt ("RSHA," meaning Reich Security Central Office), and was headed by Reinhard Heydrich. Because of these frequent changes, the functions of the Gestapo became blurred, and often overlapped with those of the other branches of the German forces.

During World War II, the Einsatzgruppen ("Task Force", mobile killing squads) was formed, and came to be an integral part of the Gestapo. It was the Einsatzgruppen's job to round up all the Jews and other "undesirables" living within Germany's newly conquered territories, and to either send them to concentration camps or put them to death.

At the end of 1940, when the Jews in Eastern Europe were interned in ghettos, the Gestapo was charged with guarding and supervising the ghettos, imposing forced labor, and causing starvation and disease in an effort to decimate the ghetto inhabitants. After the invasion of Russia in 1941, the decision was made to kill all the Jews of Europe in gas chambers and the Gestapo was called upon to supervise the dispatch of the Jews to the camps specially adapted or constructed for the program of mass murder.

The Gestapo units excelled in their unabated and premeditated cruelty, in their ability to delude its intended victims as to the fate that awaited them, and in the use of barbaric threats and torture to lead the victims to their death, all as part of the " Final Solution." The units were taught many torture techniques, and were also taught many of the practices that German doctors in Dachau tested on the inmates of concentration camps. During its tenure, the Gestapo operated without any restrictions from the civil authority, meaning that its members could not be tried for any of their police practices. This unconditional authority added an elitist element to the Gestapo; its members knew that whatever actions they took, no consequences would arise.

After the war, very few of the important members of the Gestapo were caught and brought to trial.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Geheime Staatspolizei (German for Secret State Police, abbreviated "Gestapo") was the secret police of Nazi Germany, and its main tool of oppression and destruction, which persecuted Germans, opponents of the regime, and Jews. It later played a central role in helping carry out the Nazi's " Final Solution."

# data[].attributes.body
What if you could know what would bring your downfall? Would you be more optimistic to preserve what you can, or would you be more pessimistic, knowing just where you will fall?
Reading Anne's diary, I could see how she often would write about what she wanted to do when she would get out and be free. After knowing that she eventually does not make it out of the Holocaust physically alive, it makes me sad that she never got to properly do most of the things she wanted to do. I feel like if she were to know somehow that she would not make it out of the Holocaust, her behavior would change. But I wonder, would it change to be more kind or negative?

# data[].attributes.body
"We've been strongly reminded of the fact that we're Jews in chains, chained to one spot, without any rights, but with a thousand obligations" (Pg. 282).
I find this quote interesting, purely because it puts things into perspective. Anne has been trying her hardest to find the best in the situations, but then things like this happen, harshly reminding her and the others just what kind of situation they are actually in.
I admire how Anne is so strong to stay optimistic. It is only natural that sometimes it is extremely hard to be optimistic, but Anne keeps going. Sometimes I wonder how she did it.

# data[].attributes.body
Anne has such a beautiful mind and way of thinking, even during such a tragic, oppressive time. She always finds beauty in the most gnarled of things, and it's one of her admirable traits. I love the way she loves things. Nature, the outside, Peter. She cares for things so passionately and in-depth.

# data[].attributes.body
This has been consistent throughout the whole book, however, in this section the terrible way Anne treats herself has become even more prominent. Although she says she's changing for herself, it always feels like she's changing who she is to get the approval of the adult members of the Annex and fit their view of a perfect child. Worse than that, she has terrible self doubt. Anne makes it very clear in her entries just how much she cares for Peter. Most of her writing, if not almost all of it, includes Peter somehow and how beautiful or kind or sweet he is. But then she gets insecure and says he doesn't really love her and feel the same way. Anne just puts herself through this rough cycle of self-hate and doubt. I also want to add that she always plays off her own feelings and emotions even in her diary entries which should be her best and most personal confidant. Anne is in serious denial that no, she's not okay.

# data[].attributes.body
Anne has proved that being in hiding will change your point of view on many things. An example of this change was Anne's view on nature and the outdoors. Before she was in hiding, Anne had no interest in the outdoors and never saw the beauty in the blue sky, the colorful flowers, and the cheerful birds. After being locked up inside for two years, her view on nature had changed. She now longed for a peek at the sky or a note from the chirping birds. Her love for the dark, starry night had increased after she opened the window one day during the night to get a breath of fresh, clean air. Her viewpoints on many other things had changed too such as people. In the beginning Anne believed that Peter was a self-absorbed teenage guy who only cared about himself and never gave a single thought about those surrounding him. But, after being stuck in hiding with him for a long time, it had changed her view on Peter. Anne now believes that Peter is a sweet, shy boy who longs for some love and affection. So, as you can see, going into hiding can change people's viewpoints on the world and others that around them, this is what could have contributed to Anne's change of character throughout her diary.

# data[].attributes.body
The relationship between these two characters has increasingly become more intimate and confusing. As you know, they eventually had their first kiss together and started talking to each other in order to let out the built up tension that was made throughout their time in hiding. With all this time spent together, their friendship and love for each other had grown and soon became lovers more than friends. However, Anne writes in her diary multiple times that although she loves Peter, he will just stay a friend and that all he needed was love during a time of loneliness. But, can a friendship like this be so intimate and loving? If they both survived the war, would they have gotten married or at least dated each other? We will never be able to tell because their feelings for each other will forever be unknown. Peter and Anne become very close "friends" and soon depend on each other for some relief during these awful times. This has led me to think that they both love each other and know that whatever relationship they have is more than just mutual friends. I wonder if Peter had thought the same thing as Anne, did he think they could only be friends or more?

