# data[].attributes.body
It is not Mexico's Independence Day. This day marks the day Mexico won a victory over France in war. This was called the Battle of Puebla. Though the overall war was not a total victory for Mexico, this battle was a moral boost for them.

# data[].attributes.body
Poaching has indeed reached heights that are unsustainable and could very well mean the end of this species. Elephants defend themselves like any other animal in the kingdom, so pointing fingers that them is kinda silly. Especially if that's the reasoning one might have for killing off the species. The hard part of this whole thing is that Animal poaching is just a defect of social and economic problems of Africa and Southern Asia. But one step at a time and maybe poaching will stop all together while new economic and social justice opportunities arrive to those parts of the world.

# data[].attributes.body
How do you feel when an elephant is killed (poached)? Do you actually know what elephants do? They are very intellectual. If you knew their behaviors and living styles you might re-think your answer to a more specific one. Elephants are some-what like us, human behaviors. Only, they have very, very, very good memory...and will not forget it. There's more you can research on elephants. Not all are "bad." My additional question is if elephants (some) ARE bad, what made them bad in the first place?

# data[].attributes.body
What percentile of poachers agree with what they are doing to the point they basically kill their own living history on their homeland or another's home land? What reasons are that strong? Is money really the only root to the answer?

# data[].attributes.body
That is a very severe statistic. That an Elephant is killed every 15 minutes. I also had no idea that elephant are severely endangered. This problem definitely needs to be solved. That picture just made me sour. It is all our faults as well.

# data[].attributes.body
Justin Absher's point of view on gun control really stood out to me. His views are very clear and with good reasoning. He have good examples on gun control rights such as violence against the legislatures but that would be dismissed quickly by authorities. Another example would be rioting but mentioned what good has it done in the past leading up to a final idea of what will work. What will work will be ultimately electing new legislatures in the end, he basically is saying that there's no need for war. I agree with what he said so far. I didn't even think much about it until now. Maybe there is a way to avoid war but what if the election doesn't fall into plan? Would we then have to face war? War isn't fun but to get something done right, you might have to.

# data[].attributes.body
"Illegal killings of elephants are being linked to organized crime and the funding of armed militia groups. Many consumers in Asia do not realize that by buying ivory, they are playing a role in the illegal wildlife trade and its serious consequences."

By
Li Bingbing

Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/elephants.html#u7SAxQ2eVVKJL2Wr.99"

This quote clearly states what is wrong. It also gives information on Asia that I did not expect. Can it really be true? Do the people of Asia not know what is really of the ivory industry? Maybe those who are just buying it but most likely not those selling. The facts are basic in this quote and it gets right to the point. Crime and money mainly directed from Asia. In the end, it IS illegal wildlife trade and has serious consequences.

# data[].attributes.body
[WARNING: Photo is very graphic for some viewers]

Does anyone enjoy this sight? I hope not. This is what's left behind after poachers get what they want, tusks. Obviously, they did not care how much pain it gives elephants. This sight sickens me and makes me question humanity. Poaching in Kenya will cause the extinction of the elephants. Relate this picture and picture hundreds. An elephant is killed every 15 minutes.

# data[].attributes.body
Who: Jeffrey Brown, Judy Woodruff, Paula Kahumbu (CEO, Wildlife Direct), Cynthia Moss (Amboseli Trust for Elephants), Richard Bonham, PBS, Katito Sayialel (deputy director of research for ATOE), Big Life (train patrols)

When: September 29, 2014/ 1989 International Ban on trade on African ivory

Where: Kenya, Amboseli National Park, China, David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust in Nairobi National Park

What: Elephants aren't like typical animals (smart/ complex brains, can recognize scents of humans and color of shirts (facts about the elephants) and how they are stressed/ what's changing now), poachers making more than a years salary killing one elephant now (China's known for their ivory carvings which created their new wealth), elephants will be gone within 10 years, confronting the poaching industry more and more

Why: Warn and knowledge others what is going on (people taking notice more and more), orphanages to take in baby elephants who lost a parent/ parents to poachers, massive slaughters on elephants for big pay (poachers are well organized and well armed), 300+ ranger patrol areas where there are kept elephants for protection, getting more of the community involved in protecting and stopping poachers would mean 90% of the battle won

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Racing to save Kenya's wild elephants from poachers

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
For the African elephant, poaching has reached crisis levels, according to some advocates. Killed for their magnificent ivory tusks, activists worry that wild elephants could near extinction in a decade. Jeffrey Brown reports from Amboseli National Park in Kenya about the efforts underway to save the species and confront the poaching industry.

