# data[].attributes.body
By Kailey Thornton, Alexis --> (Lex) <-- Mantler, Elliott Jones

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

A Red Herring is when information is brought up with the intention of misleading the reader, and bringing attention away from the actual issue at hand.

M&M's are a chocolates line affiliated with Nestle. Last year, M&M's announced that they would be changing the appearances of their mascots, citing political reasons. This sparked mass outrage in some corners of the internet. This hullabaloo happened to occur at the same time that Nestle was facing criticism for child slave labor crimes. All of the attention was put on to the topic of the mascots, and the labor crimes we're promptly forgotten about.

Sources:

https://harvardpolitics.com/sweet-chocolate-bitter-truth-internet-distraction-and-the-reality-of-mars-inc-s-child-slavery-practices/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The internet is no stranger to debate. Heated arguments over whether Kim and Pete were meant to be, which influencer wore it best, and if Harry Styles and Olivia Wilde are in a fake relationship dominate our headlines. Many of us have become accustomed to the outlandish nature of internet arguments, but few could have predicted who exactly would be stoking the flames of a recent online controversy: the green M&M. Like many other instances of internet obsession, though, this too was a distraction from deeper troubles.

In February 2022, Mars Inc., producer of M&M chocolates, announced that they were rebranding the iconic, human-like M&M characters that have long graced television screens across the world. Each M&M was assigned a "fresh personality" as part of a controversial marketing campaign that aimed to create "a sense of belonging and community" that better reflects contemporary America. Orange, historically defined by his anxious nature, is now going to embrace his worries, becoming an "avatar of our collective anxieties" so that he can better relate to Gen-Z. Yellow morphed into an eternal optimist, whose wise musings represent "the world as it should be." Most contentious, however, was Ms. Green's transformation. Mars renamed her "Green," dropping the "Ms" to focus more on empowerment rather than gender. Moreover, while Green was once branded as sensual, even modeling for numerous Sports Illustrated back covers, her makeover saw her trade her fashionable boots for practical sneakers to emphasize her "confidence" rather than sex appeal.

Given that the candy characters are both cultural icons and fundamentally humanoid, it seems intuitive that they be rebranded to more accurately reflect the modern human experience, one that champions empowerment, justice, and vulnerability like the new M&M's do.

Despite this, dialogue spaces from Twitter to talk shows lit aflame with angry individuals bemoaning what they perceived to be yet another example of unnecessary "corporate wokeness." Notably, political pundit Tucker Carlson took to his talk show, Tucker Carlson Tonight, whining the new candy characters were "less sexy," to the point that "you wouldn't want to have a drink with any one of them." While it is tempting to dismiss a man who considers M&M's viable candidates for a date as ridiculous and irrelevant, doing so ignores an important reality: People listen. Carlson's show was the second-most-watched cable news show in the second quarter of 2022. Even as he makes outlandish claims, Carlson's viewers continue to listen; the problems that he creates become the objects of their attention, and when crusaders against 'wokeness' rage, issues of true substance are neglected.

Even the other side of the political aisle, typically receptive to shifts toward inclusivity, came out against the M&M rebrand, claiming that it distracted from more salient issues, such as voting rights or healthcare. While their points are well-intentioned, they too miss the mark: Simply because there exist issues of greater weight does not mean that minor steps toward diversity and inclusivity are unnecessary, irrelevant, or pernicious.

What is harmful, though, is when people waste breath debating the legitimacy of changes such as Mars Inc.'s rebranding, when the very subject of their criticism may be committing much more destructive sins. Twitter users failed to realize that by spending time lambasting the redesigned candies, they themselves contributed to a hyper-fixation on a matter that does not actually require much dialogue. The superficial nature of these internet conversations - if they can be so named - reveals how the internet's raging jabber fires are burning generative discourse.

While hordes of people readily engaged in the culture war surrounding the green M&M, far less were aware that Mars Inc., just months before in 2021, had been sued over allegations of forced child labor. Eight Malian adults claimed that they were trafficked as children and used as slave labor on cocoa farms in Côte d'Ivoire, a country on the southern coast of West Africa. The lawsuit, filed by human rights organization International Rights Advocates, alleges that the defendants - Mars Inc. and several other of the world's largest chocolate companies - "'knowingly profited' from the illegal work of children." In doing so, the defendants actively participated in "aiding and abetting the illegal enslavement of thousands of children," some of whom were tragically kidnapped or sold by their parents.

The companies were also accused of misleading the public when cocoa industry representatives entered into the 2001 Harkin-Engel Protocol, a clearly delineated "problem-solving approach" intended to "credibly" eliminate the use of child labor in cocoa production. The move signaled that the cocoa industry was "taking responsibility" and working to eradicate the dangerous, unethical labor practices in its supply chain. In reality, the protocol was deeply problematic. The policies, which were non-binding and held no legal weight, called for the industry to self-regulate, apparently subscribing to the belief that suggesting those perpetuating human rights abuses stop would be effective. Not only was the protocol unenforceable and ineffective, it worked against itself by casting a misleading appearance that concealed the truth about the industry's labor practices.

This was not the first time that Mars Inc. had participated in a cover-up of its labor practices. Robert Hodson, a California citizen, sued Mars. Inc because they did not disclose the "potentiality of child slave labor" in their supply chain on their products' packaging. Hodson claimed that he would never have purchased Mars Inc. chocolate had he been aware of them. While a judge agreed that the labor practices were "reprehensible," they dismissed the case in 2016 on the basis that the practices were not relevant to the product's potential "safety risks and defects," and thus did not need to be disclosed. The judge also reasoned that since supply chain information was available on the company's website, its exclusion from chocolate labels was not "substantially injurious to consumers."

Upon scrutiny, though, the human rights information included on Mars Inc.'s website is a flagrant avoidance of the truth. The website does not explicitly disclose the potentiality of child slave labor in Mars Inc.'s cocoa production, only admitting that forced and child labor "may pose the most severe risk" in their extended (rather than direct) supply chains. Instead, the website touts the variety of ways that Mars Inc. is ardently combating the abuses they claim "may" exist.

The horrific nature of the labor practices in Mars Inc.'s supply chains and the manufacturer's immoral efforts to conceal these human rights abuses becomes increasingly outrageous when one remembers that, while labor injustice got almost no media attention, the internet instead exploded over a green M&M. Sure, Mars Inc.'s move towards a more inclusive characterization of its candy may have been both positive and polarizing, but instead of engaging in mindless debates over a natural byproduct of modernization, people should focus on meaningful issues with a realizable impact.

