# data[].attributes.body
What's Working:

Valuable insides into your input

Clear Timeline Presentation!

Clear understanding of your operation 'separation'.

Good use of research into LATCH

Talked through the process well!

Fantastic questions around sexuality!

Hyper awareness on identity was a brilliant reflection.

Developed the work well to include anonymity.

Rigorous approach demonstrated in your identification of themes.

Fridge Talks! Ingenious idea, it's well informed yet approachable and playful, well done.

Improvements:

Could the objects in the fridge be more playful?

Why those objects?

Do you need the text at the top of the site?

Should 'Fridge Talks' be more prominent on the site?

I prefer the rendering of the promotional poster to the fridge on the website, the texture is more playful.

Can sound correspond to items in the fridge?

Podcast:

Could this be extended? 15-60mins would be great, this could be a conversation for example between the group/debaters.

# data[].attributes.body
or the apple could be linked to religion bc adam and eve's apple

# data[].attributes.body
this a very unexpected but memorable project thanks to the fridge visual! i also like the interactivity of it, which encourages engagement further than a simple podcast

# data[].attributes.body
makes it more lighthearted! can be heavy topics

# data[].attributes.body
really good research that informed the final outcome

really nice idea to allow the audience to have space to comment and have a discussion based on the themes mentioned

accessibility through the transcript works well

# data[].attributes.body
transcripts encourage accessibility for those hard of hearing and/or translation into another language

its clear from your prototypes that you applied feedback to inform why you use the platforms, eg. kialo. its interesting to think about how anonymity helps with discussion.

moving forward, are you interested in considering moderating the conversation? would this be more so helpful or not?

# data[].attributes.body
Liked the method of looking into each subject within the input - using the statements as a tool to create areas of topic

# data[].attributes.body
-Words related to the Law & Crime
-Instances escape from the law
-strong disappointment
-aspirations for an ideal society
-switched from a scientific career to art

# data[].attributes.body
-Politically related words
-Carry a satirical connotation of corruption
-Use his voice to make some changes.
-Political and society environment in the 1980s
-Suburban and rural population explosion
-Class issues
-Recession

# data[].attributes.body
https://padlet.com/cfribbins07201811/ailcrmyhuqafzja5

STARTED LAYING OUT THE KEY POINTS OF OUR PROJECT READY TO DISUCSS TOMORROW, FEEL FREE TO ADD

# data[].attributes.body
SHORT PDF/ PADLET- (communicating your work through description and slides).
Make a condensed padlet?

add music?
add transcripts/ bulletpoints

PRESENTATION:
presentation: An interactive experience (you can send us any necessary files beforehand, for example if you have an activity book, it might be interesting to send it to the group beforehand and have everybody interact with the work - followed by a short discussion).

we should get people to sign up to the debate space so can interact

how are we gonna present?
eg choose one topic, screen share, show website, and listen to 1/2 talsk and use debate platform

# data[].attributes.body
- Background/ambient music behind the audio clips

- Hover element over the ingredients to preview the topic - also could design vectors or sprites instead of having the current pictures of the ingredients

- Overall they enjoyed the interactive element of the talk and the aesthetics such as the fridge juxtaposed against the serious nature of the podcast topics

# data[].attributes.body
The Last Acts of Saint Fuck You contains statements which verbally denounce tales of economic prosperity and truth. Location, America, time, 20th century. During this era, Porter had worked closely as a physicist within many avenues such as Nasa's Saturn 5 rocket, as well as the Manhattan project, which ultimately take form in the atomic bomb that devastated Hiroshima in 1945. This would prove to be a turning point for Porter, which would be vocalised within his poetry as a demoralising relationship with his former physicist work, as well as its exploitation for profiteering and power play through warfare and weaponry. Other Tales of economic saturation are found within a post war II setting in the US. The economy thrived, and Porter did not agree with the star spangled falsehood spreading throughout America like wildfire. Advertisements within newspaper, magazines and television promised an easier and happier life by purchasing products. Porters stance on this new culture of consumption is regarded as a negative one, and leads on to question the moral values of economic growth, and at what cost.

# data[].attributes.body
Does that tone of question sound like the right track?

yes

# data[].attributes.body
'...based on your expertise...'

# data[].attributes.body
Upon concluding your interpretation of Bern Porter's Fridge talks, and  based on your expertise, what is your stance on Porter's "The Last Acts of Saint Fuck You" and its relation to 20th century USA?

