# data[].attributes.body
Lucca Mendonça - Júri

After evaluating the arguments and evidence presented, We consider the defendant, William Shakespeare, responsible for the plagiarism caused to Fernando Rojas and we condemn the defendant to pay for the damages caused.

Luego de evaluar los argumentos y pruebas presentados, encontramos al imputado, William Shakespeare, responsable del plagio causado a Fernando Rojas y ordenamos al imputado que pague los daños ocasionados.

# data[].attributes.body
Nosotros, los del jurado, declaramos culpable al acusado, tanto por la falta de pruebas de su inocencia como por la presencia de pruebas de su fechoría, además de su comportamiento inadecuado durante el juicio.  Como resultado, ordenamos a William Shakespeare pagar una multa de £ 80,000 a la víctima, Fernando Rojas.

We, from the jury, found the defendant guilty, both due to the lack of evidence of his innocence and the presence of evidence of his wrongdoing, in addition to his inappropriate behavior during the trial.  As a result, we ordered William Shakespeare to pay a £ 80,000 fine to the victim, Fernando Rojas.

# data[].attributes.body
Português:
Meritíssimo Juiz,

Eu, Gabriel Saraiva, jurado da acusação de que Shakespeare plagiou a obra “La celestina”, romance feito por Fernando de Rojas, coloco meu posicionamento imparcial e com base nos argumentos levantados pelos advogados de acusação concluo que William Shakespeare é inocente porque a acusação não teve argumentos suficientes para provar e afirmar que o réu havia realmente plagiado a obra de Fernando Rojas. Portanto, ao meu ver o autor de Romeu e Julieta é inocente.

English:
Your Honor,

I, Gabriel Saraiva, sworn on the accusation that Shakespeare plagiarized the work “La celestina”, a novel by Fernando de Rojas, place my impartial position and based on the arguments raised by the prosecuting lawyers I conclude that William Shakespeare is innocent because the accusation does not had enough arguments to prove and claim that the defendant had actually plagiarized the work of Fernando Rojas. Therefore, in my view the author of Romeo and Juliet is innocent.

Español:
Tu honor,

Yo, Gabriel Saraiva, juré sobre la acusación de que Shakespeare plagió la obra “La celestina”, novela de Fernando de Rojas, coloco mi postura imparcial y con base en los argumentos planteados por los abogados de la acusación concluyo que William Shakespeare es inocente porque la acusación no Tenía suficientes argumentos para probar y afirmar que el imputado había plagiado efectivamente la obra de Fernando Rojas. Por tanto, en mi opinión, el autor de Romeo y Julieta es inocente.

# data[].attributes.body
inglês:

after traveling to London, my friends from the region took me to the theater to watch Shakespeare's work. During the theater, I noticed similarities between William's work and my father's book, these similarities are found both in the story itself and in the structure of the work's presentation.

Espanhol:

después de viajar a Londres, mis amigos de la región me llevaron al teatro para ver la obra de Shakespeare. Durante el teatro, noté similitudes entre la obra de William y el libro de mi padre, estas similitudes se encuentran tanto en la historia misma como en la estructura de la presentación de la obra.

# data[].attributes.body
Marcela Lana - Defense Lawyer.

My client, William Shakespeare, is being unfairly accused of plagiarism, making a sincere and thorough defense of the false accusation necessary for the prevention of morals and his reputation before society.  Bearing in mind that Shakespeare is being sued for the possible “copy” of the work of Spanish writer Fernando Rojas, La Celestina ”, it is necessary to scrutinize William's life and work to prove his good morals and nature in the face of such an erroneous accusation by the prosecution.
As main arguments, it can be cited:
if the prosecution interprets my client's past works as copies, it is necessary to say that he was freely inspired by them, disregarding, therefore, one accused of structured plagiarism;  Plagiarism should be set up only when the work explicitly copies other material.
The work "Romeo and Juliet" was loosely inspired by the work of another artist, Arthur Broke, and therefore, my client cannot be accused of plagiarism.  Once an explicit copy has actually taken place, Mr. Arthur Broke, author of the work “The tragic History of Romeo and Juliet”, should be accused.
In addition to these, one should consider the decorations and the support of the nobility to my client, considered very important for the culture and history of the nation.