Why are we allowing superficial wokeness culture clashes to detach our society from facing atrocities? Why can the internet babble so effectively obscure worthwhile conversation? From Tucker Carlson to Twitter users, why are so many individuals spending their precious time and energy on flashy headlines rather than meaningful discussions?

When processing similar scandals regarding human rights, it is easy to point the finger at the large corporation, and, to a certain extent, that is a justifiable course of action. Mars Inc. is actively covering up its nasty relationship with child slave labor, and fighting legal battles to continue to do so. However, to unequivocally place total blame on Mars Inc. would be to divorce ourselves from our responsibilities as consumers and citizens. We must resist the temptation to embattle ourselves in only the entertaining or salacious conversations, and instead force ourselves to dissect issues of substance. This is sometimes difficult and often laborious, but far more worthwhile. After all, once we finally commit to being thoughtful pursuers of the truth, not only will companies like Mars Inc. stop getting away with their cover-ups, but we will no longer be their accomplices.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Sweet Chocolate, Bitter Truth: Internet Distraction and the Reality of Mars Inc.'s Child Slavery Practices - Harvard Political Review

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The internet can be a place for productive debate, but its fixation on culture-war debates about M&Ms proved to be more diversion than substance and distracted from deeper troubles.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Confirmation Bias happens when individuals would rather take in information or believe it based on their own beliefs towards the subject. They would rather choose their own beliefs than listen to cold hard facts.

Connection: An example of this would be the schools we choose to enroll ourselves in. Many people who live in the same area as their family probably all went to the same school at one point in their life and in doing so they brought up a belief that this is the school they must attend since they believe it is the best school. They tend to look away at the red flags that might come with attending that school because it might not have happened to them and are unwilling to believe proven facts and problems about the school. They would rather turn a blind towards these facts and cherish their beliefs.

Sources: https://www.ourkids.net/school/choosing-schools-red-flags

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
For expert advice on a wide range of questions related to choosing a school, read our comprehensive choosing guide. You can also read our parent interviews on choosing a school, as well as our in-depth advice guide on getting into a private school.

On school red flags

"High staff turnover is a bad sign. You want strong leadership too, so if the principal, headmaster, or board of directors is changing every couple of years, this points to a lack of stability. If my child is in grade 2, I'd like to know there's continuity from grade 2 to 3.

What are the goals of the school? What are their priorities? How do they approach the curriculum? If a school can't answer those questions, this is not a good sign."
-Ann and Karen Wolff, Education Consultant, Wolff Educational Services

"Bad schools aren't transparent: they don't communicate clearly or they do so with a spin. You should also avoid schools that give you a high-pressure sales pitch: schools that accept your child and try to get you to sign on the dotted line right away, and that want all the money up front. Of course, this is different than a school that sends out a letter that says 'We need to know in 10 days, because we have a waiting list.'"
-Janyce Lastman, Education Consultant, The Tutor Group

"The biggest red flag is a lack of commitment to understanding your child. And that might mean not doing initial testing, not looking at a child's assessment, or not meeting for an in-person interview. And you want to make sure that communication goes both ways. It's almost like a dating service: you need to vet the school out, and decide if it's the right fit for your child."
-Una Malcolm, Director, Bright Light Learners

"I wouldn't recommend a school that didn't have good practices. Practice, leadership, education philosophy, execution, teachers, parent community, a joyful learning environment, parent participation, a solid admission process... It's all about good practice, and if it's not all there, to me it can't be a good fit."
-Elaine Danson, Education Consultant, Danson and Associates

Child-specific advice on school choice
For child-specific insights on choosing a school, read our guide. We explore how school choices crucially depend on kids' unique traits, such as their mental and academic focus, social tendencies, activity level, academic interests (such as art and STEM), and other attributes (such as giftedness, special needs, learning disabilities, and social issues).

To get school-choice advice customized to your child's unique traits, create a child profile through your user account and read our seven ways to choose a school based on your child's needs (i.e., overall fit, more academic challenge, social struggles, academic struggles, intensive learning interests, university preparation, and special needs.).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Expert advice on red flags in private schools

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Here education experts weigh on red flags to avoid when you choose a school. These include poor leadership and communication, lack of commitment to your child, outdated practices, and more.

# data[].attributes.headline
Post #5 Red Flags: Confusion with Correlation and Causation

# data[].attributes.subject
Post #5 Red Flags: Confusion with Correlation and Causation

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Confusion with Correlation and Causation refers to when people will miss interpret information that correlates with each other to also be the causation.

Example: An example of this would be when people see two things that correlate, in this case we have rats. Since the beginning people have blamed rats for everything, calling them dirty creatures that are only found in the deepest sewers. They believe that because rats are correlated with being dirty in the media, they believe that all rats are dirty and carry diseases. In truth rats are actually very cleanly creatures, grooming themselves more than cats. This leads to those who have rats often getting questionable looks since people associate rats with being unhygienic and a danger to health.

Sources: https://now.tufts.edu/2020/01/13/five-things-know-about-rats#:~:text=Rats%20are%20very%20clean.,frequently%20and%20thoroughly%20than%20cats.%E2%80%9D

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
For some people, just the sight of a rat's naked tail or beady eyes may be enough to cause them to shriek or get the shivers. But Cummings School program coordinator Virginia Shugrue was unfazed when her daughter, Elise, expressed an interest in getting pet rats a few years ago.

Shugrue had kept pet rats herself on and off since college, and she and her daughter have since adopted rats Maurine, Candace, and Tiger Lilly. Elise said she loves rats because they really bond with their owners and love to cuddle. "They like being handled a lot," said the thirteen-year-old, "and they never bite, even with new people."

Rats are far outnumbered by rabbits, guinea pigs, and hamsters in U.S. households. But they are still very popular pets-and for good reasons, said Jennifer Graham, a veterinarian at the Henry and Lois Foster Hospital for Small Animals.

"We see a fair amount of pet rats, in part because they're so sociable and low-maintenance," said Graham, head of Cummings School's zoological companion animal medicine (ZCAM) service. "I know some people have a phobia around rats, but I'd encourage everyone to spend a little time around one before they make up their minds about the creatures."