# data[].attributes.body
- are we saying that the talks will also be available on other platforms eg iTunes

# data[].attributes.body
- finalise podcast recording
- add bulletpoints of the talk
- re-record the talks
- create the kialo(?) polls and embed it into the website
- come up with an overarching question that covers all the topics (room for discussion + feedback)
- can link back to our audience

- add hovering prompt over the fruit

# data[].attributes.body
https://artslondon.padlet.org/benjamincain/u2edfszm4yb9kvbm

# data[].attributes.body
- refine and re-record the talks
- develop the visual language to be more appropriate to the 'retro' theme
- add in the poll/ debate feature at the end of the website

# data[].attributes.body
- is the idea clear enough? if not, how should we improve it?
- considering our output is a talk, does the idea count as one? if not, what should we focus on/ add more to?
- should the talks be a video recording rather than just an audio recording (ie with our faces in it/ have visuals playing while the audio is running/ any other suggestion)
- is having an interactive aspect better than just having the talk on its own?

# data[].attributes.body
inspiration

# data[].attributes.body
- Logo/ catch phrase/ graphic for the talk show
- Chose an aesthetic for the website
- An another item in the fridge than directs people to a page where they can engage in the work, write their own comments and opinions on Porters work (or a poll)

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.history.com/topics/1980s/1980s

The 1980s: Reagan and the Cold War

Like many other American leaders during the Cold War, President Reagan believed that the spread of communism anywhere threatened freedom everywhere. As a result, his administration was eager to provide financial and military aid to anticommunist governments and insurgencies around the world. This policy, applied in nations including Grenada, El Salvador and Nicaragua, was known as the Reagan Doctrine.

In November 1986, it emerged that the White House had secretly sold arms to Iran in an effort to win the freedom of U.S. hostages in Lebanon, and then diverted money from the sales to Nicaraguan rebels known as the Contras. The Iran-Contra affair, as it became known, resulted in the convictions–later reversed–of Reagan’s national security adviser, John Poindexter (1936-), and Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North (1943-), a member of the National Security Council

# data[].attributes.body
THE BILKING OF SWINDLERS,

THE CLOGGING OF CONDUITS,

THE CROSSBREEDING OF DELINQUENTS,

THE EXTOLLING OF CRIME,

THE HACKING OF CORPSES,

THE IMPEACHING OF INNOCENTS,

THE NATURALIZING OF CRIMINALS,

THE NON PROCESSING OF PLAINTIFFS,

THE PADDING OF CLAIMS,

THE WAIVING OF VETOS,

# data[].attributes.body
THE AFFILIATING OF BASTARDS,

THE ALIGNING OF BOOBY TRAPS,

THE ANNULING OF COVENANTS,

THE ASSESSING OF POLLS,

THE DEFOLIATING OF POSITIONS,

THE HARASSING OF TAXPAYERS,

THE FERMENTING OF RIOTS

THE FLOUTING OF JUSTICE,

THE FRAMING OF INNOCENTS

THE HUMILIATING OF OFFICIALS

THE JAUNDICING OF SPRINGS,

THE KILLING OF CIVILIANS,

THE WAGING OF REVOLUTIONS,

THE WARDING OF PEACELOVERS,

THE YOKING OF UNEQUALS,

# data[].attributes.body
Life in the US during the 20th century in regard to openly expressing sexuality, its orientations and queerness can debatably be seen as a turning point into a more progressive society. Homosexuality was not accepted in the public sphere. In areas where criminalization was active, police forces would even actively search for homosexual gatherings in order to expose and eradicate them. The 60’s and 70’s saw a radicalisation of the gay rights movement, departing from the more conservative tactics of the homophile organizations of the 50’s. There are a number of precursors to the seminal moment of the Stonewall Riots in 1969. The Stonewall Riots in the US represent more of a culmination of various activism movements/ demonstrations that occurred through the 60’s to mid 70’s ultimately reaching more of a threshold than a flip-switch sort of historical moment.

We don't know for sure what his stance was, and neither can we confirm nor deny what he truly felt, regardless however we are able to see that Porter recognises the social aspects and change that  occurred during the era. Moreover incorporating them into his work, we can't help but wonder whether he was embracing the movements or undermining them. This brings us back to our original question, that considering the work consists of contradicting and disheartened views and phrases, is expressing them from an individual stance somewhat insensitive?