Marcela Lana - Abogada defensora.

Mi cliente, William Shakespeare, está siendo acusado injustamente de plagio, haciendo una defensa sincera y exhaustiva de la falsa acusación necesaria para la prevención de la moral y su reputación ante la sociedad.  Teniendo en cuenta que Shakespeare está siendo demandado por la posible “copia” de la obra del escritor español Fernando Rojas, La Celestina ”, es necesario escudriñar la vida y obra de William para demostrar su buena moral y naturaleza ante tan errónea acusación de la fiscalía.
Como argumentos principales se pueden citar:
si la fiscalía interpreta como copias las obras pasadas de mi cliente, es necesario decir que se inspiró libremente en ellas, sin tener en cuenta, por tanto, al acusado de plagio estructurado;  El plagio debe establecerse solo cuando el trabajo copia explícitamente otro material.
La obra "Romeo y Julieta" se inspiró vagamente en la obra de otro artista, Arthur Broke, y por tanto, mi cliente no puede ser acusado de plagio.  Una vez realizada una copia explícita, el Sr. Arthur Broke, autor de la obra “La trágica historia de Romeo y Julieta”, debe ser acusado.
Además de estos, se deben considerar las condecoraciones y el apoyo de la nobleza a mi cliente, considerado muy importante para la cultura y la historia de la nación.

# data[].attributes.body
Soy abogado de Ricardo Roja (hijo de Fernando Rojas), quien acusa al dramaturgo William Shakespeare de clonar la obra de su padre, conocida como La Celestina. En un análisis exhaustivo de la obra "Romeo y Julieta" presentada en el teatro de Londres, es posible identificar elementos claros que apoyan la tesis de que Shakespeare no es el autor original de la obra y que dicha obra es un plagio. Shakespeare también ha ocurrido en su "Currículum de vida", que demuestran que es más que apto para cometer tales delitos.

I am a lawyer for Ricardo Roja (Fernando Rojas' son), who accuses the playwright William Shakespeare of cloning his father's work, known as La Celestina. In a thorough analysis of the play "Romeo and Juliet" presented at the London theater, it is possible to identify clear elements that support the thesis that Shakespeare is not the original author of the play and that such work is a plagiarism. Shakespeare also has occurred in his "life curriculum", which demonstrate that he is more than apt to commit such crimes.

# data[].attributes.body
Bianca Lustosa, 2anoB.

# data[].attributes.body
As a prosecuting attorney, my role is to prove through various arguments that the copy existed in the case in question and that Rojas is guilty.
Both works show similarities in construction and plot, hatred between families and the search for revenge for Romeo.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.body
William Shakespeare (Julia Quintão Laperriere-2B)

Acusado acusado de plagio.

Me declaro inocente y niego todos los cargos que se me imputan.  Soy un hombre honesto, mi esposa e hijos me conocen y pueden confirmarlo.  Soy autor de innumerables, brillantes y famosas obras, y puedo decir que nunca plagiaría la obra de otro autor, como tampoco quisiera que nadie pusiera su nombre en una obra escrita por mí.  Soy de mente literaria y nunca leí el libro escrito por Fernando de Rojas, de hecho nunca llegué a tener acceso a esta obra que fue escrita en un lugar tan lejos de donde vivo y que fue escrita en otro idioma (español).
Mi obra "Romeo y Julieta" se inspiró en un poema escrito por Arthur Brooke, titulado "La trágica historia de Romeo y Julieta", y en una prosa titulada "Palacio del placer", que fue escrito por William Painter.
El plagio es el acto de firmar, presentar y publicar una obra intelectual de cualquier tipo (texto, música, obra pictórica, fotografía, obra audiovisual, etc.) que contenga partes de una obra que pertenece a otra persona sin el permiso del autor.  Y es una acusación gravísima y que hay que analizar con mucho cuidado.

# data[].attributes.body
William Shakespeare (Julia Quintão Laperriere-2B)

Defendant being accused of plagiarism.