"Rats require only a small area, so they're suitable apartment pets," Graham said. Gerbils and chinchillas typically don't do well with handling, she noted, while rats are very friendly. "Some like to hang out on their human all day. And unlike hamsters, which may run on their wheel all night, rats sleep a lot and are most active when their people are up and around."

Curious about keeping pet rats? The ZCAM veterinarians shared five things you might not know.

Rats are smart, empathetic, and kind of adorable. Good problem solvers, rats can be trained to do a variety of tricks and play with their owners. In studies, rats have shown empathy, forgoing treats to help fellow rats. (Shugrue witnessed this firsthand-when her family's rat Candace was sick, rat companion Maureen would bring her food, even sharing Cheerios, her favorite snack.) Studies have shown that rats may dream and even " giggle" when tickled, added Graham.

Rats are very clean. "People often think of rats as dirty sewer creatures, but they're actually quite clean and good about grooming," Graham said. "In fact, rats groom more frequently and thoroughly than cats."

Pet rats don't live very long. "One con of rats as pets is that they only live between two and three years on average," Graham said. Respiratory disease is by far the most common killer of pet rats. Some 90 to 100 percent of animals in "ratteries"-where pets are bred-screen positive for respiratory pathogens, said Graham, explaining that "as a result, rats get infections established at time of birth."

Some rats appear fine and show no clinical signs, others struggle with illness from a young age. A period of stress can activate an underlying infection or make it worse. Rats, especially female ones, also frequently develop mammary tumors, said Graham. It is recommended to spay rats at a young age as this will reduce the incidence of mammary tumors.

Like people, rats need to watch their weight. When rat owners go to the pet store, many are tempted to buy seed mixes. Unfortunately, these diets are high in carbohydrates and fat, and are not healthy for rats. "We see a lot of obese pet rats in our hospital, and research in rats has shown that higher-carbohydrate diets and being overweight shortens their lifespan," Graham said. Formulated rodent blocks offer a much healthier option, and the ZCAM team recommends feeding rats a pellet-type diet supplemented with fruits and vegetables-with only the occasional seed treat.

Rats aren't good pets for very young children. Despite their cleanliness, rats-like all animals-can transmit diseases and pathogens to people. These include the bacterium Streptobacillus moniliformis, which can cause rat-bite fever, a very serious disease if left untreated. "Because of that potential, rats are not recommended for children under age five-as is true for all exotic-species pets, including other mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians," said ZCAM veterinarian Marjorie Bercier. "Parents also should ensure that all members of the household wash their hands well after handling pet rats."

Should you decide to get a pet rat, the ZCAM team recommends getting as large a cage [PDF] as you can accommodate and providing hiding places within, such as tunnels or a little house. "The less material rats have to burrow in, the more their stress level increases," Graham said, so be sure to provide plenty of rat-safe bedding [PDF]. To avoid aggravating respiratory issues with dust and high ammonia levels, do not use pine and cedar shavings as bedding, and change the litter material at least weekly.

You can make inexpensive enrichment toys from toilet paper rolls and other recycled items. But you'll make your rat happiest if you provide a rodent roommate. "As much as rats love their owners, they do tend to like having a rat friend, too," Graham said. Many rats are in need of good homes and can be found for adoption through organizations such as Mainely Rat Rescue, the MSPCA, and the Animal Rescue League of Boston.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Five things people don't know about rats, and why they make good pets.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Ideological Support is when ideas on a subject or argument are usually backed up with a group or culture to push the support of their idea.

Connection: An example of this being used is when political parties argue different topics based on their own Ideological Support. This can be seen when heated arguments will arise since other parties do not follow the ideals of others. For example one party could argue that tax's need to be raised to help fight back against economic issue since their entire party follows this ideal that higher taxes means better economy. On the other hand the other party might heavily disagree with that ideal that more tax's equals better economy and wish to lower taxes to make it easier for people. They would use their group ideals to push this forward in the argument.

Sources: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/tax_cuts.asp

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Advocates of tax cuts argue that reducing taxes improves the economy by boosting spending; those who oppose them say that tax cuts only help the rich because it can lead to a reduction in government services upon which lower income people rely. In other words, there are two distinct sides to this economic balancing scale.

The federal tax system relies on a number of different types of taxes to generate revenues. The largest sources of funds is the individual income tax and payroll tax. Approximately 80% of tax revenues are generated through these taxes. Personal income taxes are levied against income, interest, dividends and capital gains, with higher earners generally paying higher tax rates, while the the payroll tax is a tax levied at a fixed percentage on salaries and wages, up to a certain limit and is paid equally by both employer and employee.

Payroll taxes have become an important source of revenue for the federal government and have grown more quickly than income taxes as the government has raised rates and income limits. Commonly known as the FICA (the Federal Insurance Contributions Act) tax, the payroll tax is used to pay Social Security benefits, Medicare and unemployment benefits. (For related reading, see Introduction To Social Security)

In third comes corporate taxes, comprising 10.6% of total taxes, and followed by excise taxes. Excise taxes are a form of federal sales tax, levied on miscellaneous items such as gasoline and tobacco. They account for 3.1% of the total tax revenue.

The federal government uses tax policy to generate revenue and places the burden where it believes it will have the least effect. However, the "flypaper theory" of taxation (the belief that the burden of the tax sticks to where the government places the tax), often proves to be incorrect.

Instead, tax shifting occurs. Shifting tax burden describes the situation where the economic reaction to a tax causes prices and output in the economy to change, thereby shifting part of the burden to others. An example of this shifting took place when the government placed a sales tax on luxury goods in 1991, assuming the rich could afford to pay the tax and would not change their spending habits. Unfortunately, demand for some luxury items (highly elastic goods/services) dropped and industries such as personal aircraft manufacturing and boat building suffered, causing layoffs in some sectors.

If a tax is levied on a non- price sensitive good or service - like cigarettes - it wouldn't lead to big changes such as factory shutdowns and unemployment. Studies have shown that a 10% increase in the price of cigarettes, only reduces demand by 4%. The tax imposed on luxury goods in 1991 was also 10%, but the tax revenue fell $97 million short of projection, and yacht retailers saw a 77% drop in sales. Regardless, tax shifting should always be considered when setting tax policy.

