# data[].attributes.body
Which one do you think has the stronger writer's voice ?

WHY?

Can you identify key features to support your stance on this?

# data[].attributes.body
Add your comments below the text

# data[].attributes.body
Add your comments below the text

# data[].attributes.body
I think student B's article expresses the author's point of view more strongly for three reasons

·In the first stage of this paper, the author directly points out that he will provide the most reasonable conclusion after comparative analysis;

original text：I will include by suggesting the best definition

·In the last paragraph of the article, the author also gives a more subjective conclusion in the summary

original text：In my opinion, the definition should be narrower because the physical dimension of health could be measured in terms of life expectancy, the infant mortality rate and other relatively objective measures (Yach, 1998). This is not possible for the time

Keywords with strong tone (subjectivity)：I will conclude    In my opinion  This is not possible

# data[].attributes.body
I think student B has his own voice in the article.
First of all, he said at the beginning of the article that he would give the best definition.
And in the article gave a negative, but also added their own thoughts.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the second author of the article has a stronger point of view, because he put forward his own opinion at the very beginning, and used facts to prove his own opinion to make his opinion more convincing.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the structure of the second article is clearer than that of the first one. The first paragraph of the second article defines the scope of discussion of the whole article. Then the author starts from the second paragraph to write the changes of the concept of health in chronological order, and finally puts forward his own definition of health.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this one has stronger write's voice. These two articles have the generally same concept as well as the reference. The key point  I think why this one is stronger is the logic of writing. The author connects the  critical examinations of the concept of 'Health' by time sequence，and further more, he or she marked the source of the references more carefully. It will make our readers think it's  more rigorous, too. The first one are more like the pearls necklace, just gathering the work of other people. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this one has stronger write's voice. These two articles have the generally same concept as well as the reference. The key point  I think why this one is stronger is the logic of writing. The author connects the  critical examinations of the concept of 'Health' by time sequence，and further more, he or she marked the source of the references more carefully. It will make our readers think it's  more rigorous, too. The first one are more like the pearls necklace, just gathering the work of other people. 

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, student B's article embodies voice. He gave his own definition at the beginning of the article and proved its definition with practical examples in the following content. At the same time, the content of the second article is in a more logical order, which is written in chronological order.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Student A has a stronger voice. First of all, he outlined the structure of the whole article in the first paragraph. Secondly, every time he cites the results of other people's research, he puts forward his own opinions and explains them in his own words. Student A presents opinions and evidence from all sources. In the end, he put forward his own views on the whole article and the research direction that should be carried out in the future.