# data[].attributes.body
This relates to analyzing and evaluating because it looks into knowledge and information

# data[].attributes.body
This question connects because there is information that is left out of big ideas, events, etc that are taught

# data[].attributes.body
This connects to axioms because if knowledge was excluded it can be considered true. If the excluded information gets evaluated it has the possibility to not be considered as knowledge because it could be non true

# data[].attributes.body
knowledge is grouped in bubbles

# data[].attributes.body
The importance is learning all sides of knowledge. People who would benefit are people who evaluate information and teachers

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss

# data[].attributes.body
The question relates to sharing and evaluating knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
I think history and the human sciences. Due to personal biases, some information is left out in order to confirm their world view.

# data[].attributes.body
This question ties into the concept of perspective. Take history for example. There are some historians that exclude different evidence and informed views in order to construct a narrative of history that satisfies them.

# data[].attributes.body
The importance of knowledge bubbles.

# data[].attributes.body
Values of learning different perspectives and more thorough understanding of a topic.

# data[].attributes.body
It does matter that knowledge is learned through bubbles, take history and the human sciences. Somebody could have an uninformed view on the historical narrative if they fail to consider or learn about differing evidence. Human sciences also depends heavily on differing evidence in order to build a nuanced conclusion, which is not achieved by ignoring different views.

# data[].attributes.headline
This title is focusing on the production of knowledge and how it is connected 

# data[].attributes.subject
This title is focusing on the production of knowledge and how it is connected 

# data[].attributes.headline
This could relate to all areas of knowledge and how they don't have to be fully connected in order for you to have knowledge within them

# data[].attributes.subject
This could relate to all areas of knowledge and how they don't have to be fully connected in order for you to have knowledge within them

# data[].attributes.headline
This reminds me of filter bubbles on the internet 

# data[].attributes.subject
This reminds me of filter bubbles on the internet 

# data[].attributes.headline
Knowledge is organised in our brain using "bubbles"

# data[].attributes.subject
Knowledge is organised in our brain using "bubbles"

# data[].attributes.headline
Anyone who is interested in multiple areas of knowledge could gain from this conversation. They could talk about how each topic they have knowledge in is not fully connected to another, and that does not mean that it isn't knowledge

# data[].attributes.subject
Anyone who is interested in multiple areas of knowledge could gain from this conversation. They could talk about how each topic they have knowledge in is not fully connected to another, and that does not mean that it isn't knowledge

# data[].attributes.body
It does not matter that that knowledge is not connected and there are parts that aren't fully developed. Knowledge happens gradually, and it is not bad for your knowledge to be broken apart.

# data[].attributes.body
Technically this title could apply to any of the AoKs because bubbles could happen in the research of any topic, but it connects best to the human sciences. Knowledge that is acquired in bubbles is usually biased which is what forms bias in people.

# data[].attributes.body
This title connects to certainty because research bubbles inhibit certainty. Bias is always surrounding us. We can't be certain of truth so long as it exists.

# data[].attributes.body
The value of examining this title topic is to educate ourselves about the dangers of bias. The discussion of this title would benefit anyone who uses the internet.

# data[].attributes.body
Knowledge bubbles create bias. We cannot be certain that what we learn is the truth because we are constantly surrounded by bubbles and bias.

# data[].attributes.body
It does matter if our knowledge happens in bubbles because then it determines the amount of knowledge one obtains

# data[].attributes.body
These both include bubbles. Some history classes leave out the atrocities committed by white people. Science bubbles include flat earthers and climate change deniers.

# data[].attributes.body
It's our responsibility to avoid these bubbles and include everyone's voices.

# data[].attributes.body
It's assuming that knowledge happens in bubbles

# data[].attributes.body
It's important to avoid echo chambers so you aren't biased. You have to learn all sides.

# data[].attributes.body
It does matter. Learning shouldn't happen in a bottle. All sides should be included otherwise it creates biases where there shouldn't be biases. This is why including the other sides arguments are crucial to an argumentative piece.

# data[].attributes.body
Its relevant to history because people stuck in filter bubbles, continue to share knowledge in theses same bubbles and then information is left out and excluded which changes the story. Often times this happens with "white washing" the history books by leaving out things white people did or giving credits to white people for things they didnt actually do alone. it applies to Human Sciences because when people are in these bubbles their values and beliefs rely on their information to make their opinions and its not always the complete truth.

# data[].attributes.body
People often think that because a reliable source like a history book that its complete truth even though oftentimes important information is left out so due to bubbles, so people have certainty in their information that isn't completely valid. That is also how truth is connected.
People's perspectives often change with new information but if they are in like a filter bubble then they are just fed the same information over and over again and they never grow or change perspectives and beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
Knowledge bubbles are excluding information and voices.

# data[].attributes.body
Everyone would benefit from being able to know that the information they get is rarely ever the full story.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it does matter if our acquisition of knowledge is happening in bubbles and we are excluding voices because oftentimes the information and voices getting excluded are minorities who probably have the most to say. This also created bias' and echo chambers that make people very close-minded because they are only seeing their sides and their opinions.

# data[].attributes.headline
This title is more focused on the production/creation, discussion, and evaluation of knowledge

# data[].attributes.subject
This title is more focused on the production/creation, discussion, and evaluation of knowledge

# data[].attributes.headline
This title can relate to all AOKs because all areas of knowledge have their own filter bubbles/echo chambers, where information like how the Earth is flat can be acquired if every piece of information proving this to be false is excluded.

# data[].attributes.subject
This title can relate to all AOKs because all areas of knowledge have their own filter bubbles/echo chambers, where information like how the Earth is flat can be acquired if every piece of information proving this to be false is excluded.

# data[].attributes.headline
This title assumes that knowledge exists in 'bubbles' and that other types of diswaying information is excluded from said 'bubbles'.

# data[].attributes.subject
This title assumes that knowledge exists in 'bubbles' and that other types of diswaying information is excluded from said 'bubbles'.