C = consumption spending by individuals

I = investment spending (business spending on machinery, etc.),

G = government purchases

NX = net exports

Reducing taxes, therefore, pushes out the aggregate demand curve as consumers demand more goods and services with their higher disposable incomes. Supply side tax cuts are aimed to stimulate capital formation. If successful, the cuts will shift both aggregate demand and aggregate supply because the price level for a supply of goods will be reduced, which often leads to an increase in demand for those goods. (To learn more, read Economics Basics.)

It's a common belief that reducing marginal tax rates would spur economic growth. The idea is that lower tax rates will give people more after-tax income that could be used to buy more goods and services. This is a demand-side argument to support a tax reduction as an expansionary fiscal stimulus. Further, reduced tax rates could boost saving and investment, which would increase the productive capacity of the economy and productivity.

However, studies have shown that this isn't necessarily true. Data collected over 25 years by the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that high income earners spend much less for every tax dollar saved, than low income earners - 86 cents versus 48 cents respectively. Further, a 65-year study by the Congressional Research Service showed that economic growth was not correlated with changes in the top marginal tax and capital gains rate. In other words, economic growth is largely unaffected by how much tax the wealthy pay. Growth is more likely to spur if lower income earners get a tax cut.

Because of the ideal of fairness, cutting taxes is never a simple task. Two distinct concepts are horizontal equity and vertical equity. Horizontal equity is the idea that all individuals should be taxed equally. An example of horizontal equity is the sales tax, where the amount paid is a percentage of the article being purchased. The tax rate stays the same whether you spend $1 or $10,000. Taxes are proportional.

A second concept is vertical equity, which is translated as the ability-to-pay principle. In other words, those most able to pay should pay the higher taxes. An example of vertical equity is the federal individual income tax system. The income tax is a progressive tax because the fraction paid rises as income rises.

Reducing taxes becomes emotional because, in simple dollar terms, people who pay the most in taxes also benefit most. If you cut the sales tax by 1%, a person buying a Hyundai may save $200, while a person buying a Mercedes may save $1,000. Although the percentage benefit is the same, in simple dollar terms, the Mercedes buyer benefits more.

Cutting income taxes is more emotional because of the progressive nature of the tax. Reducing taxes 25% on a family with an adjusted gross income (AGI) of $60,000 will save them approximately $2,042. But a smaller 10% tax cut for a family with a taxable income of $150,000 would save them $3,333. Across-the-board cuts will benefit high earners more in a dollar sense simply because they earn more.

Cutting taxes reduces government revenues, at least in the short term, creates either a budget deficit, or increased sovereign debt. The natural countermeasure would be to cut spending. However, critics of tax cuts would then argue that the tax cut is helping the rich at the expense of the poor, because the services that would likely get cut, is beneficial to the poor. Proponents argue that by putting money back in consumer's pockets spending will increase, hence the economy will grow and wages will rise. At the end of the day, the outcome depends on where the cuts are made.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Advocates of tax cuts argue that reducing taxes improves the economy by boosting spending; those who oppose them say that tax cuts only help the rich because it can lead to a reduction in government services upon which lower income people rely. In other words, there are two distinct sides to this economic balancing scale.

# data[].attributes.headline
Post # 8 Pseudoscience Watchlist: Use of scientific sounding language that is meaningless

# data[].attributes.subject
Post # 8 Pseudoscience Watchlist: Use of scientific sounding language that is meaningless

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

Use of Scientific sounding language that is meaningless describes a topic that is advertised and presented with terms that sound scientific on the surface, but are ultimately meaningless and only included to create a sense of safety.

Koko the gorilla was a gorilla presented to the public by researchers as having learned sign language. The articles that they published would overwhelm the reader with scientific "facts" of study, that were nothing but smokescreens to make their case sound more believable. The researchers jump through hoops to support their own biases with minimal, if any, evidence. In reality, Koko was signing gibberish, and the researchers would make excuses for what she meant. The went as far as to claim her signing "nipple" was her saying the word "people", because the words rhyme.

Sources:

https://bigthink.com/life/ape-sign-language/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIOQgY1tqrU&t=5773s&ab_channel=Stanford

# data[].attributes.headline
Post # 9 Pseudoscience Watchlist: Deliberately creates mystery

# data[].attributes.subject
Post # 9 Pseudoscience Watchlist: Deliberately creates mystery

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

Deliberately Creates Mystery is when a source makes a claim that inherently appeals to an individuals sense of excitement. It usually includes spiritual agents at work that fill a viewer/reader with mystery and wonder.

An apparent whistle blower of the American government made the claim that not only had the government uncovered aliens, they had possession of ten alien bodies. He claimed that the government possessed proof of UFO's and was keeping it a secret. His story appeals to the general publics sense of wonder and hope that alien life is not only out there, but has visited us.

Sources:

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/us-has-found-at-least-ten-alien-bodies-in-crashed-ufos-says-whistleblower/ar-AA1ksOfr

https://metro.co.uk/2023/07/26/ufo-whistleblower-claims-people-harmed-and-injured-in-cover-up-19197076/

# data[].attributes.headline
Post # 10 Pseudoscience Watchlist: Does Not Progress

# data[].attributes.subject
Post # 10 Pseudoscience Watchlist: Does Not Progress

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

Does Not Progress describes a pseudoscience theme where a topic of discussion dates back many years and does not adjust to the times. There is no growth in the methods of learning.

The Liver King was a very popular fitness influencer in the online sphere. He claimed that men needed to return to how they lived as cavemen in order for them to reach their full potential. He advertised the need to eat raw meat and sleep on rocks as a vital role in reaching top physique. In reality, he was taking steroids to gain his muscle mass. He sold packages of raw meat to his followers and encouraged them to eat it, just as early humans did, before he was revealed as a fraud.

Sources:

https://www.fastcompany.com/90839190/liver-kings-fall-ancestral-living-need-a-new-dad

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: The Appeal To Authority red flag refers to when power is given to a figure of authority over others to boost their argument, whether it be an object or an idea etc..

Connection: Think link above shows an example of a brand that was boosted through a popular streamer named Pokimane. Using her influence and many followers she was able to promote a new snack brand named Myna. She claimed that these new snacks would offer an alternative to other snacks, making this one more "healthier" than other snacks. Not only was this a lie about it being healthier, it was also much more expensive than regular snacks coming in at 28$ for a 400 gram bag rather than other snacks being only 10$ per bag. The other issue was that these cookies had almost identical nutritional value to other snacks making her cookies pretty much obsolete when compared to other gluten free snacks.

