# data[].attributes.body
Blah blah

# data[].attributes.body
The family are allowed to have the buttons because they are allowed to express themselves and morn.

# data[].attributes.body
I do feel asthough this violated his rights. On the other hand if people are swaying their descison based on a button they shouldn't be part of a jury.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes i do think that the family members choice to wear the buttons is protected because we have freedom of speech and that's what the buttons were.

# data[].attributes.body
No it is no protected because there are in a goverment  building meaning they have to follow thier policys and rules so only ammendments that have to do with the courtroom is applied here. look at it like this some goverment buldings dont allow guns inside like a school but thats not a violation of the 2nd ammendment

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it should have an offset reaction because it applies to the first amendment but it is also violating the sixth amendments.

# data[].attributes.body
The first amendment relates to this case because the family has the right to wear the buttons.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that is protected because there is no law that says "you should wear the uniform" when you are in court .

# data[].attributes.body
Yes , I do think the family members choice to wear the buttons is protected due to our first amendment , what you wear has to do with freedom of speech.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the family should be allowed to wear the buttons. The first Amendment states that we are allowed to have Freedom of Speech and what they're doing is their own type of freedom of speech

# data[].attributes.body
Depending what on the buttons it could cause the jury to have sympathy for the victim and his family.

# data[].attributes.body
This relates to the 6th Amendment because it could be taken a certain way by the jury and the judge and they could change their minds because they feel bad due to the buttons.

# data[].attributes.body
It relates to the 6th amendment because by the family wearing the buttons the judge could feel guilty and make it a partial trial.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the family members choice to wear the buttons are protected by the 1st amendment because they have there freedom of speech.

# data[].attributes.body
as much as i dislike crime and murder this man does have the right to 100% fair trial no matter how many people he has murdered even tho i disagree with it his rights were violated.

# data[].attributes.body
He uses it to avoid imprisonment because he feel although he is being treated unlawfully with the deceased family wearing buttons. This violates the 6th amendment because the buttons lead to an impartial jury.

# data[].attributes.body
It relates to the 6th amendment because the judge and jury might feel bad for the family and say that the defendant is guilty due to his emotions .

# data[].attributes.body
It's a petition that a prisoner fills out. He tries to use it as a way to not be put into jail. With the buttons he feels like the people of the jury will feel sympathy.

# data[].attributes.body
The victims family wore buttons in honor of their fallen family member. But with them doing this it led to an impartial jury, a impartial jury is a violation of the 6th amendment. Therefore they should not have been aloud to wear the buttons in court.

# data[].attributes.body
The musladin"s  rights have been violated because

# data[].attributes.body
He uses this concept to his advantage by saying that his rights were violated and that the government is holding his body after violating them.

# data[].attributes.body
The case relates to the 6th amendment because the people participating in the court case might feel a certain way because the family had the buttons on.

# data[].attributes.body
Musladin's rights have been violated because of the victims family members coming to the courtroom wearing buttons which affected the jury as well as the judge.

# data[].attributes.body
The families first amendment rights is what protects them from wearing the buttons. It's their "Freedom of speech".

# data[].attributes.body
This case relates to the 6th amendment because the people in the case maybe bias during the case and that a violation.

# data[].attributes.body
Habeus Corpus is a petition that is filled out by a prisoner, so they aren't thrown into jail. Musladin tried to use this concept to his advantage because he feels like he isn't being treated fairly or lawfully in during the case.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't feel as though his rights were violated because they have their First Amendment rights and if the jury decides to change their mind then that's just something they decided to do.

# data[].attributes.body
I do feel asthough this violated his rights, because this might cause emotional attachment to the family.

# data[].attributes.body
Habeus Corpus is a latin term for "you have the body " basically saying that the government is holding you illegaly Musladin tries to use this concept to his advantage by filing a habeas corpus suit in the appropriate U.S District Court . If the court agrees , it releases the defendant.

# data[].attributes.body
his rights are being violated hes allowed a fair public trial

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Muslandin has the right because people in the jury will feel sympathy for the family.

# data[].attributes.body
Habeus Corpus is having the right to be freed while being jailed illegally. He used it to his advantage by saying nothing.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that they didn't violate his rights.

# data[].attributes.body
Musladin tried to use this situation to accuse the judge of violating his sixth amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that his due process was violated because emotions and bias was used during the case

# data[].attributes.body
I do think that the family should be able to wear the pin with their lost loved one on it.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the family does have the right to wear the buttons

# data[].attributes.body
I think the family members wearing the buttons are protected because they have the right to wear what the want. The only way they can say to take it off is if they have a certain uniform

# data[].attributes.body
everyone have freedom to wear and say what they want if there are specific rules.

# data[].attributes.body
they was trying to say the judge took away they sixth amendment

# data[].attributes.body
i think the family should be able to wear what they want because there are no specific rules.

# data[].attributes.body
The family has every right to be able to wear buttons to support Tom Strudder. It is how they coped, how they morned, how they expressed they were hurt.

# data[].attributes.body
Musladin's rights were violated due to him not having a fair trial. Yes the victim's family has a right to express themselves but they probably knew most of the jury

# data[].attributes.body
Habeas Corpus is a suit that'll allow the defendant to sue the government because they violated their rights. Musladin sent the suit to the appropriate U.S. District

# data[].attributes.body
The family can express themselves how ever they want but they need out of city or state people for the jury. The only reason i say this is because if the jury knows the family then they are going to take the family's side

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the First Amendment does protect Tom Strudder’s family members to be able to wear a button with his picture on it. They have the freedom to wear whatever they please.

# data[].attributes.body
Musladin’s rights could have been violated in a way because the Jury could have seen the buttons and based their decision off of sympathy for the victims family.

# data[].attributes.body
A habeas corpus suit allows a defendant to sue the government, arguing that the government has violated the defendant’s rights, and is, in essence, illegally holding his body.

# data[].attributes.body
Musladin tried to use the suit to his advantage by claiming he was not given the rights of the Sixth Amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, Musladin’s rights were taken away because the Judge did not follow the rights of the Sixth Amendment. Yes, the family has the right to wear what they please but if it’s violating another Amendment then they’re in the wrong.