# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
I strongly believe the pro side has taken this debate as they prove more realistic solutions to ensure the productivity of students and to teach students to increase self-control and maturity

# data[].attributes.subject
I strongly believe the pro side has taken this debate as they prove more realistic solutions to ensure the productivity of students and to teach students to increase self-control and maturity

# data[].attributes.headline
Based on the arguments that the con team made, I believe that they won this debate. Additionally, their arguments were a bit more persuasive and harder to rebut. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Based on the arguments that the con team made, I believe that they won this debate. Additionally, their arguments were a bit more persuasive and harder to rebut. 

# data[].attributes.body
The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example, Elyse said that middle schoolers are not mature enough to monitor their phone usage in school. I believe that the Con team had very solid reasoning for most of their claims.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the Pro side won because they provided great reasoning throughout the course of the debate and offered strong rebuttals.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the pro side has taken this debate because their arguments are more convincing and proves how students are mature enough to use phones, as well as how phones are beneficial to a child's self-control learning.

# data[].attributes.headline
Even though this was a very close debate, I believe that the pro team should win this debate. The pro side provided strong claims with evidence. Though, the con side came up with good examples and experiments, for their evidence, they were weak in the crossfire. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Even though this was a very close debate, I believe that the pro team should win this debate. The pro side provided strong claims with evidence. Though, the con side came up with good examples and experiments, for their evidence, they were weak in the crossfire. 

# data[].attributes.headline
This debate ended up being about whether or not teens are mature enough to use the benefits of cellphones. The Con team didn't explain how middle schools teens don't need to develop self control skills.

# data[].attributes.subject
This debate ended up being about whether or not teens are mature enough to use the benefits of cellphones. The Con team didn't explain how middle schools teens don't need to develop self control skills.

# data[].attributes.headline
I believe pro side won because Yulia's opening statement had great reasoning that deeply convinced me.

# data[].attributes.subject
I believe pro side won because Yulia's opening statement had great reasoning that deeply convinced me.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think pro side won because they were able to develop their points more. And the clash points of this debate was mostly from the pro sides case, making their points more relevant especially since I believe they won on those points.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think pro side won because they were able to develop their points more. And the clash points of this debate was mostly from the pro sides case, making their points more relevant especially since I believe they won on those points.

# data[].attributes.headline
I believed that the con side won this debate because of their persuasive 

# data[].attributes.subject
I believed that the con side won this debate because of their persuasive 

# data[].attributes.body
This debate was a real close one. Both sides had credible evidence and strong reasoning, however I think that the con side could explain more on how it connect to maturity. I think that the pro side won for this one.

# data[].attributes.headline
The against side presented the strongest argument and rebuttals that covered all the points that the for side presented. The against side did the best job of presenting their points and evidence with authority while using emotional and family relationship to move the audience.

# data[].attributes.subject
The against side presented the strongest argument and rebuttals that covered all the points that the for side presented. The against side did the best job of presenting their points and evidence with authority while using emotional and family relationship to move the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Therefore I believe that the against side clearly won

# data[].attributes.headline
I strongly believe that the pro side has won although the debate was very close. The pro side has responded effectively to the cons substantives and has given more convincing arguments that support the use of boarding schools.

# data[].attributes.subject
I strongly believe that the pro side has won although the debate was very close. The pro side has responded effectively to the cons substantives and has given more convincing arguments that support the use of boarding schools.

# data[].attributes.headline
Although this debate was quite  close I think Con team won. In the crossfire Richard refuted the Pro teams points on higher education by stating that day schools like SAS can have the same level of education. This debate now boils down to a debate on harms. The Con team provides points on Mental health and the Pro teams points only mitigated their points, therefore I believe Con wins. However Pro might have won if they explained how if parents send kids to boarding school they can't provide the family environment from Con.

# data[].attributes.subject
Although this debate was quite  close I think Con team won. In the crossfire Richard refuted the Pro teams points on higher education by stating that day schools like SAS can have the same level of education. This debate now boils down to a debate on harms. The Con team provides points on Mental health and the Pro teams points only mitigated their points, therefore I believe Con wins. However Pro might have won if they explained how if parents send kids to boarding school they can't provide the family environment from Con.

# data[].attributes.headline
The against side presented the strongest argument because of the evidence they provided about the harmful effects of boarding schools that are greater than the benefits of boarding schools.

# data[].attributes.subject
The against side presented the strongest argument because of the evidence they provided about the harmful effects of boarding schools that are greater than the benefits of boarding schools.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the con team won this debate because their reasons were more developed and the pro teams points were somewhat illogical. The biggest clash point of this debate also goes to the con team because the pro team only rebutted the public schools, not the private schools.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Liv and Richard completely. Richard and Liv had a very persuasive claim and had strong evidence to back it up.

# data[].attributes.headline
I believe boarding schools is beneficial to the right student.

# data[].attributes.subject
I believe boarding schools is beneficial to the right student.

# data[].attributes.body
The debate was very close and both sides have great arguments, but I believe that pro won since they focused on more then one claim.

# data[].attributes.headline
The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was that boarding schools can have negative emotion effects and bad influence on students. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was that boarding schools can have negative emotion effects and bad influence on students. 

# data[].attributes.body
I strongly believe that pro won this debate because even though Con had good points, Pro had more analysis and more explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that this debate was a tie, however if I had to choose which won then I think it's the pro side. Both of the sides had strong evidence and connected it with reasoning. The con side lacked in pathos though their evidence was really strong. The pro side had strong reasoning that was really surprisingly good with pathos. My vote goes to the pro side

# data[].attributes.body
I think the pro team won because they provided more logical reasonings and they had good evidence that just made more sense in general.

# data[].attributes.body
The against side presented the strongest arguments in this debate because I feel that the other side did not present rebuttals that were strong enough.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on Ryan's evidence about euthanasia being abused by doctors and families, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.headline
Pro team won because although con team had better confidence, the natural motion of the debate favored the pro side and made their points challenging to rebut. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Pro team won because although con team had better confidence, the natural motion of the debate favored the pro side and made their points challenging to rebut. 

# data[].attributes.headline
The con team won the debate because they provided better erasoning and evidence. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The con team won the debate because they provided better erasoning and evidence. 