Sources:

https://uproxx.com/life/pokimane-cookie-drama-explained-reviewed/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
If you've spent any time on social media or YouTube over the past few days, you're probably well aware that people are incredibly angry at Pokimane and her new cookie brand Myna Snacks. A streamer dropping a cookie brand shouldn't illicit this much internet chatter and hate but it's late 2023 and, well, here we are. The cookie drama is at your doorstep.

If you're not caught up to speed let us fill you in as quickly as we can - trust us, this is the quickest possible summary - and then we'll get to whether these cookies are even any good:

Popular social media personality, Twitch streamer, and YouTuber Imane Anys, more popularly known as Pokimane, launched a new brand of gluten-free cookies this month and almost instantly people on the internet threw a f*cking fit. There are a lot of levels to this "controversy," if you want to call it that (that's what the internet is calling it, so I guess we will too).

Controversy #1 - The Price Point

Pokimane announced her new snack brand, Myna, on November 13. Myna would offer a "healthy snack alternative" cookie that is gluten-free, made with non-GMO ingredients, and fortified with vitamin D.

Okay, all good so far. As of the launch, the cookies are not currently sold in stores but instead on the Myna website in 4-pack, 8-pack, or 12-pack options. The smallest size is $28, so $7 a bag. Sounds good right, wait no? Wrong? I'm Wrong? What's the issue here?

A lot of people weren't happy with this price point. That's... fair. If you don't think $7 for a 4oz bag of gluten-free cookies is worth it that's definitely an opinion you can have, but it's not that far off from other gluten-free snacks.

Are there cheaper gluten-free snacks? Yes. Are there more expensive gluten-free snacks? Yes. Do you have the free will to just, you know, not buy these cookies if you think they're too expensive? Yes. How is this a thing anyone cares about?

Controversy # 2 - Are These Cookies Just A Rebrand?

pokimane's new product is apparently just a rebranded 'toatzy midnight mini cookie' which she sells for three times the price. the only difference between the cookies is vitamin D3. $28 vs $9.99 for 400g.

scam? pic.twitter.com/HF1RDt1TCt

- FearBuck (@FearedBuck) November 13, 2023

After way too many people got all worked up over the price of these cookies, someone discovered that the cookies bore a resemblance to another snack, Toatzy's similarly named Midnight Cookies, which share a look, form factor, and nutritional facts (except for the vitamin D).

This is where the controversy becomes especially stupid. It turns out that the reason Toatzy's Midnight Mini Cookies and Myna's Midnight Cookies are so similar is that both products are made by the same food company, Creation Foods.

Pokimane addressed how the two products were related on her Twitter account writing:

The batch of Myna cookies we're currently shipping were made 3 weeks ago... The cookies they are being compared to were also made by our manufacturer, Creation Foods, which specializes in healthy food. The compared cookies had one test batch sold before they were retired. Months later, we partnered with Creation Foods and fell in love with the flavor profile of the midnight cookie. We then decided to work together to refine and improve the formula, and we're really happy with the final product.

So the Toatzy cookies in question aren't even on the market anymore. Hating Poki's cookies for being similar is just silly. Does Pokimane's alterations justify a price hike for what is essentially a similar product? Debatable. Though adding vitamin D does justify at least...?

How much does vitamin D cost in bulk? Ten dollars?

Again, if you think these cookies are too expensive, just don't buy them.

Controversy # 3 - Pokimane's Response To The Criticism

As if things couldn't get any more obnoxious in this "controversy," everything was taken to a new level when Pokimane responded to a chatter in her stream to those complaining about the cost of Myna Snacks.

"When people are like, 'Oh my god, $28 for cookies.' It's four bags. That's $7 a bag. I know I know math is hard when you're an idiot, but like, if you're a broke boy just say so."

It shouldn't come as a surprise at this point but, sh*t exploded after this. Twitter accounts, TikToks, and entire f*cking YouTube videos were made about this interaction, scolding Pokimane for being mean to her community. Pokimane responded to the backlash:

while what i said was 100% intended to be a joke, i see why it came off as insensitive and i apologize for that.

i also understand the current price of the cookies may be expensive for some, and promise we'll continue to consider pricing to keep myna as affordable as possible. https://t.co/u0HovPw2Za

- pokimane (@pokimanelol) November 20, 2023

"While what I said was 100% intended to be a joke, I see why it came off as insensitive and I apologize for that. I also understand the current price of the cookies may be expensive for some, and promise we'll continue to consider pricing to keep Myna as affordable as possible."

Adding that her comment was towards "ONE rude chatter," and was not a general statement towards her community.

Do you agree with the way Pokimane responded? Who f*cking cares. If you've spent any time watching streamers, you'll know that chats are a toxic environment. She probably could've handled this situation better, but also people shouldn't be so sensitive about such a non-issue. We've mentioned this a few times but...
If you don't want to support Pokimane or buy her cookies. Don't.
I'm so tired of talking about these cookies because all I want to know is... are they any good? So I paid all $28 dollars for a four-pack just so I could answer that question for you. Let's eat some damn cookies and pretend this all never happened.

Myna Cookies Taste Test

Tasting Notes & Thoughts

I like 'em. Given all the drama that surrounds these cookies, it's a little hard to taste them without being underwhelmed but obviously, that's not Myna Snacks or Pokimane's fault. Tasting these cookies makes all the controversy seem even more ridiculous.

The closest comparison I can make to a cookie you've probably had before is Oreos. The Midnight Cookies have that dark cocoa semi-bitter flavor that is characteristic of the cookie portion of an Oreo, but not nearly as sweet.

The cookie does have little chips of a cream-like substance in them, but the ratio of "cream" to cookie leans heavily on the cookie side, so it doesn't have the intense creamy sweetness that the Oreo filling has and offers a different enough experience to warrant their existence. That's something!

The aftertaste has a slight hint of salt, and the overall texture is typical of what you'd get out of a gluten-free cookie. It begins crisp but has a sort of soft almost soggy quality once it mixes with your saliva. It tastes, as you might expect, like a pretty good gluten-free cookie.

Whether you like this more or less than an Oreo depends on what you're looking for, but if you're ever offered a handful of Midnight Cookies, we say, take em!
The Bottom Line:
If you like Pokimane, are looking to support her, and live on a gluten-free diet, get the cookies. If these cookies are too expensive for you, don't buy them. If you're mad about her response to the backlash, don't buy them.