# data[].attributes.body
THE AFFILIATING OF BASTARDS,

THE BREEDING OF MONSTERS,

THE CAMOUFLAGING OF ENEMIES,

THE CERTIFYING OF DEVILS,

THE CROSSBREEDING OF DELINQUENTS,

THE EDIFYING OF TRAITORS ,

THE KEELHAULING OF DELINQUENTS,

THE LIBERATING OF DEMONS,

THE TABULATING OF THIEVERIES,

THE ZESTING OF MISERY,

# data[].attributes.body
1. The association of the Republican Party with the Christian right. Christianity’s association with unpopular Republican policies drove more young liberals and moderates away from both the party and the Church.

- strong focus on social issues in as opposed to economic or global issues

- condemn the practice of abortion and see it is murder

- contraception is condemned by the religious right

- Homosexuality,  many on the religious right see themselves as the ‘self-appointed conscience of American society’. Some of the more extreme groups such as the New Christian Right, campaign to have homosexuality criminalised.

2. The end of the Cold War 1947 – 1991)

it may have felt unpatriotic to confess one’s ambivalence toward God while the U.S. was locked in a geopolitical showdown with USSR

4. Scandals in the Catholic Church

The Church is just one of many social institutions that have lost public trust in an age of elite failure. But scandals in the Catholic Church have accelerated its particularly rapid loss of moral stature.

The 1960s did swing wide a door that had never been opened before. A new vista of lifestyle options was introduced into mainstream America. In the religious sphere, this meant that mainline Protestantism or even the tripartite division of Protestant-Catholic-Jew no longer represented all of society’s spiritual interests.

The Church, along with government, big business, and the military—those composing “the Establishment”—was denounced by the young adults of the ‘60s for its materialism, power ploys, self-interest, and smug complacency.

The marriage between the religious and political right delivered Reagan, Bush, and countless state and local victories. But it disgusted liberal Democrats, especially those with weak connections to the Church.

Therefore the 1960s did swing wide a door that had never been opened before. A new vista of lifestyle options was introduced into mainstream America. In the religious sphere, this meant that mainline Protestantism or even the tripartite division of Protestant-Catholic-Jew no longer represented all of society’s spiritual interests.

The Church, along with government, big business, and the military—those composing “the Establishment”—was denounced by the young adults of the ‘60s for its materialism, power ploys, self-interest, and smug complacency.

The marriage between the religious and political right delivered Reagan, Bush, and countless state and local victories. But it disgusted liberal Democrats, especially those with weak connections to the Church

# data[].attributes.body
The 1960s "revolution" has perhaps been exaggerated over the years. Studies show, for example, that while a large vocal minority of mostly middle- and upper-middle-class college students challenged traditional institutions and mores, many of their peers remained as committed to old-time moral and religious values as ever.

T he 1960s did swing wide a door that had never been opened before. A new vista of lifestyle options was introduced into mainstream America. In the religious sphere, this meant that mainline Protestantism or even the tripartite division of Protestant-Catholic-Jew no longer represented all of society's spiritual interests. Americans now had to take into account different kinds of spiritualities and practices, new kinds of leaders and devotees.

# data[].attributes.body
America remains an intensely religious nation and, if anything, the trend since the late 1980s has been toward stronger religious belief. Eight-in-ten Americans (81%) say that prayer is an important part of their daily lives, and just as many believe there will be a Judgment Day when people will be called before God to answer for their sins. Even more people (87%) agree with the statement “I never doubt the existence of God.”

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2003/11/05/part-8-religion-in-american-life/

# data[].attributes.body
According to Christian Smith, a sociology and religion professor at the University of Notre Dame, America’s nonreligious lurch in the 90's has mostly been the result of historical events:

the association of the Republican Party with the Christian right
The Religious Right: the factions of the right wing of US Politics, typically in the Republican Party, which use Christianity as the basis for their political beliefs. ------ strong focus on social issues in as opposed to economic or global issues.
- condemn the practice of abortion and see it is murder. As this is a policy platform, many groups have actively sort to overturn Roe v Wade 1973 and seeking to defund Planned Parenthood and many other service which provide abortions.
- Contraception is condemned by the religious right, and as with apportion they will seek to campaign against programmes which include contraception such as some policies available under Obamacare.
- Homosexuality,  many on the religious right see themselves as the ‘self-appointed conscience of American society’. Some of the more extreme groups within the religious right such as the New Christian Right, campaign to have homosexuality criminalised.