I declare myself innocent, and I deny all charges made directed at me.  I am an honest man, my wife and children know me and can confirm this.  I am the author of countless, brilliant and famous works, and I can say that I would never plagiarize the work of another author, just as I would not want anyone to put their names in a work written by me.  I am a mind of literature and I never read the book written by Fernando de Rojas. In fact, I never got to have access to this work that was written in a place so far from where I live and that was written in another language (Spanish).
My play "Romeo and Juliet" was inspired by a poem written by Arthur Brooke, called "The Tragic History of Romeo and Juliet", and in a prose called "Palace of Pleasure", which was written by William Painter.
Plagiarism is the act of signing, presenting and publishing an intellectual work of any kind (text, music, pictorial work, photography, audiovisual work, etc.) containing parts of a work that belongs to another person without the author's permission.  And it is a very serious accusation and one that must be analyzed very carefully.

# data[].attributes.body
The poet William Shakespeare, author of several worldwide famous works like Hamlet and Macbeth, is being accused of plagiarizing the work “La Celestina”, by Fernando de Rojas, in one of his classics, Romeo and Juliet.

From three testimonies, enough arguments were gathered for the accused to be found guilty of the crime committed.

The first personality to witness, Rodrigo de Rojas, son of Fernando de Rojas, presents the several similarities between both works, from their textual structure, as well as in the story itself, such as the fact that both are stories of forbidden love that ends in a fatality, that the secondary characters have a certain hatred between them, the supernatural aspect that is present in both stories, and also the acts of revenge between the characters. These examples are basically a summary of both stories, which shows how similar they are, strengthening the idea that there was plagiarism in this situation. The second witness, Lúcia Davis, Shakespeare’s former writing teacher, says that the author, in his youth, came to plagiarize several texts in his school activities, being warned several times by the school. This account shows that William has a history of plagiarism, and that, for him, such action was not uncommon. Finally, we have the testimony of Mary, the current employee of the Shakespeare family. She reports that in the years of writing Romeo and Juliet, the author was extremely pressured to write new works, since he was at the top of his career, and was going through a moment of creative block. With that, Mary says that the author began the search for inspiration in the works of different writers until he came across La Celestina, which he showed a lot of interest in. The employee reported finding several manuscripts with excerpts from Fernando's story, as well as seeing Shakespeare reading it countless times a day. The pressure suffered by William and the copy of La Celestina found in his home, reinforced the case against him, indicating a possible reason, and that he knew of the existence of the work.

Putting together the arguments above, it is possible to create a solid case against William Shakespeare, claiming that he plagiarized the work of Fernando de Rojas.

El poeta William Shakespeare, autor de varias obras famosas a nivel mundial como Hamlet y Macbeth, está siendo acusado de plagiar la obra La Celestina, de Fernando de Rojas, en uno de sus clásicos, Romeo y Julieta.

De tres testimonios se recabaron argumentos suficientes para que el imputado fuera declarado culpable del delito cometido.

El primer personaje a presenciar, Rodrigo de Rojas, hijo de Fernando de Rojas, presenta las diversas similitudes presentes en las dos obras, desde su estructura textual, así como en la propia historia, como el hecho de que ambas son historias de amor prohibido que desembocan en una fatalidad, que los personajes secundarios tienen cierto odio entre ellos, la cuestión de la sobrenaturalidad presente en ambas historias, y también el momento de la venganza entre los personajes. Estos ejemplos son básicamente un resumen de ambas historias, lo que demuestra lo similares que son, fortaleciendo la idea de que hubo plagio en esta situación. La segunda testigo, Lúcia Davis, ex maestra de escritura de Shakespeare, dice que el autor, en su juventud, llegó a plagiar varios textos al realizar sus actividades escolares, habiendo sido advertido varias veces por la escuela. Este relato muestra que William tiene un historial de plagio y que, para él, tal acción no era infrecuente. Finalmente, tenemos el testimonio de Mary, la actual empleada de la familia Shakespeare. Ella informa que en los años de escribir Romeo y Julieta, el autor se sintió extremadamente presionado para escribir nuevas obras, ya que estaba en el apogeo de su carrera, sin embargo, y atravesaba un momento de bloqueo creativo. Con eso, Mary dice que el autor comenzó la búsqueda de inspiración en las obras de diferentes escritores hasta que se encontró con La Celestina, por la que mostró mucho interés. El empleado informó haber encontrado varios manuscritos con extractos de la historia de Fernando, así como haber visto a Shakespeare leyéndola innumerables veces al día. La presión que sufrió William y la copia de La Celestina encontrada en su casa, refuerzan el caso en su contra, indicando un posible motivo, y que él conocía la existencia de la obra.