Overall, they're pretty good but completely inessential. Like, you know, this entire "controversy" itself.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pokimane's Inane Cookie Drama -- An Explainer & Taste Test

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We tried Pokimane's controversial cookies and explained all the drama surrounding the release.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

Something we do not understand yet, or otherwise known as "the unknown". We believe in it because it is interesting to us despite being unexplainable.

Connection:

UFO sightings, such as the one in the article above, are often noted as Unexplained. They require Skepticism since there is no certain answer to who or what they really are. some things remain unanswered with the lack of Evidence one person is able to produce, this is why the article above connects to being Unexplained. As an example, if you're surrounded by people who believe in aliens and UFO's. then you might find yourself inclined to believe in it as well, even if there's no scientific proof.

Sources:

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/11/politics/norad-additional-object-northern-canada/index.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
international relations and national security

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
US jet shoots down 'unidentified object' over northern Canada | CNN Politics

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Saturday that an "unidentified object" had been shot down by a US fighter jet over Canadian airspace on his orders.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

Similar to Patternicity, Agenticity is the act of applying some meaning or agency behind patterns we see in every day life.

Connection:

In the article above, the author explains how some people will refuse to wear a sweater that once belonged to someone who committed crimes, stating that the "evil energy" would cause negative effects on their being. Humans have created this agency about the supernatural. another good example brought up are government-like powers such as the Illuminati. We believe in them because of the power they have. We as humans gave them meaning, and therefore they have the power to make us believe.

Sources:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/skeptic-agenticity/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A Skeptic's take on souls, spirits, ghosts, gods, demons, angels, aliens and other invisible powers that be

By Michael Shermer

Souls, spirits, ghosts, gods, demons, angels, aliens, intelligent designers, government conspirators, and all manner of invisible agents with power and intention are believed to haunt our world and control our lives. Why?

The answer has two parts, starting with the concept of "patternicity," which I defined in my December 2008 column as the human tendency to find meaningful patterns in meaningless noise. Consider the face on Mars, the Virgin Mary on a grilled cheese sandwich, satanic messages in rock music. Of course, some patterns are real. Finding predictive patterns
in changing weather, fruiting trees, migrating prey animals and hungry predators was central to the survival of Paleolithic hominids.

The problem is that we did not evolve a baloney-detection device in our brains to discriminate between true and false patterns. So we make two types of errors: a type I error, or false positive, is believing a pattern is real when it is not; a type II error, or false negative, is not believing a pattern is real when it is. If you believe that the rustle in the grass is a dangerous predator when it is just the wind (a type I error), you are more likely to survive than if you believe that the rustle in the grass is just the wind when it is a dangerous predator (a type II error). Because the cost of making a type I error is less than the cost of making a type II error and because there is no time for careful deliberation between patternicities in the split-second world of predator-prey interactions, natural selection would have favored those animals most likely to assume that all patterns are real.

But we do something other animals do not do. As large-brained hominids with a developed cortex and a theory of mind-the capacity to be aware of such mental states as desires and intentions in both ourselves and others-we infer agency behind the patterns we observe in a practice I call "agenticity": the tendency to believe that the world is controlled by invisible intentional agents. We believe that these intentional agents control the world, sometimes invisibly from the top down (as opposed to bottom-up causal randomness). Together patternicity and agenticity form the cognitive basis of shamanism, paganism, animism, polytheism, monotheism, and all modes of Old and New Age spiritualisms.

Agenticity carries us far beyond the spirit world. The Intelligent Designer is said to be an invisible agent who created life from the top down. Aliens are often portrayed as powerful beings coming down from on high to warn us of our impending self-destruction. Conspiracy theories predictably include hidden agents at work behind the scenes, puppet masters pulling political and economic strings as we dance to the tune of the Bilderbergers, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers or the Illuminati. Even the belief that government can impose top-down measures to rescue the economy is a form of agenticity, with President Barack Obama being touted as "the one" with almost messianic powers who will save us.

There is now substantial evidence from cognitive neuroscience that humans readily find patterns and impart agency to them, well documented in the new book SuperSense (HarperOne, 2009) by University of Bristol psychologist Bruce Hood. Examples: children believe that the sun can think and follows them around; because of such beliefs, they often add smiley faces on sketched suns. Adults typically refuse to wear a mass murderer's sweater, believing that "evil" is a supernatural force that imparts its negative agency to the wearer (and, alternatively, that donning Mr. Rogers's cardigan will make you a better person). A third of transplant patients believe that the donor's personality is transplanted with the organ. Genital-shaped foods (bananas, oysters) are often believed to enhance sexual potency. Subjects watching geometric shapes with eye spots interacting on a computer screen conclude that they represent agents with moral intentions.

"Many highly educated and intelligent individuals experience a powerful sense that there are patterns, forces, energies and entities operating in the world," Hood explains. "More important, such experiences are not substantiated by a body of reliable evidence, which is why they are supernatural and unscientific. The inclination or sense that they may be real is our supersense."

We are natural-born supernaturalists.
Note: This article was originally published with the title, "Agenticity".
This article was originally published with the title "Why People Believe Invisible Agents Control the World" in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 300 No. 6 ()

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why People Believe Invisible Agents Control the World

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A Skeptic's take on souls, spirits, ghosts, gods, demons, angels, aliens and other invisible powers that be

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

Something that is easy to understand or take part in. In pseudoscience, it may refer to statements being made that use simple language to make you believe in them.

Connection:

The article posted above discusses the simplicity in believing in nothing. Take what you know in your mind and forget about it. living the simple life is the right life to live. It talks about how much more zen your life would be if you stopped worrying. This leads into Simplicity because it makes the reader want to believe that the easy way out is the correct way, because it is simply explained and uses few scientific sounding words. It's easy to believe because it works for so many people.

Sources:

https://zenhabits.net/belief/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
I've written a lot about simplifying your life, from the philosophy behind it to the tactical steps to getting to simplicity.

But the true key isn't in the steps, it's in our mental habits.

For example, I could get rid of my physical clutter and simplify my day so that I have more space in my life ... but until I address the mental habits that got me to a cluttered life, it will just keep coming back.

So here's what I've learned is the key mental habit of simplicity: noticing the mind's tendency to want more, and don't believe it.

The mind always wants more. And at the same time, it wants less - there's a polarity in the mind that craves simplicity and craves more.