# data[].attributes.body
Who: Graham Boynton, poachers, AWF, Dr. Kahumbu, Chinese government, Dr. Richard, Kenyan officials, UNODC, Tanzinia and Kenya ports, Wildlife Direct

When: October 18, 2014

Where: Kenya, Maasai Mara, Serengeti, Tanzinia

What: Elephant numbers decreasing faster than they are being born, a new leader (Dr. Kahumbu) is finally being broad and loud about this topic versus others whom have to be polite when talking about the topic, people don't want to upset the Chinese government and Dr. Kahumbu disagrees publicly, reports of Kenyan and Tanzanian ports are getaways for ivory and protecting poaching networks

Why: China's demands for ivory are becoming bigger and bigger (known for their sales in ivory products), creating new laws to punish wildlife-trafficking offences, the people need money to help protect the elephants but tourism has been decreasing from the negative news which doesn't help anymore

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Dr Kahumbu is the opposite: confrontational, fearless and ready to tackle African politicians head on. 'In this country,' she says, 'the conservation world is dominated by people who aren't African Kenyans, and that has allowed the powers-that-be to look at it as a black versus white issue. So having me speaking out and enlisting Africans from all sectors has been an important change.'

Her approach has exposed her to personal danger, and she admits she has received what she calls 'veiled threats'. 'Dealing with issues that touch on organised crime, corruption and politics - and you can be sure these criminals are engaged with the political fraternity in Kenya - then that could be dangerous,' Kahumbu acknowledges. 'But the stakes are too high to back down now.'

She is equally emphatic about what needs to be done to stem demand. The most 'blindingly obvious move in the short term' is for the Chinese government to ban the domestic trade in ivory. 'It would instantly reduce international demand by about 80 per cent,' she says, 'but at the moment the Chinese government is sending out mixed signals. It says it is trying to reduce demand by allowing organisations like WildAid to put out anti-poaching posters in subways and on the sides of buildings, but at the same time there are ivory exhibitions, they promote ivory markets and they recently started carving degree courses at Chinese universities. Everyone is terrified of upsetting China, but the situation is now urgent so there is no longer time for diplomatic niceties.'

Dr Paula Kahumbu with her mentor, Dr Richard Leakey, whom she has known since her schooldays. (Photo: Jeremy Boynton)

Kahumbu's mentor is Dr Richard Leakey, the founder of WildlifeDirect and himself a militant conservationist, who 25 years ago ran the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), surrounded at all times by five bodyguards. Midway through his term as the country's wildlife guardian in the early 1990s, the light aircraft he was piloting crashed to earth, and as a result he had both legs amputated below the knee. To this day there remain suspicions that this was an assassination attempt.

WildlifeDirect has accused Kenyan officials of protecting the international poaching networks. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Kenyan and Tanzanian ports are the main ivory gateways to the major consumer markets in China and, as Kahumbu says, 'You can't move ivory in that volume as an individual. You have to be connected to criminals, freighting companies and corrupt officials at the ports. We know they're turning off the scanning machines.'

The organisation has also been instrumental in the introduction of stringent new laws in Kenya to punish wildlife-trafficking offences, as well as increasing the penalties for possession of ivory or rhino horn from a paltry 40,000 Kenyan shillings (£279) to 20 million shillings (£139,000). These are now the most severe penalties on the continent. The country's Chief Justice has also agreed to review the filing system for wildlife crime after WildlifeDirect found that in 70 per cent of recent cases files were missing, misplaced or simply thrown away.

WildlifeDirect has harassed the government into banning Furadan, an agricultural insecticide that in recent years has been responsible for poisoning hundreds of lions, hyenas, vultures and other animals. And Kahumbu has successfully put pressure on the Kenyan courts to halt government plans to go ahead with a Chinese-built four-lane highway through Nairobi National Park, the country's oldest wildlife reserve.

Just as important as this brave and brazen confrontation with a corrupt, complacent establishment has been WildlifeDirect's use of social-media platforms to engage Kahumbu's fellow Kenyans in citizen conservation. The conventional colonial view is that black Africans are not interested in wildlife conservation. Kahumbu says WildlifeDirect's social-media traffic 'completely undermines that stereotyping'. It gives voice to some 120 conservation projects that share their daily challenges through blogs, podcasts, tweeting, video diaries and the rest. As a result, donors are contributing small but significant amounts directly to the grass-roots conservationists as they never have before.