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout the book Anne has noted many times that she is feeling sad or miserable about herself. Of course, this has to do with her current living situation and what is happening outside of the Annex, but it also has to do with self doubt and pity. Although it is understandable to be so pitiful of herself and think that everything is going sideways, Anne's confidence and view on herself is unacceptable despite current conditions. She has been acting very self-absorbed and only cares about herself and her well-being. Later on in the book her father tells her how ungrateful she has been and that she is thinking far too selfishly. I agreed with this because everyone else in the Annex is also facing many challenges and although they may not be speaking it out loud, they don't blame others for their misery. Anne has trained herself to channel all her self doubt, pity, and sadness into her actions towards her parents and her letters in her diary. When she finally realizes how needy she was being to everyone, she started viewing herself as a work in progress instead of a hopeless cause. This has lead to less entries in her diary that are based off of her depression and instead are talking about the fun parts that are happening in life. The self doubt she was feeling towards the beginning had worn off after she realized how inconsiderate she was being.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the character shown through various diary entries, it seems evident that if Anne had survived the Holocaust, she would have become an activist for the issues she was especially concerned with (likely religious freedom and women's equality). She probably would have written texts about these issues, and might have delivered speeches about them, too, due to her outgoing personality. I also think she would have been willing to share her story in the form of a Survivor Testimony, which would have been very interesting to watch. The published version of Anne's diary would have been very different as well, as Anne would have chosen what to include, could have revised the entries more, and could have added more about her experience at the concentration camps.

# data[].attributes.body
I was wondering if any of Anne's stories were ever found and published. This is a reading of Chapter 1 of "Cady's Life", which was the unfinished story based on her father's life. As we know from the Anne Frank website, her father was the one who worked to publish Anne's diary after the Holocaust. It is likely that he found "Cady's Life" while sorting through Anne's various writings. I wonder if he ever read what she had written so far, and if he recognized that it was about his life. It would have been an interesting read, had she had managed to finish it.

https://soundcloud.com/norfolklibraries/cadys-life

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Norfolk Libraries - Around the World in 20 Books

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
17 - Cady's Life (Anne Frank) by Norfolk Libraries - Around the World in 20 Books

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
As well as her diary, Anne Frank wrote so much more when she was hiding with her family in what she called "The Secret Annex". She wrote tales, rewrote paragraphs and sentences from other books, and she began a novel titled Cady's Life, which begins with a young girl waking up after a car accident. Her writings are collected in the book "Anne Frank's Tales from the Secret Annex".

# data[].attributes.body
In May 1944, many Christians are becoming increasingly more anti-Semetic because of stories of Jews betraying their Christian helpers to the Nazis. I found it interesting that even though Miep is in a very similar situation to many who are being snitched upon, it is impertinent to her that the Annex residents know she does not subscribe to any anti-Semetic ideas. This shows her ethical values.

Another idea I had (after writing above) was that Miep might be trying to convince the others she is not anti-Semetic out of self-interest. If the Annex members do not believe her to be anti-Semetic if they are caught by Nazis, when they are questioned they will not snitch on her. However, I do think Miep is simply worried out of the good of her heart because of the character that has been shown throughout previous diary entries.

# data[].attributes.headline
Definitions (Part 4) Most of them are foods that I've never heard of

# data[].attributes.subject
Definitions (Part 4) Most of them are foods that I've never heard of

# data[].attributes.body
Before I start the definitions, I'm just going to say that I don't really want to define any of the words on 252 or 255. They are talking about a subject I am kind of uncomfortable with, so I will not define anything from there.

240 - Kilter - Proper or unusual state or condition - Merriam Webster
263 - Conceited - Excessively proud of oneself - Oxford Languages
267 - Endive - A young, typically blanched chicory plant, eaten as a cooked vegetable or in salads - Oxford Languages
268 - Kohlrabi - A cabbage of a variety with an edible swollen stem - Oxford Languages
268 - Salsify - An edible European plant of the daisy family, with a long root like that of a parsnip - Oxford Languages
268 - Kugel - A kind of sweet or savory pudding of noodles or potatoes, often in Jewish cooking - Oxford Languages
286 - Piccalilli - A relish of chopped vegetables, mustard, and hot spices - Oxford Languages

# data[].attributes.body
White: Info/Resources
Red: Izzy
Orange: Brandon
Green: Kalea
Blue: Shalimar
Purple: Claire
Because we're doing a wall Padlet for this section, please keep all your posts to the assigned color! :D

# data[].attributes.body
Dec 2nd: pgs. 1-100
Dec 9th: pgs. 101-161
Dec 16th: pgs. 162-224
Jan 13th: pgs. 225-363
Feel free to read the foreword, introduction, afterword, editorial history, and the inhabitants of the secret annex and their real names on your own time because they aren't included in the required page due dates that we've set.

# data[].attributes.body
Dec 2nd: Kalea
Dec 9th: Claire
Dec 16th: Shalimar
Jan 13th: Izzy & Brandon (that's for this Padlet!)
You're welcome to bring in any other resources you find for whichever due date, but that doesn't mean you're excused on yours! (Unless you want to switch with someone, that's 100% fine just let me know so I can edit this post)