The marriage between the religious and political right delivered Reagan, Bush, and countless state and local victories. But it disgusted liberal Democrats, especially those with weak connections to the Church. It also shocked the conscience of moderates, who preferred a wide berth between their faith and their politics. Smith said it’s possible that young liberals and loosely affiliated Christians first registered their aversion to the Christian right in the early 1990s, after a decade of observing its powerful role in conservative politics.

the end of the Cold War 1947 – 1991)
it may have felt unpatriotic to confess one’s ambivalence toward God while the U.S. was locked in a geopolitical showdown with a godless Evil Empire. In 1991, however, the Cold War ended. As the U.S.S.R. dissolved, so did atheism’s association with America’s nemesis. After that, “nones” could be forthright about their religious indifference, without worrying that it made them sound like Soviet apologists.

The Church is just one of many social institutions—including banks, Congress, and the police—that have lost public trust in an age of elite failure. But scandals in the Catholic Church have accelerated its particularly rapid loss of moral stature.

Christianity’s association with unpopular Republican policies drove more young liberals and moderates away from both the party and the Church.

The Civil Rights movement, the "Sexual Revolution," and new "alternative" religions (e.g., yoga, transcendental meditation, Buddhism, Hinduism) all challenged the traditional church and its teachings, its leaders and their actions. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, then, religion itself was not rejected so much as was institutionalized Christianity. The Church, along with government, big business, and the military—those composing "the Establishment"—was denounced by the young adults of the '60s for its materialism, power ploys, self-interest, and smug complacency.

# data[].attributes.body
THE FORECLOSING OF MORTGAGES,
THE GETTING OF BRIBES,
THE KITING OF BILLS,
THE VACATING OF LEASES,
THE WRINGING OF DEBTS,
THE ZEROING OF GAINS,

# data[].attributes.body
Bern Porter’s input serves as a platform in which he expresses several imageries on sexuality, orientation and queerness. This raises the question as to whether Porter is entitled to express those opinions in the first place. Considering the writing consists of contradicting/ opposing phrases that appear disheartened, and as a white Caucasian man having not experienced the hardships that queer people faced during the 20th century, is expressing these opposing views from an individual stance somewhat insensitive; given the fragility of the topic in 20th century USA? Through his statements, is he speaking for the masses and the collective opinions of other individuals, or is he appropriating the experiences of others- is he therefore entitled to have this platform to express his opinions, without having directly experienced the statements he preaches?

# data[].attributes.body
Negativity within his work. Porter uses multiple nouns that describe people in a negative light, however paired together with contrasting verbs; those not normally associated with the nouns (ie.THE CAMOUFLAGING OF ENEMIES, THE BREEDING OF MONSTERS). There’s an immediate sense of frustration from Porter pairing the negative nouns with such verbs. This could be related back to Porter’s own personal history and his distaste with his own involvement with war. Assuming Porter held a strong moral compass towards himself after his scientific career and its detrimental effects on innocent people, his references to such nouns could be seen as his own distaste/ anger towards the world and what it had become (or as how he saw it). His career shift from science to art that was driven by the effects of war could possibly be reflected in such phrases.

But at the same time, there was so much happening in the US during the 20th century, that it’s hard to ignore other possible affiliations Porter could have made or referenced to within his work. One of the more prominent events in modern US history that occurred during the 50’s and 60’s was the civil rights movement. Following centuries-long efforts to abolish slavery and racial oppression, the American civil rights movement against racial segregation and discrimination came to prominence in the 1950’s. This recorded multiple historical turning points, events and figures such as Martin Luther King Jr, Rosa Parks, the Freedom Riders, Little Rock Nine, and so on. Having such a large movement that was widespread across the country, it would be hard to go unnoticed, even in Belfast, Maine, where Porter resided. The social turmoil that the US faced during this era would have affected everyone in any walk of life, therefore we should also assume that Porter was not only aware but also affected. Without knowing what stance/ side Porter actually took in this particular case study, it could still be inferred that those negative nouns could in some way reference these events. Regardless of whether Porter was on the side of the oppressor or the oppressed, he possibly targeted the hate and tranformed them into the negative nouns, further amplifying his anger and frustration. There is of course a plethora of different monumental historical events and instances that occurred throughout his lifetime that Porter could actual be referencing through these nouns, including other social, historical and even economical contexts, however this is just one interpretation that could be made due to its prominence during the era.