This work is also creating stark awareness of the poaching horrors that are now commonplace across the continent. When seven mountain gorillas were found brutally slaughtered in the Democratic Republic of Congo's Virunga National Park in 2007, local villagers mourned their deaths intensely, and the rangers who discovered the bodies of these animals they had known well posted their life stories and photographs. Their moving WildlifeDirect blogs had a profound effect. According to Kahumbu, 'That story went from the blog to the cover of National Geographic and raised half a million dollars for the rangers.' It also led to the local guerrilla armies in this war-torn region agreeing to protect the gorillas in the future.

'What we did with the gorillas was to make people aware of the specific horrors behind the statistics,' Kahumbu says. 'So when a rhino was poached at Ol Pejeta, I was in discussions with the Lewa board [the local conservation body]. I insisted they come with me to see the carcase, and I uploaded pictures of the board members looking at a rhino that had had its face chopped off. That's pretty powerful. By the time we got back to Nairobi that story was all over the news. It really affected people.'

Kahumbu has a lot in common with Obama. Like the US President, she is the child of a black Kenyan father and a white Western mother, her father part of the first generation of Kikuyu to be educated in Western universities. And like Obama, she has excelled academically, acquiring a bachelor's degree at Bristol university and her doctorate, in elephant behaviour, at Princeton. She is also a powerful orator, a lecturer at Princeton and author of the children's book Owen & Mzee, the true story of a hippo and a tortoise that became inseparable friends.

Throughout her formative years, Leakey was a profound influence. They were near neighbours when she was a schoolgirl in Nairobi's Karen suburb, and she remembers going to his house with her siblings - she was one of nine children - and testing him out on identifying animals they had found or seen. 'He was never wrong,' she says. Years later, after her mother had sent her to secretarial college 'because we couldn't afford university and that was regarded as the best career option for young women in those days', she turned to Leakey for advice and help in escaping a fate that for her was horrifying.

'I ran away from college after three months and decided I wanted to be a wildlife ranger and work for George Adamson [the conservationist, author and rehabilitator of lions]. Richard persuaded me to intern instead with some scientists, and he promised that if I did well he would find a way of getting me a scholarship to study at university.'

Her early studies and fieldwork involved primates, and she wrote her masters papers on the monkeys of the Tana River Primate Reserve. But, like so many African conservationists, she became increasingly fascinated with elephants. This is a sentiment echoed by most of the wildlife people I have met over the years. There is something about elephants and elephant behaviour that sets them apart from other animal species. Perhaps it is their intense family bonds, or the fact that they mourn their dead, or that they can communicate over vast African plains. Whatever it is, elephants represent something special. For Kahumbu they are 'mystical creatures. And they seem aware of us. They look us in the eye.'

The turning point in her life came when, in-between degrees, as an employee of Leakey's KWS, she was tasked with counting and measuring the ivory stockpile in the country's vaults. This was in preparation for Leakey's internationally televised burning of the tusks in 1989, an event that remains the boldest anti-trade statement in wildlife conservation. Kahumbu found her grisly auditing exercise heartbreaking. 'We were weighing and measuring tusks from elephants no older than three or four years old. At that stage I was deciding what to do for my doctoral thesis, and I thought there would be no point in studying elephants because they were on their way to extinction. I was thinking that even back then!'

The 12 tons of tusks were assembled into what Leakey deemed 'a macabre sculpture' and, in front of the world press, the country's president, Daniel arap Moi, set it alight. This publicity stunt proved a major turning point in Kenyan conservation, helping to stem the tide of poaching ripping through east Africa in the 1980s. It also gave the young Paula Kahumbu an incentive to study the animals she loved and to begin working on her doctoral thesis, on the relationship between elephants and their habitats.

'I am at my happiest out here in the bush,' she says as we head out from Cottar's 1820 tented camp, where we are staying, on to the Maasai Mara plains. She admits this is something of a cultural anathema; for a long time her fellow Kenyans asked her why she would want to work in wildlife conservation. 'They would say, "Why are you doing this? How can you go back to the bush - don't you know that's where we came from?" There was huge cultural discouragement. I just laugh at them.' But times are changing and, as her social-media campaigns have proved, modern Africans do not suffer the same cultural cringe about the wilderness as earlier generations of post-colonial Africans.

We have now been joined by Leakey and are doing what so many safari-goers do - cruising through this sun-drenched landscape watching the wildlife from the comfort of a Toyota Land Cruiser. Only, today, the plains are somewhat lacking in fellow foreign travellers, for the terrorist bombing campaign that has plagued Kenya over the past two years has led to travel advisories from the British and American governments, and resulted in a significant fall in tourism.

