# data[].attributes.body
In one of the websites, it did not have any colour and it did not look inviting:(

# data[].attributes.body
the national geographic has lots of colour and i liked it.;)

# data[].attributes.body
The National Geographic Kids
Too brief in information. Too many subheadings/tabs. it was unclear what the icons meant. Some subheadings were unclear

# data[].attributes.body
The National Geographic Kids
Had lots of fun facts. Had a diverse range of information. Had informative games. Colourful, eye catching pictures.

# data[].attributes.body
the nike website is terrible

# data[].attributes.body
The Nike website had no pics and no colours it is boring

# data[].attributes.body
The nike controversy website said that they made third world countries make their stuff

# data[].attributes.body
The Nike website was terrible it was boring and plain, it had no pictures or videos or colour

# data[].attributes.body
The Nike website was not the best because it had a lot of writing and hardly any text features. It didn't have a backround

# data[].attributes.body
The website Brain pop has a good seat out and i like how it has a search bar to share what your looking for .

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't like the BizKids website because I don't think it has enough information, links or videos.

# data[].attributes.body
Biz Kids website doesn't even has a purpose.

# data[].attributes.body
The BTN website was very interesting because it had lots of different pages and it was colourful.

# data[].attributes.body
The Nat Geo Kids website has many things that make it interesting

# data[].attributes.body
The Nike website does not have images

# data[].attributes.body
i think the BrainPop website was great it had lots of information about things.

# data[].attributes.body
The Nike controversy is just a long and big white screen with 0! pictures 0! at least some pictures instead of just paragraphs that are in black writing on a white screen

# data[].attributes.body
there are some good sentences in the Nike controversy.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the BTN website because it had information, videos and links.

# data[].attributes.headline
negative does not have information and no talking about the animals.

# data[].attributes.subject
negative does not have information and no talking about the animals.

# data[].attributes.body
The Nike website was terrible because it was boring and look s like your grand dad made it.

# data[].attributes.body
The NIKE controversy has no images or colours, just shades and an old looking type of words

# data[].attributes.body
Although

# data[].attributes.body
BizKids has no information about them they only give u videos.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the biz kids website because
it had a nice and sharp background, it had a video to watch so then you don't have to read a whole page of words

# data[].attributes.body
The Nike website has no colours, links, videos and pictures in it.

# data[].attributes.body
The site Brain pop it has no information on the front page

# data[].attributes.body
The UNICEF website was very colourful and interesting to look at

# data[].attributes.body
'The Nike controversy' is just some sentences on a blank screen. TY

# data[].attributes.body
We like how most websites had graphs that show the best to the worst brands.

# data[].attributes.body
We liked how the BTN website didn't included too many colours.

# data[].attributes.body
The Nike website has no colours it only had writing

# data[].attributes.body
On the BTN news website it was easy to read and it was basic

# data[].attributes.body
The Nike website had no colours or links to go to different fact sheets.

# data[].attributes.body
That Nike controversy had no pictures to help with reading.

# data[].attributes.body
That Nike are only making third world country's work in poor conditions not other country's.