# data[].attributes.body
Politically related words appear several times in Bern porter's poems. And when these words do appear, they usually carry a satirical connotation of corruption. Combining the social context of the time with the context in which Bern Porter wrote, we can appreciate his dissatisfaction with the political environment in which he lived and his attempts to use his voice to make some changes.
In the United States, the political environment in the 1980s was full of turmoil and unrest due to the Cold War. And the suburban and rural population of the Southwest and California began to rise after the Second World War and exploded in the 1970s. This led to the ageing of cities in the 1980s, bringing problems of overcrowding, pollution and crime. People were tired of paying high taxes for social programs they did not consider effective and were worried about the stagnating economy.
The many references to the 'common man' and the 'citizen’ in the poetry also reflect his concern for class issues.
By early 1982, the United States was experiencing its worst recession since the Great Depression.Nine million people were unemployed in November of that year.Businesses closed, families lost their homes and farmers lost their land.
This may explain the negativity tone against politics and society in the poetry.

# data[].attributes.body
Words related to the law also appear several times in the poem. The law usually represents and symbolises fairness and justice. However, there are many instances in the poem where there is an escape from the law, or where the law is unjust. From my point of view, although this reflects Bern Porter's strong disappointment with the state of society at the time, he still had aspirations for an ideal society that was fair and just. His change of heart in viewing the world came about when he switched from a scientific career to art.What he wanted to express had come to an end in terms of science and thus turned to art.

# data[].attributes.body
There are multiple references to religious imagery throughout the work, often with a negative connotation, amplifying a disheartened tone, emulating  a sense of anger and almost resentment. It paints a very dark setting, which could further convey his own personal anger and frustration at the world at the time.

In 1980's America, when Porter published his work, there was a  nonreligious lurch which was a result of historical events occurring at the time.

One being the end of the Cold War. Some have said it may have felt unpatriotic to confess one’s ambivalence toward God while America was locked in war with the Soviet Union.

Two being a combination of scandals in the Catholic Church. The Church is one of many social institutions that lost public trust in an age of elite failure and have accelerated its particularly rapid loss of moral stature. The Church, along with government, big business, and the military—was denounced by the young adults of the ‘60s for its materialism, power ploys, self-interest, and smug complacency.

Three, the association of the Republican Party with the Christian right. Christianity’s association with unpopular Republican policies drove more young liberals away from the Church. They had a strong focus on social issues as opposed to economic or global issues. They condemn the practice of abortion and see it is murder and Contraception is condemned.

Therefore the 1960s did swing wide a door that had never been opened before. A new vista of lifestyle options was introduced into mainstream America.  previous religious beliefs no longer represented all of society’s spiritual interests.

The marriage between the religious and political right delivered Reagan, Bush, and countless state and local victories. But it disgusted liberal Democrats, especially those with weak connections to the Church

# data[].attributes.body
THE CERTIFYING OF DEVILS
THE BANISHING OF BELIEVERS
THE JACOBINIZING OF BAPTISTS
THE IMMOLATING OF NUNS
THE IMPUTING OF SINS
THE LIBERATING OF DEMONS
THE SANCTIFYING OF EVIL,

THE SCAFFOLDING OF BAPTISTRIES

THE UNFROCKING OF BISHOPS,

THE UNLEASHING OF SERPENTS

THE QUOTING OF DOOM
THE VULGARIZING OF PRIESTS
THE YULING OF EASTER

# data[].attributes.headline
WHY, WHY, WHY? APPLY THIS QUESTION TO ALL OF THE ABOVE TO DECIDE UPON FINAL PLAN

# data[].attributes.subject
WHY, WHY, WHY? APPLY THIS QUESTION TO ALL OF THE ABOVE TO DECIDE UPON FINAL PLAN

# data[].attributes.body
Jack - stylistic elements for intro, premiere pro editing for debate/talk intro

# data[].attributes.body
a set of segmented/ divided talks (videos) on a digital platform that would cover the range of different topics we explored and researched- in relation to the publication.

# data[].attributes.body
Sustained stretches of talk which enables speakers and listeners to explore and build on their own and others’ ideas to develop coherent thinking. The aim is to achieve a common understanding through structured cumulative questioning and discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
expertise in the 20th century socio-political, and economic sphere within the USA.