Why does the mind want both? The mind wants more because it thinks that more will make it happy, it sees possibility in acquiring more, and it thinks that acquiring things will help relieve the uncertainty it feels.

The mind wants less when it is feeling stressed and overwhelmed, and just wants relief from that difficult feeling. It thinks that if it gets rid of stuff, there will be peace.

Both are wrong, but they come from a good-hearted place.

Why the Desire for More, & Less, are Both Wrong

The desire for more is wrong because, as we've all seen, you can get a bump of joy when you receive your new package in the mail ... but it doesn't even last a day, usually. Certainly not a few days. That dopamine hit of acquiring more is very temporary ... and it doesn't make us happier over the long term. It doesn't actually give us what we're hoping for in life, nor does it relieve any uncertainty.

Think about it:

If you are worried about an upcoming trip, you'll research the destination, buy some new clothes or equipment to help you feel more prepared, make plans and have everything set in place. The uncertainty doesn't go away, you've just kept yourself busy trying to get control as a way of coping with the stress of uncertainty.

You got into a new hobby, excited by the awesome possibilities of it. Of course you had to buy more things to enable the hobby, but that's OK, because it's going to give you this amazing new life, right? Actually, your life might change, but it won't ever be what you were fantasizing about. Your mind just tricks you.

You got that beautiful new (outfit, bag, gadget, tool, whatever) and you think, "Oh, isn't life grand?" But then your life returns to normal, and it's not any better, except now you're a little poorer and you have a cool new thing in it to clutter up your space.

So when the mind wants more, it is simply trying to find happiness or relief from stress. Neither actually results from having more, but that doesn't stop the mind from trying.

On the other hand, the mind's desire for less is just a desire for peace. And that's not a bad thing. You get some peace, I think, when you reduce your possessions or commitments. Creating space is nice. But in the end, your mind still will find something to complain about - if it's not having too many things, or too much to do, it will be boredom or tiredness or irritating people who have too much clutter in their lives.

The key is to change the mental habits.

Changing the Mental Habits

Changing mental habits is pretty tough (though we do show you how in my Habit Mastery Course, check it out!). You have to be hyper aware of your thoughts in order to change them.

Still, none of us ever let a tough challenge stop us from taking action, right?

The process is simple:

develop awareness of your mental habits over time

see what their harmful effects might be

stop believing the thoughts

make a loving effort to change them

and don't expect perfection

So with the mental habit of wanting more, you might just notice when you're online and researching something new to buy, or on Amazon or another shopping site ready to hit the "order" button. This is a good signal that your mind is wanting more in order to become happier and/or relieve uncertainty.

When you notice this, ask yourself (with credit to Byron Katie):

1. What do I believe I'll get if I buy this? More happiness? Less uncertainty?

2. Is that belief true?

3. What effect does it have on me? Is it helpful to believe this, or harmful?

4. What would I be like if I didn't believe it?

So if I'm trying to buy some new travel gear, I might notice that I believe it will give me less uncertainty to get this gear. When I ask if it's true, I will answer, "No, I know from experience that it isn't true. I'll still feel uncertainty."

I'll also notice that this belief is harmful, because it's filling my life with more stuff and emptying my bank account, and it's certainly not helpful.

What would I be like if I didn't believe it? I would be less intent on acquiring, more able to open up to my uncertainty and find peace by not needing to relieve it.

So I try to change it by saying to myself:

You don't need this new gear

You know it won't relieve your uncertainty

Opening to your uncertainty with a loving heart is the way to go

Then I try to fully feel the uncertainty, loving it as much as I love chocolate or laughter, and feel the awesome beauty of life in the midst of the uncertainty.

This is how we can change our mental habits. With awareness, with honesty, with an open heart, and with appreciation for the immense joy of life in the midst of chaos.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
I've written a lot about simplifying your life, from the philosophy behind it to the tactical steps to getting to simplicity. But the true key isn't in the steps, it's in our mental habits. For example, I could get rid of my physical clutter and simplify my day so that I have more space in my life ...

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:

Ideology is a set of thoughts or opinions made by one person or a group of people.

Connection:

The article above, unsurprisingly based on the title, gives a bunch of reasons why to believe in god. It talks about faith, heart, evidence of miracles, etc. The author(s) idealizes God, and what the grand being "stands for". They create a system of beliefs based on what their god says is right and wrong. This is a clear example of Ideology, as it shows how people opinions and beliefs can be formed around one agent.

Sources:

https://kingdomway.ca/the-top-10-reasons-to-believe-in-god/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Is there a God? Atheists say no such being exists, yet have no proof. Agnostics merely offer that they cannot know with certainty either way. Is there, however, proof that God is real and that He is alive? This article from Our Daily Bread presents careful reasoning to verify not only the reality of God's existence, but the legitimacy of trusting Him.

YOU'RE NOT ALONE if you are open to the existence of God but aren't sure you can accept Jesus' claim to be "God in the flesh." The teacher from Nazareth promised help to those who are concerned about doing the will of God. He said, "If anyone chooses to do God's will, he will find out whether My teaching comes from God or whether I speak on My own" (John 7:17 NIV).

Here are the Top 10 Reasons to believe in God...

1. THE INEVITABILITY OF FAITH.

Everyone believes in something. No one can endure the stress and cares of life without faith in something that cannot ultimately be proven. Atheists cannot prove there is no God. Pantheists cannot prove that everything is God.

Pragmatists cannot prove that what will count for them in the future is what works for them now. Nor can agnostics prove that it is impossible to know one way or the other. Faith is unavoidable, even if we choose to believe only in ourselves. What is to be decided is what evidence we think is pertinent, how we are going to interpret that evidence, and who or what we are willing to believe in (Luke 16:16).

2. THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE.

Scientific method is limited to a process defined by that which is measurable and repeatable. By definition, it cannot speak to issues of ultimate origin, meaning, or morality. For such answers, science is dependent on the
values and personal beliefs of those who use it. Science, therefore, has great potential for both good and evil. It can be used to make vaccines or poisons, nuclear power plants or nuclear weapons. It can be used to clean up the environment or to pollute it. It can be used to argue for God or against Him. Science by itself offers no moral guidance or values to govern our lives. All science can do is show us how natural law works, while telling us nothing about its origins.