Juntando los argumentos anteriores, es posible crear un caso sólido contra William Shakespeare, alegando que plagió la obra de Fernando de Rojas.

# data[].attributes.body
Lívia Freitas - 2B - N17

# data[].attributes.body
My name is Mary Drake and I worked for Mr. William Shakespeare and his family for 21 years. I am witnessing the accusation of plagiarism in the book "La Celestina", because during the period when I was employed by his family I witnessed many turbulent moments in his life. At the height of his career, Mr. Shakespeare felt very pressured and without creativity, this started to affect his behavior at home. He wandered during the night and left cigarette butts on the floor, he looked visibly dejected and stressed with so much demand. He changed overnight, when I saw him comment on his new production with his wife during dinner, I was perplexed, because to create something so complex from nothing he had to have a great epiphany. Until one day, cleaning the couple's bedroom, I realized that Mr. Shakespeare's bedside book was "La Celestina" and it was all underlined.

Mi nombre es Mary Drake y trabajé para el Sr. William Shakespeare y su familia durante 21 años. Soy testigo de la acusación de plagio en el libro "La Celestina", porque durante el período en que fui empleado de su familia presencié muchos momentos turbulentos en su vida. En el apogeo de su carrera, el Sr. Shakespeare se sintió muy presionado y sin creatividad, esto comenzó a afectar su comportamiento en el hogar. Vagaba durante la noche y dejaba colillas en el suelo, se veía visiblemente abatido y estresado con tanta exigencia. Cambió de la noche a la mañana, cuando lo vi comentar sobre su nueva producción con su esposa durante la cena, me quedé perplejo, porque para crear algo tan complejo de la nada tenía que tener una gran epifanía. Hasta que un día, limpiando el dormitorio de la pareja, me di cuenta de que el libro de cabecera del Sr. Shakespeare era "La Celestina" y estaba todo subrayado.

# data[].attributes.body
William Shakespeare (Julia Quintão Laperriere-2B)

Réu sendo acusado de plágio.

Eu me declaro inocente, e nego todas as acusações feitas direcionadas a mim. Sou um homem honesto, minha mulher e meus filhos me conhecem e podem confirmar isso. Sou autor de inúmeras, brilhantes e famosas, obras e posso afirmar que nunca plagiaria a obra de um outro autor, assim como não gostaria que alguém colocasse o nome deles em uma obra escrita por mim. Eu sou uma mente da literatura e nunca li o livro escrito por Fernando de Rojas .Na verdade nunca cheguei a ter acesso a essa obra que foi escrita em um lugar tão distante de onde eu vivo e que foi escrita em outra língua (espanhol).

A minha peça “Romeu e Julieta” foi inspirado em um poema escrito por Arthur Brooke, chamado “ A Trágica História de Romeu e Julieta”, e em uma prosa chamada “Palácio do Prazer”, que foi escrita por William Painter.

Plágio é o ato de assinar, apresentar e publicar uma obra intelectual de qualquer natureza (texto, música, obra pictórica, fotografia, obra audiovisual, etc) contendo partes de uma obra que pertença a outra pessoa sem a permissão do autor. E é uma acusação muito séria e que deve ser analisada com muito cuidado.

# data[].attributes.body
Como um advogado, meu ponto principal são os argumentos, os quais usarei para acusar o réu em questão de plágio. Acredito friamente, com base nas provas previamente obtidas que o plágio realmente aconteceu. Seguiremos fortes com o mesmo posicionamento até o final da seção.

# data[].attributes.body
Soy John Heminges del Reino Unido. Mi gran amigo de años William Shakespeare, está siendo acusado de plagio en su obra "Romeo y Julieta". Se encontraron similitudes entre la obra de Shakespeare y la obra del escritor español Fernando de Rojas "La Celestina. A lo largo de nuestra amistad, Shakespeare poco a poco demostró que era un hombre de buen carácter, honesto y lo más importante, apasionado por el arte. Nunca le faltó la inspiración y la voluntad de renovar más y más su arte. Ninguna de las historias es 50% idéntica, no entiendo la acusación. que se está haciendo, no hay lógica en absoluto.

