# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Finding information about OJP and OJP providers is...

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
If you don't work with OJP data, why would you like to?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Finding the right OJP data source was...

# data[].attributes.body
Using OJP was relatively easy- click and choose things they want to explore. Lightcast lets you map regions based on STC's definitions of CMA's.

# data[].attributes.body
Lighcast gave them flexibility for economic reasons they found was easy. they also validate with STC data- specifically the JVWS.

# data[].attributes.body
At the beginning things were extremely labour intensive. The CJTD helped take our some of the work.

# data[].attributes.body
They regularly compare data to STC, specially the JVWS - it generally lines up. Not as reliable as STC

# data[].attributes.body
VJ data is very easy to use- transferred responsibility to a new staff member and they got used to it within days. It's very transferable.

# data[].attributes.body
As the technology changes- they have to balance their needs. What is possible and not possible? How does the data design changes over the years?

# data[].attributes.body
VJ easy to use, but quality of data is a big question. there are lots of caveats and it's hard to interpret. duplication rates can be all over the place.

# data[].attributes.body
We use an excel output to feed into our dashboards and publications. (VJ)

# data[].attributes.body
Figuring out how to use it in a useful way- the JVWS is not useful for smaller provinces and often the data doesn't align.

# data[].attributes.body
Some shops are very small. Don't like pre-made data, needs raw data. Lightcast is very easy to use and has excellent geography levels.

# data[].attributes.body
Viscinity is working with them to develop their own geographies. (smaller province)

# data[].attributes.body
More interested in trends than numbers.