# data[].attributes.body
Closing statements relating back to the overarching theme and Porter

# data[].attributes.body
Accumulation of all of the above resulting an anonymous poll- this would relate back to the overarching theme

# data[].attributes.body
Show examples of our chosen statements and expanding on the over arching theme- how they relate

Politics

Law

Sexuality & queerness

Negative nouns- descriptions

Religion

Financial

# data[].attributes.body
A brief introduction and (overarching theme relating to the statements) to Porter as well as our input material

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.poll-maker.com

example https://linkto.run/p/PCR7W6EW

# data[].attributes.body
Ted talks:

Debate: different opinions shown, discussion amongst people

Lecture: deliver an educational speech. Usually based one opinion with historical/ contextual references

Sermon: address a scriptural, theological, or moral topic, usually expounding on a type of belief, law, or behavior within both past and present context
E.g. a Church sermon versus a large scale audience etc

# data[].attributes.body
https://pmvabf.org

# data[].attributes.body
If online
Can opinions get lost

# data[].attributes.body
A purely text driven platform to enable comfortable anonymity but also - why the need for anonymity? Why are people uncomfortable when putting across their opinion when their identity is open and known? By contributing to the group and having your identity known is this actually rewarding?

# data[].attributes.body
Typing gives/ create opportunity for people to get involved if people are nervous talking, comfortable environment for open speech

# data[].attributes.body
Talk may lead to a debate

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.kialo.com
- choose topic
- add comments for for and against
- can add comments on peoples opinions, add props and cons or there argument

# data[].attributes.body
Open house for discussion and closing thoughts
For those who are experts in the topic field
Chance to bring in other topics

# data[].attributes.body
General history on our input material, its author, the theme of our debate and what we hope to discuss and learn

# data[].attributes.body
Between the different categories chosen for the debate: setting the scene. Establishing a flow of discussion from a chosen topic e.g. sexuality (which also informs gender) and representation in the 20th century which allows the debate to also discuss additional and supporting topics relating to our theme, such as religion etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Where are these debates going to be held, online, chat, voice?

# data[].attributes.body
- What experts are we focusing, choose one, too general
- What age
- What belief systems do your experts have
- Will they all be English speakers since your talk is in English? is this not limiting?
- What occupation do they have
- where are these debates going to be held, online, chat, voice?
- will your audience be made of an equal number of men and women?

# data[].attributes.body
We have categorised Bern Porters statements into a variety of debate prompts- therefore it offers a variety of experts in different fields in participate

# data[].attributes.body
More than one sport

# data[].attributes.body
Experts are sometimes only hold a high amount of knowledge in a specific field. I debate would offer them the opportunity to broaden this

# data[].attributes.headline
If not, how can the work be refined in order to communicate more effectively

# data[].attributes.subject
If not, how can the work be refined in order to communicate more effectively

# data[].attributes.body
Our expert audience exist within a variety of roles such as engineers, scientists, scholars and even Youtube beauty gurus, it all comes down to criteria that define them as an expert such as their background, education, ability to reach an audience and the depth of their knowledge within their specialist field. Youtube, UN Summit talks, our experts exist everywhere.

Our experts mainly interact within debates, talks and discussions to which offers an opportunity for a wider talk or discussion, to further broaden their own knowledge and to instigate change whether autonomous or in collaboration with others.

Depending on our debate prompt, our expert audience will be able to adapt to the themes of discussion we are proposing, such as:

Words about Politics

Words about law

Sexuality & queerness

Negative nouns- when used to describe someone in a negative light

Religious connotations

Financial related words

# data[].attributes.body
Fandom
Fanatics
Enthusiast

# data[].attributes.body
Time spent in the field through practise/ Experience

On paper, qualifications through knowledge

Fanatic/ mega fan/ fandom/ through obsession

# data[].attributes.headline
What merits or achievements qualify them as an expert?

# data[].attributes.subject
What merits or achievements qualify them as an expert?

# data[].attributes.body
Awards? E.g. Nobel peace prize

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twamPVKIHVo

# data[].attributes.headline
Expert in a specific field print and production. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Expert in a specific field print and production. 

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2QxFM9y0tY

# data[].attributes.body
An expert is someone who is called upon to enlighten others of their knowledge/ expertise/ opinion

# data[].attributes.body
having our own insights/ opinions/ perspective on the topic of discussion, the audience could gain a deeper understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Experts exist within multiple dimensions, whether that be virtual presentations or live audience demonstrations. Social media platforms such as Youtube and content creators as opposed to more traditional and conventional settings such as lecture halls and a stage/audience dynamic.

# data[].attributes.body
A debate offers the opportunity for a wider talk or conversation