# data[].attributes.body
I’m John Heminges from the UK. My great friend of years William Shakespeare, is being accused of plagiarism in his play "Romeo and Juliet". Similarities were found between the work of Shakespeare and the work of Spanish writer Fernando de Rojas “La Celestina. Throughout our friendship, Shakespeare he gradually demonstrated how he was a man of good character, honest and most importantly, passionate about art. He never lacked inspiration and the will to renew his art more and more. None of the stories are even 50% identical, I don't understand the accusation. that is being done, there is no logic at all.

# data[].attributes.headline
Eduarda Vieira - Henry Condell

Meu grande amigo William Shakespeare está sendo acusado por plágio. A obra de Fernando de Rojas “La Celestina” (1499) se parece muito com a “Romeu e Julieta”. (1597)
Embora elas sejam bem parecidas, isso não quer dizer que foi um plágio, pois em nenhum momento foram extremamente idênticas.
Ele era um homem de bom caráter , que além de Romeu e Julieta tinha várias outras obras famosas como “Hamlet” “A comédia dos erros” e “Otelo, o Mouro de Veneza”.
Se ele realmente tivesse plagiado uma obra tão famosa igual essa, condenação já teria vindo a muito tempo!

My great friend William Shakespeare is being accused of plagiarism. Fernando de Rojas' work “La Celestina” (1499) is very similar to “Romeo and Juliet”. (1597)
Although they are very similar, this does not mean that it was plagiarism, because at no time were they extremely identical.
He was a man of good character, who besides Romeo and Juliet had several other famous works such as "Hamlet" "The comedy of errors" and "Othello, the Moor of Venice".
If he had really plagiarized such a famous work like this, condemnation would have come a long time ago!

Mi gran amigo William Shakespeare está siendo acusado de plagio. La obra de Fernando de Rojas “La Celestina” (1499) es muy similar a “Romeo y Julieta”. (1597)
Si bien son muy similares, esto no quiere decir que haya sido plagio, porque en ningún momento fueron extremadamente idénticos.
Era un hombre de buen carácter, que además de Romeo y Julieta tenía otras obras famosas como "Hamlet", "La comedia de los errores" y "Otelo, el moro de Venecia".
Si realmente hubiera plagiado una obra tan famosa como esta, ¡la condena habría llegado hace mucho tiempo!

# data[].attributes.subject
Eduarda Vieira - Henry Condell

Meu grande amigo William Shakespeare está sendo acusado por plágio. A obra de Fernando de Rojas “La Celestina” (1499) se parece muito com a “Romeu e Julieta”. (1597)
Embora elas sejam bem parecidas, isso não quer dizer que foi um plágio, pois em nenhum momento foram extremamente idênticas.
Ele era um homem de bom caráter , que além de Romeu e Julieta tinha várias outras obras famosas como “Hamlet” “A comédia dos erros” e “Otelo, o Mouro de Veneza”.
Se ele realmente tivesse plagiado uma obra tão famosa igual essa, condenação já teria vindo a muito tempo!

My great friend William Shakespeare is being accused of plagiarism. Fernando de Rojas' work “La Celestina” (1499) is very similar to “Romeo and Juliet”. (1597)
Although they are very similar, this does not mean that it was plagiarism, because at no time were they extremely identical.
He was a man of good character, who besides Romeo and Juliet had several other famous works such as "Hamlet" "The comedy of errors" and "Othello, the Moor of Venice".
If he had really plagiarized such a famous work like this, condemnation would have come a long time ago!

Mi gran amigo William Shakespeare está siendo acusado de plagio. La obra de Fernando de Rojas “La Celestina” (1499) es muy similar a “Romeo y Julieta”. (1597)
Si bien son muy similares, esto no quiere decir que haya sido plagio, porque en ningún momento fueron extremadamente idénticos.
Era un hombre de buen carácter, que además de Romeo y Julieta tenía otras obras famosas como "Hamlet", "La comedia de los errores" y "Otelo, el moro de Venecia".
Si realmente hubiera plagiado una obra tan famosa como esta, ¡la condena habría llegado hace mucho tiempo!