3. THE PROBLEMS OF EVOLUTION.

Some have assumed that an evolutionary explanation of life would make God unnecessary. This overlooks some problems. Even if we assume that scientists will someday find enough "missing links" to confirm that life appeared and developed gradually over great periods of time, laws of probability would still show the need for a Creator. As a result, many scientists who believe in evolution believe also that the universe in all of its immensity and complexity did not "just happen." Many feel compelled to acknowledge the possibility or even likelihood of an intelligent designer who provided the ingredients for life and set in motion the laws by which it developed.

4. THE HABITS OF THE HEART.

Mankind has been described as incurably religious. In unguarded moments of trouble or surprise, in prayer or in profanity, references to deity persist. Those who would dismiss such thoughts as bad habits or social vices are left with unanswerable questions. Denying the existence of God does not dispel the mysteries of life. Attempts to exclude God from the language of civil life does not eliminate the persistent longing for more than this life has to offer (Ecclesiastes 3:11). There is something about truth, beauty, and love that makes our hearts ache. Even in our anger with a God who would permit injustice and pain, we draw upon a moral conscience to argue that life is not as it ought to be (Romans 2:14-15). Even unwillingly, we are drawn to something that is more rather than less than ourselves.

5. THE BACKGROUND OF GENESIS.

On first reading, the opening words of the Bible seem to assume the existence of God. Genesis, however, was written at a point of time in history. Moses wrote, "In the beginning God" after Israel's exodus from Egypt. He wrote after miraculous events that were said to have been witnessed by millions of Jews and Egyptians. From the Exodus to the coming of Messiah, the God of the Bible rests His case on events witnessed in real time and locations. Anyone who doubted the claims could visit real places and people to check out the evidence for themselves.

6. THE NATION OF ISRAEL.

Israel is often used as an argument against God. Many find it difficult to believe in a God who would be partial to a "chosen people." Others find it even harder to believe in a God who would not protect His "chosen nation" from the boxcars, gas chambers, and ovens of Auschwitz and Dachau. Yet from the beginning of Old Testament history, Israel's future was prewritten. Together with other prophets, Moses predicted not only Israel's possession of the land but also her unparalleled suffering and dispersion throughout the whole earth, her eventual repentance, and then finally her last-days restoration (Deuteronomy 28-34; Isaiah 2:1-5; Ezekiel 37-38).

7. THE CLAIMS OF CHRIST.

Many who doubt the existence of God have reassured themselves with the thought, "If God wanted us to believe in Him, He would appear to us." According to the Bible, that is what God has done. Writing in the 7th century BC, the prophet Isaiah said that God would give His people a sign. A virgin would bear a son who would be called "God with us" (Isaiah 7:14; Matthew 1:23). Isaiah said this Son would be called, "Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace" (Isaiah 9:6). The prophet also said that this child would die for His people's sins before seeing His life prolonged and honoured by God (Isaiah 53). According to the New Testament, Jesus claimed to be that Messiah. Under the oversight of a Roman governor named Pontius Pilate, He was crucified on charges that He claimed to be the king of Israel and that He had represented Himself as being equal with God (John 5:18).

8. THE EVIDENCE OF MIRACLES.

The reports of the first followers of Jesus agree that He did more than just claim to be the long-awaited Messiah. These witnesses said He won their trust by healing paralytics, walking on water, and then voluntarily dying a painful, undeserved death before rising from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:1-8). Most compelling was their claim that many witnesses had seen and talked to Christ after finding His tomb empty and before watching Him ascend visibly into the clouds. These witnesses didn't have anything on earth to gain by their claims. They had no hopes of material wealth or power. Many became martyrs, claiming to the end that the long-awaited Messiah of Israel had lived among them, that He had become a sacrifice for sin, and that He had risen from the dead to assure them of His ability to bring them to God.

9. THE DETAILS OF NATURE.

Some who believe in God do not take His existence seriously. They reason that a God great enough to create the universe would be too big to be concerned about us. Jesus, however, confirmed what the design and detail of the natural world suggest. He showed that God is great enough to care about the smallest details of our lives. He spoke of one who not only knows every move we make but also the motives and thoughts of our heart. Jesus taught that God knows the number of hairs on our head, the concerns of our heart, and even the condition of a fallen sparrow (Psalm 139; Matthew 6).

10. THE VOICE OF EXPERIENCE.

The Bible says that God designs the circumstances of our lives in a way that will prompt us to look for Him (Acts 17:26). For those who do reach out for Him, the Scriptures also say that He is close enough to be found (v.27). According to the apostle Paul, God is a Spirit in whom "we live and move and have our being" (v.28). The Bible makes it just as clear, however, that we must reach out for God on His terms rather than our own. He promises to be found, not by just anyone but by those who admit their own need and are willing to trust Him rather than themselves.

YOU'RE NOT ALONE if you are open to the existence of God but aren't sure you can accept Jesus' claim to be "God in the flesh." The teacher from Nazareth promised help to those who are concerned about doing the will of God. He said, "If anyone chooses to do God's will, he will find out whether My teaching comes from God or whether I speak on My own" (John 7:17 NIV).

If you do see the evidence for the God who revealed Himself to us through His Son, then keep in mind that the Bible says Christ died to pay the price for our sins, and that all who believe in Him will receive the gifts of forgiveness and everlasting life. The salvation Christ offers is not a reward for effort but a gift to all who in light of the evidence put their trust in Him (John 5:24; Romans 4:5; Ephesians 2:8-10).

To accept God's gift of salvation, you can pray something like this:

"God, I know I'm a sinner. I know I can't save myself. I believe Jesus died on the cross for my sins. I believe He rose from the dead to live His life through all who believe in Him. I now receive Him as my Saviour. I accept Your offer of forgiveness and everlasting life. Thank You, Father. In Jesus' name I pray. Amen."

If you made a decision to put your trust in Christ, let us know by using the bubble below. Follow the LEARN MORE link you will receive, without cost or obligation, devotional and Bible-study materials designed to help you grow in your new life as a child of God. Also, pray for God to lead you to a church that faithfully teaches the Bible in a spirit of love and Christlikeness. You are more than welcome to join us here in Edmonton.

Next Steps...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Top 10 Reasons to Believe in God - Kingdom Way

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Is there a God? Atheists say no such being exists, yet have no proof. Agnostics merely offer that they cannot know with certainty either way. Is there, however, proof that God is real and that He is alive? This article from Our Daily Bread presents careful reasoning to verify not only the reality of God's [...]