The presence of tourists is a significant deterrent to poachers, and both Leakey and Kahumbu express concern about the knock-on effect of a major tourist downturn. Kahumbu says that if tourists stay away not only are there 'fewer eyes in the park', but there is less money to support ranger patrols. The last time there was a crash in tourism, following the post-2007 election violence, WildlifeDirect raised $80,000 to restore patrol levels. If this international stay-away continues into 2015, it is agreed that a great deal more will be needed to plug the gap.

As we potter through the Maasai Mara at a leisurely pace, Kahumbu and her mentor argue like a well-worn married couple. Their mutual respect is palpable, and the bickering is good-humoured. But Leakey is concerned about her safety. 'For the record,' he says, 'there are people in Kenya who would rather Paula wasn't doing what she's doing.' He says she should have a bodyguard. She says she wouldn't think of it. Then she concedes that rubbing up against the authorities can be dangerous and recalls a friend who, a few years ago, spoke out against the government and was arrested and treated badly. 'He was so affected by the experience that he disappeared from the scene.'

One of the crucial lessons Leakey has taught his pupil is the art of thinking big, acting accordingly, and so maintaining a high profile. Kahumbu has learnt how to market conservation ideas. Leakey has always had a great reputation as a peerless gatherer of donor funding for his causes, whether they be paleo institutions or conservation organisations. When he was head of the KWS in the late 1980s he managed to persuade international donors, led by the World Bank, to contribute $150 million to Kenya's conservation efforts, at a time when the West was decidedly wary of giving money to east African governments. Even today he is tirelessly raising funds for his ambitious science institute at Turkana in the north of Kenya.

Kahumbu has a similar flair for attracting publicity and supporters for her organisation. Last year she secured Kenya's First Lady, Margaret Kenyatta, as a patron of WildlifeDirect, and recently she managed to persuade the regional airline Safarilink to carry her hands off our elephants logos, but has failed to persuade the national airline, Kenya Airways. She has also convinced the airport authorities to carry warnings in the country's four international airports about the criminality of, and stringent new laws attached to, possession and transportation of ivory.

This being Africa, there have, of course, been major setbacks. Much of the dramatic branding and artwork that has carried the WildlifeDirect campaigns over the past few years was a collaboration between Kahumbu and Patrick Richer, an Australian art director who was married to a Kenyan and lived in Nairobi. But Richer was murdered in an armed robbery in his home last November, and talking about her friend and his cruel demise stops her in her tracks. 'We lost his genius,' she says quietly, 'and unfortunately all of our artwork, which was on his computer.'

Outspoken and engaging though she is about everything to do with conservation, Kahumbu seems oddly diffident about her private life, though she is proud of her 21-year-old son, who is serving in the US Navy. In a recent interview for a Kenyan website she described her status as single. In fact, in May 2010, she married the journalist Peter Greste under the acacias at Nairobi National Park. He is one of three foreign correspondents recently jailed by the Egyptian authorities. When I ask her how she feels about this, she shrugs it off, saying, 'We broke up in 2010.' And that's all she wants to say on the subject, though they are still married.

Two days in the Maasai Mara is all the time Kahumbu can afford, for there are meetings, emails, blogs, conference calls and publicity campaigns to attend to back in Nairobi. So the next morning we bounce along the corrugated dirt road heading for the Cottar's camp airstrip, and I ask her whether, in the face of all the gloomy statistics we've been discussing, she is optimistic about the future of Kenya's wildlife. 'I'm optimistic that we'll start pushing the dealers away from Kenya by making it difficult to operate here. And that's a new beginning.' And with a flashing smile, she boards the Cessna Caravan and is gone. 'An unusual woman,' Leakey says as we head back to camp.

Some weeks after our trip, I get a call in my London office from Kahumbu. She is extremely animated. She tells me that a report on Kenya's wildlife security that was commissioned by the government cabinet secretary Judi Wakhungu has just been published. It confirms everything she and Leakey have been saying about the KWS, the supposed guardians of Kenya's wildlife.

The report accuses KWS senior managers of incompetence, citing a breakdown in communications with wildlife NGOs and wildlife conservation experts, and the fact that 50 per cent of the organisation's vehicles were not being deployed in the field. It also claims that the intelligence networks, fundamental to anti-poaching successes in Leakey's heyday, had completely broken down and that staff were poorly supervised and demoralised. In short, according to Kahumbu, the KWS is not fit for purpose.

'It is worse than we thought,' she says. 'It's shocking. Nepotism, corruption, mismanagement of finances and much more.' She believes, however, that wildlife crime 'can't be defeated by KWS alone. The government needs to look at this as an issue of national security. It requires all law-enforcement agencies to work in a strategic, coordinated way, and we need to work with neighbouring countries. President Kenyatta has to take the lead on this.

'It's war now. We are losing our national heritage; we are losing our elephants. It's happening inside our national parks; rangers are being shot by other rangers because they're poaching. We have to act now.'

wildlifedirect.org

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Fighting the elephant ivory poachers of Kenya

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Dr Kahumbu is the opposite: confrontational, fearless and ready to tackle African politicians head on. 'In this country,' she says, 'the conservation world is dominated by people who aren't African Kenyans, and that has allowed the powers-that-be to look at it as a black versus white issue.

# data[].attributes.body
so besides the fact that poaching brings people money, what about the elephants population. what about the animals family. how would you feel if animals started brutally killing your family?

# data[].attributes.body
What can we do with these tusks from elephants? We can used them as weapons to fight off other predators, foraging, digging, stripping bark and moving objects. Did you know that ivory is used in everyday things? Such as piano keys, billiards balls, identification chops and more. People use ivory for their enjoyment so don't worry about poaching. Poachers stated that it's under control and they are not over poaching elephants.

# data[].attributes.body
Poaching is a big business for people to get into. Worth a $17 billion dollar trade per year and is still growing. The business is also supplied by big weapons such as the AK47 and transportation from helicopters so it's easier to target the elephants for money. $240 for some tusks and at least $100 worth profit. In China, they sell a tusk for more than $2,000 and helps the economy boost back up. If someone ever needs money fast, this is something they could do. Families are out there that would need this money.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
It is a familiar cause, but it has never been more urgent. Last year, tens of thousands of Africa's elephants were killed to supply illegal ivory to markets throughout the world. Increasingly, revenue generated from this blood ivory is being used to fuel war and terrorism in Africa.

This year, our Christmas campaign aims to help put a stop to illegal elephant poaching. To find out what all the fuss is about, read our list of the 10 things you need to know about the elephant poaching crisis.

1. Big Business
Wildlife hunting is big business - a recent 2013 estimate valued the illegal poaching trade in Africa as being worth $17 billion dollars a year and growing.

2. Big Weapons
The most common poaching gun in east Africa is the AK47. Increasingly poachers spot elephant herds from helicopter and target their prey from above. On-the-ground poachers have been known to use machetes, spears and watermelons spiked with cyanide.

3. Big Profits
According to gun policy officials the going rate for a rifle in Kenya is around $100-120 - a fortune by local economic standards but a mere fraction of the money that can be made from just one elephant (a single tusk can be worth up to $240).

4. Chinese Prices
In China such a tusk would sell for more than $2000 - its value therefore increasing tenfold by the time it is shipped out of Africa and arrives in Asia.

5. Local Misunderstanding
A recent study cited by The Times found that less than a third of Chinese people surveyed knew that elephants are killed for their tusks.

6. Common mythology
A separate study showed 70 per cent think they grow back like fingernails. Another myth propagated is that elephants' tusks fall out naturally.

7. 104 Deaths a Day
Animal rights groups estimate that poachers in Africa kill between 25,000 and 35,000 elephants annually - meaning about 104 die a day.

8. An Offence Without Prosecution
Of the 157 poaching-related cases detected in Kenya in the past three years, less than five per cent have been prosecuted and only three of those convicted were sentenced to jail.

9. Pulverizing the Trade
The Obama administration destroyed the US reserve of elephant tusks on November 5, 2013 - announcing that the pulverizing of 6 tons (5.4 tonnes) of 'blood ivory' would send out the right message to the world.

10. Not Far from Human
Elephants are more like us than you may know. They can be gay, left-handed, have the ability to grieve and - true to reputation - have amazing memories.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
10 things you need to know about elephant poaching

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It is a familiar cause, but it has never been more urgent. Last year, tens of thousands of Africa's elephants were killed to supply illegal ivory to markets throughout the world. Increasingly, revenue generated from this blood ivory is being used to fuel war and terrorism in Africa.

# data[].attributes.body
Who: Elephants, Kenyans, Chinese, Poachers, United Nations, and America. Where: Kenya, Nairobi, China, America. Why: Ivory tusks from elephants are wanted by the Chinese and Kenyans (called poachers) for money. The United Nations has been fighting to stop this but it's been growing and demand for poaching elephants is in even higher demand. When: Early 1970's and in the 1980's it was official illegal to poach. What: People from different locations, mainly in China and areas near or in Kenya, have been illegally poaching elephants big time in the past 3 years. The United Nations has been trying to capture and put a stop to the elephant killings. The value of ivory in China has greatly increased so the need for the supply is bigger which creates more death rates for elephants.